Govt announces $16m in new Ukraine support ahead of NATO Summit
The Prime Minister said the country "stands in solidarity with Ukraine".
"Its war of self-defence is well into its fourth year and our condemnation of Russia's illegal full-scale invasion remains undiminished," Luxon said.
The support will go towards two $4 million contributions to funds for lethal and non-lethal military support, including the NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine fund, and the UK and Latvia-led Drone Coalition for Ukraine.
New Zealand will also provide $7 million in further humanitarian aid for conflict-affected communities in Ukraine, and $1 million for Ukrainians displaced in neighbouring countries.
ADVERTISEMENT
Ahead of attending a NATO Summit in The Hague this week, Luxon said he expected Ukraine to be on the agenda alongside the ongoing US and Israeli conflict with Iran.
"There'll be a lot of conversation, obviously, about the Middle East, but there'll also be a lot of conversation about Ukraine as well," he told media in Brussels.
"We may be a long way from these conflicts, but it's important, if you've got values, that you stand up for them, you articulate them, and, where you can, put support to them."
Foreign Minister Winston Peters said it's "vital" countries keep pressure on Russia and work to "achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine."
Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins. (Source: 1News)
"The defence of Ukraine has significant implications not only for the security of the Euro-Atlantic, but also for the Indo-Pacific," Peters said in a media release.
"We must continue to work with others in the international community to uphold a rules-based order that serves all our interests."
ADVERTISEMENT
New Zealand's total support since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022 totals over $168 million and includes a deployment of up to 100 Defence Force personnel who are providing military training.
Luxon's European visit continues
On the second day of Luxon's five-day trip in Europe, he visited war memorials in Belgium's Ypres, an area where several key battles took place in World War I.
This included the Battle of Passchendaele, where more New Zealanders were killed than on any other day since the start of the war, with around 960 soldiers killed according to Parliament. The event is known as the darkest days in New Zealand's history.
Luxon also visited the only Māori war memorial in Europe, Pou Maumahara, as well as Passchendaele Museum, Tyne Cot Cemetery and the New Zealand Battlefield Memorial at Messines Ridge. The PM said the day had been 'quite sobering.'
Around 18,000 New Zealanders died during World War I or because of it, and 41,000 instances of wounding or illness were recorded.
More than one in ten New Zealanders served in the Expeditionary Forces, with the country's population approximately 1.1 million at the time.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
From Taonga To Target: The Assault On Te Reo Māori
From taking Māori words out of children's books and government agency names to switching the order of languages on passports, te ao Māori's place in NZ - and the country's cultural identity - are under threat Across Aotearoa - or New Zealand - depending on the speaker, resistance to te reo Māori and calls to roll it back from public life are growing louder. In Parliament, lawmakers are pushing a growing number of policies that critics say erode Māori culture and put New Zealand at risk of losing its cultural identity. Among the policies, cuts to te reo Māori teacher training (which was later replaced), mandating English-first in public service naming and communication, the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority), reversal of co-governance reforms, and undermining local Māori representation. The coalition also supported the Treaty Principles Bill, pushed by ACT, which aimed to enshrine fixed principles of the Treaty and extend these to all New Zealanders, effectively diluting Māori-specific rights. The bill was ultimately rejected by Parliament. Just last week, it was revealed that Education Minister Erica Stanford stopped the printing of new editions of a series of books designed to teach Year 1s how to read, which included te reo words, while last month in Parliament, Foreign Minister Winston Peters refused to call New Zealand 'Aotearoa'. Together, these measures signal a retreat from decades of progress toward biculturalism, says associate professor Awanui Te Huia, who teaches Māori studies at Victoria University. "The issue that these policies have created is it emboldens those [racist] positions and it treats the irrational as rational," she tells The Detail. "When we're hearing these anti-Tiriti or Waitangi statements, when we hear these anti-Māori, anti-te reo Māori statements, and they are being put forward as rational and considered arguments, this is when we have some of the trouble ... it platforms particular perspectives that are harmful for our community, harmful for cohesion." She says the revival of te reo is one of our greatest national achievements - proof of a country willing to confront its past and weave its two founding cultures together. But she worries the government's policies will stall momentum. "It's not a zero-sum game. If te reo Māori is doing well, that does not take anything away from another person; it's additive." And she says the cost of the roll-back of Māori rights and culture is damaging. "There is considerable racism that happens in our communities, and that has multiple implications across the spectrum - on economics ... on our socio-political spectrums." Māori journalist Ella Stewart has been covering the policy changes for RNZ's in-depth department. She tells The Detail that the Māori community is hurting, but also pushing back. "I have spoken to a raft of people, in my personal life but also just in reporting ... I remember speaking to Tureiti Moxon a couple of weeks ago, and she said that this partnership that's been forged many years ago, over decades and decades, to get to a point where Māori are actually at the decision-making table - she said that's all been taken away. "You have also got Māori legal scholars, Te Tiriti/treaty experts, like Carwyn Jones, who said to me, 'we are seeing that this government has a clear strategy of removing Māori rights and removing the ability of Te Tiriti to have any impact in our law'." She says, from her conversations, people would prefer if the government focused on big picture issues, rather than stripping te reo Māori from agency names and books. "I think they are mainly upset because there are some issues that are being focused on that arguably the government could be spending time doing something more important ... on more pressing issues for our people rather than 'should the name of New Zealand be New Zealand or Aotearoa', maybe focus on how you can further our people." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
On Teachers, Ferries And The Really Wasteful Spending
In the context of yesterday's teachers strike, Judith Collins claimed that teachers with ten years of experience 'can' (not 'do') earn $147,000 a year. In reality though, teachers have to pay their mortgage/rent and put food on the table with their actual earnings, not with an aspirational figure. Moreover, Cabinet Ministers earning $396,000 a year (plus a myriad of valuable perks and subsidies) are hardly in a position to decry others getting fair pay for the work they do, and for the value they give back to society. (Every backbench MP is paid $20,000 a year more than Collins' theoretical example.) The people who teach our children day in, year out are being offered a net pay cut - 1% a year for the next three years – at a time when inflation is currently running at just below 3%, and rising. Finally, the accusation that the PPTA walked out prematurely – after six days of formal negotiation – ignores the fact that months of engagement preceded these talks, and plainly, the Ministry was not willing to budge from its inflammatory position. There's no point in coming back from the picket lines to talk, when the government is dead-set against compromise. That inflexible mindset is what the strike action has aimed to change. The government, which dearly wants to distract public attention away from its wider failings, is probably welcoming this stoush. Housing for some A year ago this month, the coalition government launched its new policy on emergency housing, which - traditionally – has been the last resort for people with nowhere else to go. The new guidelines made access to emergency housing more difficult to get, and harder to keep. As a result over the past year, city footpaths and shop doorways have been seeing a sharp influx of homeless people. On the Spinoff, Joel McManus has written a solid backgrounder on the issues involved. Yet in a sideshow of extravagance last week.. Defence Minister Judith Collins opened a huge $250 million building at Ohakea Air Base that will house the Air Force's four Poseidon P-8A surveillance aircraft. Good to know that this fleet of hugely expensive aircraft (the original price tag for the basics was $2.34 billion before upgrades and add-ons) will be housed in a state-of-the-art 20,000 square metre building, in between the times they fly off around the Pacific looking for Chinese submarines that may (or may not) be out there. Priority: spend a quarter of a billion dollars on lavish housing for four aeroplanes, while cutting the ability of Kainga Ora to build housing for the tens of thousands of New Zealanders in need of a roof over their heads. Go figure. Ferries follies More revealing numbers surfaced last week about the cost of cancelling the iRex Cook Strait ferries. The total payments to South Korea's Hyundai Mipo shipyard amount to $222 million, which is the initial deposit plus the $144 million penalty imposed for breaking the contract. Reportedly, an additional $449 million has been spent on the portside infrastructure, and on the project management expenses that have included the cost of negotiating the exit. The government has made it clear that it intends to scale back the renewal of the portside infrastructure. Much of that work will simply be kicked down the road. As a result, taxpayers/travellers/firms will have to cope for years to come with rundown and already inadequate terminal facilities. The smaller ferries now being purchased will also provide a less reliable, less comfortable service during the sort of adverse weather that led to the ferry cancellations last week. There will also be a significant delay until those inferior ferries are delivered. As yet, there has been no official estimate of the economic cost of deferring the arrival of new ferries from 2026 (when the iRex ferries were due to enter service) until 2029, which is the earliest estimated arrival time of the replacement vessels. How many hundreds of millions will be lost via this avoidable delay? The government isn't asking, or telling. As yet, we don't know which shipyard will be contracted to build the new ferries. If, at year's end, this proves to be Hyundai Mipo, one can only conclude that the $144 million breakage fee was a concession, as part of a package deal. To put that another the lucky bidder turns out to be Hyundai Mipo, will that decision have been based on merit, or will it be the by-product of yet another cost cutting exercise, and a condition imposed by the South Koreans for halving the breakage fee from its original ballpark estimate of circa $300 million. This fiasco is being played out on our main domestic trade and tourism link. Footnote: As indicated above, Defence spending occurs in a silo that's largely exempted from the government's austerity measures. Despite the absence of any credible foreign threat to this country – apart from US tariffs – the coalition government will be spending $12 billion of taxpayer money on armaments and weapons delivery systems over the next few years. This irrational diversion of the nation's resources has become so normalised that it is easy to overlook just how much New Zealand society could be transformed if a fraction of that money was spent on the actual needs here at home. Consider for example, that $144 million iRex ferries contract breakage fee alone. How could that amount of money have been spent more usefully? Here are a few options, estimated on the basis of the averaged-out labour costs. Registered nurses (Reg nurse pay rates $74,000 to $153,000 pa. Average of these figs = $113,500 p.a.) Divide $144m by $113,500 = You could pay 1,269 nurses for a year merely from the breakage fee for the ferries contract. OR Support workers ("help people with health problems or disabilities to do daily tasks, such as housework, and be as independent as possible.") (Per hour rates only given: $24 to $28 /hour = $49,920 to $58,240 p.a. Average of these = $54,080 p.a.) Divide $144m by $54,080 = you could pay 2,663 support workers for a year OR Teacher aides (Per hour rates : $28 to $35 /hour = $58,240 to $72,800 p.a. Average of these = $65,520 p.a.) Divide $144m by $65,520 = you could pay 2,198 teacher aides for a year OR Early childhood teachers EC teacher $49,000 to $78,000 p.a. Average = $63,500 p.a.) Divide $144m by $63,500 = you could pay 2,268 Early Childhood teachers for a year. These are the kind of options not being taken. Billions are being wasted on (a) the shonky ferries replacement(b) Defence procurements to combat phantom enemies and (c) that $3 billion tax handout to landlords. Social services are being starved in order to make these follies possible. Thomas the Rhymer And now, a poem about bargaining, and the costs to be paid. In the 1970s, many people became aware of the medieval tale of Thomas the Rhymer through the hit song of the same name by the British folk group, Steeleye Span. Around the same time, I ran across this reading of the poem – in ye olde English – by Ian Stewart. It brings out the inherent musicality of the old language. This is a poem to be said, not read. More to the point, Stewart brings to life the otherworldly nature of the encounter between True Thomas, and the sad, seductive Queen of fair Elfland. In the video, the olde 78rpm recording is a reminder of how incredibly fast those ancient brittle discs would spin around on the turntable:
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
The importance of clear laws shown in impressive evidence from Italy
If New Zealand's laws were as ambiguous, we would be worse off by $20 billion – or about $10,000 per household – every year. What family would not welcome avoiding that? What is 'poorly drafted' law? The researchers used 10 indicators of writing that likely lacks clarity. It assesses each of over 75,000 Italian laws. One measure is sentence length. According to experts, sentences with more than 25 words are likely to be unclear. The authors found that 85% of the millions of sentences in all of this law exceeded 25 words. That might seem staggering for those who do not read law books. Authors of children's books might think it was absurd. Lawyers are likely less surprised, but still disturbed. Greater clarity in drafting should be easy to fix. So why isn't it? The paper's answer lies in law-making imperatives. These include haste, compromise, personal career aspirations and short-term expediency. Ambiguity conceals likely outcomes. It shields blame and defuses critics' attempts to pinpoint a proposed law's problems. Even lawyers cannot be sure how courts will interpret unclear laws. Nor can judges in a lower court be sure about how a higher court will interpret them. This uncertainty creates a cascade of problems throughout the legal system. The authors examined 620,000 Italian Supreme Court judgments between 2004 and 2017. They found 32% of them reversed a decision of a lower court solely on legal grounds The rule of law is a precondition for national prosperity. The law should be clear and accessible. When it is not clear to judges, it cannot be clear to those who must obey it. The paper next assessed the effects on over 700,000 Italian firms of reversed court decisions. It looked, for example, at changes in their investment spending and output growth. This aspect was another exhaustive, path-breaking achievement. It found the adverse effects were significant. The estimated permanent 5% drop in Italian national income encapsulates that. The paper's approach is ingenious, but too complex to explain here. Are New Zealand's laws better drafted in these respects? It would be good to know, because low productivity is holding New Zealanders back. It should be easy to improve drafting quality. The bigger the gains, the more it should be a priority. To better inform this article, I used AI to count the word lengths of sentences in two of New Zealand's acts. From an Italian perspective, the results were encouraging. The proportion of sentences in the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 that exceeded 25 words was 'only' 70%. For the Resource Management Act 1991, it was 53%. Even so, the implication is that most New Zealanders would not find the Resource Management Act (RMA) law clear and accessible. Parliament could be more insistent about improving clarity. The Government's Regulatory Standards Bill would increase this discipline. One part requires the Government to tell Parliament if a bill is unclear and hard to understand – and explain why. Small comfort, but better than nothing. Of course, there is more to good law than just clear drafting. Its content surely matters even more. Prominent symptoms of content problems include unaffordable housing, and infrastructure delays and inadequacies. However, much more is hidden or accepted as 'part of the woodwork'. Content problems have many sources. Public pressure on governments to 'do something' about the latest adverse headline is one source. Appeasing that pressure can be the easiest option. More mundane are the relentless daily calls on ministers to regulate or spend for this or that partisan or public-spirited cause. Such calls often fail to consider the costs to others. The Italian paper acknowledges that content also matters. It cites literature that shows property rights and institutional quality are key determinants of economic prosperity. The RMA is deficient in both respects. It offends almost everyone. The Regulatory Standards Bill also recognises the importance of protecting private property. Ministers must tell Parliament of any grounds for concern but Parliament can ignore this information at will and continues to be supreme lawmaker. (Most public opposition to this bill ignores this limiting aspect.) Greater transparency about these matters could help inform voters. Governments would spend and regulate more judiciously if more voters rewarded them for doing so. This exhaustive Italian research helps make the potential gains more concrete.
