Cutting the 'green tape': Conservation group offers top 10 ways for Dept of Interior to streamline
EXCLUSIVE: A leading conservation group that champions collaboration over regulation is releasing its top 10 recommendations for the Department of the Interior to cut so-called "green tape" – as opposed to "red tape" – which seeks to streamline the agency's work.
The Montana-based Property and Environment Research Center (PERC), a nonpartisan leader in "market solutions" for conservation, will seek to triple the rate of endangered species' recovery, double fee revenues for national parks without putting all the onus on visitors and eliminate regulations for Americans who voluntarily want to provide assistance in managing habitat restoration.
PERC CEO Brian Yablonski told Fox News Digital in an exclusive interview that there is a $23 billion backlog in national parks' infrastructure needs, conservation projects and wastewater management.
As parks grow and visitor numbers hit record levels, the Interior Department needs a responsible way to fund the increased needs without burdening U.S. taxpayers or implementing restrictions, Yablonski said.
Az Senate Leader Urges Burgum To Reverse Biden-obama Land Grab At Uranium Sites
"One way to address the needs of our national parks directly is to connect funding with demand," Yablonski said.
Read On The Fox News App
Doubling fee revenue does not mean doubling fees, he said, noting that in other countries, American visitors often pay a surcharge to that park system because they do not contribute any of the baseline taxes to park conservation.
In that way, a visitor to Skyline Drive who hails from abroad should be charged a little more than a local Virginian going from Staunton to Front Royal who already pays into park coffers through taxation, he said.
However, Yablonski underlined that the national park system is unique in that 80% of fee revenue collected at any particular park stays to support that park specifically. The other 20% goes elsewhere, including into general funds supporting parks that do not charge fees. It would also "depoliticize" park funding because fees are collected independently of Congress.
Record increases in park visitors – according to the National Park Service (NPS) – have shown that people are willing to pay to enjoy America's parkland. Therefore, an increase in the $80 America the Beautiful pass would be one area where there may not be much pain for eager park visitors. NPS reported nearly 332 million visits to parks in 2024, an increase of 6.3 million.
Trump Interior Pick Faces Senate Scrutiny
The pass gets Americans into many national parks for free, allows entrance to Skyline Drive and also gives the bearer free parking at other park-owned properties, such as the Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, Amtrak station.
Reducing obstacles to voluntary conservation is one of the best ways to cut 'green tape'," Yablonski said. Landowners seeking to aid voluntary conservation must currently go through an at-times costly and/or strung-out chronological process before they can formally assist the agency.
"It can take up to a year to get those kind of agreements approved," Yablonski said. "We just think there's a way to streamline that and get those agreements approved sooner, especially if a landowner is taking measures to do voluntary conservation on his or her land," he said.
That "green tape" cut leads into PERC's recommendations regarding the Endangered Species Act, Yablonski added.
While the act has been effective in preventing extinction, it has not helped recover species listed as endangered.
Only 3% of endangered species have recovered and been taken off the list, while 99% remain extant.
"That's because the tools needed for both are different. A tool to prevent extinction might be a more regulatory-oriented tool to actually recover something and proactively improve. It is going to be more of a market-based incentive," he said.
"The problem is we're using the regulatory tool when we should be using the incentive-based tool. And so the idea of cutting green tape is actually what are some of the new tools to take in endangered species recovery from a number like 3% and get it to 10%. And I think it's important to set goals because there are folks that seem to be okay with 3% recovery in the environmental community, which to me is shocking. We should want to try something different, try new things, bring new tools to bear to increase endangered species recovery."
The full report will be available on PERC's website on Wednesday.
Fox News Digital reached out to the Interior Department for comment on its communications with PERC thus far.Original article source: Cutting the 'green tape': Conservation group offers top 10 ways for Dept of Interior to streamline
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
16 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Marines temporarily detain man while guarding LA federal building
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Shortly after they began guarding a Los Angeles federal building Friday, U.S. Marines detained a man who had walked onto the property and did not immediately hear their commands to stop. The brief detention marked the first time federal troops have detained a civilian since they were deployed to the nation's second-largest city by President Donald Trump in response to protests over the administration's immigration arrests. The Marines were activated earlier this week but began their duties Friday. The man, Marcos Leao, was later released without charges and said the Marines were just doing their jobs. A U.S. Army North spokesperson said the troops have the authority to temporarily detain people under specific circumstances. He said those detentions end when the person can be transferred to 'appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel.' Leao's detention shows how the troops' deployment is putting them closer to carrying out law enforcement actions. Already, National Guard soldiers have been providing security on raids as Trump has promised as part of his immigration crackdown . Leao, a former Army combat engineer, said he was rushing to get to a Veterans Affairs appointment when he stepped past a piece of caution tape outside the federal building. He looked up to find a Marine sprinting toward him. 'I had my headphones in, so I didn't hear them,' Leao said. 'They told me to get down on the ground. I basically complied with everything they were saying.' Leao was placed in zip ties and held for more than two hours by the Marines and members of the National Guard, he said. After Los Angeles police arrived, he was released without charges, he said. The Los Angeles Police Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 'I didn't know it was going to be this intense here,' he said later. A U.S. official told the AP that a civilian had stepped over the line. He was warned they would take him down and they did, according to the official, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter. About 200 Marines out of the 700 deployed arrived in the city Friday, joining 2,000 members of the National Guard that have been stationed outside federal buildings this week in Los Angeles. Another 2,000 Guard members were notified of deployment earlier this week. Before the unusual deployment, the Pentagon scrambled to establish rules to guide U.S. Marines who could be faced with the rare and difficult prospect of using force against citizens on American soil. The forces have been trained in de-escalation, crowd control and standing rules for the use of force, the military has said. But the use of the active-duty forces still raises difficult questions. 'I believe that this is an inevitable precursor of things yet to come when you put troops with guns right next to civilians who are doing whatever they do,' said Gary Solis, a former Marine Corps. prosecutor and military judge. He said it's an example of Trump's attempt to unravel the Posse Comitatus Act, which bars active-duty forces from conducting law enforcement. ___ Watson reported from San Diego and Baldor from Washington. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AGL Energy (ASX:AGL) investors are sitting on a loss of 20% if they invested five years ago
In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in AGL Energy Limited (ASX:AGL), since the last five years saw the share price fall 39%. So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time. Looking back five years, both AGL Energy's share price and EPS declined; the latter at a rate of 25% per year. This fall in the EPS is worse than the 9% compound annual share price fall. So the market may previously have expected a drop, or else it expects the situation will improve. The company's earnings per share (over time) is depicted in the image below (click to see the exact numbers). This free interactive report on AGL Energy's earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further. As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for AGL Energy the TSR over the last 5 years was -20%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! AGL Energy shareholders gained a total return of 8.9% during the year. But that return falls short of the market. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 4% per year, over five years. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks, for example - AGL Energy has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of. If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of undervalued small caps that insiders are buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Australian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sombre Fundamentals Suggest General Mills Stock (GIS) is Stuck in a Value Trap
Not so long ago, General Mills (GIS) stock was synonymous with safety, defensiveness, and stability. The company consistently delivered results in line with market expectations, rewarding shareholders with a generous and growing dividend. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter The snacking category, once an exception among packaged food groups, seemed immune to changing eating habits and the rise of private-label brands. But things have taken a turn for the worse. Cereal and snack bar consumption has declined sharply due to growing structural headwinds, resulting in a contraction of General Mills' business. What remains solid, however, is the company's ability to generate value for shareholders above its cost of capital, which in theory still makes General Mills a defensive stock. Valuations at current levels also look attractive, offering some margin of safety. The problem is that the sustainability of these strengths is in question. When secular headwinds are at play, it doesn't matter much if fundamentals suggest a cushion or if valuations appear cheap—the stock is likely to continue drifting downward over time. That said, I see this as a potential value trap for investors hoping to be heroes with General Mills stock. For that reason, I hold a neutral view on GIS. U.S. consumers have been gradually changing their eating habits—and that's not just an opinion, it's a fact. The packaged foods sector has seen a decline in demand for snacks in recent years. A big part of this comes from the rapid rise in GLP-1 weight loss drugs and a new generation that's increasingly avoiding 'bad foods' in favor of a healthier lifestyle. Recent 2024 data shows that around 12% of American adults report having used a GLP-1 drug, with 6% currently using one. Some studies suggest that GLP-1 users significantly reduce their grocery store purchases by 6%, with a 11% drop in snack sales in the six months following adoption. This shift is already reflected in the financial results of packaged food companies, such as General Mills. Over the past three years, General Mills' revenue has grown at a CAGR of just 1.8%. While operating margins improved at a 4.9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR), free cash flow declined at an 8.7% CAGR, which is a concerning trend. In addition to these broad changes in consumer behavior, General Mills has been facing weak U.S. consumption trends due to market share losses in key categories, particularly to private-label brands from retailers such as Costco (COST) and Walmart (WMT). In its most recent earnings report, net sales totaled $4.8 billion, a 5% decline year over year, and fell short of analyst expectations. North American retail sales declined 7%, with a 6% drop in sales volume. Alongside softer demand, temporary pressures also played a role, including lower volumes in snacks and dry pet food. The pet segment declined 3% year over year, while international sales fell 4%, primarily due to foreign exchange headwinds and weaker results in key markets such as China and Brazil. As a result, General Mills revised its guidance for fiscal year 2025. The company now expects organic net sales to decline between 1.5% and 2%, compared to a previous forecast of flat to slightly positive growth (up to 1%). While General Mills' stock performance may appear underwhelming—hovering near the same levels it traded at over a decade ago—there are still compelling elements to its investment case. Despite a growth narrative that appears not just stalled but potentially in decline, the company continues to deliver strong returns on invested capital (ROIC). Over the past twelve months, General Mills generated $2.93 billion in NOPAT against $22.9 billion in invested capital, resulting in an ROIC of 12.8%. That figure aligns well with industry peers like Nestlé (NSRGY), Mondelez (MDLZ), and Kellogg's (KLG), and it comfortably exceeds the company's estimated cost of capital, highlighting efficient capital deployment even in a slow-growth environment. Assuming a cost of equity of 7.5% (given GIS's low beta and 10-year Treasury yields around 4.5%), and a 30% debt weighting, General Mills' weighted average cost of capital (WACC) would land around 6.8%. In other words, despite the recent headwinds, the company continues to create value for shareholders and allocate capital efficiently. That shows up in its dividend policy as well. General Mills currently offers a dividend yield of 4.4%, which is almost on par with the risk-free rate, all while maintaining a payout ratio of just 53%. Beyond General Mills' ability to generate returns above its cost of capital, the stock also appears attractively priced based on valuation. One particularly useful—and often underappreciated—metric for evaluating mature, capital-intensive companies like those in the consumer packaged goods sector is earnings yield, calculated as operating income divided by enterprise value. Over the past twelve months, General Mills reported $3.6 billion in operating income (EBIT) against an enterprise value of $43.5 billion, resulting in an earnings yield of 8.4%. Compared to a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 6.8%, this positive spread suggests the company is generating real value for shareholders—a potentially encouraging sign for long-term investors. However, the reliability of earnings yield as a valuation signal rests on the assumption that earnings will remain stable or improve. In General Mills' case, that assumption is under strain. The company recently lowered its fiscal 2025 guidance, now forecasting a 7% to 8% decline in adjusted operating profit, nearly twice the size of its earlier projections. In short, while the current valuation offers a degree of margin of safety, the growing uncertainty around future profitability raises meaningful concerns and tempers a more bullish outlook. Analyst sentiment on General Mills (GIS) remains mixed. Of the 13 analysts covering the stock, only one holds a bullish rating, ten are neutral, and one is bearish. The consensus stock price target for GIS stock is $57.67, representing an upside of approximately 6.7% over the coming year. General Mills checks many of the boxes for a classic value investment, consistently generating returns above its cost of capital while trading at what appears to be an attractive valuation. However, the company is contending with mounting structural headwinds—including evolving consumer eating habits, the rise of GLP-1 drugs, shifting retail dynamics, and increased competition from private-label brands. These challenges cast doubt on the long-term sustainability of its value creation, despite current metrics remaining solid. Given these concerns, General Mills currently leans more toward a value trap than a compelling value opportunity. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
