logo
I tested £38 gadget to beat the salon and save my split ends – it blew my mind

I tested £38 gadget to beat the salon and save my split ends – it blew my mind

The Sun03-07-2025
MY hair used to be pampered like royalty – regular trims, glossy blow-dries and a shelf full of fancy products to keep split ends at bay.
But since becoming a mum in March, all that TLC has gone out the window.
These days, I'm lucky if I get five minutes to run a brush through it, let alone book a salon snip.
Between 3am feeds and the endless blur of nappies, my hair's been left to fend for itself, usually shoved into a dry-shampooed topknot that's more bird's nest than 'blowout'.
The result? A record-breaking ten months without a trim and therefore more split ends than a Love Island recoupling.
And while I dream of a head massage and glossy finish, the reality of juggling a newborn — and hearing my baby scream mid-hair wash — isn't exactly soothing.
Add in the fact that my maternity pay is disappearing into nappies, wipes and babygrows, and a pricey haircut isn't an option any more.
Days at home mean it's easy enough to ignore, but with a holiday coming up, my unruly mop needs taming before it hits airport security.
So, on one of my early-hours TikTok scrolls, I came across a £38 gadget that promised to rescue my dead ends from the brink — a split-end hair trimmer by Luxmend, a British beauty website.
The device — which looks like a typical hair straightener, but with scary teeth — has accumulated thousands of tried-and-tested videos, attracting more than two million views.
Clip after clip showed users running the device over their frazzled ends, trimming just the damaged bits and revealing smooth, shiny strands underneath — within minutes.
Finally, a hair fix I could squeeze in during nap time? I was sold.
According to Luxmend, the gadget only targets split ends, trimming away the frazzled bits without affecting your overall length.
It works by feeding strands through a hair plate, which lifts any rogue, spiky ends and snips them off with built-in blades. The device comes with sectioning clips, a USB charger and a quick-start guide that recommends working in layers for the best results.
Once charged, it powers up instantly, and to turn it off, you simply lock it shut. Easy enough.
But I won't lie, I was nervous.
The inner prongs look a little too aggressive for something gliding near my face. And the noise? Loud enough to make the baby stir.
It doesn't exactly scream 'trust me'.
So, before committing my split ends to Luxmend's blades, I did what any trend-follower would do — another TikTok deep dive.
'Unravelling rope'
Cue panic. Among the glossy before-and-afters were horror stories — users showing clumps of hair inside the gadget's clear chamber, gasping as more than just their ends disappeared.
Was this sleek little trimmer a miracle — or a mistake waiting to happen?
Wes Sharpton, a hairstylist at haircare brand hairstory.com, says: 'As professional stylists, we think of split ends like an unravelling rope — they travel up the strand and only a proper haircut can truly stop the damage from progressing.
'Split-end machines claim to remove frizz and damage, but in reality, they only trim the small hairs that stick out, and those hairs eventually reappear, leaving the hair still looking frizzy and uneven.'
That being said, considering the current state of my locks, I was desperate — and convinced myself that if I just did the ends, I wouldn't have much to lose if it did go terribly wrong.
4
During my daughter's nap, I finally gave it a go.
I started cautiously, pulling down a hidden layer of hair from underneath.
That way, if it massacred my mane, I could at least cover the damage.
Taking a section about an inch wide, I fed the last two to three inches through the trimmer, clamped it shut and slowly pulled it down.
You can definitely feel the tension as it works — it doesn't glide like straighteners.
There's a subtle resistance, like the machine is chewing through your ends — gently, I hoped. Once I reached the bottom, I flipped the gadget open and peeked through the clear chamber.
Sure enough, it was filled with tiny chopped hairs — the kind that normally coat the bathroom sink when my partner trims his beard.
I decided to tackle just one half of my head first, partly for damage control and partly to see if there was a real difference.
It's surprisingly easy to do solo, but you can't rush it. I tried feeding in a thicker chunk of hair at one point and the device struggled to chomp through it.
Working in smaller sections, I watched the clear chamber steadily fill up with little wisps of split ends.
Weirdly, it became really satisfying and addictive. I didn't want to stop.
The results do far? The freshly trimmed sections looked noticeably smoother, glossier and far less frizzy.
Most of those pesky split ends had vanished, and with each section I got braver — thankfully without losing more than I intended.
4
Once half my head was done, the difference was obvious.
One side looked sleek and fresh, the other still rocking the tumbleweed look.
I was genuinely blown away that this £38 gadget managed to freshen up my frazzled ends in under 15 minutes.
Sure, it's not quite the same as a salon experience, but let's be honest, neither is trying to wrangle a baby through a haircut.
And in the meantime, it has bought me a few extra months of avoiding the hairdresser — and the hefty bill that comes with it.
Pre-baby, I was paying as much as £150 per cut and £220 for a cut and colour, visiting the salon every four months.
That's at least £400 a year, just to get it trimmed.
The best bit about my new split-end saviour?
You can whip it out whenever you've got a moment to yourself — even at 3am when the baby's asleep and you're wide awake.
Don't mention it to your hairdresser.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins... and says Dad's Army's Private Godfrey could have done better than these recruits
CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins... and says Dad's Army's Private Godfrey could have done better than these recruits

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins... and says Dad's Army's Private Godfrey could have done better than these recruits

Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins - Channel 4 Rating: At ease, you men... dancer Louie Spence has declared that, in the event of World War III breaking out, he's ready to serve. 'I might just jump at it,' he bragged, on Celebrity SAS: Who Dares Wins. 'I think I'd be in the Home Guard. We'd have a gay Dad's Army, darling. Honestly, they wouldn't want to mess with the gays.' Shortly after that, he botched a hostage rescue exercise by hurling a grenade into a building where two civilians were waiting to be saved. Private Godfrey could have done a better job. The show launched on Sunday night — small wonder that by yesterday's second episode, Louie had already bailed out and gone home. His big idea might not save the country from invasion, but surely the BBC would love an LGBT remake of its most successful comedy. Call it Fab Army. Previous series of Celebrity SAS have been camp enough to merit their own float at a Pride festival. The ex-special forces veterans in charge of each batch of hapless volunteers couldn't help standing in a row with their thumbs tucked into their belts, like a Village People tribute act. Former U.S. Marine Rudy Reyes was caught on camera, stripped to the waist and admiring his muscles in the mirror. I worried that the next ordeal the celebs faced would be a choreographed Full Monty striptease, to a soundtrack of You Can Keep Your Hat On. This time, the NCOs are less flamboyant but also less aggressive. They snarl, swear and belittle contestants for every mistake, but so far we've seen no 'beastings' — the punishing bouts of intensive exercise that end only when recruits pass out from exhaustion. And these days, the mock interrogations are more like therapy sessions. They still begin with victims propelled into half-lit cells with bags over their heads, but the questions are sympathetic, even kindly. 'Don't be so nervous,' chief instructor Mark 'Billy' Billingham told Michaella McCollum, one of the 'Peru Two' jailed in South America for drug smuggling. They coaxed the story from her, beginning with teenage drug abuse in Northern Ireland, then working as a courier for an organised crime gang in Spain, followed by arrest at the airport in Lima. 'So yeah, I ended up spending three years in prison,' she said. Billy asked the questions expected of all good psychotherapists: 'How did that feel? Do you wanna talk about it?' Back in the dorm, she was beaming: 'I feel a bit better after that chat with them, really positive.' The physical challenges involve lots of running up mountains with rucksacks, as ever, but I can't help feeling that a lot of the tears and terror are manufactured for the cameras. One test saw the celebs hanging from a zipwire over an abyss. If that same set-up were an attraction at a theme park, people would queue for hours to have a go.

Shock winners of popular TV dating show revealed
Shock winners of popular TV dating show revealed

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Shock winners of popular TV dating show revealed

The Love Island 2025 winners were crowned during a live ceremony on Monday, 4 August. The ITV2 dating show concluded after an eight-week run of love triangles and drama. Four couples competed in the final for the chance to win the £50,000 prize money. The finalists included Shakira Khan and Harry Cooksley, Toni Laites and Cach Mercer, Yasmin Pettet and Jamie Rhodes, and Angel Swift and Ty Isherwood. ITV also announced that Love Island: All Stars will return for an extended third series in 2026.

The Chase star Mark Labbett apologises for his 'bursts of anger' on Celebs Go Dating - as quizzer admits he 'got quite grumpy on set'
The Chase star Mark Labbett apologises for his 'bursts of anger' on Celebs Go Dating - as quizzer admits he 'got quite grumpy on set'

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The Chase star Mark Labbett apologises for his 'bursts of anger' on Celebs Go Dating - as quizzer admits he 'got quite grumpy on set'

The Chase's Mark Labbett has apologised for experiencing 'bursts of anger' while looking for love on Celebs Go Dating. The professional quizzer, 59, admitted that the filming schedule of reality TV was drastically different from what he is used to and as a result, he lost his temper on set. He told The Mirror: 'I'm used to being in a pre-planned environment on The Chase, where timings are strict, but reality TV can go on for longer and the days end up ending later than you think.' Mark, who has publicly stated that he believes he is on the autism spectrum but not been diagnosed, said his mental health suffered on the show. The star added: 'For me, the one thing I found was that you need a social battery recharge, and as someone on the spectrum, that's something I really need.' He also revealed that his suspected neurodivergence has impacted his dating life as he finds people hard to read. Mark now plans to take the lessons he has learned from filming the show into any future contracts to ensure he does not act in an unbecoming manner again. He said: 'I got quite grumpy on set. I did apologise to everyone, but, in the future, I'd definitely have it in my contract that I need breaks to have a nap and recharge.' As well as admitting that he got moody on set, he also explained that he was impacted by his diabetes. He revealed: 'I wear a glucose monitor and on one of the nights, my glucose level went off the scale.' This prompted his co-star Kerry Katona to joke: 'And Mark went off the scale too!' Even though the show was a 'learning curve' for the star, he said that he is still looking forward to its release. Mark's grumpiness was not the only issue he faced in his latest attempt to find love and he also had a health scare on the set of Celebs Go Dating, which temporarily halted filming. The presenter suffered what's known as a hypoglycaemic attack - an event caused by a person's blood sugar dropping too low, resulting in symptoms like shaking and sweating. Mark (pictured on the far left) said that even though Celebs Go Dating was a 'learning curve' for the star, he is looking forward to its release Recalling the moment, Mark said: 'One night, I had a hypoglycaemic attack. 'I might have been a bit grumpy that night. I apologised to everyone after.' Mark was previously in a relationship with TV presenter Hayley Palmer, 43, but the pair split a week after their first anniversary last year. It was Mark who decided to leave the relationship, blindsiding Hayley when he ended their romance over the phone. The Chase presenter later put his reasoning down to their 16-year age gap and stressed to The Sun that he was 'very lucky' to have dated her for a year. Prior to this, he was married to Katie Lawrence, 32, who was 27 years his junior. The couple were together for seven years and share one child, a son, but parted ways in 2020, with their age gap once again cited as a contributing factor in the split.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store