Terror returns? Damascus church bombing sparks Lebanese probe into ISIS ties
Report by Lara El Hachem, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian
All signs — from Syria to Lebanon — suggest that terrorist cells remain active.
In Damascus, a terrorist group bombed Saint Elias church. The Syrian government blamed ISIS for the attack, while a group calling itself Saraya Ansar al-Sunna claimed responsibility.
In Beirut, the Lebanese army announced the arrest of one of ISIS' top commanders, Lebanese national R.F., known by the alias 'Qasoura.'
Is there a connection between the church bombing in Syria and Qasoura's arrest?
According to security sources, Qasoura had been under surveillance for months, and the army has never ceased its preemptive intelligence efforts to track and prevent sleeper cells from operating.
While the Damascus bombing has not triggered any direct repercussions in Lebanon, sources consider it a warning sign — prompting continued security coordination between Lebanon and Syria.
LBCI has learned that Lebanon has requested Syria to provide the identities of those arrested in connection with the recent church bombing.
Authorities want to determine whether any are Lebanese, have criminal records in Lebanon, or are linked to extremist groups operating locally. They also raised the possibility of further joint security cooperation once the investigation concludes.
Meanwhile, Lebanese-Syrian security meetings continue, especially following Prime Minister Nawaf Salam's recent talks in Syria.
One primary objective of these meetings is to report any security breaches along the intertwined northern and eastern borders, where both countries share critical security interests.
Lebanon's Army Commander, General Rodolph Haykal, visited Lebanese military positions in the Bekaa region two days ago to inspect ongoing efforts to maintain border control on the Lebanese side.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
8 hours ago
- LBCI
Terror returns? Damascus church bombing sparks Lebanese probe into ISIS ties
Report by Lara El Hachem, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian All signs — from Syria to Lebanon — suggest that terrorist cells remain active. In Damascus, a terrorist group bombed Saint Elias church. The Syrian government blamed ISIS for the attack, while a group calling itself Saraya Ansar al-Sunna claimed responsibility. In Beirut, the Lebanese army announced the arrest of one of ISIS' top commanders, Lebanese national R.F., known by the alias 'Qasoura.' Is there a connection between the church bombing in Syria and Qasoura's arrest? According to security sources, Qasoura had been under surveillance for months, and the army has never ceased its preemptive intelligence efforts to track and prevent sleeper cells from operating. While the Damascus bombing has not triggered any direct repercussions in Lebanon, sources consider it a warning sign — prompting continued security coordination between Lebanon and Syria. LBCI has learned that Lebanon has requested Syria to provide the identities of those arrested in connection with the recent church bombing. Authorities want to determine whether any are Lebanese, have criminal records in Lebanon, or are linked to extremist groups operating locally. They also raised the possibility of further joint security cooperation once the investigation concludes. Meanwhile, Lebanese-Syrian security meetings continue, especially following Prime Minister Nawaf Salam's recent talks in Syria. One primary objective of these meetings is to report any security breaches along the intertwined northern and eastern borders, where both countries share critical security interests. Lebanon's Army Commander, General Rodolph Haykal, visited Lebanese military positions in the Bekaa region two days ago to inspect ongoing efforts to maintain border control on the Lebanese side.
LBCI
11 hours ago
- LBCI
Lebanon, UK discuss UN Resolution 1701 and border security challenges
Lebanon's Defense Minister Michel Menassa met on Wednesday with the UK Defense Senior Advisor to the Middle East and North Africa, Vice Admiral Edward Ahlgren. The talks provided a comprehensive overview of the regional and Lebanese security landscape, examining recent developments and their potential impact on Lebanon. Discussions also touched on the Lebanese army's implementation of U.N. Resolution 1701 and its deployment in southern Lebanon, amid Israel's continued occupation of the five strategic hills. The meeting further addressed the army's ongoing efforts to secure Lebanon's northern and eastern borders with Syria.
LBCI
11 hours ago
- LBCI
Two wars, no winners: A year later, inside Israel's battles on the Lebanon and Iran fronts
Report by Wissam Nasrallah, English adaptation by Karine Keuchkerian The roar of Israeli fighter jets and the blast of Iranian ballistic missiles have fallen silent, marking the end of a 12-day war. That conflict followed the 66-day war between Hezbollah and Israel, which may not be over. So what did the two wars yield, and what consequences did each leave behind? Let's start with the morning of June 13. Israel launched what it called 'Operation Rising Lion,' targeting senior military commanders and striking sensitive military facilities. Its stated objective was to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure, but its broader aim was to destabilize—and ultimately topple—the Iranian regime. But the operation faltered. Iran held its ground and retaliated by striking Tel Aviv, setting off a trail of destruction from northern to southern Israel. In Lebanon, Israel conducted a series of strikes. The most notable was the pager explosion operation; the most consequential was the assassination of Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah. The attacks took a toll on the group, which retaliated—but not at a scale that matched Israel's assault. That's the military picture. As for the ceasefire, it began with a message from U.S. President Donald Trump to Iran: unconditional surrender. The turning point came when Washington entered the conflict, striking Iran's nuclear sites. During the war, Trump floated the possibility of regime change in Tehran—only to later state he was against it. In the end, Trump declared the war over with a few words posted on social media. The ceasefire agreement remains ambiguous, and all parties continue to claim victory. In Lebanon, the ceasefire was formalized through a signed agreement—partially made public, with significant portions kept undisclosed. A monitoring committee was formed, yet Israel continues to occupy territory, carry out airstrikes, and conduct targeted assassinations. The bottom line: Tehran was not defeated, and Tel Aviv did not win. Attention has shifted to negotiations, where Washington—the broker of the ceasefire—will face an Iranian regime newly armed with the credibility of demonstrated military capability. As for the war in Lebanon, Hezbollah is left with few gains. Both the group and the Lebanese state remain barred from leading reconstruction, while Trump has permitted China to resume importing Iranian oil. The outcomes of the Lebanon war and the Iran conflict will likely differ. The most important variable: the results of both wars—and, perhaps more crucially, that Trump is back in the White House.
