logo
Pahalgam terror attack fallout: How militaries, nuclear arsenal of India and Pakistan compare

Pahalgam terror attack fallout: How militaries, nuclear arsenal of India and Pakistan compare

Time of India01-05-2025

The recent terror attack in Pahalgam that claimed the lives of 26 tourists has sharply escalated tensions between India and Pakistan, raising fears of a broader conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbors.
Pakistan claims to have credible intelligence suggesting that India intends to launch military action soon, further intensifying the already fragile situation in the region.
Since the attack, the militaries of India and Pakistan have exchanged sporadic gunfire along the disputed Line of Control (LoC), and diplomatic relations have deteriorated sharply.
With military conflict being a distinct possibility, here's a detailed look at the defense forces and arsenals of India and Pakistan, drawing on data from the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies and other authoritative sources, to understand the military balance amid this crisis.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Oromia: AI guru Andrew Ng recommends: Read These 5 Books And Turn Your Life Aroun...
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
Personnel and forces
India maintains a significantly larger and more powerful military force compared to Pakistan.
According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, India has approximately 1.4 million active military personnel, including 1.23 million in the Army, 75,500 in the Navy, 149,900 in the Air Force, and 13,350 in the Coast Guard.
In contrast, Pakistan's active military numbers fewer than 700,000, with 560,000 in the army, 70,000 in the air force, and 30,000 in the navy.
India also fields a much larger paramilitary force of about 2.5 million personnel, compared to Pakistan's approximately 500,000 paramilitary members. This disparity enhances India's capacity for internal security and counterinsurgency operations, especially in volatile regions like Kashmir.
Defense budgets
India's defense budget for the fiscal year 2025-26 is estimated at around $79 billion, reflecting a nearly 10% increase over the previous year.
Pakistan's defense budget is significantly smaller, at approximately $7.6 to $8 billion.
This vast difference in funding allows India to invest heavily in modernising its military hardware, procurement, and maintenance, while Pakistan faces more constrained resources.
Armored and mechanised forces
India possesses about 4,201 tanks, including advanced models such as the T-90 Bhishma and the indigenous Arjun tanks.
Pakistan fields approximately 2,627 tanks, a smaller armored fleet in comparison. In terms of artillery, India has 9,743 units, while Pakistan has 4,619.
Air and naval capabilities
India operates a fleet of roughly 730 combat-ready aircraft, including modern fighters like the Rafale jets, while Pakistan has about 452 aircraft.
The Indian Navy is also more formidable, with 16 destroyers, 16 frigates, and two aircraft carriers, compared to Pakistan's navy, which includes eight submarines and 10 frigates.
Nuclear arsenal and missile capabilities
Both India and Pakistan possess nuclear weapons, with India recently surpassing Pakistan in the number of warheads for the first time in over two decades. India is estimated to have around 180 nuclear warheads, while Pakistan has approximately 170.
This shift reflects India's ongoing nuclear modernization efforts, including the deployment of Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs) on its Agni-V ballistic missiles, which significantly enhance its strike capabilities.
India's Agni-V missile has a range of 5,000 to 8,000 kilometers, capable of reaching targets across the region and beyond, including China.
Pakistan's Shaheen-3 missile, still under development, has a range of around 2,750 kilometers, sufficient to cover all of India depending on launch location.
Both countries are working to develop a nuclear triad-capabilities to launch nuclear weapons from land, sea, and air-which adds to the complexity of deterrence and escalation risks in the region.
Advantage India
The military imbalance between India and Pakistan is stark, with India's conventional forces and defense budget far outstripping Pakistan's.
This disparity has pushed Pakistan to rely more on asymmetric strategies, including its nuclear deterrent, to offset India's superiority. The recent
Pahalgam attack
and subsequent threats of military action have brought these dynamics into sharp focus.
India's nuclear doctrine has traditionally emphasized 'No First Use,' but recent statements suggest potential flexibility in response to major terrorist attacks linked to Pakistan, especially if chemical or biological weapons are involved.
India's ongoing development of a
nuclear triad
and MIRV capabilities further complicates the strategic calculus, increasing the risks of escalation in any conflict scenario.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Those who spoke bravely are all dead': Donald Trump says he gave Iran 60-day ultimatum; warns 'it will only get worse' as Israel holds lethal US weapons
'Those who spoke bravely are all dead': Donald Trump says he gave Iran 60-day ultimatum; warns 'it will only get worse' as Israel holds lethal US weapons

Time of India

time23 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Those who spoke bravely are all dead': Donald Trump says he gave Iran 60-day ultimatum; warns 'it will only get worse' as Israel holds lethal US weapons

A major flashpoint in the Middle East erupted into open military confrontation overnight, with Israel launching its most expansive airstrikes on Iran in decades, targeting the country's military command and nuclear infrastructure. In a dramatic twist, US President Donald Trump claimed credit for setting the stage, citing a 60-day ultimatum he says he gave Iran, even as his own officials denied direct American involvement in the operation. 'Today is Day 61': Trump ties himself to Israeli strikes Despite earlier statements by senior Trump administration figures, including secretary of state Marco Rubio , distancing the US from the Israeli attack, Trump took to Truth Social on Friday to suggest the strikes followed a countdown he had initiated. "Two months ago I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to 'make a deal,'" Trump wrote. "Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!" In another lengthy post, Trump described warning Iran in "the strongest of words" and claimed Iranian commanders "didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!" He added, "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter... by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo come to an end. Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left." Israel's Operation Rising Lion Early Friday, Israeli fighter jets and drones struck key Iranian military and nuclear facilities in what Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu dubbed "Operation Rising Lion." The strikes killed six top nuclear scientists and several senior military commanders. Israeli officials declared the operation a necessary pre-emptive strike to dismantle Iran's weapons capabilities. "This operation will continue for as many days as it takes," Netanyahu said in a video message, warning of further action against the Iranian regime. Iran retaliates Within hours, Iran responded with a heavy barrage of ballistic missiles aimed at Israeli cities including Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Explosions echoed across central Israel into early Saturday as missile defense systems were activated and civilians were urged to take shelter. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it targeted military airbases and weapons production centers that were 'sources of the criminal aggression.' A senior Iranian official told CNN, 'Everyone will feel it,' referencing further possible retaliation and threats to strike regional bases of any nation that aids Israel. Trump walks a fine line While Trump openly praised the Israeli operation—calling it "excellent" in remarks to ABC News—he continued to insist the US played no active military role. "We gave them a chance, and they didn't take it. They got hit—very hard. And there's more to come. A lot more," he told to ABC News. Still, the mixed signals out of Washington have raised eyebrows. Just a day earlier, Trump had called for peaceful diplomatic resolution with Iran.

Startup Mantra: Accelerate business growth with sustainability
Startup Mantra: Accelerate business growth with sustainability

Hindustan Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Startup Mantra: Accelerate business growth with sustainability

At a time when businesses across the globe are navigating a maze of sustainability regulations, a Pune-based startup is helping them find clarity—and compliance—with confidence. Founded in 2021 by Rajesh Patel, Snowkap is a Net Zero Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform that helps companies manage their Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) performance and reduce their carbon footprint. Born out of a problem Patel encountered firsthand—scattered ESG data, outdated tools, and a lack of business-aligned solutions—Snowkap blends artificial intelligence with human expertise to create a comprehensive, usable platform. 'We're not trying to retrofit old systems,' says Patel, who also heads the Powerweave Group. 'We wanted to create something grounded in how sustainability actually functions inside modern businesses,' he said. From pain point to platform The ideation for Snowkap began with conversations across boardrooms and factory floors. Patel and his team met sustainability officers, procurement heads, chief financial officers (CFOs), auditors, and policy advisors across geographies. 'We mapped where ESG data comes from, who owns it, where it gets stuck. The pattern was clear—manual processes, scattered workflows, and a heavy reliance on consultants just to stay compliant,' says Patel. What emerged was a business-grade ESG ERP platform—built from scratch, not retrofitted. The platform integrates directly into an enterprise's existing systems, automates data collection, matches it to global frameworks, and flags gaps, enabling quick and credible reporting. It supports the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), among others. 'Think of us as your ESG control tower,' Patel explains. 'We plug in, clean up your data, match it to global standards, and help build your reports—all from one place.' Bootstrapped but built-to-scale The product has been in the making for over 18 months, backed entirely by the Powerweave Group and developed by a core team of engineers, ESG experts, and compliance professionals. Around $1.5 million has been invested so far through internal capital and grants. Unlike many early-stage startups, Snowkap has avoided the blitz-scaling trap. 'We built with intent, not speed,' says Patel. While most SaaS companies bleed cash in the name of scale, Snowkap's infrastructure and product choices were made to grow sustainably. 'From the beginning, we asked—how can we scale without increasing burn?' adds Patel. Human and AI approach The global ESG software market, currently pegged at $3.17 billion, is dominated by giants like SAP, IBM, and Microsoft, which together command over 60% market share. Snowkap, like other Indian entrants (with <10% market share), is an emerging challenger in a rapidly growing industry. What sets Snowkap apart, says Patel, is its Human + AI approach. 'Most platforms stop at reporting. We go further—our AI does the heavy lifting, and our ESG experts help translate that into business-first action,' he says. 'It's not just about compliance—it's about helping businesses make smarter decisions.' Europe and GCC on the radar Snowkap now plans to expand into high-impact markets in Europe and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The timing is deliberate. 'Europe is now the epicentre of sustainability regulation,' says Patel, referring to new frameworks like the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), and the Omnibus Directive. 'These aren't just acronyms—they're reshaping boardroom agendas.' To enter these markets, Snowkap is strengthening its partner ecosystem. Local collaborators, especially in Europe, bring on-ground knowledge and regulatory understanding, while Snowkap provides the scalable tech backbone. Industry tailwinds The ESG software market is booming—with a global compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.7%, projected to hit $8.03 billion by 2030. India's market is smaller but growing faster—from ~$110 million now to an estimated $377 million by 2030 (CAGR of 22.9%). For Patel, it's not just a business opportunity—it's a shift in how companies define performance. 'ESG is now a boardroom priority, not just a CSR checkbox. When something becomes central to business strategy, you need infrastructure that evolves with it.'

'I told them': Donald Trump claims push for action against Iran; also says US didn't take part
'I told them': Donald Trump claims push for action against Iran; also says US didn't take part

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

'I told them': Donald Trump claims push for action against Iran; also says US didn't take part

US President Donald Trump is navigating a delicate balancing act as he claims foreknowledge of Israel's massive airstrikes on Iran while distancing the US from direct involvement. Though initial statements from American officials described the Israeli operation as unilateral, Trump later said it came after a 60-day ultimatum he gave Iran to strike a nuclear deal. 'Today is day 61,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'I told [Iran] what to do, but they just couldn't get there.' His shifting stance comes despite tensions with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. Trump is now presenting the strikes as part of a pressure campaign to bring Iran back to the negotiating table. 'They should now come to the table before it's too late,' he said. 'I think it's been excellent,' Trump told ABC News about the Israeli strikes. 'We gave Iran a chance, and they didn't take it. They got hit—hard. As hard as you can get hit. And there's more coming. A lot more.' But the US response has been inconsistent. US secretary of state Marco Rubio distanced Washington from the strikes, the White House ordered a partial evacuation of personnel, and officials have been vague about America's military involvement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025 Top Trending Local Enterprise Accounting Software [Click Here] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio said. He added, "Let me be clear: Iran should not target US interests or personnel." This has raised questions over whether Israel moved ahead of Washington to force its hand. According to the Guardian, some Israeli sources claimed Trump had given a "green light," but analysts warn Israel may be trying to draw the US into a wider conflict. Intelligence agencies likely had advance warning, given the scale of the attack: over 200 Israeli jets striking more than 100 targets. Meanwhile, the US recently resupplied Israel's Iron Dome system and deployed B-52 and B-2 bombers to Diego Garcia. The Fordow enrichment site in Iran remains intact—raising speculation that Washington may yet play a direct role if the conflict deepens. Trump's response mirrors previous efforts to portray himself as a peacemaker—such as his claim that he prevented nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan recently.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store