New Zealand lawmaker who called opponents spineless over Gaza is ejected from Parliament a 2nd time
Chlöe Swarbrick, co-leader of the left-leaning Green Party and part of the opposition bloc, was ordered to leave parliament on Tuesday over a speech in which she called for government lawmakers 'with a spine' to endorse her proposal for New Zealand to impose sanctions on Israel over the war in Gaza.
She was hit with a three-day ban — lengthy by New Zealand parliamentary standards — but returned the next day only to be ejected a second time.
Her censure came amid fraught scenes in Parliament in Wellington on Tuesday as opponents rebuked the government for not moving to recognize an independent Palestinian state, days after neighboring Australia pledged to do so. Countries including France, Britain and Canada are also expected to recognize a state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
'We are one of the very few countries in the world who so far refuse to acknowledge the absolute bare minimum,' Swarbrick said.
Calling opponents spineless prompted the ejection
The Green party lawmaker was abruptly ejected from the debating chamber when she urged government politicians to join her in a proposal to sanction Israel, which currently wouldn't have enough votes to pass into law.
'If we can find six of 68 government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history,' Swarbrick said, referring to other Members of Parliament.
'That is completely unacceptable to make that statement,' Speaker Gerry Brownlee interrupted. 'Withdraw it and apologize.'
The Green politician refused. Brownlee told her to leave the debating chamber for the rest of the week.
'Happily,' Swarbrick said.
The standoff resumed when Swarbrick took her seat again on Wednesday despite the ban and Brownlee asked again if she would apologize. Swarbrick declined and was ejected once more, yelling 'free Palestine' as she went.
Brownlee took the serious step, rare in New Zealand's Parliament, of taking a vote to 'name' Swarbrick for her misconduct, a ruling that means a legislator is formally suspended with their pay docked. The vote passed, with all government lawmakers endorsing it.
Opposition lawmakers claim double standards
The measure provoked fresh debate in Parliament about punishments for unruly behavior. Government lawmakers voted in June to enact unprecedented lengthy bans of opposition Māori Party lawmakers who performed a haka chant to protest a controversial vote.
On Wednesday, opposition politicians decried Swarbrick's penalty as unusually severe, with lawmaker Willie Jackson highlighting his own ban of just 30 minutes for calling one of his colleagues a liar, before he was allowed to resume his seat without an apology. In another recent example, a government politician used an eye-watering expletive without censure, supporters of Swarbrick said.
Several others had escaped punishment in recent years when using the word 'spineless' about their opponents. Opposition leader Chris Hipkins said it was unprecedented for a lawmaker to be ejected from Parliament for a second day over the same offense.
Brownlee, however, said he had drawn a line when Swarbrick directed a personal insult at all 68 government lawmakers — including him.
'We have so many threats and other stuff being directed at Members of Parliament,' he said. 'If we don't change the behavior in here, nothing will change outside.'
Pressure grows to decide Palestinian statehood question
Meanwhile, the government continues to mull recognition of an independent Palestinian state. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon Wednesday made his most strident rebuke yet of Benjamin Netanyahu, saying the Israel leader 'has lost the plot' on the 'human catastrophe' in Gaza.
'I think Netanyahu has gone way too far,' Luxon told reporters. 'He is not listening to the international community and that is unacceptable.'
While senior New Zealand officials, including Luxon, have said recognition of Palestine from their government was 'a matter of not if, but when,' his Cabinet has yet to endorse a change of position. A decision will be made in September after further consideration, Luxon said Monday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
This conversation is being recorded: Trump's hot mic moment is the latest in a long global list
LONDON (AP) — Behold the power of the humble hot mic. The magnifier of sound, a descendant of 150-year-old technology, on Monday added to its long history of cutting through the most scripted political spectacles when it captured more than two minutes of U.S. President Donald Trump and eight European leaders chit-chatting around a White House news conference on their talks to end Russia's war in Ukraine. The standout quote came from Trump himself to French President Emmanuel Macron even before anyone sat down. The American president, reflecting his comments after meeting in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin: 'I think he wants to make a deal for me, you understand, as crazy as it sounds.' How politics and diplomacy sound when the principals think no one is listening can reveal much about the character, humor and humanity of our leaders — for better and sometimes for worse. As public figures, they've long known what the rest of us are increasingly learning in the age of CCTV, Coldplay kiss cams and social media: In public, no one can realistically expect privacy. 'Whenever I hear about a hot mic moment, my first reaction is that this is what they really think, that it's not gone through the external communications filter,' said Bill McGowan, founder and CEO of Clarity Media Group in New York. 'That's why people love it so much: There is nothing more authentic than what people say on a hot mic.' Always assume the microphone — or camera — is turned on Hot mics, often leavened with video, have bedeviled aspiring and actual leaders long before social media. During a sound check for his weekly radio address in 1984, U.S. President Ronald Reagan famously joked about attacking the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. 'My fellow Americans," Reagan quipped, not realizing the practice run was being recorded. "I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.' The Soviet Union didn't find it funny and condemned it given the consequential subject at hand. Putin, too, has fallen prey to the perils of a live mic. In 2006, he was quoted in Russian media joking about Israel's president, who had been charged with and later was convicted of rape. The Kremlin said Putin was not joking about rape and his meaning had been lost in translation. Sometimes a hot mic moment involves no words at all. Presidential candidate Al Gore was widely parodied for issuing exasperated and very audible sighs during his debate with George W. Bush in 2000. In others, the words uttered for all to hear are profane. Bush was caught telling running mate Dick Cheney that a reporter for The New York Times was a 'major-league a--hole.' 'This is a big f———- deal,' then-U.S. Vice President Joe Biden famously said, loudly enough to be picked up on a microphone, as President Barack Obama prepared to sign his signature Affordable Care Act in 2010. Obama was caught on camera in South Korea telling Dmitri Medvedev, then the Russian president, that he'll have 'more flexibility' to resolve sensitive issues — 'particularly with missile defense' — after the 2012 presidential election, his last. Republican Mitt Romney, Obama's rival that year, called the exchange 'bowing to the Kremlin.' 'Sometimes it's the unguarded moments that are the most revealing of all,' Romney said in a statement, dubbing the incident 'hot mic diplomacy.' Live mics have picked up name-calling and gossip aplenty even in the most mannerly circles. In 2022, Jacinda Ardern, then New Zealand's prime minister, known for her skill at debating and calm, measured responses, was caught on a hot mic tossing an aside in which she referred to a rival politician as 'such an arrogant pr—-' during Parliament Question Time. In 2005, Jacques Chirac, then president of France, was recorded airing his distaste for British food during a visit to Russia. Speaking to Putin and Gerhard Schroder, he was heard saying that worse food could only be found in Finland, according to widely reported accounts. Britain's King Charles III chose to deal with his hot mic moment with humor. In 2022, shortly after his coronation, Charles lost his patience with a leaky pen while signing a document on a live feed. He can be heard grousing: "Oh, God, I hate this!' and muttering, 'I can't bear this bloody thing … every stinking time.' It wasn't the first pen that had troubled him. The British ability to poke fun at oneself, he said in a speech the next year, is well known: 'Just as well, you may say, given some of the vicissitudes I have faced with frustratingly failing fountain pens this past year.' Trump owns perhaps the ultimate hot mic moment The American president is famously uncontrolled in public with a penchant for 'saying it like it is,' sometimes with profanity. That makes him popular among some supporters. But even he had trouble putting a lid on comments he made before he was a candidate to "Access Hollywood' in tapes that jeopardized his campaign in the final stretch of the 2016 presidential race. Trump did not appear to know the microphone was recording. Trump bragged about kissing, groping and trying to have sex with women who were not his wife on recordings obtained by The Washington Post and NBC News and aired just two days before his debate with Hillary Clinton. The celebrity businessman boasted 'when you're a star, they let you do it,' in a conversation with Billy Bush, then a host of the television show. On Monday, though, the chatter on both ends of the East Room press conference gave observers a glimpse of the diplomatic game. Dismissed unceremoniously from the White House in March, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy now sat at the table with Trump and seven of his European peers: Macron, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Finland's President Alexander Stubb, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Trump complimented Macron's tan. He said Stubb is a good golfer. He asked if anyone wanted to ask the press questions when the White House pool was admitted to the room — before it galloped inside. The European leaders smiled at the shouting and shuffling. Stubb asked Trump if he's 'been through this every day?' 'He loves it. He loves it, eh?" she said.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Hamas must give up control': Fatah official lays out vision for Gaza after war
Al-Hayek stresses that the Palestinian Authority should govern Gaza after the war and urges international backing for reconstruction. GAZA CITY - Munther Al-Hayek, spokesperson for the Palestinian Fatah Movement in the Gaza Strip, spoke with The Media Line about Fatah's vision for post-war Gaza. He described a future government under Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa, the removal of Hamas from power, coordination with Arab states, and the role of the Palestinian Authority (PA). Discussing governance after the war, Al-Hayek said Gaza should be administered by a government headed by Mustafa and stressed that Hamas should be pressured to step down. He explained that Fatah is engaged in 'intensive and ongoing communications' with Egypt and other Arab countries about postwar arrangements. Al-Hayek pointed out that an Arab-Islamic plan—endorsed by both the Arab Summit and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in Jeddah - calls for the PA to 'impose its legal jurisdiction over the Gaza Strip.' 'The day following the war must be distinctly Palestinian,' he told The Media Line, noting that Israel has rejected proposals giving the PA control. He added that the PA is 'the official and legitimate face of the State of Palestine.' According to Al-Hayek, Fatah believes the Mustafa government should take full legal authority in Gaza, backed by 'all political parties, including Fatah and the Palestinian factions,' so it can 'fulfill its administrative and governance responsibilities in Gaza, particularly the day after the war.' He said that afterward, the process should move toward 'legislative, presidential, and National Council elections, allowing the Palestinian people to choose their future leadership.' Ending war is immediate priority Ending the war, he continued, was the immediate priority. 'Right now, all we are thinking about is ending the war in the Gaza Strip,' he said, 'and then moving towards a political process that leads to the establishment of the Palestinian state and its embodiment on the ground in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, with Jerusalem as its capital.' Al-Hayek made clear that Hamas should relinquish its governing role. 'We have requested Hamas to exit the governmental and administrative scene,' he told The Media Line. 'We have not asked Hamas members and their families to leave the Gaza Strip, as they remain an integral part of the Palestinian people. However, Hamas is now required to step back from this governing role.' He said Hamas 'currently finds itself in a difficult situation' and that 'all Palestinian factions desire nothing but to reach a clear and well-defined agreement' allowing the PA to take over governance in Gaza, as it already does in the West Bank. One reason Hamas must step aside, he argued, is that 'the situation after October 7 is entirely different from what it was before October 7.' The war, he said, has created 'complex security circumstances,' including the occupation of large parts of Gaza, demographic and geographic shifts, and 'the presence of occupying forces in the Strip.' 'To alleviate all the suffering and harsh pain endured by our people,' he said, 'Hamas must step aside and allow the Palestinian National Authority to assume responsibility.' Responding to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's remark that 'neither Fatahstan, nor Hamastan, nor the Palestinian Authority will exist in the Gaza Strip,' Al-Hayek cited international support for a PA role. He noted that when the European Union called for the PA's presence at the Rafah crossing, 'it meant the Palestinian Authority, regardless of the form or nature of its presence.' Turning to humanitarian concerns, Al-Hayek said Gaza will face an enormous task of rebuilding once the war ends. 'The Gaza Strip needs reconstruction. It needs the world to mobilize for food and reconstruction,' he said. But he added, 'this world will not mobilize, pay, or undertake reconstruction except through the legitimate body.' That legitimate body, he emphasized, is 'the Palestinian National Authority, which represents the Palestinians in the territories occupied in 1967.' He said there are ongoing contacts with 'the entire international community, the United Nations, and the European Union,' and added, 'There will certainly be contacts with the United States.' Speaking about Washington's role, Al-Hayek criticized the lack of American action so far. 'Unfortunately, up to this moment, the United States and the administration of President Trump—who personally spoke about extinguishing fires across the entire Middle East—have not yet acted regarding Gaza,' he said. 'We have not found any initiative from the United States to stop the war in Gaza.' He urged the US to recognize 'there was already a proposed solution on the table, which is the two-state solution.' Without it, he warned, 'hatred will persist within this generation that experienced the war of October 7. This generation will fully realize that if the Palestinian issue is not resolved, there will be neither security nor peace in the Middle East region, especially in Palestine.' 'Therefore,' he said, 'the United States is required to take a step forward—first to stop the war, then to assist the Palestinian people in obtaining their rights.' Those rights, he concluded, 'can only be achieved through the realization of a Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital—this is for sure.' The Fatah spokesperson also emphasized the importance of regional and global backing. 'We have experienced a war in the Gaza Strip that targeted our people. The international community, our Arab brothers, our friends, and the European Union must stand by the Palestinian people.' Asked whether Gazans would be allowed to leave, Al-Hayek was unequivocal. 'The Palestinian people do not want to leave Gaza,' he told The Media Line. 'We repeat each time: We will remain in Gaza until Judgment Day. Here we were born, and here we shall die.' He acknowledged that some residents might travel temporarily 'for leisure, education, or medical treatment,' but rejected the idea of permanent departure. To abandon Gaza, he said, in the way envisioned by 'Netanyahu's extremist government, along with Smotrich and Ben-Gvir—that is an illusion. We emphasize clearly: this is an illusion. We will remain in Gaza until Judgment Day.' 'We are the rightful owners of this land; we will build it, develop it, live upon it, and be buried beneath its soil,' he said. 'Some of us might leave temporarily due to difficult living conditions, for education or medical treatment. But to leave and abandon our homes, houses, history, and lives—that certainly is an illusion.' No Palestinian, he added, 'would accept leaving their property, life, and memories behind simply because of a war.' Only the National Security Forces, Al-Hayek said, should be deployed 'to protect public properties and the properties of citizens.' Any administrative or support committees, he argued, must 'be part of the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinian government. We do not say 'coordinate' with the Authority, as 'coordination' is a vague term.' He called the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) 'the representative of the Palestinian people' and said it will determine Gaza's future. 'Whoever wishes to govern the Strip must go to the ballot box, because it is the Palestinian people who choose their future leadership,' he said. The spokesperson pointed to a 'clear plan proposed by Fatah' through Egypt that affirms 'on the day after, legitimacy belongs exclusively to the official body representing the Palestinian people.' He concluded by calling for a ceasefire 'at least during this phase' that would include 'the release of hostages from the Gaza Strip' and the release by Israel of prisoners who, he said, 'fought for freedom and independence.' 'Regarding pressure,' he finished, 'we have repeatedly demanded—and we demand once again for the thousandth time—that Hamas exit the governmental scene. Hamas must leave the Gaza Strip to the legitimate government, which represents Palestinian citizens in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.'
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
India's Modi meets China's top diplomat as Asian powers rebuild ties
NEW DELHI (AP) — Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi met China's top diplomat on Tuesday and hailed the 'steady progress' made in improving the bilateral relationship after a yearslong standoff between the nuclear-armed Asian powers. Modi also noted 'respect for each other's interests and sensitiveness' in a statement on social media after meeting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. China's foreign ministry said the countries have entered a 'steady development track" and the countries should 'trust and support' each other. Wang arrived in India on Monday and has met with Foreign Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar as well as National Security Adviser Ajit Doval about the countries' disputed border in the Himalayan mountains. India's foreign ministry said Wang's meeting with Doval discussed 'deescalation, delimitation and boundary affairs.' Relations plummeted in 2020 after security forces clashed along the border. The violence, the worst in decades, left 20 Indian soldiers and four Chinese soldiers dead, freezing high-level political engagements. 'The setbacks we experienced in the past few years were not in the interest of the people of our two countries. We are heartened to see the stability that is now restored in the borders,' Wang said Monday. Modi emphasized the importance of maintaining peace and tranquility on the border and reiterated India's commitment to a 'fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable resolution of the boundary question,' his office said in a statement. The rebuilding of India-China ties coincides with friction between New Delhi and Washington after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed steep tariffs on India, a longtime ally seen as a counterbalance against China's influence in Asia. India is part of the Quad security alliance with the U.S., along with Australia and Japan. 'Compromise at the highest political level' The chill in relations after the deadly clash in 2020 between troops in the Ladakh region affected trade, diplomacy and air travel, as both sides deployed tens of thousands of security forces in border areas. Some progress has been made since then. Last year, India and China agreed to a pact on border patrols and withdrew additional forces along some border areas. Both countries continue to fortify their border by building roads and rail networks. In recent months, the countries have increased official visits and discussed easing some trade restrictions, movement of citizens and visas for businesspeople. In June, Beijing allowed pilgrims from India to visit holy sites in Tibet. Both sides are working to restore direct flights. Last week, the spokesman for India's foreign ministry, Randhir Jaiswal, said India and China were in discussions to restart trade through three points along their 3,488-kilometer (2,167-mile) border. 'Settling the boundary issue between the two countries requires political compromise at the highest political level,' said Manoj Joshi, a fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank. He also served as a member of the advisory board for India's National Security Council. Modi plans to visit China soon The thaw between Beijing and New Delhi began last October when Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping met at a summit of emerging economies in Russia. It was the first time the leaders had spoken in person since 2019. Modi is set to meet Xi when he travels to China late this month — his first visit in seven years — to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a regional grouping formed by China, Russia and others to counter U.S. influence in Asia. Earlier this year, Xi called for India and China's relations to take the form of a 'dragon-elephant tango' — a dance between the emblematic animals of the countries. Last month, India's external affairs minister visited Beijing in his first trip to China since 2020. The US and Pakistan play roles in the thaw The renewed engagement comes as New Delhi's ties with Donald Trump are fraying. Washington has imposed a 50% tariff on Indian goods, which includes a penalty of 25% for purchasing Russian crude oil. The tariffs take effect Aug. 27. India has shown no sign of backing down, instead signing more agreements with Russia to deepen economic cooperation. Trump's renewed engagement with India's arch rival, Pakistan, has also encouraged New Delhi's overtures to China, said Lt. Gen. D.S. Hooda, who led the Indian military's Northern Command from 2014 to 2016. In June, Trump hosted Pakistan's army chief for a White House lunch and later announced an energy deal with Islamabad to jointly develop the country's oil reserves. Both followed Trump's claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after the two sides traded military strikes in May. That clash saw Pakistan use Chinese-made military jets and missiles against India. 'China is heavily invested in Pakistan and, practically speaking, you can't have any expectation that Beijing will hold back support to Islamabad," Hooda said. 'But you can't have two hostile neighbors on your borders and simultaneously deal with them also.' ___ Associated Press writer Aijaz Hussain in Srinagar, India, and video producer Liu Zheng in Beijing contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
