logo
Public Land Sales Proposal Could Advance at 1 A.M. Tomorrow

Public Land Sales Proposal Could Advance at 1 A.M. Tomorrow

Yahoo20-05-2025

A congressional budget proposal that requires the federal government to sell or trade over 500,000 acres of public land in Utah and Nevada is moving to its next step: a Rules Committee meeting at 1 a.m. tomorrow morning.
The timing of the meeting, in which members will vote on the conformity of the budget with House rules, confirms to critics that Republican lawmakers want to shield their vote from public scrutiny. The last-minute introduction of the land-sales amendment to the House Natural Resources budget mark-up, at about 11 p.m. after 14 hours of meetings on May 6, was lambasted as a 'dark-of-night' procedure by critics who claim the action could create a destabilizing precedent leading to wholesale loss of federal public land.
The public-land sale proposal has stoked widespread opposition in the conservation and hunting community, with most organizations calling on their members to contact their congressional delegation to demand a 'no' vote on that portion of the federal budget.
'This isn't about partisanship. This is about principle,' North American board chair for Backcountry Hunters & Anglers Ryan Callaghan said in a press statement. 'Our public lands are not bargaining chips. They are not surplus. And they are not for sale.'
The centrist Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation noted that while disposal of federal land to accommodate urban growth in the West is often appropriate, there's already an established process to identify and dispose of those lands.
'But when efforts to sell or dispose of federal lands are unexpectedly added to a piece of legislation that requires a lower degree of Congressional passage than normal legislation, it causes concern,' the CSF wrote in a post. 'In this case, a late night, unexpected amendment to a budget reconciliation bill, which requires only a simple majority of 51 votes in the Senate compared to the normal threshold of 60, to potentially sell off and dispose of certain federal lands is problematic.'
This afternoon the House Rules Committee is expected to start considering the Natural Resources budget mark-up, along with contributions from other House committees, as part of the procedural process that ensures the budget conforms with legal, policy, and procedural guidelines. Several Rules Committee members have suggested that they may not vote in line with Republican leadership and the Trump Administration, making the Rules Committee an important stop for those who would remove some of its objectionable provisions.
According to reporting by E&E News Republican and Montana congressman Ryan Zinke, Trump's first Interior Secretary and a vocal opponent of selling or trading public lands, may seek to insert language in the bill before it reaches the Rules Committee. Zinke reportedly plans to include changes and remove the land-disposal amendment.
'The sale of public land is a red line for me,' Zinke told Outdoor Life in an interview earlier this year. 'Along with upholding the Constitution of the United States, fighting attempts to sell or trade wholesale pieces of our public estate is something I will not bend on.'
It's unclear how the mechanics of Zinke's amendment would affect the larger Natural Resources budget mark-up, or whether it would have support among Rules Committee members to proceed.
The entirety of the 1,116-page budget bill, known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, would make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent, reduce tax credits for climate-friendly energy investments, make significant cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, raise the nation's debt limit by $4 trillion, expand funding for the military, and reduce most federal agency personnel and budgets.
Provisions of the budget bill affecting natural resource and public-land management were detailed in the House Natural Resources' contribution to the package earlier this month. Because the provisions are part of what's called a budget reconciliation process, the entire package needs only a simple majority to pass the House and the Senate.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil Advances as OPEC+ Supply Boost Vies With Geopolitical Risk
Oil Advances as OPEC+ Supply Boost Vies With Geopolitical Risk

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil Advances as OPEC+ Supply Boost Vies With Geopolitical Risk

(Bloomberg) -- Oil advanced as OPEC+ hiked production less than some had feared and geopolitical concerns flared over Ukraine and Iran. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months Brent crude for August rose toward $65 a barrel after losing 2.2% last week, while West Texas Intermediate was above $62. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies agreed on Saturday to add 411,000 barrels a day of supply in July, matching expectations, but defying reports late last week that the group was considering an even bigger volume. Meanwhile, Ukraine struck air bases deep in Russia and Iran criticized a report showing its growing stockpiles of enriched uranium, in escalations that reduce the chance of more supply from the sanctioned OPEC+ members entering the market. Trade frictions also remained in focus, after President Donald Trump said he would be increasing tariffs on steel and aluminum. Monday's move higher comes after a turbulent two months that saw prices tumble to a four-year low in the wake of Trump's tariff wars, before recuperating some of those losses. Crude remains almost 15% lower this year, pressured by the simmering trade conflicts and the abandoning by OPEC+ of its former strategy of defending higher prices by curbing output. OPEC+ officials said the quota boost reflected Saudi Arabia's desire to punish over-producing members such as Kazakhstan and Iraq. Some members — including Russia, Algeria and Oman — had wanted a pause. The group next meets on July 6 to discuss output levels for August. 'Brent should be well supported in the middle of our expected $60-$65 summer range until we get a better understanding of how quickly actual OPEC production is rising,' said Robert Rennie, head of commodity and carbon research at Westpac Banking Corp. in Sydney. 'We may be seeing signs that the pace of increase could slow in the coming months' as some members had wanted a lull in the quota hikes. YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies
The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies

The Hill

time15 minutes ago

  • The Hill

The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies

WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Poland has elected Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian and staunch nationalist, as its next president in a closely watched vote that signals a resurgence of right-wing populism in the heart of Europe. Nawrocki, who is set to take office on Aug. 6, is expected to shape the country's domestic and foreign policy in ways that could strain ties with Brussels while aligning the Central European nation of nearly 38 million people more closely with the administration of President Donald Trump in the United States. Here are some key takeaways: Nawrocki's victory underscores the enduring appeal of nationalist rhetoric among about half of the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union, and its deep social divisions. The 42-year-old historian who had no previous political experience built his campaign on patriotic themes, traditional Catholic values, and a vow to defend Poland's sovereignty against the EU and larger European nations like Germany. His win also reflects the appeal of right-wing nationalism across Europe, where concerns about migration, national sovereignty, and cultural identity have led to surging support for parties on the right — even the far right in recent times. Far-right candidates did very well in Poland's first round of voting two weeks earlier, underlining the appeal of the nationalist and conservative views. Nawrocki picked up many of those votes. As his supporters celebrate his win, those who voted for the defeated liberal candidate, Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, worry that it will hasten the erosion of liberal democratic norms. Nawrocki's presidency presents a direct challenge to Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who returned to power in late 2023 pledging to mend relations with the EU and restore judicial independence which Brussels said was eroded by Law and Justice, the party that backed Nawrocki. But Tusk's coalition — a fragile alliance of centrists, leftists, and agrarian conservatives — has struggled to push through key promises including a civil union law for same-sex couples and a less restrictive abortion law. Nawrocki, who opposes such measures, will have the power to veto legislation, complicating Tusk's agenda and potentially triggering political gridlock. Nawrocki's election could signal a stronger relationship between Poland and the Trump administration. Poland and the U.S. are close allies, and there are 10,000 U.S. troops stationed in Poland, but Tusk and his partners in the past have been critical of Trump. Nawrocki, however, has a worldview closely aligned with Trump and his Make America Great Again ethos. Trump welcomed Nawrocki to the White House a month ago and his administration made clear in other ways that he was its preferred candidate. While Nawrocki has voiced support for Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, he does not back Ukrainian membership in NATO and has questioned the long-term costs of aid — particularly support for refugees. His rhetoric has at times echoed that of Trump, for instance by accusing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of what he said was insufficient gratitude for Poland's assistance. With growing public fatigue over helping Ukrainian refugees, Nawrocki's approach could shift Poland's posture from strong ally to conditional partner if the war drags on much longer. The election result is a setback for the EU, which had welcomed Tusk's return in 2023 as a signal of renewed pro-European engagement. Nawrocki and the Law and Justice party have criticized what nationalists view as EU overreach into Poland's national affairs, especially regarding judicial reforms and migration policy. While the president does not control day-to-day diplomacy, Nawrocki's symbolic and veto powers could frustrate Brussels' efforts to bring Poland back into alignment with bloc standards, particularly on rule-of-law issues. Though an EU member, Poland has its own currency, the zloty, which weakened slightly on Monday morning, reflecting investor concerns over potential policy instability and renewed tensions with EU institutions. Billions of euros in EU funding has been linked to judicial reforms which Tusk's government will now be unlikely to enact without presidential cooperation.

List of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website following criticism

time16 minutes ago

List of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website following criticism

WASHINGTON -- A widely anticipated list of ' sanctuary jurisdictions' no longer appears on the Department of Homeland Security's website after receiving widespread criticism for including localities that have actively supported the Trump administration's hard-line immigration policies. The department last week published the list of the jurisdictions. It said each one would receive formal notification the government deemed them uncooperative with federal immigration enforcement and whether they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. The list was published Thursday on the department's website but on Sunday there was a 'Page Not Found" error message in its place. The list was part of the Trump administration's efforts to target communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren't doing enough to help its immigration enforcement agenda and the promises the president made to deport more than 11 million people living in the U.S. without legal authorization. The list is being constantly reviewed and can be changed at any time and will be updated regularly, a DHS senior official said. 'Designation of a sanctuary jurisdiction is based on the evaluation of numerous factors, including self-identification as a Sanctuary Jurisdiction, noncompliance with Federal law enforcement in enforcing immigration laws, restrictions on information sharing, and legal protections for illegal aliens,' the official said in a statement. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that there had been anger from some officials about the list. However, she didn't address why it was removed. 'Some of the cities have pushed back,' Noem said. 'They think because they don't have one law or another on the books that they don't qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals.' The list, which was riddled with misspellings, received pushback from officials in communities spanning from urban to rural and blue to red who said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California, the city of Huntington Beach made the list even though it had filed a lawsuit challenging the state's immigration sanctuary law and passed a resolution this year declaring the community a 'non-sanctuary city.' Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his community must have been a clerical error. Davel voted for Trump as did 67% of Shawano County. Davel thinks the administration may have confused the county's vote in 2021 to become a 'Second Amendment Sanctuary County' that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants. He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store