Panic in Pakistan as India vows to cut off water supply
Spraying pesticides on his parched vegetables one street away from the Indus River, Pakistani farmer Homla Thakhur is worried about his future.
The sun is at its peak, the river is running very low, and India has vowed to cut supplies upstream after a deadly militant attack in Kashmir.
"If they stop water, all of this will turn into the Thar desert, the whole country," said Thakhur, 40, before heading back to the river to refill the tank for the spray gun.
"We'll die of hunger."
His nearly two-hectare farm is located in the Latifabad area of the southeastern province of Sindh, from where the Indus flows into the Arabian Sea after originating in Tibet and snaking through India.
Thakhur's fears were echoed by more than 15 Pakistani farmers and several other experts, especially as rain has been scanty in recent years.
For the first time, India on Wednesday suspended the World Bank-mediated Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 that ensures water for 80% of Pakistani farms, saying it would last until "Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjures its support for cross-border terrorism".
India says two of the three militants who attacked tourists and killed 26 men in Kashmir were from Pakistan. Islamabad has denied any role and said "any attempt to stop or divert the flow of water belonging to Pakistan ... will be considered as an Act of War".
The treaty split the Indus and its tributaries between the nuclear-armed rivals.
Government officials and experts on both sides say India cannot stop water flows immediately, because the treaty has allowed it to only build hydropower plants without significant storage or dams on the three rivers allocated to Pakistan. But things could start changing in a few months.
"We will ensure no drop of the Indus River's water reaches Pakistan," India's water resources minister, Chandrakant Raghunath Paatil, said on X.
He did not respond to questions about the fears in Pakistan.
Two Indian government officials, who declined to be identified discussing a sensitive subject, said the country could within months start diverting the water for its own farms using canals while planning hydroelectric dams that could take four to seven years to finish.
Immediately, India will stop sharing data like hydrological flows at various sites of the rivers flowing through India, withhold flood warnings and skip annual meetings under the Permanent Indus Commission headed by one official each from the two countries, said Kushvinder Vohra, a recently retired head of India's Central Water Commission.
"They will not have much information with them when the water is coming, how much is coming," said Vohra, who was also India's Indus Commissioner and now advises the government occasionally.
"Without the information, they cannot plan."
And it is not just agriculture, a shortage of water will also hit electricity generation and potentially cripple the economy, economists say.
Vaqar Ahmed, economist and team lead with UK consulting firm Oxford Policy Management, said that Pakistan had underestimated the threat of India walking away from the treaty.
"India hasn't got the kind of immediate infrastructure to halt the waterflows, especially during flood times, so this period creates a crucial window for Pakistan to address the inefficiencies in its water sector," he said.
"There are a lot of inefficiencies, leakages."
RUNNING DISPUTES
In recent years, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government has been seeking to renegotiate the treaty and the two countries have been trying to settle some of their differences in the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague over the size of the Kishenganga and Ratle hydroelectric plants' water storage area.
"We can now pursue our projects in free will," said Vohra.
In a letter on Thursday, India told Pakistan that circumstances had changed since the treaty was signed, including population increases and the need for more cleaner energy sources, referring to hydropower.
A World Bank spokesperson said it was a "signatory to the treaty for a limited set of defined tasks" and that it does "not opine on treaty-related sovereign decisions taken by its member countries".
Nadeem Shah, who has a 150-acre farm in Sindh where he grows cotton, sugar cane, wheat and vegetables, said he was also worried about drinking water.
"We have trust in God, but there are concerns over India's actions," he said.
The three rivers meant for Pakistan, a country of 240 million people, irrigate more than 16 million hectares of farmland, or up to 80% of the total.
Ghasharib Shaokat of Pakistan Agriculture Research, a Karachi research firm, said India's actions inject uncertainty "into a system that was never designed for unpredictability".
"At this moment, we don't have a substitute," he said. "The rivers governed by the treaty support not just crops, but cities, power generation, and millions of livelihoods."
The treaty remained largely unscathed even when India and Pakistan fought four wars since separating in 1947, but the suspension sets a dangerous precedent, Pakistani politicians said.
"We're already locked into generations of conflict, and by exiting the Indus Water Treaty, I believe we're locking future generations into a brand new context of conflict," said Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, Pakistan's former foreign minister.
"That must not happen."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 days ago
- Scoop
Poor Countries Set To Pay $22billion For China Debt
New research from the Lowy Institute shows the world's poorest countries will make record high debt repayments to China this year. The research, released last month, showed China is set to call in US$22 billion for debts from 75 countries assessed by the World Bank as the world's poorest and most vulnerable in 2025. Ten Pacific nations were on the list. China's foreign ministry, meanwhile, denies Beijing is responsible for developing debt. Lowy research author Riley Duke said China had shifted from lead bilateral banker to chief debt collector for the developing world. "Because of the large amount of lending that China did in the mid-2010s, and the way it structured its loans through its Belt-and-Road initiative, this year, it is seeing a huge spike in repayments," he said. For Pacific countries that had borrowed from China, Duke said repayment strain was already an issue. He identified Tonga, Samoa and Vanuatu as being at higher risk due to respective loans. In Tonga, the impact of Chinese loans had been a "big political issue" this year. Duke anticipated that about 15 percent of the government's revenue over the next few years would be devoted to debt repayments. "Last year, Tonga spent more on its debt repayments than it did on health for its citizens," he said. "And so when we look at the….forward outlook, there are more challenges on the horizon. There are key development issues across the Pacific that countries and their governments and their people want to be dealing with. "But instead, these debt burdens are there and they're persistent. "Again, just to focus on Tonga…. [it] ran five successful budget surpluses in the lead-up to having a big wave of Chinese debt repayments coming in. "But then it faced huge economic costs from the pandemic, from the earthquake, from cyclones, and so that wiped out all the money that [the government] had put aside." Duke believed the amount of China's lending into the region was less than a quarter of the level it was in the mid-2010s. "I'd be surprised to see any new large loans from China in the region, and I think related to that is the broader topic of whether Pacific countries should take on lots of debt. "Pacific countries have large financing gaps. There's a lot of infrastructure that needs to be built, and sometimes loans are the best way to do that, and ultimately that just comes back to the quality of the project. "People are a bit afraid of debt, and I think it's a bit…of a dirty word, but if a loan is taken out to finance a project that is good for economic growth, good for a Pacific country [because] it drives connectivity [and] it drives the economy, then it's a good loan, and it's good debt to take on, and it will pay itself back." He said there had also been a shift in how China engaged with the region. "China's main form of engagement with the Pacific 15 years ago was lending. I think 80 percent of all of China's development financing to the region was in the form of loans, and that's fallen off dramatically since around 2018." That shift was due to a range of factors, including increased financing options for Pacific governments, Duke said. "In 2010, China might have been the only partner offering large-scale infrastructure financing. "Australia is now offering more financing in that space. The World Bank is offering more financing in that space; there's climate funds that are also offering adaptation projects and adaptation infrastructure. "So there are more options on the table for Pacific countries than there was previously. And I think that is part of the reason that China's lending has declined." China's foreign ministry denied Beijing was responsible for developing debt. "China's cooperation on investment and financing with developing countries follows international practice, market principles, and the principle of debt sustainability," spokesperson Mao Ning said. "A handful of countries are spreading the narrative that China is responsible for these countries' debt. "However, they ignore the fact that multilateral financial institutions and commercial creditors from developed countries are the main creditors of developing countries, and the primary source of debt repayment pressure. "Lies cannot cover truth and people can tell right from wrong."
RNZ News
01-06-2025
- RNZ News
These Pacific Islands are building walls to stop rising seas. Will it work?
By Doug Dingwall and Adel Fruean , ABC News A seawall under construction at Ebeye in Marshall Islands. Photo: Supplied: Hall Contracting The sea used to wreak havoc as it crashed into Simeona Tapeneko's village in Samoa. Water would flood the houses in Lauli'i, on the north coast of the country's most populated island, overwhelming an old seawall built offshore. "Many things - including our homes - were severely damaged," Tapeneko said. "The waves also destroyed the graves of deceased family members." When builders laid the last rock of a new seawall there in May, ending six months of construction, Lauli'i breathed a collective sigh of relief. Tapeneko said the $1.9 million wall, funded by the New Zealand government, would protect the homes from storm surges. "Families are happy and feel secure with its height," he said. Simeona Tapeneko has seen rising sea levels damage his village. Photo: ABC News / Adel Fruean It's one of many Pacific Island communities building seawalls to defend themselves against rising sea levels. One of Marshall Islands' most populated islands, Ebeye, is buttressing its coast with a wall of rock shipped from Dubai and funded by the World Bank and Green Climate Fund. New seawalls also protect low-lying atolls in Tuvalu, and more will appear in Kiribati, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Fiji and other island nations, many with funding from the Australian government and international development organisations. They're a source of hope for countries grappling with sea level rise - which scientists say will continue even if the world limits global temperature rises to 1.5C above pre-industrial times. Coastal engineers say places like the Netherlands have long used engineering to hold back the sea from low-lying lands - and that the Pacific could do the same. But researchers in climate change adaptation say seawalls are usually a costly, short-term fix in a region with limited money. "A seawall along an eroding coastline is really only a stopgap measure, because we know that [sea level rise] is projected to continue well beyond the end of this century, perhaps by about another 200 or 300 years," Patrick Nunn, a University of Sunshine Coast climate scientist, said. Lauli'i residents feel safer now the village has a new seawall. Photo: ABC News / Adel Fruean Not far from the shores of Lauli'i, its old seawall sits mostly submerged in water. Leota Vaimauga, a village chief, estimates it lasted for 10-15 years before it was overwhelmed by the sea. And while he's relieved the village has a new seawall, he expects Lauli'i will need to replace it in another decade, depending on the weather and the stability of the new barrier. Climate adaptation researchers say seawalls have a clear downside that makes them hard to sustain in rural areas. "You have to keep elevating them, have to keep extending them, and so they're very economically costly," Jon Barnett, a climate adaptation researcher at the University of Melbourne, said. "They're an all-or-nothing strategy that really needs to be considered well in advance and thought through." Most seawalls in rural coastal areas are funded and built by local communities, and have been too expensive to maintain, researchers say. Professor Nunn calculates that on average, the structures will collapse after 18 to 24 months. Photo: Supplied / Hall Contracting A study he co-authored in 2021 describes the Pacific's rural coastlines as "littered with the remains of collapsed seawalls". Climate adaptation researchers also say seawalls have side effects, like diverting erosion to other parts of the coast, forcing waves to scour the seafloor at their seaward side, and pooling water on their landward side. Professor Nunn said rural villages in the Pacific's higher volcanic islands could better use the labour and resources spent on seawalls on a longer-term solution - relocating further inland and upslope. But he said seawalls can offer important psychological benefits for communities losing land to rising seas. They also provide time for them to consider whether to relocate, researchers and coastal engineers say. It's something Queensland University of Technology climate change adaptation researcher, Annah Piggott-McKellar, observed in one Fiji village that relocated after building a series of seawalls. "Land is… a way of life. It's a part of who people are," she said. "So trying everything that's possible before making that decision to move is important." But Dr Piggott-McKellar said there was also a risk that seawalls give false hope. "Having that realistic conversation and understanding of what a seawall might be there to do is going to be important." Leota Vaimauga says Lauli'i's old seawall no longer protects the village. Photo: ABC News / Adel Fruean For the Pacific's low-lying atolls, new seawalls come with fanfare. In Marshall Islands, 65,000 tonnes of rock shipped from the United Arab Emirates will form a new 1.81 kilometre barrier on the seaward side of Ebeye island. Hall Contracting, which is building the multi-million-dollar seawall, said it was due to be completed by December. "The houses in Ebeye are built right up against the ocean … in large storm events those houses can be affected," company chief executive and director Cameron Hall said. "This seawall will protect them." Hall said seawalls have an important role to play for Pacific Island nations as sea levels rise. "Civil engineering is a powerful thing. In my opinion, there's no reason why [it] should be confined to developed countries," he said. "It's a problem that developed nations have created … and if there's an engineering solution, why wouldn't we do it for them?" The work is logistically challenging, requiring builders to move machinery to remote atolls, and source material for the seawalls. In Tuvalu, Hall Contracting dredged sand from the lagoon by the capital Funafuti to build seven hectares of new or "reclaimed" land protected by a seawall of sandbags. It also constructed a seawall of interlinked hexagonal concrete blocks along part of the coast at Nanumea, another Tuvalu atoll. It's all part of Tuvalu's coastal adaptation project, funded by the Tuvaluan and Australian governments and the Green Climate Fund, aiming to keep the nation inhabitable. But a group of Nanumeans is championing a proposal to save their home for the longer-term. Local engineer Truman Lomi has worked on a concept for the Nanumea Salvation Seawall Project for years. It involves building a barrier around the entire island - rather than just a section. He said the barrier would protect the entire coast from large, powerful waves. For now, it requires funding for a feasibility study. The Ebeye seawall will protect the island using rocks from a large quarry in the UAE. Photo: Supplied: Hall Contracting His granddaughter Ashleigh Chatelier, a member of the Nanumea Salvation Seawall group, said the project also carried a message about Tuvalu's ability to adapt to climate change. "We're not helpless. We are resilient, we have the skill set, we have the tools," she said. "Unfortunately, we are restricted in terms of the funding of this project, but the reality is that this is a community-led resilience project and it essentially has come from the roots of Nanumea." Countries have long used engineering to protect, or reclaim, land from the sea. In the Netherlands, dams and dykes keep vast, low-lying areas from flooding. The Maldives, in the Indian Ocean, has reclaimed land from rising seas, although at huge financial and environmental costs. "An engineering solution is possible," Francois Flocard, coastal engineer at the University of New South Wales' Water Research Laboratory, said. "It's [about] understanding, as a community and as a society, where does it make sense to be applied?" Professor Barnett says there are other options for communities where seawalls are too costly to build and maintain. One is to try restoring and conserving ecosystems in a way that lets islands respond naturally to sea level rise. "That doesn't mean they're going to be easy to live on," he said. "Shorelines are going to change, the topography of islands is going to change. Some bits are going to erode, some bits are going to grow. "But the adaptation options there are probably much cheaper." Reclaimed land at Tuvalu's capital, Funafuti. Photo: Supplied: Hall Contracting The massive Afsluitdijk is more than 32 kilometres long and has protected the Netherlands for 90 years. Photo: SANDER KONING / KONING PHOTOGRAP / AFP Some Pacific Island nations are also creating nature-based barriers, using mangroves, sloping rock walls and vetiver grass to block rising seas. In some ways, Professor Barnett said, all action is good action compared to the paralysis on climate change adaptation in some countries. Leaders in countries like Tuvalu are being told there is only decades until their nations are uninhabitable, he said. "There's no rule book. No country's ever had to face this problem before. Now, what do you do?" Professor Barnett said. "You've got to protect the capital. You have to have an airport. You have to have a hospital. You have to have schools. "It seems perfectly reasonable to engage in the kinds of urban defensive strategies." -ABC
Scoop
31-05-2025
- Scoop
Defend The Adivasis Of Central India. Ceasefire And Peace Talks Now
It is not just Palestine that is under siege. Central India is also embroiled in an all-out-war that is killing the Indigenous Adivasi people. Like Israel, the Indian state has also committed countless harrowing violations to the international humanitarian law – but toward its own people, in order to seize the mineral-rich land of the region for its neoliberal agenda. To open Central India to foreign investments and corporate plunder, the government launched its military campaign against Naxals (Maoist rebels). However, this campaign has mainly targeted the civilian Adivasi communities and their advocates. Recently, the government intensified its attacks through routine harassment, extrajudicial killings, mass sexual violence, illegal arrests and detention in security camps, and aerial bombings, especially in the region of Bastar, Chhattisgarh and the Karegatta Hills, Telangana. Many of the state-perpetrated killings are covered up as deaths from fake encounters. In Bastar alone, over 400 of these killings were reported since January 2024, which included elderly and children casualties. This year, hundreds of cases of rape, unlawful arrests of activists, and the burning of over 300 villages in Bastar have been documented. All this brutal violence is justified under the pretense of counter-insurgency, which has reinforced the land grabbing and forcible displacement of communities already legitimized by deceptive policies such as the Scheduled Tribes and Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act (FRA). The constitutional rights granted to Adivasis for self-governance are blatantly ignored and violated to favor exploitation of natural resources through the rapid expansion of infrastructure for intensive extractive industries, which in turn threaten the lives and livelihoods of the Adivasis, attack their food systems, and destroy the environment. The People's Coalition on Food Sovereignty expresses its grave concern over the situation, particularly the employment of state militarization that is pushing the Adivasi population into starvation and destitution. Moreover, we strongly condemn the violations to human rights and the international humanitarian law committed by the Indian state and its forces in the name of counter-insurgency to acquire Adivasi lands and plunder their communities' resources. We call out the India government for its war crimes, including the extrajudicial killings of Naxal combatants – even the General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) – that have been seeking deescalation through their unilateral ceasefire declaration. We urge to heed the appeals for ceasefire and peace talks and immediately suspend the national and regional counter-insurgency programs behind Central India's militarization that are killing the Adivasis (such as Operation Kagar in Bastar and Operation Black Forest in Karegatta Hills). The root causes of armed conflict will never be addressed by the further escalation of wars and military offensives that only contribute to people's hunger and impoverishment. There would never be a need for the people to take up arms in the first place if their socio-economic demands and civil liberties – especially concerning the right to food and land – are met and pro-people development is prioritized over profit.
