Rewilding group to assess possible return of white storks to London
White storks could once be seen flying in Britain's skies and building their huge nests on roofs and in trees, but they disappeared centuries ago as a breeding bird as a result of hunting and habitat loss.
Citizen Zoo, an organisation that specialises in community-led urban rewilding, is conducting an appraisal on making London a 'white stork-friendly city'. It will include habitat mapping, contacting boroughs across the capital to gauge their interest and surveying the public about the birds.
The White Stork Project in Sussex has sought to create new colonies of rehabilitated injured birds at Knepp and Wadhurst Park since 2016. These can act as a 'magnet' for wild birds that visit from the continent, and the project's first breeding success was in 2020.
In the four decades before the start of the project there were just 27 records of white storks across Greater London, but there were 472 sightings between 2016 and 2023, with the numbers increasing year on year, conservationists said.
Elliot Newton, a co-founder of Citizen Zoo and its director of rewilding, said: 'If you look across European landscapes, this is a bird that can actually thrive in urban landscapes. What we want to see is how we can make London a more white stork-friendly environment, and embrace it for its ability to inspire people about the nature we can and should have close to where we live.'
The survey is being led by Dr Rachel White, of the University of Brighton, with two phases that mirror a national survey she conducted as part of the White Stork Project in Sussex.
The first phase has involved surveying a representative sample of 1,000 Londoners, and the second phase is asking residents and frequent visitors to give their views on white storks and their place in the capital.
The London survey will feed into Citizen Zoo's wider assessment of the political and public enthusiasm and habitat availability for storks, and potential next steps such as creating more habitat to encourage natural colonisation or even a release similar to that in Sussex.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Citizen Zoo has previously worked with communities to bring beavers back to Ealing, reintroduce water voles in Surrey and restore wetlands in the capital.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
16 minutes ago
- The Sun
One of Britain's wokest councils has banned staff referring to parents as mum and dad
ONE of Britain's wokest councils has banned staff referring to parents as mum and dad. Officials say 'caregivers' is more appropriate. They also advise workers to avoid using the adjectives 'young' and 'old'. Merton Council in South London has warned its employees not to make assumptions about a child's biological parents. Bosses claim not saying the words 'mother' and 'father' helps to 'recognise diverse family formation'. The council's 27-page inclusive language guide — obtained by The Sun using Freedom of Information laws — also tells employees not to use 'young', 'old' or 'mature' for fear of being ageist. It also advises workers to use 'person-centred language' — and avoid gendered phrases such as 'man the desk'. The guidance, drawn up by the debt-stricken council's equality and diversity team, also warns: 'Avoid making assumptions about preferred names or nicknames without asking the individual first.' Free Speech Union boss Lord Toby Young said: 'I'm amazed that Merton Council has time for this nonsense. "I can only assume fly-tipping and potholes aren't a problem in Merton.' A council spokeswoman insisted: 'We aim to communicate with understanding and without making assumptions.' 1
Times
44 minutes ago
- Times
Even I see the point of prenups these days
As summer weddings roll by, does the thought of prenuptial contracts reassure or disgust you? It may depend on your generation, but their rising popularity certainly reflects a change in the idea of marriage. Even 20 years ago most of us associated 'prenups' with American billionaires, Hollywood stars with chronically unsettled emotions or George Clooney getting gloriously suckered in the Coen brothers' Intolerable Cruelty. But ideals erode: four years ago the Marriage Foundation estimated that one in five couples in the UK sign prenups, and a YouGov survey finds more than 60 per cent liking the idea. Inquiries to law firms reflect the change and so, cautiously, does the law itself: since a 2009 Supreme Court ruling, a contract between a couple ring-fencing their separate assets can be taken into consideration during divorce proceedings. • Why are couples who meet online more likely to fall out of love? And last year Sir Robert Buckland KC wrote here that it's already time to make prenups fully enforceable. As Boris Johnson's lord chancellor he knows the turf, having introduced no-fault divorce. He calls prenups a 'wise and practical choice'. It's worth discussing, though traditional spirits may wince. Ancient vows echo down the centuries: 'For richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, forsaking all others, till death us do part.' The bride's promise to obey, of course, got shuffled out of the service in the 1920s, though Princess Elizabeth endearingly opted to say it to Philip Mountbatten in 1947. But even harder to find in use is one magnificent 16th-century promise that bridegrooms made: 'With all my worldly goods, I thee endow.' Women never said it, since it was pretty much implied for centuries that we'd hand everything over, unless protected by some upper-crust web of trusts or entails. But now, even in church weddings, that majestic phrase is nearly gone, enduring only if you choose the 1559 Book of Common Prayer. Otherwise it's Alternative Services: Series One (as used by the Prince of Wales) which more cautiously says: 'All my worldly goods with thee I share.' Still more commonly in our age of self-analysis and identity-pride, each just says: 'All that I am I give to you.' In the Catholic service there's no mention of money-sharing. Yet there is an ancient, haunting bravery about that lordly promise to 'endow' every penny of your wealth on the beloved. The word suggests permanent, irrecoverable; an almost monastic plunge of dedication. It certainly contrasts with the fashion for writing your own florid vows, like 'You are my sunrise and sunset, the dream I have dreamt all my life'; 'I promise to never lose our spark' or — apparently quite popular — the Backstreet Boys-style 'You are my fire, my one desire'. None of these specifically implies endowing any assets. • Inside Picasso's studios: the secrets of the places where he lived and loved Tracking the phrase, I hit upon Mumsnet. Here, in a very modern take, is a young woman worriedly unsure whether, during her register office wedding, she somehow accidentally 'endowed' her chap with a right to half the £10,000 she got by selling a possession from her single days. Was it, she asks, written in law? Because if so, 'I'm just uncomfortable with the idea of not having control of my stuff!'. Someone else asks if selling her clothes on eBay entitles him to half the dibs. The discussion continues sensibly enough, with talk of fairness and joint accounts and pensions in divorce. But the uncomfortable lack of clarity, and frequent depressing stories of rough divorces, began to change my mind about prenups. And, as one commenter sapiently observed, by marrying in the UK you're sort of signing one anyway: it's just that if you do separate it'll be the courts, not you, deciding who gets what. And — aside from the obvious need for child support — who wants strange lawyers running your life? It is easy to mock prenup absurdities, American or domestic. One law firm, conceivably tongue in cheek, suggests terms that couples might include. Like at what age you can each retire, the frequency of family visits, restricted screen time, sexual action or stipulations on future weight (one comedian jokes that there are two stone of her man which she certainly never married). Another suggested stipulation was to dictate 'how long either party is expected to wait before dating somebody else if they separate'. • Alison Steadman: 'My secret? A few gins and tonic in the evening' Most of these are enough to make any onlooker turn down the wedding invitation and bin the gift list; few firms would even draft them and no court admits their validity. But it could be that if they became fully enforceable, as Buckland suggests, only rational and financial ones would be written. And money does matter when more than four out of ten marriages break up. We have an inexcusably wide wealth gap; a twistedly absurd housing market makes it worse. Prenups are very tempting if one party has built up assets: it's middle-aged couples who still inquire most about prenups because implicitly 'endowing' half a business or property feels risky. Our intergenerational wealth gap is an even bigger driver of worry. Homeowner parents who donated a deposit on a first flat or might leave a small fortune within a decade or so may flinch and murmur about a prenup if their child's whirlwind romance looks like a gambler, drinker or reckless investor. Some might make paying for the wedding conditional on such a precaution, since only the wealthiest can afford the complexity of setting up trusts. It's all fuel for sad long-term rifts. But maybe if prenups do become the norm, like insurance or fire extinguishers, and were known to be fully enforceable, it might all feel less creepy. Maybe it's time. But, sigh! It's not romantic …
Times
44 minutes ago
- Times
How to erase the misery of student loneliness
T here are many implausible things about the Netflix campus romance My Oxford Year — an American visits the dreaming spires and falls for her handsome, castle-dwelling, cancer-stricken tutor — but perhaps the most unlikely part is the way new students confidently start chatting on first meeting. In my experience, they are more likely to stare intently at their shoes or phones in awkward silence, especially the boys. The real story is that many feel deeply lonely during their degrees, as several polls and studies confirm. A bit of future loneliness may not seem like a big deal to parents facing the ordeal of A-level results day this week, more concerned about whether their offspring will get to university at all. They probably assume things haven't much changed since their own time spent propping up the student bar; that eventually all but the most antisocial are bound to make friends. But in fact, quite a lot has changed — even leaving aside the negative effects of smartphones or lockdowns on burgeoning social skills.
