JD Vance's team ordered the water levels in Ohio to be raised so he would have ‘ideal kayaking conditions', report claims
Vance was on a family vacation in south-western Ohio last week and spotted by locals canoeing down the Little Miami River on his birthday on August 2.
The vice president's team requested that Army Corps engineers change the outflow of Caesar Creek Lake, which feeds into the river, to 'support safe navigation' of Vance's security detail, The Guardian reports.
An anonymous source reportedly told the newspaper the request was made not only for safety and security reasons, but to create the 'ideal' conditions on the water so Vance could enjoy a paddle down the river.
The outlet said it could not independently verify the claim.
The vice president's office did not immediately respond to The Independent 's request for comment.
A Secret Service spokesperson told The Independent it coordinated with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and Army Corps of Engineers to ensure that Vance's security detail could 'operate safely with appropriate water levels during a recent visit.'
In early August, aligning with the dates Vance was in the area, there was a sudden increase in the river level and a corresponding drop in Caesar Creek Lake's water surface elevation, according to public data on the U.S. Geological Survey website.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers spokesperson Gene Pawlik told The Guardian that a request was received to 'temporarily increase outflows from Caesar Creek Lake to support safe navigation of U.S. Secret Service personnel.'
The Guardian 's source, who was reported to have knowledge of the matter, said the request for 'special releases' is not generally something that's granted for individuals.
The Secret Service request 'met the operational criteria outlined in the Water Control Manual for Caesar Creek Lake and did not require a deviation from normal procedures,' Pawlik said.
'It was determined that the operations would not adversely affect downstream or upstream water levels. Downstream stakeholders were notified in advance of the slight outflow increase, which occurred August 1, 2025,' the spokesperson added.
While there is no suggestion that the vice president's team did anything illegal, critics said it appeared hypocritical of Vance to receive 'special treatment' for his family vacation in the beauty spot when his administration has overseen drastic job cuts in the National Park Service.
'It's outrageous for the Army corps of engineers to spend taxpayer money to increase water flow in a river so @VP can go canoeing when budget cuts to the National Park Service have severely impacted family vacations for everyone else,' ethics lawyer Richard Painter, who served in George W. Bush's administration, reacted in a post on X.
'While there may well be security-related explanations or justifications that come into the analysis, my reaction is: I don't care,' Norman Eisen, former President Barack Obama's ethics czar, told The Guardian. 'We shouldn't be utilizing government resources in this way. I never would have allowed it.'
'I never would have permitted this kind of a thing because whether it technically violates the rules or not, it creates the appearance that the vice-president of the United States is getting special treatment that's not available to the average person who wants to utilize that body of water for recreational purposes,' Eisen added.
Protesters have frequently crashed Vance's family vacations in the six months he has been in office.
After news that Vance and his family planned a day out at Disneyland in California last month, hundreds turned out to protest at the theme park to condemn the Trump administration's immigration raids across the state.
Vance is soon headed for the U.K. countryside hotspot of the Cotswolds on his next family vacation, where he is expected to rent a quaint rural cottage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
a few seconds ago
- The Sun
White House ‘considering inviting Zelensky to Alaska Summit with Trump & Putin' as Europe pushes for ‘alternative plan'
THE White House is said to be considering inviting Volodymyr Zelensky to attend Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's Alaska summit. Trump and Putin are set to hold crunch talks over ending the war in Ukraine on Friday with sources close to the US President saying they are "very hopeful" that Ukraine's leader will be included. 5 5 5 5 One senior administration official told NBC News that a trilateral meeting remains "absolutely" possible. Another official briefed on White House conversations said: "It's being discussed." It is believed that no official invite has been talked about with Kyiv as of yet. A senior White House official explained: "Right now, the White House is focusing on planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin." Zelensky has already been adamant that he must be involved in any peace talks as they directly impact on the future of his country. Speaking overnight, the brave leader said any pact struck without Kyiv's involvement would be "stillborn decisions against peace" and would fail before they even began. "Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace," he said. "They will not achieve anything." His powerful stance has now been echoed by European leaders. Sir Keir Starmer and the leaders of France, Italy, Poland, Finland and the EU all issued a stark warning saying there can be no peace without Ukraine. A strongly-worded statement read: "We share the conviction that a diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests. "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. "We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. "The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. "We are united as Europeans and determined to jointly promote our interests." European officials have also put forward an alternative proposal to help end the war, according to The Wall Street Journal. It comes after reports suggested Washington and Moscow are eyeing a territorial "swap" agreement to end the war. This would see both side concede to losing out ground to each other - a move which Russia would likely view as a triumph. Zelensky is adamant that he will never allow for any territory to be claimed by Moscow due to the illegal conflict. A potential three-way meeting with Zelensky, Trump and Putin would mark the first time the two war leaders have spoken since the conflict. Zelensky has constantly asked to sit down with Putin in person in the past so he can remind the despot of his atrocities to his face. But Putin has signalled reluctance on meeting Zelensky directly. He recently said: "I have nothing against it in general… But certain conditions must be created for this. "But unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions." The US president also dismissed claims that next week's historic summit hinges on a three-way meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky. Asked if Putin needed to meet Zelensky in order to meet him, Trump clarified: "No, he doesn't." Despite that, the White House is preparing for the possible bilateral or trilateral summit. Press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed: "The White House is working through the details of these potential meetings… details will be provided at the appropriate time." 5
Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
Newsom calls Trump's $1 billion UCLA settlement offer extortion, says California won't bow
WASHINGTON, Aug 9 (Reuters) - California Governor Gavin Newsom said on Saturday that a $1 billion settlement offer by President Donald Trump's administration for UCLA amounted to political extortion to which the state will not bow. The University of California says it is reviewing a $1 billion settlement offer by the Trump administration for UCLA after the government froze hundreds of millions of dollars in funding over pro-Palestinian protests. UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze $584 million in funding. Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. "Donald Trump has weaponized the DOJ (Department of Justice) to kneecap America's #1 public university system — freezing medical & science funding until @UCLA pays his $1 billion ransom," the office of Newsom, a Democrat, said in a post. "California won't bow to Trump's disgusting political extortion," it added. "This isn't about protecting Jewish students - it's a billion-dollar political shakedown from the pay-to-play president." The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests and in doing so violated Jewish and Israeli students' civil rights. The White House had no immediate comment beyond the offer. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's war in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Experts have raised free speech and academic freedom concerns over the Republican president's threats. The University of California says paying such a large settlement would "completely devastate" the institution. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. Rights advocates have noted a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. The government has settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both accepted certain government demands. Settlement talks with Harvard University are ongoing.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce nominated to be deputy U.N. ambassador
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce has been nominated to be the deputy representative to the U.N. 'I am pleased to announce that I am nominating Tammy Bruce, a Great Patriot, Television Personality, and Bestselling Author, as our next Deputy Representative of the United States to the United Nations, with the rank of Ambassador,' President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday. 'Since the beginning of my Second Term, Tammy has been serving with distinction as Spokesperson of the State Department, where she did a fantastic job,' he added. 'Tammy Bruce will represent our Country brilliantly at the United Nations. Congratulations Tammy!' Bruce has become one of the most well-known faces of Trump's State Department in the first six months of his second stint in the White House. She has regularly held press conferences on the administration's foreign policy. This comes as the U.S. doesn't currently have an ambassador to the U.N. Former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, who was ousted following the Signal scandal in which sensitive battle plans were inadvertently shared with a prominent journalist, has been nominated but has yet to be confirmed. He had his confirmation hearing last month, but the Senate hasn't held a vote on his nomination yet. It was first revealed in January that Bruce, a former Fox News contributor and radio host, would join the State Department. Trump has made several picks from the network to join his administration, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a former Fox & Friends co-host. Bruce had long been a Democrat and liberal activist before becoming a conservative and backing Trump, Politico noted. Deputy representative is a role that requires Senate confirmation, meaning that legislators will have the opportunity to scrutinize Bruce, who, if confirmed, would take on the role as the Trump administration's actions have put the U.S. on a collision course with allies. Specifically, her new posting comes as the U.S. is backing Israel even as the global community is increasingly critical of the country amid its war in Gaza.
