logo
How much should the Empire State Child Credit offer families?

How much should the Empire State Child Credit offer families?

Yahoo21-03-2025

ALBANY, N.Y. (NEXSTAR) — New data reaffirms that families continue to struggle financially, with Gov. Kathy Hochul and the New York State Legislature under pressure to address rising child poverty statewide. The Rockefeller Institute of Government and the Citizens' Committee for Children of New York want the state to boost the Empire State Child Credit from current levels.
Hochul outlined a plan in early January to raise the child tax credit from $330 per child to up to $1,000 per child until age 4, and $500 until age 16. Meant to cover 2.75 million children in 1.6 million households, the credit would pay out once a year, offering a refundable benefit even for families who owe nothing in taxes. If included as is in the state budget, it would adjust for income, with the full benefit available for households earning up to $110,000.
More Local News
An analysis from the Rockefeller Institute of Government's Chief Economist, Leigh Wedenoja, broke down the plan, comparing Hochul's expanded credit proposal to the temporary federal expansion that paid monthly checks under the American Rescue Plan. The research showed that child tax credits pull millions out of poverty, helping families save up for emergencies or big purchases.
While the once-a-year payment may not be as helpful with regular expenses like rent or groceries, Wedenoja acknowledged, it would create a forced saving mechanism. That means New Yorkers could use a lump-sum from a tax credit for a down payment on a home or a reliable car.
But Wedenoja also made the case for the credits having more value than just a tax refund. She pointed to research showing the knock-on effects of expanding child tax credits: improved prenatal outcomes, test scores, and employment numbers for single moms who reinvest in local economies.
Wedenoja explained that the Empire State Child Credit follows recommendations from the Child Poverty Reduction Advisory Council, which formed in 2021 under the Child Poverty Reduction Act. But she said the state plan differs from earlier methods by setting a fixed amount per child instead of connecting to federal numbers, bringing New York in line with many other states that set their own credit values as necessary.
The Rockefeller Institute analysis supported expanding the credit, but did not push for more than what Hochul had proposed. But advocates, including the Citizens' Committee for Children of New York (CCC), argue that boosting the credit further—and improving rental assistance, food support, and early care—would do more to meet families' basic needs every day or every month.
A separate report released on March 18 by the CCC—backed by the New York Can End Child Poverty Coalition—advocated for a larger credit of $1,500 per child. Their report, available to read at the bottom of this story, factored in 18 well-being metrics covering economic security, housing, health, education, and youth. It showed gaps in early education and persistent health challenges that impact child development.
The CCC report also determined that about 731,000 kids live below the poverty line in New York, with one in five facing poverty in 20 out of 62 counties. In counties where family incomes average between $46,000 and $75,000, most parents work for low wages while struggling with high costs. A family with two incomes needs about $138,000 a year to cover expenses, but the average family's annual income in New York is about $97,000.
Many financial hardships come from long-standing social problems, according to the CCC report, but it's not an isolated issue. They found that over 20% of renter households in 50 of New York's 62 counties spend at least half their income on rent. Regionally, urban areas with dense populations have bleaker rents and higher poverty rates, while less populated rural areas have fewer job prospects and less access to social services.
New York lawmakers also included new and improved tax credits in their budget proposals. Both the Rockefeller Institute and CCC want lawmakers to consider broader measures and targeted investment to address the rising cost of living and persistent inequality through targeted investments.
More Local News
Advocates, including groups such as the Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy and the Children's Agenda, argued that expanded child tax credits form just a single, vital part of a larger effort to eradicate child poverty. They said that state leaders working on the Fiscal Year 2026 budget should not only increase tax credits to at least $1,500 per child, but also expand public assistance, health services, and affordable housing and education.
'New York's unacceptably high rate of child poverty is the result of policy choices—not personal failures. As this report shows, among the most pressing challenges families face is the cost of meeting basic needs, including access to affordable, quality child care,' said Children's Agenda CEO Larry Marx. 'While our elected representatives in Albany now debate the state budget, one of the most important ways to reduce child poverty statewide and make New York affordable for all families is to supplement families' incomes with expanded tax credits. That tool has been proven effective, and children's needs can't wait for action; they are the definition of now.'
Take a look at the CCC report below:
2025_03_CFWB2025_Report_842f37Download
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

President Trump takes center stage in NYC mayoral race as Dem candidates Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo spar over how to ‘fight' his agenda
President Trump takes center stage in NYC mayoral race as Dem candidates Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo spar over how to ‘fight' his agenda

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

President Trump takes center stage in NYC mayoral race as Dem candidates Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo spar over how to ‘fight' his agenda

Leading Democratic mayoral hopefuls Zohran Mamdani and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo are battling to see who can fend off President Trump's agenda better. Both candidates released plans Tuesday to 'protect' the Big Apple from the feds after Trump sent in the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles to quell anti-immigration enforcement protests this week. Mamdani, the surging Democratic socialist candidate, proposed $224 million in legal defense funding, abortion hubs and more as part of his 'Trump proof' sanctuary city plans. Fighting the Trump administration will require 'fiscal independence' from the feds, he said at a press conference — claiming that his $10 billion tax increase plan will help pave the way. The Queens assemblyman previously said he would pay for his freebie-filled agenda with a flat 2% tax increase on New Yorkers making $1 million or more and by raising the corporate tax rate to match New Jersey's 11.5% – a move that experts said could lead to a mass exodus from the Big Apple. The campaign didn't clarify how much of Mamdani's tax plan was already accounted for, nor how much would be reserved to cover his Trump resistance proposal and any lost federal funding. Cuomo, meanwhile, released his own plan to thwart any future federal crackdowns in New York City. The proposal includes calls for legal monitors to ensure the NYPD complies with sanctuary laws, outfitting potential protests with first aid stations and coordinating with local groups to keep demonstrations peaceful. Cuomo's campaign did not respond to a request for comment about the estimated cost of his proposals. 'It is essential that we learn from the events unfolding in Los Angeles and prepare now, so New York City does not repeat the same mistakes,' the former governor said in a statement. Mamdani, when announcing his own proposals, also took the opportunity to swipe at frontrunner Cuomo, saying that he would bend the knee to Trump on immigration. 'We need someone who's going to fight against Donald Trump. Cuomo would welcome Trump's troops into our city with open arms if it meant another check in his pocket to fund his campaign,' Mamdani said. 'What we are seeing in Los Angeles is something that we have to be clear eyed about. It is authoritarianism. It is an example of what the Trump administration is already doing across this country, and hopes to bring to cities from coast to coast,' he said. Cuomo rep Rich Azzopardi shot back that the ex-gov has a 'documented' past of bucking the Republican president. 'Only one candidate in this race has a documented history of standing up to Trump and preventing him from sending troops to New York and it sure isn't the Silver Spoon socialist performance artist who only passed three bills during his time as a legislator and then stopped showing up to work,' he said.

Michael Goodwin: Dems agree NYC is too expensive — and voters can't afford them being in charge
Michael Goodwin: Dems agree NYC is too expensive — and voters can't afford them being in charge

New York Post

time5 hours ago

  • New York Post

Michael Goodwin: Dems agree NYC is too expensive — and voters can't afford them being in charge

If there is a single point of agreement among all the Democrats running for mayor, it's that New York is too damn expensive. They uniformly call it an 'affordability crisis' and pledge to do something about it if elected. They are largely correct — the cost of living in New York has become absurdly high. Advertisement Although part of the trend grew out of the inflation sparked by massive spending by federal, state and local governments during the COVID era, there is also a long history of Gotham being one of most expensive places in the nation to live. A study shows that, in comparison to the national average, food prices in the five boroughs are about 22% higher, while housing is 278% more expensive. Making ends meet The United Way finds that basic costs for city households have risen twice as fast as the median income and estimates that about half of them need help from the government, friends or family just to make ends meet. Advertisement As Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani recently told The New York Times, 'There are far too many New Yorkers who do not know if they will be able to call themselves that next year, who do not know if they will be able to afford their rent, or their child care, their groceries, or even their MetroCard.' True to his socialist affiliations, Mamdani is promising the longest list of freebies, but his rivals have all joined the spree. Even Andrew Cuomo, often regarded as the most centrist of the bunch and the leader according to polls, is no shrinking violet in the giveaway games. The candidates' promises to address the problem sound very nice — until you realize that nearly everything they are offering would ultimately drive the sky-high cost of living even higher. Advertisement Already that burden is one of the top reasons why New York City and state lead America in losing residents to lower-cost jurisdictions. Congestion pricing is the latest example of how and why the cost of living here keeps rising. If the candidates all want to raise prices even higher, they should support a joint slogan: 'Dear Voters, If you're not broke yet, just wait.' The problem is that government compassion doesn't come cheap. Advertisement In fact, it's outrageously expensive. That's certainly true in the case at hand. The candidates' 'solutions' are just promises to give away more stuff to more people, such as free bus service, free child care, free this and free that. It's all wrapped in the language of compassion for the poor and working class. But what the lefty Dems leave out of the conversation is an honest explanation about where the money would come from to pay for all their added goodies, and what the impact would be of an expanded redistribution scheme to deliver them. Don't be fooled by the lack of details. That's intentional because the numbers would be frightening. Take away to give away But hiding the truth doesn't change the fact that because City Hall can't print money, it will first have to take more from residents and businesses if it is going to give away more. Advertisement Consider the obvious impact on businesses. If they are taxed more, most will make up for it by raising prices on their customers, cut the pay of their workers or reduce the number of workers. When a business goes broke, the city gets no taxes and the workers have no income. Because higher taxes always impose a trickle-down cost on some people, a similar outcome is true if the government raises income taxes on individuals, sales taxes or property taxes. Advertisement Somebody somewhere along the line is going to feel the pinch of every added dollar the city takes to give away to someone it declares more deserving. For those forced to pay more, the 'solution' to the problem means their cost of living is going to get even higher. That's why the candidates' plans need to be seen in light of the current budget. As it stands, City Hall will raise and spend a whopping $112.4 billion this year — nearly as much as the entire state of ­Florida. Advertisement New York state, meanwhile, will raise and spend $255 billion, with much of that money coming to the city. Additional agencies, such as the MTA, have their own budgets, which spend tens of billions more. Clearly the problem isn't a shortage of money to spend. Advertisement The problem is a shortage of responsible spending. Thus raising spending for 'new needs,' as the politicians call their freebies, by hiking taxes and fees at this point is almost certain to create as many problems as it solves. There is still time for the Dems to lay out a plan to actually reduce government costs. The first debate was little more than a bidding game to see who could promise more new giveaways and most ­vehemently denounce Donald Trump while pledging to 'resist' his presidency. The second and final mayoral debate, required by the NYC Campaign ­Finance Board, will take place Thursday, with primary day falling on June 24. It's incumbent on the moderators to demand that Mamdani and all the others explain, with specifics, where they would get added funds and who would pay them. Glib lines like taxing the 'top 1%' mean nothing because those families already pay inordinate amounts of the city's personal ­income tax. According to a city comptroller report, in 2021 the top 1% — about 6,000 families who reported incomes of $1 million or more — paid a whopping 48% of the city's total income tax haul. It's neither fair nor sensible to demand they pay more, when packing up and leaving altogether is proving to be so popular. Leftward lurch Unfortunately, we haven't heard much of a different message from other candidates in the race, including Mayor Adams, who is running as an independent. With GOP candidate Curtis Sliwa widely considered not viable, there is so far no check and balance on the Dems' leftward lurch. The vast majority of their spendthrift City Council candidates and those seeking other offices on the ballot are proving to be automatic supporters of larger and more expensive programs. National conversations about cutting taxes and reducing government waste, fraud and abuse have yet to find meaningful support in New York. That must start to change this week. Libs' stupidity taking a toll There they go again: Another major media outlet is confusing victimhood with the consequences of wrongdoing. The bleeding heart Boston Globe writes, 'Unpaid fees jeopardize thousands of Mass. driver's licenses,' saying, 'Thousands of Massachusetts drivers each year face the possibility of losing their legal authority to drive unless debts unrelated to road safety are paid in full.' Among the debts it cites are tolls the drivers evaded. Here's a crazy idea: The drivers could pay the tolls and keep their licenses. Why is that so hard?

Gov. Hochul's review now pending on Medical Aid in Dying Act
Gov. Hochul's review now pending on Medical Aid in Dying Act

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Gov. Hochul's review now pending on Medical Aid in Dying Act

ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WROC) – The New York State Senate has passed the Medical Aid in Dying Act for the first time since the legislation was introduced in 2016. The bill allows terminally ill adults with incurable diseases and six months or less to live the ability to make the decision to peacefully end their lives through a prescription. If signed by Gov. Kathy Hochul, New York State will join 11 other U.S. states in legalizing the end-of-life option. News 8 heard from those in support of and against the legislation, as it now goes to the governor's desk for signature. Andrea Calloway serves as executive director for the Sunset House, which is Irondequoit's only comfort care home for terminally ill patients. The Sunset House has been offering end-of-life care, supported by donations, for over 35 years. 'Here at the Sunset House, we allow the resident to be in control of decision making, as long as it's safe. I believe, personally, people should have the right to their own decisions of what will work best for them,' said Calloway. New York State Assemblymember Josh Jensen has opposed the bill from the beginning and led the debate on the state Assembly floor before it passed. 'What was really prevalent in the Assembly debate is it's not a partisan issue and not a conservative issue, it's a question of morality. It's a question of life or death. I think that was shown not just through opposition of people like me, but I think 21 Democratic no votes and six Democratic no votes in the Senate last night. Certainly, there was bipartisan opposition, but not bipartisan support,' said Asm. Jensen. From the perspective of hospice care, Calloway adds it's unclear what the future of this option might look like for providers like the Sunset House, should it become law. 'It's a jigsaw puzzle of a thousand pieces. There's a lot of moving parts here. There's family involved, friends involved, a doctor involved, and the individual person involved. [It's a question of,] 'Do you have everything in order before you make this decision to do this?' There's lots of pieces involved,' said Calloway. Assemblymember Harry Bronson also weighed in, saying the bill offers a 'compassionate choice.' 'While I understand and respect the concerns of those who object, I believe the Medical Aid in Dying Act is fundamentally about offering a compassionate choice to qualified patients who wish to die on their own terms. This legislation represents a careful balance between providing end-of-life autonomy and maintaining essential protections to ensure that this profound decision is made voluntarily by those who are truly facing the end of their lives.' As the legislation goes before Gov. Hochul for review, the president of the New York State Bar Association issued the following statement to encourage her approval: 'Medical Aid in Dying offers both dignity and compassion to those experiencing a terminal illness. It ensures that New Yorkers have a full array of end-of-life options and provides them with the autonomy to make their own choices to avoid needless suffering. We commend the legislature for passing this important bill and will continue to offer our support and advocacy in encouraging the governor to sign it into law.' More information about the Sunset House and ways to support their care can be found here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store