logo
Teen killer of 8-year-old Maddy Middleton, now 25, denied parole in Santa Cruz County

Teen killer of 8-year-old Maddy Middleton, now 25, denied parole in Santa Cruz County

CBS News21-02-2025
A convicted child-killer and rapist was denied parole by a jury, according to prosecutors, nearly a decade since his crimes shocked Santa Cruz County and the rest of the country.
The jury found that Adrian Gonzalez -- who kidnapped, raped, and murdered 8-year-old Madyson "Maddy" Middleton in Santa Cruz in July 2015 -- would pose a danger if released, the Santa Cruz County District Attorney's Office said in a statement Thursday.
"The entire community felt the loss of Maddy Middleton in 2015, and the effects of the crime are still felt. Adrian Gonzalez poses as much danger to our community today as he did the day the crime was committed. The verdict of the jury demonstrates that members of this community will not permit him to be released until he no longer poses a danger," Chief Deputy District Attorney Tara George said.
On July 26, 2015, Madyson was lured into another apartment by Gonzalez, who duct-taped her mouth shut and sexually assaulted her. He then stabbed and strangled her to death before he dumped her body in a dumpster.
Gonzalez, who was 15 years and 8 months old at the time of the crime, was charged two days later as an adult and was set for trial in 2017. However, his case became legally complicated as then-California governor Jerry Brown controversially signed Senate Bill 1391 into law in 2018, which specified that under no circumstances could a 14- or 15-year-old be tried as an adult.
Despite opposition from district attorneys, law enforcement agencies and victims' rights groups, a Supreme Court ruling later confirmed the legality of Senate Bill 1391 and prevented Gonzalez from being tried as an adult.
Gonzalez entered the Department of Juvenile Justice on May 25, 2021, and stayed there until its closure on June 19, 2023. After its closure, he was sent to a Secure Youth Treatment facility in Sonoma County where he was incarcerated until he turned 25 in 2024.
In July, a probable cause hearing was conducted to determine whether Gonzalez still poses a danger to the community or he should stay in custody for two more years. The judge approved a jury trial, which started on Nov. 7. The trial, which lasted three and a half months, found that Adrian should not be released from custody.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's border wall gets hot new upgrade and more top headlines
Trump's border wall gets hot new upgrade and more top headlines

Fox News

time17 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump's border wall gets hot new upgrade and more top headlines

1. Trump's border wall gets hot new upgrade 2. Hot mic moment between Trump and Macron 3. Blue state AG warns police they'll 'regret' arresting her in viral video ON ALERT – Hurricane Erin unleashes massive waves, extreme coastal impacts along East Coast. Continue reading … PRIVILEGE REVOKED – Former Obama officials stripped of clearances as Gabbard exposes 'betrayal.' Continue reading … HIGH TENSION – Bryan Kohberger prosecutor breaks silence on key hearing that crushed killer's defense. Continue reading … PREDATOR PATTERN – Blue city rattled as alleged serial attacker preys on women in ritzy neighborhood. Continue reading … WOKE OVERREACH – Parents outraged as school punishes boys over trans locker room confrontation. Continue reading … -- SHORT AND SWEET – The Supreme Court's 'most interesting justice' leaves crowd puzzled after brief remarks. Continue reading … COURT COSTS – Preemptively pardoned Schiff launches legal defense fund under Trump admin. Continue reading … NEXT STEPS – Republicans and Democrats battle over House seats before 2026 midterms. Continue reading … RADICAL SHUTDOWN – 'Far Left agitators' boo Trump's House GOP ally offstage at event. Continue reading … DEI TARGET – White CBS anchor claims she was demoted due to diversity quotas lawsuit. Continue reading … RETURN TO SENDER – 'The View' co-host mocks first lady's peace plea to Putin. Continue reading … CREATURE CONSPIRACY – Red-eyed monster that 'kept pace with car going 100 mph' haunts small town. Continue reading … CALIFORNIA LEAVIN' – Pastor warns families to flee state if Newsom signs 'dangerous' bill. Continue reading … BILLY MCLAUGHLIN – I made memes for the White House. Here's what I learned. Continue reading … DAN GAINOR – Leftist MSNBC changes its name, but it's still the same embarrassment. Continue reading … -- TOXIC IMPORT – Radioactive material discovered in food sold at Walmart. Continue reading … SODA SWAP – Costco's Pepsi-to-Coke switch goes viral as members sound off. Continue reading … AMERICAN CULTURE QUIZ – Test yourself on vintage vehicles and carnival crowds. Take the quiz here … BURIED SPLENDOR – 1,700-year-old Roman bathhouse unearthed by archaeologists after surprise discovery. Continue reading … CALM DOWN – Brain expert reveals best advice for calming mind and body. See video … STEPHEN A. SMITH – Trump has done more than any administration to end world conflicts. See video … JAMES CARVILLE – Democrats need a presidential nominee. See video … Tune in to the FOX NEWS RUNDOWN PODCAST for today's in-depth reporting on the news that impacts you. Check it out ... What's it looking like in your neighborhood? Continue reading… Thank you for making us your first choice in the morning! We'll see you in your inbox first thing Thursday.

Guns or weed? Trump administration says you can't use both.
Guns or weed? Trump administration says you can't use both.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Guns or weed? Trump administration says you can't use both.

WASHINGTON – The Trump administration's aggressive defense of gun rights has at least one exception. The government's lawyers want the Supreme Court to make clear that regular pot smokers – and other drug users − shouldn't be allowed to own firearms. An appeals court has said a federal law making it a crime for drug users to have a gun can't be used against someone based solely on their past drug use. Limiting the law to blocking the use of guns while a person is high effectively guts the statute that reduces gun violence, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court. They're asking the justices to overturn the appeals court's decision. Trump's Justice Department has sided with gun owners in other cases The department's defense of the law is particularly notable as the Trump administration has sided with gun rights advocates in other cases – including one in which they declined to appeal a lower court's ruling against a federal law setting 21 as the minimum age to own a handgun. More: Trump DOJ wants Supreme Court to bring down hammer on gun rules But on the issue of drug use, the government is appealing four cases to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to focus on one involving a dual citizen of the United States and Pakistan who was charged with unlawfully owning a Glock pistol because he regularly smoked marijuana. The FBI had been monitoring Ali Danial Hemani because of his alleged connection to Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, which the government has designated a global terrorist group, according to filings. The government also alleges Hemani used and sold promethazine, an antihistamine used to treat allergies and motion sickness that can boost an opioid high, and used cocaine, although he was prosecuted based on his marijuana use. Hemani's attorneys said the government is trying to 'inflame and disparage' Hemani's character and the only facts that matter are that he was not high when the FBI found the Glock 19 in his Texas home. Hemani was charged with violating the federal law that prohibits the possession of firearms by a person who 'is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance.' More: Supreme Court sides with Biden and upholds regulations of ghost guns to make them traceable Appeals court ruled past drug use not enough to stop gun ownership The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the law can't be applied to Hamani under the Supreme Court's landmark 2022 decision that gun prohibitions must be grounded in history that is "consistent with our tradition of gun regulation." While history and tradition support 'some limits on a presently intoxicated person's right to carry a weapon,' the appeals court said, 'they do not support disarming a sober person based solely on past substance usage.' The Justice Department said the appeals court got it wrong. Laws that existed at the time the country was founded restricted the rights of habitual drinkers, even when they were sober, they argued. 'And for about as long as legislatures have regulated drugs, they have prohibited the possession of arms by drug users and addicts – not just by persons under the influence of drugs,' they wrote. Law used in hundreds of prosecutions, including Hunter Biden's Since the federal government created its background-check system for firearms in 1998, the federal restriction on drug users has stopped more gun sales than any requirement other than the ban on felons and fugitives owning weapons, according to the filing. And it's used in hundreds of prosecutions each year, they said. (Hunter Biden, who was later pardoned by his father during President Joe Biden's final weeks in office, was convicted in 2024 of violating the law by purchasing a gun despite having a known drug addiction.) Hunter Biden trial recap Joe Biden's son guilty on all charges in historic gun case Hemani's lawyers argue that the government's interpretation of the law makes no sense when an estimated 19% of Americans have used marijuana and about 32% own a firearm. That means millions of Americans are violating the law that could put them behind bars for up to 15 years, they said in a filing. The appeals court, Hemani's lawyers said, correctly applied the Supreme Court's past decisions and 'common sense' to rule that 'history and tradition only supports a ban on carrying firearms while intoxicated.' In addition to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, two other appeals courts have issued rulings that restrict use of the federal ban: both courts ruled there should be individualized assessments of defendants' drug use to determine if their rights could be restricted. Trump administration touts program to restore gun rights The Justice Department argues that 'marginal' cases are better addressed on a case-by-case basis, through a federal program the Trump administration restarted that lets individuals petition to have their gun rights restored. The administration's championship of that program makes it less surprising that the Justice Department is vigorously defending the ban on drug users having guns, said Andrew Willinger, executive director of the Duke Center for Firearms Law, a research center. In addition, the administration has shown a broad desire to crack down on illegal drug use. 'In some sense, when those two areas are colliding – gun rights and anti-drug policies – it looks like anti-drug policies are going to win out,' he said. More: Supreme Court rules Mexico can't sue US gunmakers over cartel violence Willinger said there's a relatively strong chance the Supreme Court will get involved, which the justices tend to do when a lower court strikes down or restricts the application of a federal criminal law – especially if the government asks them to intervene. But the high court could also wait to see how other appeals courts handle similar cases and how well the Justice Department's program for restoring gun rights addresses these concerns, he said. The court could announce whether it will take up the issue this fall. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Guns or weed? Federal government says you can't use both. Solve the daily Crossword

Ex-Space Force sergeant Orest Schur sentenced to 54 years in prison for fatally shooting suspected teen car thief
Ex-Space Force sergeant Orest Schur sentenced to 54 years in prison for fatally shooting suspected teen car thief

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Ex-Space Force sergeant Orest Schur sentenced to 54 years in prison for fatally shooting suspected teen car thief

A former US Space Force sergeant who fired multiple rounds at two suspected carjackers outside his home, killing a 14-year-old, has been sentenced to over half a century in jail. Orest Schur, 29, became emotional as he apologized for murdering 14-year-old Xavier Kirk before he was sentenced to 54 years in prison for the 2023 fatal shooting, the Adams and Broomfield Counties District Attorney's Office announced. 'I am sorry for the events that occurred that night, for the pain, for the grief and trauma that have followed and for the impact that my case had on so many lives,' a tearful Schur told an Aurora, Colo. courtroom on Aug. 15. 5 Orest Schur was sentenced to 54 years in prison for fatally shooting 14-year-old Xavier Kirk in 2023. Aurora PD The deadly shooting also left a 13-year-old hospitalized. Schur, a then-Technical Sergeant with the US Space Force based in Aurora, was awoken by a car alarm outside his apartment at around 11 p.m. on July 5, 2023. The then 27-year-old grabbed a pistol and ran outside to his Hyundai Elantra, where he spotted two people dressed in all black attempting to break into the car. Schur confronted the individuals, but the would-be carjackers fled the area in another car. The military sergeant gave chase in his car and fired multiple rounds at the teens. The fleeing car crashed into the backyard fence of a home four blocks south of Schur's residence. 5 Orest Schur speaks to the courtroom during his sentencing hearing in Aurora, Colorado on Aug. 15, 2025. CBS News Colorado Kirk and his teen accomplice hopped out of the damaged car and began running away as Schur continued to fire. Kirk was found suffering from gunshot wounds to the head and back. He was transported to a local hospital and pronounced dead. The 13-year-old, who was driving the getaway car, was shot in the back and managed to get to a relative's house before being brought to a hospital and survived. Schur was arrested after the shooting and charged with first-degree murder and first-degree attempted murder. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters A jury found the discharged Space Force guardian guilty of the lesser crimes of second-degree murder and second-degree attempted murder on June 16. During the trial, Schur claimed the two potential carjackers had shot first and he was acting in self-defense. Investigators found 11 shell casings were fired, all from Schur, and concluded there was no evidence either teen was armed during the robbery. Adams County District Court Judge Caryn Datz argued the trained military sergeant should have known not to take lethal action, CBS News Colorado reported. 5 Tire marks left on the street after the teens crashed during the shooting. CBS News Colorado 5 Damaged to a fence after the car crash on June 5, 2023. CBS News Colorado The former Guardian faced up to 80 years in jail. 'This was vigilante violence at its worst and now a young man is dead,' said Adams and Broomfield Counties District Attorney Brian Mason. 'The defendant took the law into his own hands, chasing down a fleeing vehicle and opening fire on its occupants. A 14-year-old boy will now never grow up because of the defendant's actions.' Kirk's family called out Schur during the hearing, questioning why he shot at the unarmed boys. 'What Mr. Schur did to my son and his friend, to chase them down and execute him, over a car that they didn't even take is ludicrous,' Kirk's father told the courtroom. 5 Investigators found 11 shell casings at the scene, all from Schur, and concluded there was no evidence either teen was armed during the robbery. CBS News Colorado Other relatives deflected from the teens' brazen attempted carjacking to focus on Schur's shooting. 'You know, kids make mistakes, and so, I always teach my kids in my family, like my nephews and nieces, about consequences and repercussions,' another relative, the outlet reported. 'We're not trying to excuse any wrongdoing of Xavier, or wrong they were involved in. The part that's messed up is Orest Shur's car was never stolen.' Prosecutors read a statement written by the wounded teen, who also referred to his actions on the night of the shooting but called out Schur for shooting at them. 'An adult chose to use deadly force against two unarmed teenagers. That is not justice, that is not safety, that is not accountability. I survived, but I am not the same. My friend didn't survive at all. And no matter what we did that night, I didn't deserve to be shot, and Xavier didn't deserve to die,' the boy wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store