Swish Dominates Mobile Payments in Sweden
04/11/2025, Stockholm, Sweden // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire //
Swish, a secure mobile payment platform, continues to dominate payment methods in Sweden, with over 8.5 million users across the country. As Sweden embraces a cashless future, Swish has become the go-to method not only for everyday transactions but also for specialized sectors, offering speed, safety, and convenience unmatched by other platforms.
Developed in partnership with major Swedish banks and using BankID for verification, Swish has built a reputation for ultra-secure, instant transactions. Unlike many payment services, it doesn't charge transaction fees, making it an ideal solution for both casual users and online gaming players alike.
Swish has carved out a major niche in the online gaming world. Top Swedish-licensed casinos such as LeoVegas, Betsson, Videoslots, Betsafe, and Momang Casino all accept Swish for fast deposits and withdrawals. For players, this means they can fund their accounts and cash out winnings within seconds—all with just a few taps on their smartphone.
Security is another major draw. Transactions through Swish are protected by BankID, Sweden's national electronic identification system. It ensures every payment is verified and traceable, drastically reducing fraud and misuse.
Swish's exclusivity to casinos holding a Swedish gaming license adds a layer of consumer protection. The operators must meet strict regulatory standards to ensure player safety and responsible gaming tools are always in place. While this limits players to Swedish-licensed casinos only, it also guarantees a level of oversight not always present with international operators.
One advantage of Swish is its accommodation of micro-withdrawals. For example, Momang Casino allows minimum withdrawals as low as 1 SEK, perfect for casual or low-stakes players who want to maintain control over their spending.
While Americans rely on apps like Venmo, Zelle, Cash App, and Apple Pay, these platforms often fall short in areas where Swish excels. US payment apps typically aren't integrated with online gaming platforms because of tighter federal regulations, and peer-to-peer transfers often lack the real-time speed and zero-fee structure that Swish offers.
Swish's direct connection to bank accounts, real-time processing, and nationwide adoption through BankID make it a standout in mobile payments. In contrast, US systems are often fragmented, with differing support across banks and apps and limited functionality in regulated sectors.
From paying a friend back for lunch to withdrawing game winnings in under a minute, Swish has changed how Swedes handle money. Its rise reflects a broader shift toward secure mobile payments in everyday life.
For players navigating Sweden's online gaming scene, Foreningenstorasyster is a good resource. It offers detailed information about safe and licensed operators and helps users choose trusted sites. The platform promotes responsible gaming by featuring only casinos that meet Swedish regulations.
https://foreningenstorasyster.se/.
Foreningenstorasyster offers reliable information on Swedish online gaming, including trusted payment methods like Swish. The platform promotes responsible gaming and only features operators that follow Swedish regulations.
Media Contact
Foreningenstorasyster
Kungsholmsgatan 17B 112 27 Stockholm
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump Is Losing His Trade War
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Donald Trump's trade war is fast turning into a fiasco. When the president started the war, Team Trump advertised it as certain to be fast, easy, and cheap. Trump would impose tariffs. The world would yield to his will. The tariffs would do everything at once. They would protect U.S. industry from foreign competition without raising prices, and generate vast revenues that would finance other tax cuts. Americans could eat their cake, continue to have the cake, and trade the same cake for pie—all at the same time. 'There's not going to be any pain for American workers,' Trump's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, vowed in April. The advertising rapidly proved false. The U.S. economy is slowing because of the Trump tariffs; China's is thriving in spite of them. Team Trump falsely promotes vague five-page outlines with alienated former allies as big deals; China is successfully wooing some of its former rivals, such as Vietnam. America's standing in the world is measurably sinking; China's is measurably rising. Courts are ruling that Trump's tariffs are illegal; public opinion mistrusts the tariffs, regarding them as expensive and unproductive. The promise of huge flows of painless money from tariff revenues is evanescing as the fantasy it always was. Oh, and the country's largest chain of Halloween retailers canceled its traditional summer grand opening because of Trump-caused supply disruptions. What comes next, as things go wrong? Trump's first instinct is to blame the targets of his economic aggression for not cooperating with his wishes. On May 30, Trump accused China of violating an imaginary agreement with him. On June 4, he complained that Xi Jinping was 'extremely hard to make a deal with.' But Trump seldom chooses to quarrel with foreign dictators, saying in the same breath, 'I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will.' Today, in all-caps emphasis, Trump announced that a deal had been done, declaring that his 'RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT' with the Chinese president-for-life. The lack of details in the announcement strongly suggests that Trump yielded more and gained less than his publicity apparatus wants Americans to believe. That's because, in reality, Trump's global trade war has always been subordinate to his domestic culture war. Trump much prefers to vent his rage against enemies within. Get ready for him to blame the failure of his trade war on fellow Americans who did not support him enough. The Trump tariffs will be ballyhooed as an act of patriotism, a necessary sacrifice to be laid on the altar of the nation. One of Trump's television talkers reminded viewers that Americans melted down their pots and pans to win the Second World War. If the president needs to ration dolls and colored pencils, how dare any true American raise a contrary voice? The coming call for national solidarity with Trump's Great Patriotic War against imported Halloween costumes deserves all the scoffing it will get and more. Trump ordered the nation into economic warfare. He did not do any of the things necessary to create any hope of success in that war. The impending defeat is his personal doing, entirely his own fault. [Jonathan Chait: The good news about Trump's tariffs] Recall the classic Norm Macdonald bit in which the comedian marvels that in the 20th century, Germany decided to go to war with 'the world,' twice. That was meant as a joke. Trump adopted it as his actual strategy. Trump's rationalizers invoke anxiety about China as his justification. Yes, China numbered among the targets of Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs. But so did Australia. So did Brazil. So did Canada. So did Denmark. So did Egypt. And on and on, through the whole alphabet of American allies and trading partners. The United States is by far the planet's strongest national economy, producing slightly more than one-quarter of the planet's goods and services. Including its historic and recent partners, the United States could potentially lead a group of nations sufficiently influential to write economic rules that everybody would need to take into account. That fact underpinned the Trans-Pacific Partnership concept of the Obama years: Form a large-enough and attractive-enough club, and China will have no choice but to comply with the founding members' terms. Trump's alternative concept is for a quarter of the world economy to cut itself off from the other three-quarters, and then wait for the three-quarters to beg for mercy from the one-quarter. Unsurprisingly, that concept is fast proving a stinker. But suppose the president sincerely believed that the U.S. had no choice: The one-quarter must fight the three-quarters as a matter of national survival, or 'liberation,' from the tyranny of foreign goods and services, foreign fruits and vegetables. Crazy, but suppose he did. What would follow? A rational president would grasp that a U.S. economic war against the rest of the world would be a big, protracted, and painful undertaking. Such an enormous commitment would require democratic consent from a large majority of the public, all the more so because the United States is starting the war itself. Trump's trade conflict is very much a war of choice. The president must explain why he chose it. A rational president determined to fight an economic war would try to mobilize broad support from the public and from Congress. He would seek allies in Congress, and not only from his own party. He might, for example, compromise on some of his other goals. If he also wanted to tighten immigration at the same time as waging a global trade war, or to roll back DEI programs, or to cut taxes for the wealthy, or to relax anti-corruption measures, or to pardon the crimes of his violent supporters, or to plan any other ambitious but divisive project, he might think twice about pursuing them. You can't ask your opponents to pay more and do without if you won't forgo even a scrap of your partisan agenda. You can ask anyway, but don't be shocked when they answer with a Bronx cheer. That president would also lead from the front. A president seeking to inspire Americans to endure hardship for the greater good would certainly not throw himself a multimillion-dollar birthday parade at public expense. He would not accept lavish gifts from foreign governments, would not operate a pay-for-access business that collected billions of dollars for himself and his family from undisclosed favor-seekers. While asking other Americans to accept less, he would not brazenly help himself to more. He certainly would not troll, insult, and demean those who may not have voted for him, but whose cooperation he needs now. This president has, of course, done the most egregious version of every item above. His economic war is adjunct to his partisan culture war. He did not seek broad support. He gleefully offends and alienates everyone outside his base. Which works for him as long as times are prosperous, as they were in the first three years of his first administration. Allow things to get tough, though, and it's a different story. Trump cannot ask for patience and trust, because at least half the country has unalterably judged him as untrustworthy and out only for himself. [David Frum: The ultimate bait and switch of Trump's tariffs] Trump bet his presidency on the theory that trade wars are 'good and easy to win,' as he posted during his first term. His second-term trade war, however, is proving not so easy, and not so good, either. He is fighting it alone, without global allies or domestic consent, because that's his nature. It's now also his problem. In the 1983 movie WarGames, a computer thinks its way through dozens of terrifying nuclear scenarios and concludes: 'The only winning move is not to play.' In other words, the only safe way to conduct a nuclear exchange is never to have one. The same could be said of trade wars, at least when fought by one nation, however big and rich, against all the others, all at once. Trump decided he did not care about Americans' support for his economic war. He did not ask for their backing. He did not make any effort to win it. He willfully alienated at least half of the public. Now that he's losing, his supporters want to scold the country because it rejects the whole misbegotten project as stupid and doomed. Don't listen to their reproaches. This is Trump's war, and his alone. The only way to win now is to end Trump's trade war as rapidly as possible. And then end the excessive, unilateral trade powers of a corrupt president who blundered into a pointless and doomed conflict without justification, plan, or consent. Article originally published at The Atlantic
New York Post
42 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump voters get smacked by inflation in shopping aisles — and some blame tariffs
Shoppers vote with their wallets – and even those who supported President Trump are having a tough time swallowing prices that are surging because of his trade war, The Post has learned. Omar — a Los Angeles-based long-haul truck driver who spoke to The Post on the condition his last name not be given — said he convinced his wife, grown children and father-in-law to vote for Trump last fall. His pitch: Trump was 'a businessman and everything was going to better because he was going to be good for the economy,' he told The Post in an interview. Since then, however, parts and services for his rig have gone through the roof. An oil change now costs $480 compared with the $360 he paid a year ago. He recently forked out $600 each for Firestone tires. Last year, they were $390 each. 'He's doing things that are making the economy worse,' Omar said. 'Tariffs are hurting everyone.' 8 Retailers have signaled that they will raise prices while some have already done so on some items. Reddit/Plus_Astronaut_420 On Wednesday, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics said inflation in May rose 2.4%. That was in line with the expectations of economists, who said the effects of Trump's tariffs still haven't had a broad and significant impact on prices. Some shoppers aren't buying it, as many of the the 40% of Americans who are living paycheck to paycheck see their purchasing power as vanishing. Retailers including Walmart, Dollar General, Target, Costco and Best Buy have warned they will be raising prices due to tariffs – and some have been caught doing it already. At Walmart, a 'Jurassic World' T. Rex figure had spiked by nearly 38% to $55 on May 21 from just a month ago. A heating pad costs 25% more $24.96 this year, according to employees who posted photos of the price hikes on social media. A fishing reel at Walmart jumped to $83.26 from $57.37. 8 A fishing reel at Walmart jumped in price this year, according to Walmart employees. Reddit/Majestickenny12 Joe — a regular Walmart shopper who also asked that his last name not be used — told The Post last week he was eyeing new air conditioners at the store in Cortlandt Manor, NY. Last year, he said, a small unit that cools off a 300-square-foot room cost $115 — up from $100 a year earlier. Now, that same unit costs $139. A resident of nearby Peekskill, NY, he adds that he's cooking at home more and cutting back on visits to McDonald's, Panera Bread and his favorite local diner — where a steak now costs $30 versus $22 last year — to about three times a month versus eight times a month last year. 'I don't like the fact that I'm paying more for the same thing that used to cost me less,' he told The Post. 8 Peekskill resident, Joe, says a small air conditioner at Walmart cost $115 last year– and this year it's $139. Google Maps Last week, Campbell's CEO Mick Beekhuizen said during an earnings call with analysts that the company is seeing 'the highest levels of meals prepared at home since early 2020.' Campbell's is selling more canned soup, Italian sauces and meals, Beekhuizen said as consumers choose 'ingredients that help stretch tighter food budgets.' As of April, prices on groceries and key household goods had risen by 56% during the past six years, according to a Gordon Haskett pricing study looking at 20 common items at a Texas Walmart store. Shoppers at that location paid $99.40 in April for the same 20 items that cost them $63.52 in April 2019, including a 111% increase for a two-liter bottle of Pepsi to $2.64, a 41% increase to $8.44 for 12 rolls of Angel Soft toilet paper and a 56% increase to $3.48 for a 20-ounce Heinz ketchup bottle. The pain has only increased in recent weeks, according to grocery store owners. 8 President Trump shows off a chart of tariffs on 'Liberation Day.' AFP via Getty Images 8 Walmart workers are sharing pictures of price hikes at stores around the country. Reddit/Nvalee A 10.8 oz box of Honey Nut Cheerios and a 9.6 oz box of Kellogg's Corn Flakes each went up by 50 cents since March to $5.99 at three Key Food stores in the New York metro area and Massachusetts, according to an owner, Anthony Pena. A 59 oz bottle of Tropicana orange juice meanwhile went up by 10% to $5.59 over the same period and bananas have risen by as much as 5 cents to 15 cents per pound in New York City. 'Our distributors don't tell us why the prices went up,' Pena added. 'They just post the new prices.' Milton and Nettie Hargrove, a retired couple living in Peekskill, NY, were out last week at a nearby Five Below buying candy – one of the few treats they allow themselves these days. They live on Social Security and have to budget carefully or they will wind up borrowing from friends and family to pay for food and gas, they told The Post. Meanwhile, southern states including Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, Georgia, Texas, and North Carolina are 'experiencing some of the greatest consumer credit stress,' said Moody's economist Justin Begley. The 30-plus day delinquency rates on credit cards, auto and student loans in those states have all risen the most this year, according to Moody's data. 8 A 59-ounce Tropicana orange juice costs 10% more since March at several Key Food grocery stores. Tropicana 'A lot of people have been relying on debt to make ends meet,' said Richard Barrington, a financial analyst for Credit Sesame. Credit-card debt has grown at a faster rate than any other type of debt over the past 5 years. 'It's not like prices reset to where they were before,' Barrington added. 'They are still higher than they were and they are eating up a higher portion of people's budget.' While inflation has tracked lower than many economists expected, it could ratchet up to 4% later this year depending on what happens with tariffs, according to Moody's chief economist, Mark Zandi. 8 Honey Nut Cheerios is 50 cents more expensive since March at some Key Food stores. General Mills 8 Kellogg's Corn Flakes is 50 cents more expensive since March. Kellogg's Thanks to a 25% tariff on automobiles, new car buyers paid 2.5% more for their vehicles in April compared to March – or $48,699, according to Kelley Blue Book, which notes that a monthly increase that steep is 'rare.' Used cars ticked up by $367 to $25,547 over the same period. Older vehicles priced less than $15,000 are in 'short supply' as shoppers rushed to scoop up deals before tariffs kicked in, according to the Blue Book. 'We are at the precipice of a storm and you want to say 'look up, look at what's coming and protect yourself,' Jeff Mandel, founder of IDIQ, which offers financial services and advice to consumers in financial distress.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Democrat on Bessent's tariff deadline remarks: ‘Does it smell like TACOs'?
Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) knocked President Trump on Wednesday after his Treasury secretary suggested that the 90-day pause on 'reciprocal' tariffs could be extended even further for countries willing to negotiate with the U.S. 'Does it smell like TACOs in here to anyone else?' Beyer posted on X, using an acronym for 'Trump Always Chickens Out' — a pejorative phrase used by critics to describe Trump's trade policy. The post came in response to a clip of Beyer's line of questioning with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who appeared Wednesday before the House Ways and Means Committee. Beyer asked Bessent if Americans should prepare for the sweeping tariffs to kick in next month, if the president's pledge to strike '90 deals in 90 days' doesn't come to fruition by the deadline. 'I would say, as I have repeatedly said, that there are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those, and it is highly likely that those countries that are negotiating — or trading blocs, as in the case of the EU — who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the day forward to continue good-faith negotiations,' Bessent said in his testimony. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not.' Trump has repeatedly threatened tariffs in recent months, only to pull back days later. He initially threatened tariffs on Mexico and Canada in early February but ultimately delayed imposing them. Trump imposed sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of nations on April 2, but one week later announced there would be a 90-day reprieve where the tariffs were lowered to 10 percent. More recently, he said last week he would impose a 50 percent tariff on the European Union starting in June. But days later, he announced he would delay those tariffs until July 9 while the two sides held talks.
