
Abu Bakar Jais appointed as new court of appeal president
Abu Bakar, 63, brings with him over three decades of experience in legal and judicial service.
He began his judicial career as a Judicial Commissioner at the Kuala Lumpur High Court on July 8, 2013. He was then appointed as a High Court Judge on March 21, 2016, and served in both the Kuala Lumpur and Seremban High Courts until 2019.
On Dec 5, 2019, he was elevated to the Court of Appeal, and later to the Federal Court on June 13, 2023.
Born in Muar, Johor, Abu Bakar graduated with a Bachelor of Laws (Hons) from Universiti Malaya (1982-1986) and later obtained a Certificate in Government Legal Advisers Course from the University of London in 1996.
His career spans various roles in the legal and judicial sectors, including stints as a law tutor at the International Islamic University Malaysia (1986-1987), Deputy Public Prosecutor at the Attorney General's Chambers and the Anti-Corruption Agency (1987-1990), Magistrate in Ipoh (1990), and Assistant Director at the Legal Aid Bureau (1991).
Abu Bakar also served as Federal Counsel in the Civil Division of the Attorney General's Chambers (1992-1995) and as Senior Federal Counsel until 2000.
In private practice, he was a litigation partner at Zaid Ibrahim & Co. (2001-2003) and later at Hisham, Sobri & Kadir (2004-2013).
Abu Bakar was part of the Federal Court panel in 2023 that ruled on former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's application for a review of his conviction and 12-year prison sentence over the misappropriation of RM42mil from SRC International Sdn Bhd.
He also sat on the panel that decided the appeal involving SIS Forum (Malaysia). - Bernama

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
10 minutes ago
- The Star
Family vindicated by court's fresh investigation order
KUALA LUMPUR: The family of Dutch model Ivana Smit has welcomed the High Court's order to reopen the investigation into her death, nearly eight years after the tragic incident. In a statement released through the family's lawyer, Datuk Sankara Nair, Smit's uncle Fred Agenjo Weinhold said the family was 'very content' with the judge's decision that held four defendants liable over the negligence linked to the investigation. 'The money awarded is of no consequence. What is far more important is that we have received acknowledgement from Malaysia that we were not crazy for saying this for almost eight years. 'We won't get Ivana back, but at least we have the satisfaction of knowing that a new investigation has been ordered and the monsters responsible cannot rest easy,' he said. Sankara commended the court for issuing exemplary and unprecedented mandamus orders, including the removal of Asst Supt Faizal Abdullah from the investigation, the formal reopening of the case, and a requirement for quarterly progress reports to be submitted to the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), with the AGC mandated to take appropriate prosecutorial steps. 'These structural and supervisory remedies demonstrate the court's clear intent to ensure accountability is no longer delayed or denied,' said Sankara. He also urged the AGC to consider the public interest, the suffering endured by the family and the integrity of the court's decision before deciding whether to appeal the judgment. Yesterday, Justice Roz Mawar Rozain awarded RM1.1mil in general, aggravated and exemplary damages to Smit's mother Christina Carolina Gerarda Johanna Verstappen in her civil suit against the defendants for negligence in handling the investigation into her daughter's death.


Borneo Post
31 minutes ago
- Borneo Post
Minister sees appointment of first woman chief judge of Sabah, Sarawak as ‘legacy'
KUCHING (July 30): The appointment of Sarawak-born Datuk Azizah Nawawi as the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak is creating a legacy and also a benchmark of excellence for others to follow. This was highlighted by the Minister of Women, Childhood and Community Wellbeing Development Sarawak Dato Sri Fatimah Abdullah in her congratulatory message yesterday. 'On behalf of the state government and the women of Sarawak, I would like to congratulate the new Chief Justice of High Court of Sabah and Sarawak, the first woman to hold the position. 'She makes us proud, and with such achievement, she is creating a legacy, a benchmark of excellence for others to follow,' said Fatimah, also Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) Women chief. Azizah, born in Sibu on Jan 9, 1962. She graduated with a degree in law from the University of Otago, New Zealand. The 63-year-old Azizah took over the post from fellow Sibu native, Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli, who retired on July 24. On Monday, His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, presented the instrument of appointment to Azizah during the ceremony held at Istana Negara, Kuala Lumpur. Also appointed was Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh, 62, as the Chief Justice of Malaysia. Both Wan Ahmad Farid and Azizah were former Court of Appeal judges prior to their respective promotions. His Majesty also presented instruments of appointment to Datuk Abu Bakar Jais as the President of the Court of Appeal, followed by the appointment of eight Court of Appeal Judges and 14 High Court Judges. Wan Ahmad Farid has been appointed as the 17th Chief Justice of Malaysia, succeeding Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who retired on July 2. Abu Bakar, 63, meanwhile, is filling the vacancy of President of the Court of Appeal following the retirement of Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim on July 3.


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Dead model's mum gets RM1.1mil
KUALA LUMPUR: The mother of Dutch model Ivana Smit (pic) has been awarded RM1.1mil in damages by the High Court over the mishandling of the investigation into her daughter's death, while the police have been ordered to recommence their probe into the case. In her findings, Justice Roz Mawar Rozain said there were breaches of statutory duty by the defendants, holding them liable to varying degrees of responsibility for the failures in the investigation. 'This case represents a profound failure of Malaysia's law enforcement system,' she said in her judgment yesterday. The court noted multiple lapses, including premature classification, crime scene management errors, failure to preserve evidence, inadequate handling of witnesses and suspects, neglect of foreign evidence and the dismissal of expert testimony. 'These are simple and clear elements that support my finding of breaches in the duty of care,' she added. Smit, 18, was found dead on the sixth floor of CapSquare Residence on Dec 7, 2017, after falling from the 20th floor of a condominium unit owned by an American couple, Alex Johnson and Luna Almazkyzy. On Nov 20, 2020, Smit's mother, Christina Carolina Gerarda Johanna Verstappen, filed a civil suit against the Inspector-General of Police, Dang Wangi investigating officer Asst Supt Faizal Abdullah, the Home Minister and the government, alleging negligence in handling the investigation. Justice Roz Mawar found that ASP Faizal had committed multiple breaches of duty during the investigation. The court was presented with evidence that Johnson's DNA was found under Smit's fingernails in a DNA report dated Feb 8, 2018. Despite this, both Johnson and Almazkyzy were allowed to leave Malaysia on March 29, 2018. Justice Roz Mawar said ASP Faizal had arbitrarily classified the case as a suicide on the very day the investigation began as a suspected homicide. Despite a 2019 High Court order to reopen the case, ASP Faizal was retained as the investigating officer in the special task force that was formed. 'The same compromised officer was retained. Ineffective measures were taken. 'Though the case continued, the defendants failed to present any evidence supporting their continued investigative methods,' she said, noting that the case had made no significant progress since 2019. This, she said, constituted non-compliance with the High Court order issued in November 2019. 'The 2019 High Court order was clear and unambiguous. It directed that the case be reclassified as a death caused by a person or persons unknown and compelled the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC) to instruct the police to reopen the investigation as a murder case,' she said. Justice Roz Mawar described Verstappen as a 'direct victim' who had endured prolonged emotional and psychological trauma due to the defendants' negligence. The court awarded the plaintiff RM500,000 in general damages for emotional distress, mental anguish and loss of closure; RM300,000 in aggravated damages for the defendants' high-handed and oppressive conduct; and RM300,000 in exemplary damages to punish gross misconduct in public office and deter future breaches. Interest on the judgment sum was set at 5% per annum from the date of the judgment until full settlement, with the court also ordering the defendants to pay RM100,000 in costs to the plaintiff. A mandamus order was issued as well, requiring the police to reopen the investigation into Smit's death. The judge also instructed the IGP, named as the first defendant, to remove ASP Faizal from the current task force. 'The police are directed to brief the AGC every three months from the date of this judgment on the progress of the investigation. 'The AGC is to evaluate the sufficiency of evidence and determine the next steps,' she added. Justice Roz Mawar said while the case highlighted significant investigative failures, her findings should not be viewed as a criticism of the police force. She said the evidence pointed to multiple departures from accepted investigative standards, which resulted in a denial of justice to the plaintiff. The findings, she said, should be treated as identification of areas needing correction. In November 2019, the High Court overturned a coroner's ruling that classified Smit's death as a 'misadventure'. Justice Collin Lawrence Sequerah (now a Court of Appeal judge) had allowed the family's application to review the ruling in March that year. In his findings, Justice Sequerah concluded that Smit's death was caused by 'persons known or unknown' and said there had been insufficient investigation into the possibility of homicide.