logo
DHS places new limits on lawmakers visiting ICE facilities

DHS places new limits on lawmakers visiting ICE facilities

The Hill4 hours ago

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is placing new limitations on lawmakers seeking to visit detention facilities, putting out new guidelines in the wake of visits from Democrats that have turned confrontational.
Members of Congress have the legal right to make unannounced visits to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities.
But new guidance posted by ICE seeks to rein in that power, asking lawmakers to give 72 hours notice before any visits, while requiring their staff to give 24 hours notice.
Though lawmakers retain the ability to make unannounced visits to ICE detention facilities, the new policy blocks them from visiting field offices, where most agency action takes place.
'Kristi Noem's new policy to block congressional oversight of ICE facilities is not only unprecedented, it is an affront to the Constitution and Federal law. Noem is now not only attempting to restrict when Members can visit, but completely blocking access to ICE Field Offices – even if Members schedule visits in advance. No matter how much she and [President] Trump want to force us to live under their authoritarian rule, ICE is not above oversight and the Department must follow the law,' Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), said in a statement.
'This unlawful policy is a smokescreen to deny Member visits to ICE offices across the country, which are holding migrants – and sometimes even U.S. citizens – for days at a time. They are therefore detention facilities and are subject to oversight and inspection at any time. DHS pretending otherwise is simply their latest lie.'
Recent Democratic visits have resulted in clashes with DHS personnel.
A scuffle erupted when a trio of New Jersey Democrats attempted to visit Delaney Hall alongside Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D), with DHS agents later arresting him for trespassing.
The charges against Baraka were swiftly dropped, but prosecutors later brought charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.), accusing her of assaulting law enforcement with her forearms during the scum. If convicted, she faces 17 years in prison.
Though not at an ICE facility, Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was handcuffed after he interrupted a press conference with DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.
DHS did not immediately respond to request for comment.
The new guidance contains other details that would limit congressional visits at ICE facilities.
It says 'group size or visit itinerary may be modified to reduce operational impacts' while smaller facilities may also limit the tour group size.
It also seeks to place restrictions on lawmaker interaction with detainees, saying they must list who they wish to speak with or give 48 hours notice so that ICE personnel can post a sign up sheet for those wishing to speak with lawmakers.
'ICE will not facilitate meetings with detainees in detention facilities without valid, signed privacy releases. If Members and/or Congressional staff would like to meet with a specific detainee or set of detainees, please provide names, alien registration numbers, and valid, signed privacy releases with your request,' it states.
It also bars any photography and videography within ICE facilities.
Though the guidance suggests privacy is a top concern, the Trump administration has routinely showed photos of migrants they've arrested as well as those boarding deportation flights, though some images have been shot from behind.
Noem also came under fire for filming a video in a Salvadoran prison where the Trump administration sent some migrants, showcasing the backdrop as a warning to migrants.
Thompson contended the new measures were designed at concealing the impacts of Trump's policies as well as the conditions in detention.
'There is no valid or legal reason for denying Member access to ICE facilities and DHS's ever-changing justifications prove this,' he said.
'To be clear, there is no agency or department that is 'too busy' for oversight. If ICE has nothing to hide, DHS must make its facilities available.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Support for regulating psychoactive hemp gains momentum in NC
Support for regulating psychoactive hemp gains momentum in NC

Axios

time28 minutes ago

  • Axios

Support for regulating psychoactive hemp gains momentum in NC

Bipartisan support for restricting hemp in North Carolina is gaining steam, with GOP lawmakers unveiling yet another proposal Tuesday that would regulate intoxicating weed-like products in the state. Why it matters: The new legislation, backed by the state's most powerful Republican, is one of several bills proposed in recent months that would crack down on psychoactive hemp products in North Carolina. Though marijuana remains illegal in any form, the state is among the most lenient in the country in its regulation of hemp-derived consumables, but a bipartisan movement to change that has been building. What they're saying: "Stores selling these hemp products are popping up in towns across North Carolina, and children are getting ahold of these products," Senate Leader Phil Berger said in a press release about the bill Monday night. "Without these regulations, the availability of these dangerous products is only going to get worse." Driving the news: On Tuesday morning, Republican lawmakers in North Carolina's state Senate rolled out the most restrictive yet viable proposal yet to regulate hemp while moving to ban products made with any hemp-derived cannabinoids other than delta-9, the psychoactive component of marijuana. The bill would also set age and dosage limits and licensing and testing standards for sellers and manufacturers. Yes, but: It would not legalize marijuana, however — a proposal that has been floated in previous sessions but has yet to surface this year. Flashback: "It's really ironic that in some ways, the most liberal, pro-marijuana adult-use state in the country is North Carolina," Democratic Gov. Josh Stein told WRAL in an exclusive interview earlier this month, in which he also announced he was launching a task force to explore regulations on THC products and marijuana legalization "It's not Colorado, it's not Massachusetts, it's not these states that legalized it and then created a regulatory structure to sell it. It's North Carolina, where we have no rules whatsoever." State of play: As of now, the state has no limits — or age restrictions — on any cannabinoids with psychoactive effects much like those of THC, including delta-9. The new bill unveiled Tuesday, however, would outright ban "synthetic" high-inducing hemp products that can be found on shelves just a few blocks from the state legislature, including delta-8, THC-A, delta-7 and delta-10. The bill also appears to ban CBD, another hemp-derived cannabinoid. The cannabis plant has more than 100 cannabinoids. Some of them produce a weed-like high, while others, like CBD, are not. The other side: House Rules Chairman Rep. John Bell, who is the president of CBD and hemp manufacturer Asterra Labs, is "disappointed in the bill," he told Axios in a text message Tuesday. "This bill will destroy the hemp industry and move it out of state. Not one stakeholder was involved." He had not expressed the same opposition to another bill proposed earlier this session that would regulate his industry, though he told Axios at the time that the legislation wouldn't necessarily be a slam dunk for his company because it would implement new licensing fees and require changes to how it packages its products, for example. Democrats and Republicans alike expressed support for the new legislation, however, when it was unveiled in a committee hearing Tuesday morning. North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson also attended the committee meeting. "This is long overdue," Jackson, a Democrat, told lawmakers. "One of the major themes in terms of feedback that I've gotten from law enforcement and from families over the last six months has been about this issue — and usually happens when a family learns that it is truly the Wild West, at least with respect to what children are allowed to buy in these places."

House Speaker Johnson tours ICE facility, says Chicago mayor is 'on the wrong side of the law'
House Speaker Johnson tours ICE facility, says Chicago mayor is 'on the wrong side of the law'

Fox News

time34 minutes ago

  • Fox News

House Speaker Johnson tours ICE facility, says Chicago mayor is 'on the wrong side of the law'

House Speaker Mike Johnson called out Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson for opposing federal immigration enforcement, saying he was "on the wrong side of the law." "I tell you what, they have a very difficult job in this deep blue territory with a mayor on the wrong side of the law," the Speaker said Wednesday on Fox News' "America's Newsroom" with Bill Hemmer and guest co-host Gillian Turner. "They are doing everything they can, a patriotic duty," Speaker Johnson said, referring to his visit to a Chicago Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility. "They are understaffed, overwhelmed with the workload trying to go after the dangerous criminal illegal aliens in the country, harming American citizens. The mayor of Chicago thinks it's an ill-conceived mission, that's madness." Both Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and Mayor Johnson have spoken out against Trump's immigration enforcement efforts. "We do know ICE is coming once again in force to cities across the country, so we expect to see them in Chicago," Pritzker said Thursday. "I don't know exactly how big the force will be, but I do know he has used other law enforcement along with ICE to carry out his ill-conceived mission to go after people who frankly are paying taxes, and they're law-abiding, and they've been here for many, many years." Mayor Johnson said Monday that Trump should not deploy federal troops to enforce federal immigration priorities. "We will continue to resist," he said. "Whether it's in the courts, in the streets, or through public policy, we're going to stand up for working people." The City of Chicago has allowed in over 51,000 illegal immigrants from the southern border since August 31, 2022. Speaker Johnson addressed Trump's "big, beautiful bill" — a measure to extend the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and provide new funding for the border and defense — which passed the House on May 22 and is now in the Senate. "We're working on the one big beautiful bill to allow them the resources that are desperately needed," he said. "I mean, they are doing the job. The border is secured. We are locked down. We're not allowing illegals into the country anymore. But the enforcement and removal of the dangerous people who got here is an essential task for our ICE agents and officers to take care of. They need more personnel, they need more facilities. We're here to see it," the Speaker added. He also said that the legislation will give annual $10,000 bonuses over the next four years to ICE and Border Patrol agents "for the people on the front lines," echoing a statement from the White House.

LGBTQ advocacy, legal groups condemn court decision on gender affirming care ban: ‘Catastrophic failure for our nation's youth'
LGBTQ advocacy, legal groups condemn court decision on gender affirming care ban: ‘Catastrophic failure for our nation's youth'

Chicago Tribune

time35 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

LGBTQ advocacy, legal groups condemn court decision on gender affirming care ban: ‘Catastrophic failure for our nation's youth'

Chicago area Trans and LGBTQ+ community groups responded with disappointment and anger Wednesday to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care. Representatives from Trans Up Front Illinois, Brave Space Alliance, Equality Illinois and Arcus Behavioral Health — groups that provide resources to trans and non-binary people — condemned the decision during a Wednesday afternoon news conference. 'Today's Supreme Court ruling is a catastrophic failure for our nation's youth,' Brian Johnson, CEO of Equality Illinois, an LGBTQ+ rights advocacy group said at the Center on Halsted. 'By upholding Tennessee's discriminatory ban on gender affirming care, the court has allowed dangerous double standards.' In the case, U.S. v. Skrmetti, three families with transgender children and a healthcare provider challenged Tennessee's law banning puberty blockers and hormone treatment for trans minors. The state has kept those drugs legally available for other purposes. Plaintiffs argued the ban violates their Constitutional right to equal protection under the law, while Tennessee contended it is necessary to protect children. Lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union Illinois and Lambda Legal's Illinois chapter said the court incorrectly concluded that Tennessee's ban wasn't a form of sex discrimination — prohibited by the Constitution's 14th Amendment. The court's opinion that the ban only implicates what the law allows people of different ages to do came as a result of 'mental gymnastics' and 'logistical hoops,' said Doug Curtis, Midwest Director of Lambda Legal — a nonprofit advocacy group. Chicago trans rights advocates said they're worried the ruling could push trans youth in other states to more dangerous, unsupervised sources of gender affirming care in states with bans similar to Tennessee. Channyn Lynne Parker, CEO of Brave Space Alliance, said after she sought out black market prescription hormones to help her transition during her teenage years, she developed life-threatening blood clots that left her with lung scarring. She worries that the pattern will repeat with Tennessee's ban upheld. 'It will only drive them to the underground, making preventable tragedies more likely,' Parker said. 'We owe it to every young person to ensure that they have access to safe, affirming healthcare.' Despite the Supreme Court's decision, advocates stressed that Illinois continues to be a sanctuary state for young people and families seeking gender affirming care. The state has shield laws for patients seeking gender affirming care and doctors who provide it. Illinois' Human Rights Act also prohibits discrimination based on gender identity, said Michelle García, ACLU Illinois Deputy Legal Director. 'Come to Illinois,' García said. 'We will protect you.' LGBTQ+ advocates were planning to hold a protest against the Skrmetti decision at noon Saturday in Federal Plaza.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store