"It's for govt to fulfil duty, convene parliament...": CPI-M MP John Brittas after five-nation visit
New Delhi [India], June 4 (ANI): After concluding a five-nation visit as part of an all-party delegation, Communist Party of India (Marxist) MP, John Brittas urged the government to now convene Parliament and inform the public and the international community about India's position.
Speaking to ANI upon his return, Brittas said, 'Now, since the opposition members who are part of the outreach delegations have fulfilled their obligations and duties, it is for the government to fulfil its duty, convene the parliament, and inform the people and the world community.'
Brittas said that the delegation received a 'mixed response' during their tour, which aimed to address international concerns and perceptions about India's current situation with Pakistan.
'There was much misinformation in that part of the globe, maybe because of the Western media's reportage on the Indo-Pak skirmishes. There were impressions that India has been doing something against Pakistan, and our mission could ensure that India's position is explained,' Brittas told ANI.
Brittas emphasised the positive impact of the outreach effort, stating, 'We feel that the message of this mission has gone down very well among those countries we visited.' He further added, 'At the end of this mission, we feel that we have been able to fulfil the responsibility given to us.'
Now that the delegation's role has concluded, Brittas placed the onus on the government to respond to both domestic and global expectations.'It is for the government to fulfil its duty, convene the parliament, and inform the people and the world community,' he repeated.
Earlier, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) MP termed their visit as a 'successful' one. 'It has been a successful trip to the five nations. We met many sections of society. We could convey the message of India about what happened and how cross-border terrorism affects us. We understand that they appreciate that India wants to be on the path of peace and progress,' Brittas said.
Brittas was part of an all-party delegation, led by JD(U) MP Sanjay Kumar Jha, and included BJP MPs Aparajita Sarangi, Brij Lal, Pradan Baruah, Hemang Joshi, TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee, and Congress leader Salman Khurshid. The all-party delegation visited Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fact check: Is Russia's new fact-checking platform credible?
In early April, Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs unveiled the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) — a self-proclaimed international alliance of fact-checkers and media outlets. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The initiative was first presented at the "Dialogue about Fakes 2.0" forum in Moscow in November 2024. At a press briefing following the April announcement, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova framed the GFCN as a counter to what she called the West's "relentless stream of fake stories and disinformation campaigns," accusing Western fact-checkers of engaging in "biased pseudo-fact-checking. " "This global civic initiative," Zakharova said, "will enable us to counter destructive Western actions using our own constructive agenda." But established fact-checking sites such as Facta and Maldita have raised red flags over the GFCN's Kremlin-aligned backers, opaque operations, and overtly one-sided narratives. DW Fact check takes a closer look Who's behind the GFCN? The GFCN was co-founded by TASS, Russia's state-run news agency, and the Autonomous Non-Profit Organization ANO Dialog — both known for their close ties to the Kremlin. TASS was suspended in 2022 by the European Alliance of News Agencies (EANA) over concerns about its editorial independence. In 2023, the European Union sanctioned ANO Dialog for its role in spreading disinformation and for operating the pro-Kremlin website War on Fakes. Ahead of Russia's 2024 presidential election, the US Treasury also sanctioned the group under Executive Order 14024, targeting individuals and entities linked to the Russian government. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Does the GFCN meet global fact-checking standards? Independent fact-checking relies on transparency, verifiable sourcing, and open methodologies. Leading organisations such as the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) require fact-checks to cite public data and provide transparent methods that others can replicate. DW reviewed several GFCN articles and found consistent problems with sourcing and methodology. In one article titled "The Romanian Elections: How Did the West Win Only on the Second Try?", the author cites the 2024 Eurobarometer, claiming only 22% of Romanians support aid to refugees, only 14% back the EU's actions on Ukraine, and only 13% favor Ukraine's EU candidate status. But these figures are false. DW cross-checked the data and found significantly higher levels of Romanian support for EU policies on Ukraine in the 2024 Eurobarometer contradicting the article's core claim. Another piece alleges that the Soros family was the "shadow organizer" behind the "HANDS OFF!" protests against US President Donald Trump's second administration, which took place across the United States on April 5, 2025. The article argues that, since some organizers had previously received grants from the Open Society Foundations, the Soros family must have orchestrated the protest. That's misleading. The piece focuses narrowly on two groups — MoveOn and Indivisible — and ignores the broader coalition behind the rallies. While both organizations have indeed received funding from Open Society Foundations, the grants supported general programming, not the April 5 protests specifically. Moreover, these groups list dozens of funders, not just the Soros-backed foundation. Receiving support from Open Society Foundations doesn't prove direct involvement on the part of the Soros family, whose philanthropic work has long been targeted by conspiracy theorists. These narratives often paint Soros as a puppet master behind protests, migration, or global unrest — claims that have been widely discredited. Another GFCN article titled "Is ChatGPT Prone to Russian Propaganda?" fails to seriously engage with the question it raises. Instead, it spends most of its word count defending TASS and attacking a Norwegian media outlet that questioned the Russian agency's credibility. The article barely mentions recent investigations — such a report by NewsGuard, which DW covered — which document Russian attempts to manipulate generative AI platforms. The piece's only conclusion appears in the final paragraph, which vaguely states: "It is incorrect to give a chatbot human qualities and accuse it of 'preferring' one of the sources to the others." GFCN: Who is writing these stories? One contributor to the GFCN is Sonja van den Ende, a Dutch journalist living in Russia who has been embedded with Russian troops in Ukraine. Some Dutch media have described her as a conspiracy theorist. On X, she recently posted: "Germany is the country of knife pullers, used to be a country of beer and bratwurst, now asylum seekers, i.e. radicalised rebels from Syria, Iraq etc." Other GFCN contributors include Tim Anderson, director of the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies. He has called the massacre of Ukrainian civilians in Bucha a "scam" and falsely claimed that Russia's invasion of Ukraine did not involve the targeting of civilian infrastructure. A familiar Russian playbook: mimic and confuse Observers say the GFCN's name — just one letter removed from the IFCN — is no accident. The International Fact-Checking Network, founded in 2015 by the Poynter Institute, is a respected consortium of more than 150 independent fact-checkers worldwide. It trains journalists, enforces professional standards, and certifies outlets based on transparency and editorial independence. The GFCN, on the other hand, appears to follow a long-standing tactic of the Russian state: imitating legitimate institutions to blur the line between journalism and propaganda. "We do not consider their activities to fall within the professional fact-checking ecosystem," IFCN director Angie Drobnic Holan told DW, citing Russia's consistent suppression of independent journalism. "Professional fact-checking requires the ability to independently verify claims across the political spectrum," she said. "Journalists must be free to publish findings that contradict the government. We are highly dubious that this effort allows for that." Tommaso Canetta, a policy officer with the European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO), called the GFCN a classic case of political appropriation. "This is a tactic we've seen many times; co-opting terms with credibility, like 'fact-checking,' and stripping them of meaning," he explained. "Political actors often label partisan narratives as 'fact checks' when they clearly are not." He stressed that affiliations with networks like the IFCN or the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN) help distinguish legitimate outlets from those engaged in manipulation. "Without such standards, we end up with initiatives — like this one from Russia — that pollute the term and muddy the waters."
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Israel Doesn't Speak For Us': Pro-Palestine Jewish March In Brussels Denounces Genocide And Zionism
Dozens of pro-Palestine Jewish protesters marched through Brussels to denounce Israel's actions in Gaza and reject the use of Jewish identity to justify the war. Demonstrators carried banners and staged symbolic die-ins to honor victims in Gaza. Many voiced frustration at Western governments and media for equating Jewish identity with Zionism. They condemned Prime Minister Netanyahu's motives, accusing him of using the war to maintain power and erase Palestinian presence. Protesters emphasized that supporting Jewish security does not mean oppressing Palestinians or enabling genocide. Watch Read More
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
How China gained control over the global rare earth minerals supply chain
The alarm has been intensifying in the past few weeks as global automakers, including major German manufacturers, raised concerns over China's export restrictions on rare earth alloys, magnets, and mixtures, warning that the curbs could trigger production delays and operational shutdowns. The latest backlash follows similar complaints from US firms and an Indian electric vehicle producer last week, highlighting the mounting global fallout from Beijing's April decision to suspend outbound shipments of several critical minerals. China has intensified its strategic dominance over the global supply of rare earth elements by adding critical minerals to its export control list, further straining already fragile global supply chains amid rising geopolitical tensions. The move, seen as a direct response to heightened tariffs imposed by the United States, underscores China's decades-long state-led push to monopolise both the mining and, more critically, the processing of rare earth materials—metals that are essential to a range of advanced technologies from electric vehicles to fighter jets. The 1990s strategy that gave China a monopoly Despite being relatively abundant in the Earth's crust, rare earths are rarely found in concentrated deposits and require complex, often environmentally hazardous, refining processes. China's edge lies not only in its 30–36 per cent share of global reserves but in its near-total control of the processing chain, estimated at over 85 per cent of global capacity. Beginning in the 1990s, Beijing classified rare earths as strategic resources, shielding the sector from foreign control and channelling significant state support into extraction and refining. Initiatives like 'Made in China 2025' ensured rare earths remained embedded in the country's high-tech ambitions. Western retreat allowed China to dominate supply chains As the US and other Western nations shut down domestic operations over cost and environmental concerns, China ramped up investment. It perfected the solvent extraction method, a process initially developed in the US but later abandoned due to regulatory and environmental challenges. By the early 2000s, China produced up to 97 per cent of the world's rare earths and began restricting exports, simultaneously driving up global prices and encouraging foreign manufacturers to relocate operations to China to secure uninterrupted supply. Export curbs on 7 key elements spark global concern In April, China extended export restrictions on terbium, yttrium, dysprosium, gadolinium, lutetium, samarium, and scandium—seven of the 17 recognised rare earth elements. Each plays a unique role in modern technologies and defence systems. Why terbium, yttrium and dysprosium matter globally Terbium: Vital for smartphone displays and aircraft magnets. China exports 85 per cent to Japan, just 5 per cent to the US. Yttrium: Used in medical lasers and superconductors. US relies 93 per cent on China. Dysprosium: Key for EV magnets and wind turbines. Majority goes to Japan and South Korea. Gadolinium: Common in MRI scans and reactor cores. Lutetium: Used in oil refining, mainly imported by the US. Samarium: Strategic for military-grade magnets and nuclear use. Scandium: Critical for aerospace; no US production in 50+ years. Japan, US, EU scramble to reduce China dependency China's move is expected to hit countries that are already struggling to build independent rare earth supply chains. According to Chinese customs data, Japan remains the largest buyer of these restricted materials, followed by South Korea and the US. Global supply chain diversification faces uphill battle In response, nations are accelerating efforts to reduce reliance on Chinese supply. Australia's Lynas Rare Earths is expanding its Malaysian plant. The EU is funding scandium production, and the US has revived mining at the Mountain Pass facility in California—though the ore is still sent abroad for processing. Yet such initiatives face formidable challenges. China's low production costs, lenient environmental standards, and strong vertical integration give it a lasting competitive edge.
