logo
'Incredibly rare' conclave documents held at Scots library

'Incredibly rare' conclave documents held at Scots library

The 69-year-old was elevated to pontiff relatively quickly, after just two days of conclave, but the inner workings of the election remain opaque despite renewed interest following 2024's Oscar winning film on the subject.
Research by a scholar at the University of St Andrews has shed light on documents dating back to the 1655 conclave, including unused ballots which would usually be incinerated.
Read More:
Katherine Tycz, a Postdoctoral Research Assistant on the Universal Short Title Catalogue, tells The Herald: "It's incredibly rare, I think this collection is probably one of the best-preserved and largest collections of print produced by the Vatican in this period outside of Italy.
'To have conclave documents is incredibly rare, they were burning them from at least the 15th Century. The smoke signal came a bit later, but they were burning the ballots to preserve secrecy from an early period.
"I think the reason they do survive is they were either extras or they were samples, because they're not filled out. They must have kept some extras around for when they needed to print them again so they'd know what they should look like.
'They would have been using a hand press and having to set the bed of it with the movable type, the different designs that you see on the ballot would have had to have the lines set with individual pieces of type, so it was quite a laborious process. A tally sheet from the 1655 papal conclave featuring the Latin names of the cardinals. Crawford.B.16(3). Reproduced with permission from materials on loan to the National Library of Scotland from the Balcarres Heritage Trust (Image: National Library of Scotland)
'These are just single sheet items so they'd have been printed fairly quickly, but the use of the two colours on the tally sheet was another step to the process you'd have to print each colour individually unless you were a very skilled printer. You can see they wanted to make these look nice even if they were going to be burned.
'It's a very special thing to have these survive – talking about something that has happened in the conclave is punishable by excommunication, so to have any surviving evidence is really special.'
The 1655 conclave was an impactful one, even allowing a woman, Olimpia Maidalchini, to address the cardinals.
The favourite to be elected was Giulio Cesare Sacchetti, France's preferred candidate, but his papacy was opposed by Spain and by the people of Rome who devised a ditty: "Non fate Papa Sacchetti, se no Roma sarà a pezzetti" - don't make Sacchetti pope or Rome will be in pieces.
He'd failed to be elected in the conclave of 1644 and 11 years later could not get past 33 votes from the 64 cardinals, well short of the two-thirds majority he needed.
As a result the conclave went on for close to three months, with some younger cardinals resorting to pranks for their own amusement.
This would prove to have tragic consequences when a younger cardinal, who had dressed himself as a ghost, frightened cardinal Pier Luigi Carafa so badly that he collapsed on the cold marble floor and, allegedly, developed the pneumonia which would kill him.
Sachetti eventually realised he could not win and urged electors loyal to France to vote for Fabio Chigi, Pope Alexander VII, instead as a compromise candidate.
The ballots at the National Library of Scotland reflect the lengthy process, featuring as they do space for election by accessus.
A now discontinued 'second preference' way of voting which would allow cardinals to change their choice in the second round, it was abandoned at the 1903 conclave as it eliminated the secrecy of the first ballot.
Four voting slips for the election of a pope, with space for the name and their signa. B.41 (15). Reproduced with permission from materials on loan to the National Library of Scotland from the Balcarres Heritage Trust (Image: National Library of Scotland) Dr Tycz explains: "They would write their names on it and it would be folded over so they wouldn't be immediately visible, but it would have their name and a phrase that would identify them, called the signa.
'In the first round of voting, which was called the 'scrutiny', they would write their signa on the ballot and in the next round they'd match them up to make sure someone wasn't giving a candidate an extra vote. The accessus would be a changed vote, and that was the way to confirm it was a changed vote.
'That was what the ballot sheet was for, there would have been a slightly different version for the first round which doesn't survive in great quantities and is very difficult to find images of."
Given how rare materials from a papal conclave are, it's perhaps surprising that the papers ended up in Scotland rather than being locked away in a Vatican vault.
Dr Tycz says: "The collection was acquired by the Earl of Crawford in the late 19th Century from the Borghese family, there was a Borghese Pope in the early 17th Century.
'The Borghese family collected these kinds of items, probably to keep some kind of family record, and they were sold to the Earl of Crawford.
'They're currently on loan to the National Library of Scotland from the family, they've been catalogued really well and been made very accessible for researchers to go and see them.
'It's a really great resource for us as scholars.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Herald's Unspun Live heads to the Edinburgh Fringe
The Herald's Unspun Live heads to the Edinburgh Fringe

The Herald Scotland

time2 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

The Herald's Unspun Live heads to the Edinburgh Fringe

Across four nights, audiences will hear from First Minister John Swinney, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, and Britain's leading polling expert, Professor Sir John Curtice. Tickets are available now — click here to book your place at Unspun Live. These discussions will move beyond the usual political talking points, exploring the personal motivations, challenges and life experiences that shape Scotland's most influential figures. Professor Sir John Curtice and guestsThe series opens on 4 August with Professor Sir John Curtice, who will be joined by special guests to take the political temperature of the nation and analyse the trends influencing the next Holyrood election. Click here to buy tickets to Unspun Live with John Curtice and guests John Swinney (Image: Gordon Terris) On 5 August, John Swinney will make a rare festival appearance. He will be interviewed by The Herald's Brian Taylor — the legendary former political editor of BBC Scotland, who has been covering the First Minister for more than 25 years. The SNP leader will reflect on his first year leading the Scottish Government, the challenges facing his party and the country, and share a personal perspective on leadership and life in high office. Click here to buy tickets for Unspun Live with John Swinney Anas Sarwar reading The Herald (Image: Gordon Terris) On 6 August, attention turns to the opposition. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar will discuss one of the most dramatic years in his party's recent history. Buoyed by a strong performance at Thursday's by-election in Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, his appearance comes at a pivotal moment in his campaign to lead the next Scottish Government. Click here to buy tickets for Unspun Live with Anas Sarwar Kate Forbes speaking to The Herald (Image: Colin Mearns) Closing the series on 7 August is Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes. A former SNP leadership contender and key figure in the Cabinet, she will offer insights into the Government's economic priorities — and reflect on her political journey to date. Click here to buy tickets for Unspun Live with Kate Forbes Each Unspun Live session will be hosted by journalists and columnists from The Herald. The events will combine political analysis with personal storytelling, offering audiences a rare chance to engage with both the public views and private reflections of Scotland's leading politicians. Audience members will also be invited to put their questions directly to the guests, ensuring a two-way conversation about Scotland's political direction — and the people behind the headlines. Catherine Salmond, Editor of The Herald, said: 'We are delighted to bring the world's longest-running national newspaper into the heart of the world's largest arts festival. 'As Scotland faces a pivotal election in 2026, there is real value in having these conversations live on stage — where our readers and the wider public can engage directly with the people shaping our country's future. 'For those with a serious interest in Scottish politics, The Herald remains an essential read, combining authoritative coverage with unparalleled access to the key players and issues that matter. 'It is all part of our commitment to fostering understanding and informed debate — ensuring Scots have access to the insight they need, whether in our pages or face to face.' Click here to book your tickets now via the Summerhall box office.

Council forced to U-turn on nursery mothballing plans
Council forced to U-turn on nursery mothballing plans

The Herald Scotland

time15 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Council forced to U-turn on nursery mothballing plans

Despite previously insisting that the closures would go ahead, council officials have now indicated that they will abandon the plans and seek a review of the authority's approach to mothballing. In response to multiple requests to explain why unelected officers were able to make decisions on mothballing without consultation, a council spokesperson had previously suggested that government guidance – which includes clear instructions to consult with communities on any such decision – does not apply to nurseries, meaning that they did not need to discuss the matter with families before implementing the changes. In recent days, however, the council has come under increasing pressure over its plans. The matter has been raised in the Scottish Parliament, and government officials recently wrote to the council to warn that the proposals were not in line with statutory requirements. In a letter to Laurence Findlay, the Director for Education and Children's Services at Aberdeenshire Council, a government official explicitly stated that mothballing guidance applies to council-run nurseries, and highlighted a section of the document stating that any mothballing decision 'should be taken in consultation with the parents involved.' The government's letter also raised concerns about the mothballing of another nursery in 2024 which has since been removed from the options that parents can choose from when applying for a space for their child. Scottish Conservatives MSP Alexander Burnett has also written to the administration, which is led by councillors from his own party. His email, which has been seen by The Herald, sharply criticised several aspects of the council's approach and urged them to abandon the mothballing proposals. In addition to this, The Herald has been shown email correspondence in which the council is explicitly advised by a solicitor acting for parents that they considered the plans "unlawful". Officials are asked to state whether they agree with this, in which case they would have had to advise councillors of this, or disagree, in which case there would be no reason for families to delay further legal action. Opposition councillors had successfully demanded a special meeting of the council take place to consider the matter, with the session planned for Monday 9 June. When The Herald approached the council about this matter earlier today an official declined to comment, stating that they did not wish to 'pre-empt' any decisions that might be made by elected representatives. However, by mid-afternoon this position had changed, and the council's press team issued a release stating that the administration now intends to abandon the controversial mothballing plans: 'The Administration is minded to seek a review of our mothballing guidance to incorporate a consultation process with parents. 'We acknowledge the strong feelings concerning the four settings and appreciate the concerns of parents who highly value their local early learning facilities. We are trying to balance the needs of children and families, with a challenging financial position – but it is critical we do this in the right way. 'We will be recommending that we pause planning for all future mothballing activity currently underway, whilst we examine the guidance. Whilst we have been engaging with parents, we need to consult at a much earlier stage to inform the decision-making process, and we will explore how to integrate this into the procedure. 'We will also recommend reversing the budget decision identifying this as a saving in our 2025/26 budget process and seek to identify the saving from elsewhere. 'We are taking the unusual step of announcing our intention prior to the meeting in the hope that we remove further anxiety for the people who have made requests to speak.' The original proposals had been strongly opposed by SNP and some independent councillors who have welcomed the U-turn. Commenting, SNP Education and Children's Spokesperson, Cllr Louise McAllister, said: 'The decision to mothball these nurseries, without consultation or democratic oversight, was wrong from the get go, and that is a point we have strived to make since the announcements in April. 'As well as the U-turn on mothballing, I sincerely hope that the administration also accept that these decisions need to be fully returned to the hands of elected members, so that we can truly be a voice for the communities we represent. 'Whilst I am delighted for the children who can now continue to access their childcare provision in these settings, I think the administration must acknowledge and apologise for the hurt and distress caused by this short sighted decision making.' SNP Deputy Education and Children's Spokesperson, Cllr Jenny Nicol, added: 'From the outset we have voted against mothballing decisions being made by officers, and consistently challenged a process that lacked proper consultation and failed to consider the long term impact on rural families. 'For too long, decisions were being made behind closed doors, without the input of those most affected and facing the traumatic realities of mothballing. This reversal shows what can be achieved when communities stand up and are supported by Councillors who put people before 'process'.' 'We welcome this shift, but it must now be followed by a full review of the guidance and a genuine commitment to rural early years provision going forward.' SNP Cllr Dawn Black, who represents Stonehaven and Lower Deeside, praised local communities who 'have stepped up and fought this campaign so passionately and so successfully.' 'As Councillors our hands have been tied to a certain extent and we have done all we can to push this issue forward – and finally we see some change. We could not have done that without the dedication of local voices who took the time to email and speak with individual Councillors and at the education committee. 'Regardless of guidance from elsewhere, as a council we should want to consult with communities – to work with them to find sustainable ways forward – that should have already been in our guidance. Instead the Tory-led administration have tried to force change on communities, whilst hiding behind officers, and have realised that people just will not stand for it.'

Swinney defends claims Labour 'out of it' in by-election
Swinney defends claims Labour 'out of it' in by-election

The Herald Scotland

time19 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Swinney defends claims Labour 'out of it' in by-election

In the run-up to the vote, the First Minister had dismissed Labour's chances. He told The Herald on Wednesday that Anas Sarwar's party was 'out of it'. READ MORE Speaking to journalists at SNP headquarters in Edinburgh, Mr Swinney said the close result showed there had been some improvement on his party's dire performance at last year's general election. He also insisted he remained the right person to lead the SNP into next year's Holyrood election. 'The SNP has made progress in this by-election — perhaps not as much as I would like, but progress nonetheless. That is against the backdrop of a really damaging election last summer. "We have got to continue to focus on addressing the priorities of the people of Scotland and giving them hope about the future — for a better Scotland. That is what my leadership is about.' He said the party had 'faced a tough time'. 'We are in a period of recovery. We have not recovered. We are in a period of recovery, so we are making headway — but not all the headway we need to make. "I have got to ensure the SNP remains absolutely focused at all levels, in government and the party, and in all aspects of our work — making sure we complete that journey before 2026. 'Last summer, I think people would have doubted the SNP could have been in contention to win a by-election in Hamilton after the severe loss we suffered. But we were in contention. We were not strong enough to win, but we were in contention — and we will build on that.' Asked how he had so badly misjudged the race, the First Minister said he had called it as he saw it. 'What I saw was the Labour vote collapsing compared to last summer — down 20% on the result last night. I saw Reform surging, and that was patently obvious in the result. I told people they could vote SNP to stop Reform. "We got into contention. Last summer, we lost that constituency — roughly that area — by about 9,000 votes. This time, we were in the running. 'I think people would have been surprised last summer if the SNP had got itself into the running. But, you know, I called it as I saw it — and the result demonstrates the trends I was seeing: Labour way down, Reform way up.' Asked if he owed voters an apology for potentially misleading them — suggesting Labour had no chance when that was not the case — Mr Swinney said he had given an 'honest assessment'. 'The Labour vote was crashing down compared to last summer. On the doorsteps, people were angry with Labour over issues like the winter fuel payment for pensioners being abolished. They told us they were not going to vote Labour. At the same time, they said they planned to vote Reform. 'The combination of those two things shaped the message: the SNP could stop Reform. I certainly do not want the poisonous politics of Farage to be imported into the Scottish Parliament.' Asked if the result represented a failure of the SNP's ground campaign, Mr Swinney said it did not. 'What we were seeing were trends — and those trends were borne out by the result. Labour's vote is way down. Last summer, it was at 50%. They are now down to 31%. The data speaks for itself. 'Reform was a strong presence in the constituency. That is what it was. The SNP vote held firm. That was based on our position in the election last summer. We have delivered some progress — not enough. I am not for a moment suggesting we have delivered enough progress, but our share of the vote was up on last summer.' READ MORE Mr Swinney said voters had raised concerns over NHS services, including access to GPs. 'These are issues that are very much at the heart of the priorities in the programme my government is taking forward.' He said he would 'reflect carefully' on what voters told him during the campaign. 'Obviously, I will consider carefully what I heard. There is nothing quite like being on the doorsteps for several weeks to hear what people are thinking and feeling — you hear it very directly. So I will consider that response and determine how best the government and the SNP should respond.' Asked about a potential reshuffle, Mr Swinney said he would 'consider all issues around the ministerial team'. Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero. Màiri McAllan, he added, would return from maternity leave soon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store