Samsung chairman Lee's long legal saga ends with acquittal
The top court on Thursday (Jul 17) upheld a Seoul High Court ruling that acquitted Lee and other Samsung officials of all 19 charges stemming from the 2015 merger of Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries Prosecutors alleged the deal helped Lee cement his control over the conglomerate.
The decision ends a years-long legal saga that had cast a shadow over the leadership of South Korea's biggest conglomerate. It will also allow the company to focus on revitalising its business and try to reclaim its position as a leading supplier of the advanced chips driving the artificial revolution just as US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose crippling duties on chip exports.
South Korean prosecutors in 2023 sought a five-year prison sentence along with a 500 million won (S$461,654) fine for Lee. However, a Seoul district court in February 2024 ruled in Lee's favour. A year later, the Seoul High Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal and upheld the lower court's decision, clearing Lee of all charges.
The case had been ongoing since 2020.
Samsung Group shares rose on Thursday following the verdict. Samsung Electronics shares rose as much as 2.3 per cent while Samsung Biologics shares jumped as much as 3.1 per cent.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
'Today's final ruling by the Supreme Court has clearly confirmed that the merger of Samsung C&T and the accounting treatment of Samsung Biologics were lawful,' Samsung's legal counsel said in a statement.
The acquittal lifts a weight off the world's largest maker of memory chips and displays, which has been battling intense competition. Domestic rival SK Hynix has stolen a march over Samsung in the race to supply cutting edge chips for the development of AI.
Korea has expressed deep concerns over Washington's proposal to levy import duties on semiconductors, with Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo warning this week that such duties could deal a significant blow to one of the nation's key export industries.
Lee, 57, was embroiled for years in legal struggles that rocked the tech establishment and triggered a political scandal that led to the impeachment of former President Park Geun-hye. But Lee secured a presidential pardon in 2022 from the graft charges, allowing him to formally take the helm of the conglomerate that his grandfather created in 1938. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Colombia ex-president Uribe sentenced to 12 years of house arrest, will appeal
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox BOGOTA - Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe was sentenced by a judge on Friday to 12 years of house arrest for abuse of process and bribery of a public official, in a long-running case over connections to former right-wing paramilitaries. Uribe was convicted of the two charges on Monday by Judge Sandra Liliana Heredia in a witness-tampering case that has run for about 13 years. He has always maintained his innocence. Heredia read the sentence to the court in an afternoon hearing on Friday. Uribe will be fined $578,000, Heredia's ruling said, and barred from public office for more than eight years. Uribe, whose legal team has said he will appeal the ruling, is to report to authorities in Rionegro, in Antioquia province, where he resides, and then "proceed immediately to his residence where he will comply with house arrest," the ruling said. Uribe and his lawyers appeared virtually at the afternoon hearing. There is an appeal hearing scheduled for August 4. The conviction made Uribe the country's first ex-president to ever be found guilty at trial and came less than a year before Colombia's 2026 presidential election, in which several of Uribe's allies and proteges are competing for top office. It could also have implications for Colombia's relationship with the United States. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this week that Uribe's conviction was a "weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges" and analysts have said there could be cuts to U.S. aid in response. Uribe, 73, and his supporters have always said the process is a persecution, while his detractors have celebrated it as deserved comeuppance for a man who has been accused for decades of close ties with violent right-wing paramilitaries but never convicted of any crime until now. TESTIMONIES FROM FORMER PARAMILITARIES Uribe, who was president from 2002 to 2010 and oversaw a military offensive against leftist guerrillas, was charged over allegations he ordered a lawyer to bribe jailed paramilitaries to discredit claims he had ties to their organizations. Those claims stemmed from leftist Senator Ivan Cepeda, who collected testimonies from former paramilitaries who said Uribe had supported their organizations in Antioquia, where he once served as governor. Uribe alleged in 2012 that Cepeda orchestrated the testimonies in a plot to tie him to the paramilitaries, but the Supreme Court ruled six years later that Cepeda had not paid or pressured the ex-paramilitaries. Instead, the court said it was Uribe and his allies who pressured the witnesses. Cepeda has been classed as a victim in the case and attended both Monday and Friday's hearings in person. Two jailed former paramilitaries testified that Diego Cadena, the lawyer formerly representing Uribe, offered them money to testify in Uribe's favor. Cadena, who is also facing charges, has denied the accusations and testified, along with several other ex-paramilitaries, on Uribe's behalf. Each charge carried a potential sentence of six to 12 years. Uribe, who was placed under house arrest for two months in 2020, is head of the powerful Democratic Center party and was a senator for years both before and after his presidency. He has repeatedly emphasized that he extradited paramilitary leaders to the United States. Colombia's truth commission says paramilitary groups, which demobilized under deals with Uribe's government, killed more than 205,000 people, nearly half of the 450,000 deaths recorded during the ongoing civil conflict. Paramilitaries, along with guerrilla groups and members of the armed forces, also committed forced disappearances, sexual violence, displacement and other crimes. Uribe joins a list of Latin American leaders who have been convicted and sometimes jailed, including Peru's Alberto Fujimori, Brazil's Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Ecuador's Rafael Correa, Argentina's Cristina Fernandez and Panama's Ricardo Martinelli. REUTERS
New Paper
10 hours ago
- New Paper
Work injury at Sumo Salad covered under valid insurance policy: MOM
The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said salad shop Sumo Salad was covered by a valid insurance policy when an alleged work injury involving a staff member occurred on June 6. The salad shop's owner, the late Ms Jane Lee, had submitted an incident report to MOM soon after. As at June 27, the company had been reimbursed by its insurer for the medical expenses and medical leave wages it had claimed, MOM told reporters during a briefing on Aug 1. When asked whether there were outstanding claims after June 27, the ministry said the claims process has not concluded as investigations are still ongoing. Before finalising a claim, doctors must assess the extent of an injured worker's incapacity, which determines the amount of lump-sum compensation for the worker. MOM added that it has not received any indication from the insurer of potential fraud, but emphasised that the possibility cannot be ruled out. Ms Lee died on July 19, a day after she posted two Facebook posts alleging that a former staff member had staged a fall in an attempt to claim workplace injury compensation. She believed her company was targeted because of "an unfortunate gap" in insurance coverage. Ms Lee also urged MOM and the police to investigate the case thoroughly, as she believed it was a premeditated scheme involving the ex-employee's husband and possibly a law firm. The incident has sparked wider discussions about challenges faced by small business owners in Singapore, and the need for stronger safeguards against abuses of the Work Injury Compensation Act (Wica). MOM said the worker involved in this case is still in Singapore on a Special Pass, which is typically issued temporarily to those whose work permits have been cancelled and are awaiting departure, or for specific purposes such as assisting with investigation and attending court. MOM said insurers had referred about 12 claims a year for investigation into potential fraud. Over the last five years, the ministry had prosecuted about two workers a year for fraudulent claims. These workers were jailed between three and 13 weeks. The maximum penalty is a jail term of up to 12 months, or a $15,000 fine, or both. Employers who fail to buy insurance for their manual workers, and non-manual workers earning $2,600 a month or less, may be fined up to $10,000, jailed up to 12 months, or both. In the last five years, MOM had prosecuted about two employers a year for such offences. MOM said the ministry conducts audit checks on employers for their Wica coverage. "When we detect they do not have any insurance, we will nudge them," an MOM spokesman said, adding that a grace period is given to employers to buy or renew insurance. MOM added that over the past three years, 94 per cent of all work injury claims were paid by insurers. For the remaining 6 per cent, most were paid directly by employers exempted from buying the Workplace Injury Compensation (WIC) insurance. Generally, employers with insurance coverage can be reimbursed for medical expenses as well as wages paid to workers on medical leave. The insurer will make lump sum compensations to workers or their family in the event of death, permanent incapacity or incapacity that remains six months post-injury, based on doctors' assessments. If there are disputes on the degree of permanent incapacity awarded, the case will be referred to the WIC Medical Board for independent reassessment.
Online Citizen
11 hours ago
- Online Citizen
MOM: Sumo Salad employer fully reimbursed by insurer; no fraud found so far in work injury claim
SINGAPORE: The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) confirmed on 1 August 2025 that the employer involved in the Sumo Salad workplace injury case has been fully reimbursed by their insurer. The reimbursement, which covers medical bills and medical leave wages submitted up to that point, was completed on 26 and 27 June. Speaking at a media briefing on the Work Injury Compensation Act (WICA), MOM added that it had not received any indication from the insurer that fraud was involved. However, a ministry spokesperson clarified that this does not eliminate the possibility of fraud, as investigations are still ongoing. 'We have not received any indication from the insurer that there is fraud. But that is different from saying that there is no fraud, because we are investigating,' the spokesperson stated. The update comes amid heightened public scrutiny following the death of Jane Lee, the owner of Sumo Salad, who posted online allegations of a fraudulent work injury claim shortly before her passing. Lee alleged in Facebook posts on 18 July that a foreign worker had staged a fall to claim compensation from her business, operated under the name EatGreen. She said her company had become the target of what she believed to be a 'fraudulent scheme,' and lamented a gap in their insurance coverage at the time. Jane Lee died on 19 July. The Singapore Police Force is conducting an investigation into her unnatural death. According to MOM, the work injury incident was reported to have occurred on 6 June. The employer subsequently filed a work injury report. MOM said the employer held a valid insurance policy at the time of the incident. While confirming the employer's insurance status, MOM declined to name the insurer, citing ongoing investigations. The ministry also stated that the work injury claims process in this case has not yet concluded. Asked about the current status of the foreign worker involved in the claim, MOM said it does not usually disclose individual employment statuses. However, it noted that in certain cases under investigation, special passes may be issued to legalise a worker's stay in Singapore during the process. Jane Lee passed away after raising alarm over alleged foreign worker injury claim scam Jane Lee, a mother of two in her 40s, alleged before her death that the worker had staged the incident just two days before the end of her employment contract. In one of her final social media posts, she claimed that the worker's husband and possibly a law firm had collaborated in orchestrating the event. She warned that small businesses with incomplete insurance cover could be particularly vulnerable to such tactics, which she believed were meant to instil fear and extort money. Lee also voiced concerns that workers could exaggerate injuries or falsely claim permanent disabilities in order to obtain higher payouts. Her posts called on authorities to investigate the case thoroughly to protect small business owners facing similar risks. The incident has since triggered an outpouring of public sympathy and renewed calls for more robust safeguards against fraudulent claims under WICA. Many small business owners have echoed Lee's concerns and urged MOM to tighten checks on suspicious claims, while ensuring legitimate injuries continue to receive fair compensation. MOM: 28,500 work injury claims filed annually; about 12 cases a year flagged for suspected fraud During the same media briefing, MOM provided broader context about work injury compensation in Singapore. It revealed that approximately 28,500 work injury claims are filed annually. Out of these, insurers and employers pay compensation for around 26,800 cases each year. MOM said that insurers refer roughly 12 cases annually to the ministry for investigation into potential fraud. The ministry stressed that WICA is designed to balance the financial liabilities of employers with the social protections needed by injured workers. It explained that the Act imposes compensation caps to protect employers from sudden large financial burdens while providing workers with a quicker, low-cost path to compensation. Under WICA, employers are required to purchase work injury insurance for all manual workers, regardless of salary. Non-manual workers earning S$2,600 or less a month must also be insured, as must all platform workers through their operators. The Act covers medical expenses, medical leave wages, and lump sum compensation for permanent incapacity or death. Over the past three years, 94 per cent of WICA claims were paid out by insurers. The remaining 6 per cent were generally paid directly by employers who are exempt from mandatory insurance. MOM also highlighted several safeguards built into the system to prevent abuse. These include assessments by insurers, who act as gatekeepers, and mandatory medical evaluations, which are tightly regulated. Additionally, all parties involved in a claim, including employers, workers and insurers, are allowed to raise objections to any aspect of the process.
