Minister Ramokgopa promises to change unsustainable electricity prices
Image: Jairus Mmutle/GCIS
ELECTRICITY and Energy Minister Dr Kgosientsho Ramokgopa has promised big changes to electricity prices in the coming months in efforts to address what he described as unsustainable prices.
Ahead of the ANC NEC meeting at various venues in Gauteng, Ramokgopa disclosed that South Africa was on the brink of 'energy poverty'.
"Electricity is unaffordable. We cannot continue along this tariff path. We are getting into a situation here in the country with new dimensions of energy poverty. There are households there, as I speak to you, that will not be able to afford the cost of electricity...Poor households are being forced to make choices between a loaf of bread and buying prepaid electricity units," he said.
His remarks come after the residents of Tembisa forced Ekurhuleni Mayor Nkosindiphile Xhakaza to reconsider the R126 electricity fixed surcharge against residents who took to the streets two weeks ago over skyrocketing electricity prices.
Energy expert, Professor Vally Padayachee, reflecting on the soaring prices of electricity, indicated that the rising cost of electricity is concerning as it impacts not only household budgets but also the overall economy.
"Increases of over approximately 600% in recent years are unsustainable and disproportionate to many citizens' income levels. Electricity, a public good, should arguably be like water, a fundamental right, accessible and affordable for all South Africans.
"For the average South African household, rising electricity costs have become a serious financial concern. Many families find themselves allocating a growing portion of their income to energy bills, which can lead to difficult choices between essential services such as food, education, and healthcare. This financial strain can cause stress and adversely affect family life," he stated.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
To curb the effects of energy poverty, Vally said: "The rising costs of electricity calls for urgent structural reforms to the energy pricing model in South Africa. Policymakers must explore ways to stabilise prices for households and reduce the burden on vulnerable populations. There must be a concerted effort towards transitioning to a sustainable energy future that emphasises renewable energy sources.
"By investing in sustainable energy technologies, the government can work towards reducing reliance on expensive fossil fuels, ultimately lowering electricity costs over the long term."
Taking to X, former Eskom COO, Matshela Koko, lamented the rising costs of electricity in spite of a promise that IPPs (independent power producers) would help reduce energy prices.
"Eskom's electricity sales have plummeted from 220 TWh to 180 TWh over the past decade, yet electricity costs have skyrocketed by 600%. Here's the truth: wind, solar, and battery storage won't lower the electricity prices you see on your electricity bills. It is irrespective of the near-zero marginal cost of production of wind and solar projects."
Cape Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
36 minutes ago
- IOL News
South Africa braces for impact as 30% US tariffs take effect
President Cyril Ramaphosa and Trump held a telephone discussion on bilateral trade matters with Trump on Wednesday morning, undertaking to continue with further engagements recognizing the various trade negotiations the US was currently involved in. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers The government has reiterated its dedication to navigating trade waters with the United States through constructive engagement and negotiation as the hefty tariffs on exports come into effect from Friday. This comes as the US President Donald Trump imposed a 30% tariff on South African imports, which are anticipated to have a profound impact on critical sectors of the South African economy, particularly the automotive and agriculture industries. President Cyril Ramaphosa and Trump held a telephone discussion on bilateral trade matters with Trump on Wednesday morning, undertaking to continue with further engagements recognizing the various trade negotiations the US was currently involved in. Minister in The Presidency, Khumbudzo Ntshavheni, said on Thursday that the Cabinet received an update regarding the Framework Deal established with the US, which aims to create a foundation for ongoing discussions. A notable aspect of this agreement is a provision that stipulates tariffs will be reconsidered once the two nations reach a comprehensive deal. 'Government's efforts remain focused on growing the economy to save and create new jobs, which include intensifying diversification efforts and strengthen their global supply chain integration as the country works to expand its export markets to Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and across Africa to enhance our economic resilience,' Ntshavheni said. Meanwhile, Ntshavheni said the government was focusing on demand side interventions in the impacted industries and targeted interventions to ensure industry stability and safeguard employment. The implementation of the tariffs has raised concerns among South African businesses that rely on exports to the US market, as increased costs could lead to reduced competitiveness. The government this week warned that about 30 000 jobs in various sectors were likely to be impacted by the unilateral 30% import tariffs, hence it is seeking to craft an export diversification strategy leaning heavily towards China's R20 billion market. Ben Farrell, global CEO of the Chartered Institute for Procurement and Supply (CIPS), urged African nations to step forward as leaders in the next era of global supply chains. Farrell issued a warning against protectionist policies and blasted the US tariffs. 'The most popular vehicle in America is the Ford F150 – 45% of its parts are made outside America. Some of them here in Africa. Now these manufacturers are about to see a 35% increase in costs because of tariffs,' he said. 'Consider the implications of this unilateral national action against global suppliers. It's insanity. The stars have aligned for procurement and supply around the world, and particularly here in Africa.' The US is South Africa's third-largest bilateral trading partner after China and the European Union. South Africa's exports to the US account for about 7.5% of the country's total exports, and in turn the largest category of SA's exports to the US are precious metals, at 36% of total exports to the US, which are mainly tariff exempt. The second largest category is vehicles, aircraft and vessels at 20% of total exports to the US, and the third, products of iron and steel at 14%. Mineral products follow next, at 6.8% and chemicals at 6.7%. Investec chief economist, Annabel Bishop, said there were many different issues at play for South Africa in terms of trade balance as the country was running a surplus. 'We could be running a bigger trade surplus if we'd managed to repair the problems we have in Transnet. So there's still an opportunity for us to improve,' Bishop said. 'But I do think an important point is that around the world there's very fierce competition on trade. There's a lot of focus on price. And of course, what this differentiated tariff structure does is now make some countries more competitive than others. And South Africa, 30%, instead of the 15%, which most African countries are, is therefore prejudiced.' Bishop also warned of direct implications of these tariffs on the consumer inflation. She said though the full tariff effect has not come through and was only going to be apparent towards the end of this year, there was an expectation that US economic growth will dip in the medium term as importers absorb the rising costs of imported products. 'But also, while it's not to forget that there could be a double whammy effect. If inflation comes out higher and, of course, remains persistent, then you also start to worry about going to higher interest rate territory,' Bishop said. 'Then has a secondary negative impact on consumers. At the moment, we don't think that's the case. We think the tariff impact is going to be once-off, if it is indeed a once-off tariff situation. 'Then the monetary policy authorities can look through that and say, 'OK, we won't move our interest rates yet'. But it becomes more entrenched, and this is the problem with uncertainty. If tariffs fluctuate, if they move around, you're always at a moving target. You never really know where you are.' BUSINESS REPORT
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
These ships have finally sailed – bye Karpowership!
South Africa is now finally free of the 20 year, R200 billion shackle in the form of the Karpowerships that would have destroyed our economy. In the dark days of load shedding when South Africans had more hours of no electricity than hours with electricity, consumers were starting to think that the Karpowerships – that would have cost the country about R200 billion over 20 years – would not be such a bad idea. Thankfully, load shedding became a thing of the past and government decided to scrap the project where it would have commissioned three Karpowerships to help the country with power and get rid of load shedding. Many South Africans and civil society organisations were not happy with the decision to supplement South Africa's electricity grid this way, and the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) asked the courts to overturn the decision. Recently, the high court did just that and issued an order declaring the Karpowership licences invalid and overturned them. Recently, the Pretoria High Court did just that. It granted outa an order ruling that the three Karpowership electricity generation licences issued are invalid and overturned them. The National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa) issued the licences that were a crucial step in government's plan to sign 20-year deals with the floating power stations as 'emergency' electricity. The deals were expected to have cost about R200 billion over the 20 years, an amount that would have been added to the price of electricity. ALSO READ: Karpowership project gets green light, a costly gamble? Outa's three year fight against Karpowership and Nersa in 2022 Outa filed its case on 26 April 2022 and called for the court to review Nersa's decision to grant the licences. It resulted in a three-year fight, including a long dispute over access to documents. Adv Stephanie Fick, executive director of Outa, says they believe this case contributed significantly to the collapse of the Karpowership deals, as Eskom eventually cancelled the grid access. The removal of the generation licences is the final end of this deal and Fick says Outa regards this as a significant legal victory and a huge victory for the public. 'The Karpowership deals are now absolutely dead. It will never be loaded onto your electricity bill. This ruling is a powerful affirmation that decisions involving billions in public funds must comply with the law. We challenged this process because the public deserves transparency, proper oversight and value for money, none of which were present in this licensing saga.' According to the court order, the 'decision of the first respondent [Nersa] to award a generation licence to the second respondent [Karpowership]' was 'reviewed and set aside' for each of the three generation licences. The court order also confirmed a settlement agreement between Outa and Nersa. Karpowership was cited in the case and initially opposed it but withdrew a few months ago. As part of the settlement agreement, Nersa agreed to withdraw its opposition to Outa's review application and the court formally set aside the impugned licences. In addition, the court ordered Nersa to pay the costs of the application on a party-and-party scale, including fees for two counsel. Fick says this reflects the seriousness of the matter and the substantial public interest involved. ALSO READ: 'It's buried': Ramokgopa says Karpowership deal 'dead in the water' Karpowership had no environmental impact studies or agreements with Eskom The Karpowership generation licences were issued in 2021 as part of the Risk Mitigation Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme, which aimed to urgently address South Africa's electricity shortfall. Outa's review application cited multiple legal and procedural concerns, including: The absence of required environmental authorisations and port approvals; The lack of confirmed power purchase agreements with Eskom; Criminal investigations pending against the Karpowership entities; and Significant long-term financial risks to the public without adequate regulatory scrutiny. Fick says the case was delayed for nearly two years due to disputes over access to the administrative record. Outa demanded a copy of the full record of Nersa's decisions, with the full reasons for the decisions, as part of the review process. However, Nersa and Karpowership objected. After a court order compelling the production of documents in 2024, the Karpowership entities were liquidated and their attorneys withdrew from the matter in June 2025. Despite the lack of opposition, Outa pushed to ensure the matter was formally adjudicated and made part of the public record through an order of court. The full record was eventually made available, but parts are blocked from public access. 'This is not just a legal win but a win for public interest litigation. This case reinforces the principle that even when government acts urgently, the law and due process cannot be ignored,' Fick said. 'This judgment protects the public from being locked into a flawed and costly energy deal and it strengthens the principle that administrative decisions must be lawful, rational and in the public interest.'
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Call for South Africa to act on 'debanking' as Trump moves to ban closures in the US
#RacistBanksMustFall, applauded the recent move by US President Donald Trump to combat debanking practices, urging South Africa to follow suit and introduce similar protections for its citizens. Image: SoraAI/IOL The #RacistBanksMustFall movement in South Africa has urged urgent legislative reforms following the announcement of a new US executive order that seeks to ban banks from closing accounts based on political or religious views. As reported by Business Report, the group praised the decision by former US President Donald Trump to address what is known as "debanking" - a practice where banks withdraw services from individuals or organisations for ideological reasons. The executive order, expected to be signed soon, directs US regulators to discard the "reputational risk" clause often used to justify such closures. Trump alleges that institutions like JPMorgan and Bank of America discriminated against him and his supporters. Debanking, broadly defined, refers to banks refusing services to customers for a variety of reasons. In the US, there is no legal right to a bank account, and banks often cite regulatory or compliance concerns. In an interview with CNBC, Trump accused major lenders of rejecting his deposits post-presidency, asserting: "They told me, 'I'm sorry sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.'" In South Africa, the debate around debanking has intensified, with local institutions, particularly Nedbank, under scrutiny. Nedbank's 2023 annual report revealed the closure of nearly 200 accounts, a move critics claim disproportionately affects politically vocal individuals and businesses. One of the most high-profile cases involves the Sekunjalo Group, which argues that its account closures are politically driven attempts to silence dissent. #RacistBanksMustFall campaign leader Crown Prince Adil Nchabeleng said South African banks are guilty of similar discriminatory practices. He cited the example of businessman and media mogul Dr Iqbal Survé, whose companies have had accounts closed over perceived "reputational risk" linked to his political influence and media ownership. Nchabeleng called Trump's executive order a 'positive development' and urged South Africa to implement similar safeguards. 'For long now, the banks have been doing as they wish,' he said. He further alleged that banks are targeting politically inconvenient individuals and that this practice also impacts society's most vulnerable. 'Local banks have unilaterally bankrupted families and auctioned off homes without sufficient cause,' said Nchabeleng, who believes the process violates constitutional protections for access to financial services. He added: 'It is high time the banking institution stops its discriminatory practices.' Current South African regulations require banks to give notice and allow customers to respond before closing accounts. Legal precedent set in Bredenkamp v Standard Bank allows terminations on reputational grounds but has faced multiple legal challenges.
