Japan's Competition Regulator Says Tech Giants' Integration of Own Generative AI into Services Could Violate Antimonopoly Law
Yomiuri Shimbun file photo
The Japan Fair Trade Commission head office in Chiyoda Ward, Tokyo
The Japan Fair Trade Commission stated that tech giants integrating their own generative AI into their existing products with the intent to interfere with rival companies' business, this could constitute 'tie-in sales' or 'private monopolization' in violation of the Antimonopoly Law, in a report on its investigation into the generative AI market published Friday.
There is a trend in the digital market for Big Tech companies, particularly Google, Apple, Facebook (now Meta), Amazon and Microsoft, to integrate their own generative AI services into their products. For example, Google search results include AI-generated summaries, while Microsoft has incorporated generative AI into office software like Word to assist with writing documents.
According to the report, competing AI development companies expressed concerns to the JFTC that dominant firms could gain an advantage in the distribution of generative AI by integrating generative AI products into existing digital services and that it would become difficult to have users adopt latecomer firms' generative AI products.
The JFTC noted that the integration of generative AI products into existing services by tech giants and other companies is a 'method of technological innovations and such an act itself is not immediately problematic under the Antimonopoly Law.' However, the commission also argued that if the purpose is to hinder competitors' businesses or raise barriers to entry, there is a risk of violating the law.
Regarding the integration of generative AI on smartphones, related companies have expressed concerns. One company said 'restricting access to the software necessary to run our generative AI will cause a competitive disadvantage.'
As Google and Apple have a monopoly on the the basic software for smartphones, the commission expressed the view that such access restrictions could also constitute 'interference with a competitor's transactions' in violation of the Antimonopoly Law.
This is the first edition of the report, and the JFTC plans to continue to watch the situation and publish follow up reports as needed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
16 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Japan's Competition Regulator Says Tech Giants' Integration of Own Generative AI into Services Could Violate Antimonopoly Law
Yomiuri Shimbun file photo The Japan Fair Trade Commission head office in Chiyoda Ward, Tokyo The Japan Fair Trade Commission stated that tech giants integrating their own generative AI into their existing products with the intent to interfere with rival companies' business, this could constitute 'tie-in sales' or 'private monopolization' in violation of the Antimonopoly Law, in a report on its investigation into the generative AI market published Friday. There is a trend in the digital market for Big Tech companies, particularly Google, Apple, Facebook (now Meta), Amazon and Microsoft, to integrate their own generative AI services into their products. For example, Google search results include AI-generated summaries, while Microsoft has incorporated generative AI into office software like Word to assist with writing documents. According to the report, competing AI development companies expressed concerns to the JFTC that dominant firms could gain an advantage in the distribution of generative AI by integrating generative AI products into existing digital services and that it would become difficult to have users adopt latecomer firms' generative AI products. The JFTC noted that the integration of generative AI products into existing services by tech giants and other companies is a 'method of technological innovations and such an act itself is not immediately problematic under the Antimonopoly Law.' However, the commission also argued that if the purpose is to hinder competitors' businesses or raise barriers to entry, there is a risk of violating the law. Regarding the integration of generative AI on smartphones, related companies have expressed concerns. One company said 'restricting access to the software necessary to run our generative AI will cause a competitive disadvantage.' As Google and Apple have a monopoly on the the basic software for smartphones, the commission expressed the view that such access restrictions could also constitute 'interference with a competitor's transactions' in violation of the Antimonopoly Law. This is the first edition of the report, and the JFTC plans to continue to watch the situation and publish follow up reports as needed.
Japan Times
3 days ago
- Japan Times
Alphabet CEO expects to keep hiring engineers while AI advances
Alphabet's Sundar Pichai said his company will keep expanding its engineering ranks at least into 2026, stressing human talent remains key even as Google's parent ramps up artificial intelligence investments. Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech conference in San Francisco, Pichai said he will continue to invest in engineering in the near future. U.S. tech leaders like Microsoft have trimmed more staff this year, reflecting in part the enormous investments needed to ensure leadership in AI. The firings have stoked fears about the technology replacing certain job functions. Google, itself, has conducted rounds of layoffs in recent years to free up resources.
Japan Today
4 days ago
- Japan Today
Top scientist wants to prevent AI from going rogue
Concerned about the rapid spread of generative AI, a pioneer researcher is developing software to keep tabs on a technology that is increasingly taking over human tasks. Canadian computer science professor Yoshua Bengio is considered one of the godfathers of the artificial intelligence revolution and on Tuesday announced the launch of LawZero, a non-profit organization intended to mitigate the technology's inherent risks. The winner of the Turing Award, also known as the Nobel Prize for computer science, has been warning for several years of the risks of AI, whether through its malicious use or the software itself going awry. Those risks are increasing with the development of so-called AI agents, a use of the technology that tasks computers with making decisions that were once made by human workers. The goal of these agents is to build virtual employees that can do practically any job a human can, at a fraction of the cost. "Currently, AI is developed to maximize profit," Bengio said, adding it was being deployed even as it persists to show flaws. Moreover, for Bengio, giving AI human-like agency will easily be used for malicious purposes such as disinformation, bioweapons, and cyberattacks. "If we lose control of rogue super-intelligent AIs, they could greatly harm humanity," he said. One of the first objectives at LawZero will be to develop Scientist AI, a form of specially trained AI that can be used as a guardrail to ensure other AIs are behaving properly, the company said. The organization already has over 15 researchers and has received funding from Schmidt Sciences, a charity set up by former Google boss Eric Schmidt and his wife Wendy. The project comes as powerful large language models (or LLMs) from OpenAI, Google and Anthropic are deployed across all sectors of the digital economy, while still showing significant problems. These include AI models that show a capability to deceive and fabricate false information even as they increase productivity. In a recent example, AI company Anthropic said that during safety testing, its latest AI model tried to blackmail an engineer to avoid being replaced by another system. © 2025 AFP
