Mumbai could get its first underground rail line
MUMBAI: Mumbai will get its first underground rail line, if all goes according to plan. Taking a cue from the Mumbai metro, whose Line 3 is the city's first-ever underground transport corridor, the Central Railway (CR) hopes to tunnel underground to build its fifth and sixth lines between Parel/Currey Road and Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus (CMST) in South Mumbai.
The route in question covers Phase 2 of a project to build a fifth and sixth railway corridor along the Kurla-Parel-CSMT stretch of the CR's suburban system. Phase 2 is a 7.4-km line from Parel to CSMT. Phase 1, from Kurla to Parel, covers 10.1 km and is currently underway.
Given the considerable challenges in land acquisition and rehabilitating project affected persons (PAPs) for mega projects like these, the railway believes tunnelling under the city would skirt these issues, making it a smoother ride. After all, if the Mumbai metro can do it, why not the railways, they argue.
Nonetheless, it's an ambitious plan, and it's still in its early stages. The Mumbai Rail Vikas Corporation (MRVC) and Central Railway have met a few times but are yet to chalk out a plan for the proposed underground rail line. The outcome of technical feasibility studies will determine which agency will execute the project.
Railway officials said the line would be 7.4 km long and built 20-25 metres under the overland railway tracks. Aligning with them, it would skirt buildings, roads and underground utilities, which typically pose a huge challenge to any underground project.
'We are still analysing the possibility of going underground between Parel and CSMT stations for the fifth and sixth rail lines, and the necessary studies will be undertaken before finalising it. We are preparing terms of reference for the process, and will appoint a consultant,' a senior railway official told HT.
'We will have to assess the availability of land for tunnel boring machines to enter/exit at CSMT and Parel, which will be identified during the study. Once underground, we can have alternative alignments to end the tunnel at the CSMT end,' he said.
Two entry/exit points are being considered for the proposed tunnel at the CSMT end – one inside the terminus and the other near the terminus. In the first instance, the tunnel can enter/exit CSMT inside the terminus, next to the suburban railway corridor or close to the long-distance train platforms, whichever is feasible, the official said.
As an alternative, an entry/exit point on the P D'Mello side of CSMT may be considered. Here, however, there are two likely challenges. The alignment of the proposed Metro 11 line, an underground metro corridor from Wadala to CSMT, would have to be taken into consideration. The Central Railway would also have to take into account the underground CSMT station of Metro 3.
The tentative cost of the entire project (Phase 1 and 2) if the underground corridor is approved is pegged at ₹3,000 crore, almost three times the original cost, with only overland lines. When originally sanctioned in 2008, the estimated cost was ₹890.89 crore. It has since been revised to ₹1,337 crore.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
18 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HT Interview: India, Aus ties have moved to a higher level, says Marles
Australia backs India's efforts to combat terrorism and the halting of military actions with Pakistan last month was 'an act of Indian leadership', Australian deputy prime minister Richard Marles said on Wednesday, while outlining Canberra's plans to foster closer defence and security ties with New Delhi. In a conversation with HT, Marles, who is also defence minister, spoke about China's backing of Pakistan during recent clashes with India, saying both Delhi and Canberra feel China's massive military build-up has had 'an impact on the strategic landscape of the Indo-Pacific', and expressed hope that am India-Australia comprehensive economic cooperation agreement (CECA) will be concluded soon. Edited excepts: Q: As India and Australia mark five years of their comprehensive strategic partnership, you've said the re-elected Albanese government is going to be more ambitious. How do you look back at these five years and what's next? Marles: India's place in Australia's worldview has grown dramatically under Prime Minister [Narendra] Modi's leadership. The bilateral relationship has gone to a greater level - we're doing more economically together and have never been more strategically aligned. This is reflected in our much greater security and defence relationship, which is not just in terms of how we engage in forums that we meet in, the way in which we speak, but actually at a practical level, we're doing more. [Something] as specific as maritime domain awareness, what we're doing with our Boeing P-8 surveillance aircraft that both countries use. When you're sharing that kind of information, you're only doing that with the closest of friends. This collaboration enormously enhances our ability to see the ocean for both India and Australia. Q: One focus area for Australia is ensuring the Indo-Pacific remains free, open and secure, and you are looking very closely at the Indian Ocean. Australia gifted a patrol boat to the Maldives during your visit. What more would you like do with India in the Indian Ocean? Marles: We want to see a free and open Indian Ocean and work with India as the major player here. From Australia's perspective, 50% of our trade goes past the front door here. We've got a deep national interest in the rules of the road applying in the Indian Ocean, freedom of navigation, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, freedom of trade. The Maldives patrol boat gift builds on our Pacific Island programme experience. It presents an opportunity for us to cooperate with India in supporting smaller nations' maritime capabilities. Q: There's been a fundamental shift in India-Australia defence ties, including the signing of a logistics support agreement and an air-to-air refuelling agreement. How do you plan to expand interoperability and exercises? Marles: There is a whole lot of ambition that we have. The world's complexity and our strategic alignment make closer cooperation increasingly attractive. There's more we can do in maritime domain awareness and expanding exercises - bilaterally and potentially with other countries. We see opportunities in intelligence-sharing. But the biggest area is maritime domain awareness and activity. We want progress on key agreements and roadmaps leading to this year's 2+2 meeting [of defence and foreign ministers] and leaders' summit. This is a crucial year for advancement. Q: China's military activities across the region are a concern for many countries and there are clear signs China backed Pakistan, in terms of equipment and surveillance, during the recent clashes with India. In that context, how does Australia view the hostilities between India and Pakistan? Marles: Though there's two points [here]. We condemn the Pahalgam terrorist attack. Our sympathies are with the families who lost loved ones. We stand with India and all countries combating terrorism. We acknowledge and welcome the stoppage of military activity - we see that as an act of Indian leadership. We'll continue working with India to combat terrorism in all forms. Regarding China - our relationship is complex. It's our largest trading partner, but we have security concerns we've expressed to China directly. We're watching the world's biggest conventional military buildup since WWII, done without strategic reassurance. China's intent remains unclear, and this impacts the Indo-Pacific's strategic landscape. We feel that, India feels that. Since our last 2+2 meeting in November 2023, these issues have become more complex. The reasons for India-Australia cooperation have only grown. Q: The Economic Cooperation and Trade Agreement (ECTA) changed the economic landscape between India and Australia. How far are we on the path towards the comprehensive economic cooperation agreement (CECA)? Marles: We've seen real progress across the four economic roadmap areas PM Albanese outlined - education, green energy, agriculture and tourism. CECA negotiations continue. We're hopeful for a conclusion in the not-too-distant future, which would elevate our trading arrangements. Over the last five years, India's trade with Australia has grown at double the rate of its trade with the rest of the world. The India-Australia trading relationship, measured against all of India's trading relationships, is a standout. What we've achieved has made a huge difference, and we're excited about the next level. It's a huge opportunity - our economies are complementary. Q: Is there anything in particular holding up negotiations on CECA? Marles: No, negotiations are going well. It's natural that people bring different positions that need working through. We're pleased with progress and hopeful for a near-future conclusion. Q: India is set to host the Quad Summit at a time when the US administration appears to be more inward-looking. What would Australia like to see on the agenda of the Quad Summit? Marles: I don't necessarily accept that assertion. We all want American leadership, but the Quad has always been an opportunity for four like-minded democracies with shared values to cooperate for the Indo-Pacific's benefit. This meeting is important for continuing Quad momentum across current engagement areas. We want to see that expanded. As the first Quad Summit of the Trump administration, it has significance. The Quad is important for our countries' Indo-Pacific leadership, making this meeting crucial. Q: Do you think the Indian government's concerns about activities of Khalistani separatists in Australia have been addressed? Are there still concerns about their activities? Marles: I hope not. People in Australia have the right to their views, but there's no sympathy for the Khalistani movement from the Australian government - none at all. We take our obligations to provide security for India's missions very seriously. Q: How do you plan on building on the role of the Indian diaspora in Australia to further strengthen bilateral relations? Marles: The Indian diaspora is a wonderful asset for Australia. It's our fastest growing community, bringing energy and industry to the Australian economy. We are huge recipients of their contributions.
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
Texmaco Rail bags Rs 122-cr order from MRVC
Texmaco Rail & Engineering said that it has received an order worth Rs 122.31 crore from Mumbai Railway Vikas Corporation (MRVC). The order is for the design, supply, construction, installation, testing, and commissioning of traction transformers and associated works for Western Railway. The project is scheduled to be executed within 30 months. Texmaco Rail & Engineering is a diversified heavy engineering company, with products including railway freight wagons, hydro-mechanical equipment and industrial structures for infrastructure industry, locomotive components and locomotive shells, railway bridges, steel castings, pressure vessels, etc. The company has reported 13.5% decline in consolidated net profit to Rs 39 crore despite a 17.6% rise in revenue from operations to Rs 1,346 crore in Q4 FY25 as compared with Q4 FY24. Shares of Texmaco Rail & Engineering shed 0.43% to Rs 160.80 on the BSE.
Hindustan Times
3 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Centre to bring stricter law to deal with fake fertilisers
The Centre is preparing to introduce a stricter law to tackle the issue of fake fertilisers and spurious agricultural inputs — a problem that, according to a recent study, accounts for 40% of total sales by value and causes economic losses to farmers by reducing overall output, HT has learnt. The country already has provisions that ban and criminalise sale of counterfeit pesticides and fertilisers, but seizures and crackdowns are not commonplace. The new law will have harsher punishment and target supply chains, an official said. Agriculture minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan had recently flagged the issue, urging farmers not to overuse agricultural chemicals and limit their use to prescribed limits, apart from warning marketeers of fake fertilisers of stern action. Under current provisions, the federal fertiliser control order 1985 (clause 19) lays down technical specifications for each type of fertiliser approved for farm-use sale, making illegal the marketing of agrochemicals not meeting these standards. However, sale of substandard, fake or adulterated fertilisers is currently punishable under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, a law that is meant to regulate and maintain supply of goods, and often used to crack down on hoarding and tame inflation. 'The government wants to bring a strict law that is specifically meant to penalise sale of illegal and fake fertilisers and farm chemicals,' the official said. Fake products cut over 10 million tonnes of potential agricultural output in the world's most populous country, according to a 2015 study by the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce (FICCI). The value of illegal pesticides, for instance, has been expanding by nearly 20% a year, according to the study's findings. Farmers often complain of lack of accountability for the spurious sales. In 2023, the ministry of chemicals and fertilisers, while uncovering the diversion of subsidised urea, had seized 70,000 bags of potentially counterfeit products. Counterfeiters manage to penetrate rural markets by copying packaging and labelling of genuine brands, a second official said. On May 30, the Rajasthan government sealed 34 factories and lodged 12 first information reports on fake fertiliser sales.
