Leading charity hits out at Trump's destructive plan that will deny 1.4m women and girls birth control
More than three-quarters of the $9.7m (£7.2m) worth of supplies were destined for just five countries: the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, and Mali. Tanzania, which was due to receive more than 40 per cent of the stock, will be the hardest hit.
The Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition, which brings together governments, private companies and charities to make contraception accessible, has projected that without these supplies there will be 174,000 more unintended pregnancies and 56,000 unsafe abortions.
The plan forms part of wide-ranging cuts to US foreign aid, which includes stopping providing birth control to lower-income countries. A State Department spokesperson said the US had 'avoided an additional $34.1 million in taxpayer costs by negotiating no-cost cancellations of pending orders'. However the destruction of these supplies – which have already been paid for – is estimated to cost $167,000, according to the US government.
IPPF said its offers to take on the costs of donating the contraception - which includes pills, implants and injections - rather than letting it go to waste had been rejected. The supplies were largely not due to expire for up to five years.
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) was one of the world's biggest providers of contraception.
Without these contraceptives, women and girls are unable to choose how to protect themselves, Dr Bakari, project coordinator at Tazanian sexual and reproductive health NGO Umati explained.
'The impact of the USAID funding cuts has already significantly affected the provision of sexual and reproductive health services in Tanzania - leading to a shortage of contraceptive commodities, especially implants. This shortage has directly impacted clients' choices regarding family planning uptake.'
In many of these countries, options like implants and long-acting injectable contraception are particularly popular because they grant women discretion and control when their partners may not approve of them taking pills for example.
In Tanzania, a million injectable contraceptives and more than 350,000 implants have been earmarked to be burnt - almost a third of the contraception needed for a whole year.
In Mali, more than a million contraceptive pills and almost 100,000 implants are being withheld and risk being destroyed - a quarter of the country's annual needs, while in Kenya more than 100,000 promised implants are not being distributed.
Executive Director for the Reproductive Health Network in Kenya, Nelly Munyasia, said these setbacks had come at a time when unmet need for contraception was already high - with profound implications for the lifechances of women and girls.
'Nearly 1 in 5 girls aged 15–19 is already pregnant or has given birth. Unsafe abortions remain among the five leading causes of maternal deaths in Kenya,' she said.
A US State Department spokesperson confirmed that a 'preliminary decision was made to destroy certain birth control commodities from terminated USAID contracts'.
However, the current status of the supplies remains somewhat of a mystery. While a Belgian government spokesperson confirmed that at least some of the contraceptives were in transit, they, along with the French and US governments, would not confirm whether any of the stock had reached France.
A Belgian government spokesperson said the country remained committed to exploring, 'all possible avenues to prevent the destruction of these stocks and continues to engage in discussions with the American authorities'.
Major waste management companies including Veolia and SUEZ have denied involvement in the incineration. Hormonal contraceptives require specialised disposal to prevent the hormones from polluting the environment and entering the water supply.
President of IPPF's French member association, Le Planning familial, Sarah Durocher, said: 'We call on the French government to take responsibility and act urgently to prevent the destruction of USAID-funded contraceptives.
'It is unacceptable that France, a country that champions feminist diplomacy, has remained silent while others, like Belgium, have stepped in to engage with the US government. In the face of this injustice, solidarity with the people who were counting on these life-saving supplies is not optional: it is a moral imperative.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Mars confirms M&M's, Skittles and others will have no synthetic dyes in 2026
M&M's, Skittles, and some of the world's most popular colorful candies will be made without artificial colors in the United States next year. Candy manufacturer Mars Wrigley North America quietly announced the move last month, saying the products would be made available online across the country. 'Brands that will soon have options made without FD&C colors: M&M's Chocolate, Skittles Original, Extra Gum Spearmint and Starburst Original fruit chews,' the company said. Mars Wrigley is slated to announce further commitments to complying with the Trump administration's push to 'Make America Healthy Again.' 'When we have identified fully effective, scalable solutions across the entire portfolio, we will share additional item commitments and timelines,' it said.
Glasgow Times
31 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Locals slam proposals to close Renfrewshire Disability Resource Centre
The service, which provides support for people with physical disabilities and sensory impairments, is one of several services that have been earmarked for closure by Renfrewshire Health and Social Care Partnership (HSCP). It was recently reported that Renfrewshire HSCP has put wide-ranging cuts to health and social care services back on the table in an attempt to plug a multi-million-pound funding gap for the financial year 2026/27. Neil Bibby MSP, who led the meeting, was joined by Labour councillors Iain McMillan, Ben Smith, Carolann Davidson and Janis McDonald to hear from service users and their families about how the proposals have affected their mental and physical health. Bibby expressed concerns about the plans. He said: "When horrific proposals like this are made, it is crucial that the voices of those they affect are heard. "That is why it was so valuable – though deeply concerning – to listen first-hand to the views of DRC users and their families regarding the closure of their vital service they face. "The closure of the DRC proposed by Renfrewshire HSCP is simply unacceptable, and I will continue to do all I can to ensure that it and other essential services are saved from the axe. READ MORE: World's tallest cinema in Glasgow's could 'close any day' "But given the Scottish Government funds both Renfrewshire Council and the local health board – the bodies that make up the HSCP – ministers in Edinburgh should also set out what, if anything, they are going to do to prevent these proposals from becoming a reality.' Attendees also highlighted how central the DRC is to their quality of life through the social activities and services it provides, and many told of the huge anxiety its uncertain future has caused. McMillan added: "It was really humbling to hear first-hand what the DRC and other services that are under threat mean to service users and their families. "It is a disgrace that the HSCP finds itself in this position. "The Scottish Government should be ashamed of themselves as they have stood back and allowed this situation to develop." A spokesperson from Renfrewshire HSCP said: "We understand this is a worrying time for many, particularly unpaid carers and families who rely on day services and disability support. "We would like to make it clear that the proposal under consideration is not to close the DRC service, but to relocate it – allowing us to continue delivering services from fewer buildings across our portfolio. READ MORE: Will asylum seekers be housed in a former Glasgow care home? "This proposal also forms part of a wider review of services, including Learning Disability and Physical Disability Day Services, Older Adult Day Services, and Learning Disability Respite. "Like many public sector organisations across Scotland, the HSCP is facing significant financial pressures. "In response, the Integration Joint Board (IJB) is exploring ways to review and redesign services to ensure they remain sustainable while continuing to support those most in need. "In December 2024, IJB voting members considered approximately £19 million of potential savings across HSCP service areas. "This reflected their decision to identify savings of 10 per cent across all influenceable service budgets, wherever possible. "They agreed that £13.8m of this amount should be managed over the next three financial years through the redesign of internal service models. "The IJB also agreed that the proposals identified to make up the remaining shortfall should be further developed, with feedback gathered through public and staff engagement. "This period of engagement, which ran throughout June and into July 2025, offered people opportunities to share their views through face-to-face and online events, as well as through questionnaires. "It was designed to gather feedback from individuals, families, carers, and staff on how any proposed changes might affect people. "The feedback collected through these activities is currently being reviewed and will inform the updated impact assessments, which will be published ahead of the next IJB meeting on Friday, September 19, 2025. "We want to emphasise that no decisions will be made on any of the proposals before this meeting."
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
US appeals court says Trump administration can cut billions in foreign aid
The federal government does not have to continue making foreign aid payments, a US appeals court has ruled in a major victory for President Donald ruling reverses a lower court judgment that said the Trump administration had to restore billions of dollars in foreign aid that had already been approved by Congress. On his first day back at the White House in January, Trump imposed a 90-day pause on all foreign assistance. International aid groups who relied heavily on government grants sued to challenge Trump's order. Among the funding cuts are nearly $4 billion (£2.95b) for global health programs through September. More than $6 billion for HIV and AIDS programs, which Congress had approved through 2028, can be axed, as well, under the out of the three judges on the appeals court panel agreed the plaintiffs in the case, the aid groups, did not have standing to bring the lawsuit, and so the funding cuts could international aid groups sued the administration in February. In March a district judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration's funding freeze, saying it was done unlawfully because the funds were allocated by Congress. Since he returned to office, Trump has slashed foreign aid, largely shuttering US Agency for International Development (USAID), the main foreign aid agency, because he found its spending "wasteful". More than 80% of all the agency's programmes were cancelled as of March, and on 1 July the remainder were taken over by the State Department as USAID officially closed its doors. Former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama condemned shutting down the agency and humanitarian organisations around the world have criticised Trump's funding cuts as both drastic and could cause more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030, according to a warning published by researchers in the highly esteemed Lancet medical journal earlier this year.
