Private hospital ordered to pay Rs 34 lakh compensation for delaying ICU treatment over consent
Hospital said consent for ICU admission was denied
Panel rejects hospital's argument, says emergency care must be given
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed Wockhardt Hospitals in Nashik to pay ₹34 lakh in compensation to the father of a young man who died in 2010 after the hospital failed to provide timely ICU care. The panel held that emergency medical care is a part of the right to life under the Constitution, and hospitals and doctors must provide such treatment immediately, even without the patient's or relative's consent, a TOI report stated.The case involved Ravindra Naidu, who was admitted to Wockhardt Hospitals late on April 15, 2010, after a nosebleed. Ravindra, who had a complicated medical history including hypertension, chronic smoking, and occasional alcohol use, reportedly fell in the bathroom and complained of chest pain and uneasiness around 3 am.According to the complaint filed by his father, Vijay Dashrath Naidu, the hospital did not immediately shift him to the ICU or provide proper treatment. He alleged that ICU admission was delayed until around 7 am, and the family was not informed of his condition between 7am and 11 am. He believed his son had died around 8.30 am on April 16 but said treatment continued until 12.30 pm to create false records.Wockhardt Hospitals and its doctors claimed that Ravindra's death was caused by pre-existing medical issues and his own decision to stop prescribed anti-hypertensive medication. They said he had accelerated hypertension, which led to a fatal cardiovascular event. The hospital further claimed that ICU admission had been advised at the time of admission but was declined by the patient and his relatives, as recorded in the ICU register.The state consumer commission rejected the hospital's argument about consent. 'A relative's consent is generally not legally required for admitting a patient to ICU. If the patient is critically ill and needs emergency care, the hospital and doctors can admit the patient to ICU under the doctrine of implied consent,' the panel observed.While the commission acknowledged that the treating doctors appeared to have acted with qualification and skill, it concluded that the hospital failed in its duty to provide timely emergency care, which amounted to medical negligence Earlier complaint was dismissed by Nashik district forumVijay Dashrath Naidu had initially approached the Nashik District Consumer Forum, which dismissed his complaint of medical negligence. He later appealed to the state commission, which overturned the forum's order and held the hospital accountable for lapses in emergency care procedures.The compensation of ₹34 lakh was awarded as relief for the hospital's failure to admit the patient to the ICU in time, resulting in his death.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Activists and experts hail Supreme Court focus on mental health
Kolkata: Mental health activists and experts have welcomed the Supreme Court's explicit recognition of mental health as an integral part of the constitutional Right to Life under Article 21. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They say this broadens the interpretation of the right to life to include psychological well-being, not just physical survival. The SC recognised the right to mental health as an integral component of the right to life under Article 21 while laying down binding guidelines for educational institutions and coaching centres across India. The observation was made in a case related to the death of a 17-year-old student undergoing coaching for the NEET examination. The apex court set aside orders of the Andhra Pradesh HC to allow transfer of the investigation into the death under suspicious circumstances to CBI. Mental health activist Ratnaboli Ray, who is the founder of Anjali, a rights-based organisation, said the order moves mental health from the realm of welfare or charity into the domain of legal and constitutional rights. "This means that the state and institutions are no longer simply encouraged but obligated to ensure mental health protections as part of their duty under the Constitution," said Ray, a psychologist by training. Ray also pointed out that by issuing guidelines for students' welfare in the context of mental health, the court has acknowledged the growing mental health crisis in educational spaces — ranging from anxiety and depression to suicide. This makes schools and universities potentially accountable for creating psychologically safe environments. Advocate Arush Sengupta said embedding mental health under Article 21 makes it justiciable. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "If someone's right to mental well-being is violated, they can now take legal recourse based on constitutional grounds. This also strengthens the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, which already defines access to mental health services as a right, but until now lacked the direct constitutional force to ensure consistent and widespread enforcement," he said. Psychiatrist Aniruddha Deb felt the ruling has the potential to transform institutional accountability, public funding, and societal attitudes in India. "This is a landmark judgment. Till now, mental illness was perceived as a disability, a dysfunction and looked down upon. People with mental illness were relegated to second-class citizens. They were even denied right to vote. Being of unsound mind precluded them from holding any office. All that will change now," said Deb. Ray added that the moment demands bold, rights-affirming governance, not piecemeal or tokenistic gestures. "The judiciary has spoken. It is now the executive's responsibility to institutionalise this vision into everyday governance so that mental health is not only constitutionally protected, but meaningfully lived," she added.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Activists and experts hail Supreme Court verdict on mental health
1 2 Kolkata: Mental health activists and experts have welcomed the Supreme Court's explicit recognition of mental health as an integral part of the constitutional Right to Life under Article 21. They say this broadens the interpretation of the right to life to include psychological well-being, not just physical survival. The SC recognised the right to mental health as an integral component of the right to life under Article 21 while laying down binding guidelines for educational institutions and coaching centres across India. The observation was made in a case related to the death of a 17-year-old student undergoing coaching for the NEET examination. The apex court set aside orders of the Andhra Pradesh HC to allow transfer of the investigation into the death under suspicious circumstances to CBI. Mental health activist Ratnaboli Ray, who is the founder of Anjali, a rights-based organisation, said the order moves mental health from the realm of welfare or charity into the domain of legal and constitutional rights. "This means that the state and institutions are no longer simply encouraged but obligated to ensure mental health protections as part of their duty under the Constitution," said Ray, a psychologist by training. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Ray also pointed out that by issuing guidelines for students' welfare in the context of mental health, the court has acknowledged the growing mental health crisis in educational spaces — ranging from anxiety and depression to suicide. This makes schools and universities potentially accountable for creating psychologically safe environments. Advocate Arush Sengupta said embedding mental health under Article 21 makes it justiciable. "If someone's right to mental well-being is violated, they can now take legal recourse based on constitutional grounds. This also strengthens the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, which already defines access to mental health services as a right, but until now lacked the direct constitutional force to ensure consistent and widespread enforcement," he said. Psychiatrist Aniruddha Deb felt the ruling has the potential to transform institutional accountability, public funding, and societal attitudes in India. "This is a landmark judgment. Till now, mental illness was perceived as a disability, a dysfunction and looked down upon. People with mental illness were relegated to second-class citizens. They were even denied right to vote. Being of unsound mind precluded them from holding any office. All that will change now," said Deb. Ray added that the moment demands bold, rights-affirming governance, not piecemeal or tokenistic gestures. "The judiciary has spoken. It is now the executive's responsibility to institutionalise this vision into everyday governance so that mental health is not only constitutionally protected, but meaningfully lived," she added. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
What is Autoimmune Encephalitis? The rare brain disease that forced Aussie athlete Tiana Death to relearn how to walk, talk and write
What is Autoimmune Encephalitis? Live Events How rare is Autoimmune Encephalitis? Diagnosis and recovery (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Former Australian athletics champion Tiana Death (pronounced Dee-arthe) has publicly shared her diagnosis of a rare neurological condition autoimmune encephalitis , two years after she collapsed at home during a major 24-year-old, Sydney athlete who won bronze in the 100m hurdles at the 2017 national championships and competed in the 2018 Youth Commonwealth Games, detailed her story on Instagram last month. She described how her life changed suddenly in 2023 when she was found unconscious in her room and rushed to intensive told Daily Mail that at the time of her collapse, she had been experiencing fatigue, headaches, and flu-like symptoms. She later began having seizures and lost the ability to walk, talk, or open her eyes. Initially, doctors believed a virus may have triggered the condition was so severe that doctors considered placing her in an induced coma. During her hospital stay, Death says she didn't recognize her father and experienced severe memory encephalitis is a rare disorder where the immune system mistakenly attacks the brain, leading to inflammation, seizures, memory loss, and other neurological issues. Treatment includes high-dose steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy to suppress the immune began receiving monthly IVIG infusions, using plasma from healthy donors, which helped her regain some was discharged from the hospital in February and had to relearn basic tasks like walking, talking, and encephalitis is a rare but recognized neurological condition, with an estimated incidence of about 1 to 2 cases per 100,000 people per year. Though it can affect people of any age, it is more commonly diagnosed in children, adolescents, and young tricky part of being with the illness is that it is often misdiagnosed early on due to its similarity to viral encephalitis or psychiatric disorders, but awareness is wasn't until June this year that doctors officially diagnosed her with autoimmune encephalitis. By then, she had already spent months trying to manage her seizures with epilepsy recovery journey has included significant physical and emotional has returned to living independently but continues to manage her lifelong illness with regular treatments and medical support.
