
Trump's Rift with Putin Signals Possible Shift in U.S.-Russia Relations
U.S. President Donald Trump, who has often faced criticism for his previous warmth toward Russia, is now signaling a noticeably tougher stance on President Vladimir Putin. Indeed, I believe this emerging rift could reshape not only America's current policy toward Moscow but also broader geopolitical dynamics, particularly regarding the war in Ukraine.
In fact, President Trump's recent statements expressing disappointment in Putin have come as a relief to many European leaders who, for years, worried that Trump's friendly approach might embolden the Kremlin. Now, in what I think is a significant diplomatic and political escalation, Trump has reportedly authorized Congress to advance new legislation imposing sweeping sanctions on Russia. These proposed measures target Russian oil exports—especially to major buyers like India and China—and include asset freezes, severe financial restrictions, and tariffs as high as 500% on U.S. imports from countries that continue purchasing Russian energy. However, the draft legislation would give the President discretion to delay or lift sanctions if he deems it appropriate.
Moreover, media leaks suggest that President Trump might soon announce a new arms package for Ukraine, potentially including offensive weapons. In my point of view, this would mark a stark shift from his earlier reluctance to escalate tensions with Moscow. According to Axios, Trump recently told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a phone call that he wants to support Ukraine's air defenses after an increase in Russian attacks—even though a previous shipment of U.S. weapons had been paused.
I think Trump's changing attitude stems from his frustration with Putin's unwillingness to take tangible steps toward ending the war in Ukraine. There's also growing bipartisan consensus in Congress for stricter sanctions against Russia. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported in late May that Trump privately told European leaders that Putin isn't ready for peace because he believes he's winning the war.
Yet, in my view, uncertainty remains over whether Trump will fully follow through on this tougher rhetoric. After all, he has reversed course in the past. For example, just a few months ago, he backed off plans for financial sanctions on Russia, citing warnings that such measures could harm U.S. business interests. Additionally, Trump has previously recognized Crimea as Russian territory and criticized Zelenskyy's insistence on reclaiming it, arguing that the issue is blocking peace talks.
In turn, Putin seems largely unfazed by Trump's recent expressions of disappointment. In fact, the New York Times suggests that the Kremlin remains committed to its military campaign in Ukraine, betting that Russian forces might achieve decisive battlefield advantages in the months ahead. Many analysts, myself included, suspect that despite Trump's new threats, Putin still hopes he can negotiate a deal with Trump in the future to ease sanctions if Russia agrees to end the conflict on favorable terms.
Meanwhile, Putin has continued his familiar narrative accusing the West of exploiting the collapse of the Soviet Union for geopolitical gain. Recently, he claimed that after the Soviet Union fell, the West chose to 'live by rules it created for itself,' disregarding Russia's strategic interests. I believe these remarks are meant to justify Moscow's increasingly assertive foreign policy and to rally domestic support.
Europe's relationship with Russian energy remains complex, particularly in the nuclear sector. According to a recent report by the Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research (ECSSR), despite geopolitical tensions, the European Commission announced on June 16 that it has no immediate plans to reduce reliance on Russian nuclear fuel. In my point of view, this highlights Europe's strategic vulnerability. Five EU countries operate 19 nuclear reactors built to run on Russian fuel. While four of these countries have signed deals with U.S.-based Westinghouse and France's Framatome for alternative supplies, transitioning could take five to seven years and require significant investment.
Globally, Russia's foreign policy continues to evolve. Despite talk of a closer strategic partnership between Moscow and Tehran, Russia has provided limited support for Iran in its conflict with Israel. Axios reported that Putin recently urged Iran to accept a nuclear deal with the U.S. based on zero uranium enrichment—a proposal that Tehran has reportedly rejected. Separately, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov met his Turkish counterpart on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in Brazil, discussing Middle Eastern tensions and concerns about growing defense ties between Turkey and Azerbaijan. Both Russia and Turkey have previously offered to store Iranian uranium on their territories to prevent a regional nuclear arms race.
Lavrov is currently touring Asia, including planned visits to North Korea and China, signaling Russia's ongoing search for diplomatic and economic partnerships beyond the West.
In my view, President Trump's newly confrontational tone toward Putin could either open fresh diplomatic channels—or risk slamming the door shut on negotiations between two leaders who once openly praised each other as friends. Only time will tell whether this shift is genuine or merely another twist in the unpredictable saga of Trump's foreign policy.
read more
Analysis- Turkey Has 0 Regional Allies... Why?
Analysis: Russia, Turkey... Libya in Return For Syria?
Analysis: Who Will Gain Trump's Peace Plan Fruits?
Analysis: Will Turkey's Erdogan Resort to Snap Election?
Analysis: What Are Turkey's Aspirations in Iraq?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: Mercenaries In Libya... Who Should Be Blamed?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis- How 'Libya Nightmare' Takes Erdogan to Algiers
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: What Happens After Brexit?
Opinion & Analysis
Analysis: Strategic Significance of Libya's Sirte, Jufra!
News
Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters
News
China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier
Sports
Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer
Videos & Features
Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall
Lifestyle
Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt
Business
Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War
News
"Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence"
News
Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks
Arts & Culture
Hawass Foundation Launches 1st Course to Teach Ancient Egyptian Language
Videos & Features
Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily News Egypt
an hour ago
- Daily News Egypt
Al-Sisi welcomes Trump's remarks on Nile Dam, endorses US vision for ‘just peace'
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi on Tuesday welcomed recent comments by US President Donald Trump regarding the Nile Dam in Ethiopia, voicing support for what he described as Trump's 'vision for achieving a just peace' in global conflict zones. In a statement shared on his official social media platforms, Al-Sisi praised what he called the US administration's 'serious efforts' to mediate international disputes and end wars. He expressed confidence in Trump's ability to help resolve complex issues—including ongoing conflicts in Ukraine, Palestine, and across Africa. Addressing the Nile dam dispute, Al-Sisi said Egypt values Trump's interest in securing a fair agreement that safeguards the interests of all stakeholders, while reaffirming Egypt's view of the Nile as a 'source of life' for its people. Trump's remarks came during a meeting Monday with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, in which he referenced the Ethiopian dam, describing it as 'one of the largest in the world.' He added that it had 'stopped the flow of water to what's known as the Nile River'—a rare public alignment with Cairo's long-held concerns that GERD poses a potential threat to Egypt's water security. 'If I were Egypt, I'd want the water in the Nile,' Trump said, before adding, 'We believe this issue will be resolved very soon.' The comments sparked debate, particularly over Trump's apparent acknowledgment that the US had supported the dam's construction—an unexpected development amid longstanding tensions between Egypt and Ethiopia over Nile water rights. Negotiations over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), have repeatedly stalled in recent years despite international mediation. Egypt fears the dam will significantly reduce its share of Nile water, while Ethiopia insists the project is essential for economic development and electricity generation.


Al-Ahram Weekly
3 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Ukrainians welcome US aid but see Trump's 50-day ultimatum to Putin as too long - War in Ukraine
Ukrainians welcomed U.S. President Donald Trump's pledge of more U.S.-made weapons in their three-year fight against Russia's invasion, though it is unclear what exactly they will get and how quickly. The time frame for the further arms deliveries, which European countries have agreed to pay for, is crucial. Russia is making a summer push to break through along the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, and its drones and missiles are hammering Ukrainian cities more than at any time in the war. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked Trump for his 'willingness to support Ukraine.' In Kyiv, resident Nina Tokar, 70, said Tuesday that with more US weapons going to Ukraine 'maybe this will all end faster.' However, following Trump's threat late last week to impose major sanctions on Russia for failing to reach a deal to end the fighting, the American president said Monday that Moscow would get 50 days to come to a settlement or face 'very severe' economic sanctions. While some believe strict tariffs on Moscow could be a game changer, the decision to postpone them until September struck some European observers as being too long. Ukrainian officials made no direct comment about the 50-day window, but for Russia, the delay of new sanctions came as a reprieve. Senior Russian lawmaker Konstantin Kosachev commented: 'Oh, how much can change both on the battlefield and with the mood of those leading the US and NATO in 50 days.' Russian President Vladimir Putin hasn't budged when presented with previous US deadlines and threats. In an interview with the BBC broadcast Tuesday, Trump said of Putin: 'I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him.' Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Moscow 'would like to understand what is behind this statement about 50 days,' noting that the Kremlin has offered to continue direct peace talks with Ukraine. 'Earlier, there were also the deadlines of 24 hours and of 100 days,' Lavrov said during an official trip to China. 'We've seen it all and really would like to understand the motivation of the US president.' An assessment published Tuesday by Chatham House noted that 'the exact details of what has been agreed remain hazy.' 'Putin will continue to judge Trump by his actions, not by his words — and so far, there is little enough action to be seen,' the London-based think tank said. Military experts are trying to figure out whether Russian forces could use the window left by Trump to achieve significant territorial gains. Russian troops are slowly ramming through the Ukrainian defenses in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region, the main focus of the Russian offensive. They are also trying to carve out a buffer zone along the border with the northeastern Ukrainian regions of Sumy and Kharkiv. Russia currently holds about 20% of Ukraine. Ukraine's depleted army has recently been losing more territory, but there is no sign of a looming collapse on the front line, analysts say. Zelenskyy said he spoke to Trump after the Republican leader's Oval Office announcement Monday on weapons sales, expressing gratitude for the decision to send more Patriot air defense missiles that are vital to defend Ukrainian cities. 'We discussed … the necessary measures and decisions to provide greater protection for people from Russian attacks and strengthen our positions,' Zelenskyy said on Telegram. 'We agreed to talk more often and coordinate our steps in the future.' Trump and Zelenskyy have had a notoriously fraught relationship, and Washington's consent to providing more weaponry has eased Kyiv's worries. Even so, some Ukrainians felt the US decision won't alter the course of the war. 'If we take the situation as a whole, it hardly looks like this will fundamentally change anything,' Kyiv resident Oles Oliinyk, 33, told The Associated Press. Tokar, the Kyiv resident, was also skeptical. 'I have very little faith in (Trump). He says one thing today, and tomorrow he may say something else.' Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp expressed misgivings about the 50-day delay on sanctions. 'I do believe that the 50 days that Mr Trump has announced is rather long. It's up to September 2. I think that's rather long,' he said in Brussels on Tuesday. Much remains to be worked out about how and when the weapons, especially the Patriot systems, will be provided, Denmark's Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said. But, in an indication that Europe is relieved that the US hasn't walked away from the conflict, he added: 'The most important thing is that we now have an American readiness to deliver these most needed weapons.' Some European countries, such as Hungary and Slovakia, still rely heavily on Russia for energy supplies and could be hit hard by Trump's threatened secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil and gas — an effort to isolate Moscow in the global economy. Lithuania's Foreign Minister Kęstutis Budrys said Trump's 50-day delay was a 'signal for Europe to prepare ourselves, because we still have some member states that are exposed to imports of oil and oil products from Russia.' German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said it remains to be seen whether Trump's announcement will be a turnaround but 'what is decisive is that the tone has changed.' The president's threat to impose sanctions after 50 days is 'significant progress,' Pistorius told ARD television. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Mada
5 hours ago
- Mada
Trump says US ‘working on' resolving Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam dispute
After United States President Donald Trump said that the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) dispute is 'a big problem' that the US is 'working on' resolving, President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi expressed appreciation for what he described as Trump's keenness to reach a 'fair agreement' between Egypt, Sudan and Ethiopia on the matter. 'If I am Egypt, I want to have water in the Nile,' Trump said during a press conference with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte on Monday, adding that the Nile is a 'very important source of income and life' for Egypt. In response, Sisi praised what he called Trump's 'recognition' of the river's vital importance for Egyptians in his statement on Tuesday. Egypt has voiced existential concerns over its water security in its decade-long dispute with Ethiopia, arguing that the dam imposes a fait accompli on downstream countries that will either compromise their access to water or force their hand in agreements about resource-sharing. The US stepped in as a mediator to three-way negotiations which were ultimately unresolved between the countries involved in 2019, later stepping back to an observing role in another stalled round of talks between the Nile states led by the African Union. During Monday's presser, Trump reiterated his previous claims that the GERD is funded by the US. 'I think the US funded the dam,' he said, adding, 'I do not know why they didn't solve the problem before they built the dam. But it is nice when the Nile River has water.' He also referred to 'keeping peace between Egypt and Ethiopia' in the GERD dispute in a post from June on social media, claiming that he will resolve the dispute along with a series of other international diplomatic impasses for which he deserves a Nobel Prize, and, similar to what he said on Monday, that the US financed the GERD project, though 'stupidly.' Trump noted Egypt's concerns at the time, saying that it 'substantially reduces the water flowing into the Nile River.' In response, the director general of GERD's Public Participation Coordination Office, Aregawi Berhe, denied Trump's claims and stressed that the project was built by the 'Ethiopian people.' Prime Minister Mostafa Madbuly announced in the weekly cabinet presser last week Ethiopia's intention to resume GERD negotiations, after a years-long lapse in the talks that collapsed in December 2023. Egypt asked Ethiopia to 'sign a document' that would turn the intention into a written commitment, he added. Egypt has repeatedly voiced its concerns over its access to vital water resources amid the dam's establishment in successive rounds of talks since 2013. The US mediated an earlier round of talks after Egypt called for international mediation toward a deal. Delegations from Ethiopia, Egypt and Sudan met three times in Washington DC in 2020. An Egyptian government source speaking to Mada Masr on condition of anonymity at the time said that there are three terms on which Egypt would not 'under any circumstances' compromise: an agreed minimum amount of water Ethiopia would have to release annually, legally-binding measures for mitigation and dispute resolution and a final document that does not imply any permanent concession from Egypt on its water rights. A consultant to the negotiations said that Ethiopia was also insisting on a water share — a term to which they said Egypt would never agree. Though America's role in any future talks is unclear, Trump's comments come months ahead of Addis Ababa's inauguration of the mega-dam project, scheduled for September. The country completed the fourth and final filling phase of the dam in 2023 in a move that Cairo said was 'unilateral' action that disregards the interests of downstream countries Sudan and Egypt.