logo
Pakistan violates ceasefire agreement with India for 10th day: Why does it continue to fire across the Line of Control?

Pakistan violates ceasefire agreement with India for 10th day: Why does it continue to fire across the Line of Control?

Mint04-05-2025
Pakistani troops continued their pattern of unprovoked small arms firing across multiple sectors along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir, drawing a strong and effective response from the Indian Army, officials said on Sunday.
This marks the 10th consecutive night of cross-border firing, occurring amid escalating tensions following the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, which killed 26 people, most of them tourists.
According to officials, ceasefire violations were reported from eight locations across five districts of the Union Territory during the intervening night of Saturday and Sunday. Fortunately, no casualties have been reported so far.
'During the night of May 3 and 4, Pakistan Army posts resorted to unprovoked small arms fire across the LoC in areas opposite Kupwara, Baramulla, Poonch, Rajouri, Mendhar, Naushera, Sunderbani, and Akhnoor in J&K. Indian Army responded promptly and proportionately,' a defence spokesperson said.
The ceasefire violations along the LoC and International Border (IB) have been very rare since India and Pakistan renewed the ceasefire agreement on February 25, 2021.
India shares a total of 3,323 km of border with Pakistan, divided into three parts: the International Border (IB), approximately 2,400 km from Gujarat to the northern banks of the Chenab River in Akhnoor, Jammu; the Line of Control (LoC), 740 km long, running from parts of Jammu to parts of Leh; and the Actual Ground Position Line (AGPL), 110 km long, dividing the Siachen region from NJ 9842 to Indira Col in the north.
The LoC, serving as the de facto border, stretches for approximately 740 kilometres, from Sangam in Kashmir to Point NJ-9842 near the Siachen Glacier. In Jammu, the LoC transitions into what India considers the International Border (IB), as India has no territorial claims on Pakistani Punjab.
The Ceasefire Line between India and Pakistan was initially established under the Karachi Agreement of 1949, following the 1948–49 war. It was later renamed the Line of Control (LoC) after the Simla Agreement in 1972. Though not recognised as an international boundary, the LoC functions as a military control line between the two countries.
However, cross-border firing and the infiltration of Pakistan-backed terrorists, particularly since the onset of the Kashmir insurgency in 1989, along with attacks by Pakistani Border Action Teams (BATs), have rendered the ceasefire 'agreement' effectively meaningless.
Periods like the 1990s and the span between 2016 and 2021 saw over a thousand violations annually, with the 1990s often described by Indian Army veterans as a 'free for all' along the Line of Control.
In 2021, both militaries found mutual incentive to curb hostilities and reaffirmed the 2003 ceasefire understanding, originally established ahead of the India-Pakistan Composite Dialogue.
Despite the broader breakdown in diplomatic and economic ties since 2019, the military channel remains the only active line of bilateral communication, giving both nations a reason to maintain the current ceasefire arrangement.
According to (Retd) IFS officer Anil Trigunayat, former Ambassador to Jordan, Libya and Malta, ceasefire violations are mostly cover fires to enable the entry of terrorists, and to provoke India to retaliate.
'Mostly it does to facilitate the entry of terrorists across the border by providing fire cover. Secondly it wishes to provoke India to retaliate and use grey zone warfare to accuse India of violation to garner international sympathy and domestic support as it goes through tremendous financial and socio-economic stress," the former Ambassador told Livemint.
Over the past four years, Pakistan's economy has steadily declined, while the military's dominant hold over the country is increasingly being challenged by insurgent groups such as the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF).
Following the Taliban's return to power in Afghanistan, the TTP significantly escalated its operations, leading to a 73% surge in terror attacks across Pakistan in the first 21 months of Taliban rule, according to a report by ORF.
The province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has been hit hardest, witnessing an alarming 279.8% rise in incidents, jumping from 572 in 2021 to 2,173 in 2024. Meanwhile, the BLA and BLF have also stepped up their offensives, particularly targeting Pakistani military installations, further destabilizing internal security from multiple fronts, according to the report.
First Published: 4 May 2025, 08:14 PM IST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Asim Munir left red-faced, Hina Rabbani Khar makes shocking statement, says 'US looking at Pakistan through...'
Asim Munir left red-faced, Hina Rabbani Khar makes shocking statement, says 'US looking at Pakistan through...'

India.com

time5 minutes ago

  • India.com

Asim Munir left red-faced, Hina Rabbani Khar makes shocking statement, says 'US looking at Pakistan through...'

Asim Munir left red-faced, Hina Rabbani Khar makes shocking statement, says 'US looking at Pakistan through...' Of late Pakistan and US are getting closer. After Operation Sindoor, many leaders including Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir have visited US repeatedly and are continuously praising President Donald Trump. While at one end Pakistan is trying hard to gain US trust, former Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar has objected to US' attitude towards her country. Hina Rabbani said that US should reconsider its political outlook towards South Asia and should not look at Pakistan through the prism of its relations with India. While talking to 'GZERO' media, Hina said, 'I think US has started looking at Pakistan only from the Indian perspective. Pakistan should not be seen from the Indian perspective in US, which is very aggressive towards Pakistan.' What Hina said about India? Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar also targeted India during the conversation. Hina said, 'By attacking Pakistan in May 2025, India has tried to set a new criteria. This can become a dangerous situation for the entire region. He said that incidents of terrorism are seen continuously in South Asia. In such a situation, no country has the right to launch a missile attack on another country in case of a terrorist incident.'

Damage already done: Fareed Zakaria on downturn in India-US ties under Trump
Damage already done: Fareed Zakaria on downturn in India-US ties under Trump

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Damage already done: Fareed Zakaria on downturn in India-US ties under Trump

With India-US ties at its lowest ebb, geopolitical expert Fareed Zakaria squarely blamed President Donald Trump for "undoing" decades of "painstaking efforts" by previous administrations to build on the relationship with New his segment on CNN, Zakaria emphasised that imposing the highest tariffs on India while deepening its ties with Pakistan was the "biggest foreign policy mistake" by Trump 2.0, underscoring that the "damage had already been done".advertisement"Even if Trump reverses course, the damage is done. India believes America has shown its true colours. It's unreliable, its willingness to be brutal to those whom it calls its friends. India will feel that it needs to hedge its bets. Stay close to Russia and make amends with China," Zakaria said. WORSENING US-INDIA TIES India has been a victim of Trump 2.0's new playbook - humiliate allies, and flirt with adversaries. Despite warm ties during his first term, India has had to deal with Trump's compulsive bluster in his second from imposing a 25% reciprocal tariff, Trump has slapped an additional levy of 25% on India over its purchase of Russian oil - a revenue source the White House said was sustaining Moscow's war in what has pinched India more is the US's return to the policy of hyphenating India with Pakistan. With the trade deal with India in limbo, Trump has sought to deepen economic ties with Pakistan. Not only has the US reduced tariffs on Pakistani imports to 19% from 29%, it has also struck a deal to develop oil reserves in Pakistan."Trump placed India in the highest category of tariffs, while placing Pakistan at just 19% and offering joint efforts to look for oil. There is little accessible oil there. He met with Pakistan's Army chief in private. A Trump family-backed firm has ties to Pakistan's National Crypto Council, fuelling suspicions of backroom deals," Zakaria Trump's threats, India has not halted its oil trade with Russia and has sought to reset its ties with China by leaving border disputes behind. HOW US BUILT ITS TIES WITH INDIAAnalysing US-India ties through the years since the Cold War, Zakaria underlined that Washington's strategic outreach towards India had been bipartisan. However, Trump's "inexplicable hostility" towards India reversed policies pursued under five administrations, including his own previous one, the noted American journalist and author said."President Clinton's visit in 2000 was hugely successful... A pivotal shift took place under George W. Bush. His administration realised that a rising China was transforming the international system, and the single most important counterweight to China could be India, which was beginning to reform economically," he further said the Barack Obama administration saw India as key to its pivot to Asia and supported New Delhi's bid to become a permanent member of the UN Security Council. "He greatly increased trade between the two economies," Zakaria geopolitical analyst went on to say that the first Trump administration "took an important leap forward" by reinvigorating the Quad, a defence-oriented group of the US, Australia, Japan and India."President Biden built on the Trump legacy... India began cooperating with the US in the manufacture of everything - from fighter jets to computer chips. In the second quarter of this year, India exported more smartphones to the US market than China," he pointed the course has changed quickly under Trump 2.0. India now finds itself isolated by the US amid Trump's trade and tariff bluster.- EndsTune InMust Watch

Fake Marshal: Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir lies again, says 'India begged' for ceasefire during Operation Sindoor
Fake Marshal: Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir lies again, says 'India begged' for ceasefire during Operation Sindoor

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Fake Marshal: Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir lies again, says 'India begged' for ceasefire during Operation Sindoor

Pakistan Army chief General Asim Munir has come under scrutiny after making false statements at a diaspora event in Belgium, where he claimed that India was 'forced to beg for a ceasefire' during the recent India-Pakistan conflict and that US President Donald Trump had to intervene to mediate, as reported by HT. These assertions contradict official Indian accounts and were made during a closed-door event organized by the Overseas Pakistani Foundation near Brussels on August 11. False claims on ceasefire and conflict Munir's remarks sharply contrast with facts presented by the Indian government following Operation Sindoor . The ceasefire between India and Pakistan was reached through Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) level talks, with no mediation by the United States. In fact, on May 10, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio called India's External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, informing him that Pakistan was seeking a ceasefire after India's successful strike on Nur Khan air base using BrahMos and SCALP missiles. Jaishankar made it clear that any ceasefire proposal needed to come formally from Pakistan's DGMO through established channels. At the Belgium event, Munir falsely claimed that Pakistan had given a 'befitting reply' to India by shooting down 'advanced Indian aircraft,' which earned Pakistan new global respect. He also alleged that India peddled false victimhood over terrorism while 'discreetly supporting trans-border terror' in Pakistan, Canada, and the US—charges consistently denied by New Delhi. Munir further stated that the international community 'only respects power' and that India had no option but to seek a ceasefire, prompting Trump's intervention. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 21st Century Skills Start with Confident Communication Planet Spark Learn More Undo Crude analogy comparing India and Pakistan During a private dinner in Florida last week, Munir used what he called an 'unusual crude analogy' to describe the relationship between the two neighbours. 'I am going to use a crude analogy to explain the situation... India is a shining Mercedes coming on a highway like a Ferrari, but we are a dump truck full of gravel. If the truck hits the car, who will be the loser?' Munir said. This was part of his second visit to the US in two months. Repeated aggressive rhetoric and nuclear threats This was not Munir's first instance of aggressive or false statements about the conflict. During his visit to Washington last week, he reportedly warned the Pakistani diaspora in Tampa, Florida, that Pakistan would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons if its survival was threatened. He was quoted saying, 'We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us.' Live Events India's response and condemnation Indian officials dismissed Munir's comments as typical rhetoric from Pakistan's military, especially when it enjoys Western support. A government source described such statements as symptomatic of Pakistan's lack of democracy, with the military controlling the country and possibly eyeing a political role for Munir despite his denials. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) condemned the remarks as 'nuclear sabre-rattling' and evidence of Pakistan's recklessness. The ministry's statement said, 'The international community can draw its own conclusions on the irresponsibility inherent in such remarks, which also reinforce well-held doubts about the integrity of nuclear command and control in a state where the military is hand-in-glove with terrorist groups.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store