logo
Central African Republic's Touadera announces bid for third term

Central African Republic's Touadera announces bid for third term

Reuters6 days ago
BANGUI, July 26 (Reuters) - Central African Republic's President Faustin-Archange Touadera said on Saturday he will run for a third term later this year, seeking to extend his rule into a second decade after scrapping term limits in 2023.
"Many of you have asked for me, and my answer is yes. I am your candidate for the presidential election of December 2025," the 68-year-old said at a meeting of his party, the United Hearts Movement, in the capital Bangui.
"We will continue the work of rebuilding our country."
Since taking office in 2016, Touadera has enlisted outside forces to stay in power amid a persistent civil conflict, including mercenaries from Russia's Wagner militia, who intervened in 2018 on the side of the government.
Landlocked Central African Republic, roughly the size of France and with a population of around 5.5 million, is deeply impoverished despite being rich in resources including gold, diamonds and timber.
It has witnessed waves of instability, including coups and rebellions, since independence from France in 1960.
Touadera won a second term in 2020, though militants including the Coalition of Patriots for Change (CPC) have fought to overturn that result.
The army, backed by United Nations peacekeepers and Russian and Rwandan troops, has been fighting the group for years.
Touadera's current term was supposed to be his last, but in 2023 the country held a constitutional referendum that abolished the two-term limit and extended the presidential mandate from five to seven years.
Opposition parties and civil society groups have said the new constitution, which was backed by more than 95% of voters, could allow Touadera to stay in power for life.
The exact date of the December vote has not been announced.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats find it hard to move on when Biden and Harris keep hogging the spotlight
Democrats find it hard to move on when Biden and Harris keep hogging the spotlight

The Independent

time13 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Democrats find it hard to move on when Biden and Harris keep hogging the spotlight

Donald Trump is President of the United States. Republicans control all three branches of government. And even as Democrats are planning to regroup and contest next year's midterm elections, the two people who many of them blame for last year's dismal election outcome simply will not go away. More than half a year after they left office after a single four-year term, former president Joe Biden and former vice president Kamala Harris are continuing to remain in the spotlight and allow Republicans to highlight their failures instead of letting their party move on and find a way to regain the support that was lost during their time in office. Harris, who lost all seven of the contested swing states in last year's election, recently announced an upcoming book that will focus on the 107-day campaign she waged against Trump after Biden withdrew from the 2024 race following his dismal debate performance last June. She also revealed that she won't enter the upcoming race to succeed California Governor Gavin Newsom, who must leave office in 2027 when his second four-year term ends, leaving open the possibility that she'll enter what is expected to be a crowded primary race for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination. Biden, whose 11th hour pardons of his family members and other political allies emboldened Trump to grant reprieves for the violent rioters who tried to prevent his 2020 loss from being certified, is still giving speeches in which he is attacking his predecessor-turned-successor, a stark contrast from how most former presidents have behaved after leaving office. At one such appearance, an address to the National Bar Association in Chicago on Thursday, he accused the Trump administration of 'doing its best to dismantle the Constitution,' giving right-wing media outlets plenty of fodder to use at a time when his party is trying to focus on the future and the current government's policy problems. And the president's son, Hunter Biden, is doing his best to stay in the headlines with a series of podcast appearances in which he casts blame for his father's exit from the race on a broad range of people — but not his father. The former Democratic ticket's refusal to fade away after a devastating electoral performance is ruffling feathers among party figures who are tasked with moving forward and figuring out how to escape from the wilderness in next year's midterms. A number of popular governors, including Illinois' JB Prizker and Kentucky's Andy Beshear, have been making the trek to early primary states with an eye towards 2028, and voters are increasingly eager to elect new faces rather than older establishment figures. Donna Bojarsky, a Democratic consultant, told The Washington Post that 'nobody' in the party is looking to go 'back to 2024' as they look for a way forward against the Republicans. 'The shadow of 2024 is long, and I think all perspectives in the mix believe we need something fresh,' she said. Another strategist Cooper Teboe, said the party's current predicament stems from a sclerosis that has taken hold on account of incumbents refusing to relinquish power to the next generation. 'The core reason the Democratic Party is in the position it is in today is because no new figures, no new ideas, have been allowed to rise up and take hold,' he said. But there is a group eager for Biden and Harris to remain part of the national conversation — Republicans. One GOP consultant who spoke to The Independent said Hunter Biden's recent profanity-laced podcast appearances and the former president's speeches are just what they need to keep his failures in the public eye as his party tries to regain the trust of voters. 'Hunter Biden is just what Democrats need more of going into the midterms,' he said, more than a bit sarcastically.

Presidential candidates can now be reimbursed up to €250k for election expenses
Presidential candidates can now be reimbursed up to €250k for election expenses

BreakingNews.ie

time14 minutes ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Presidential candidates can now be reimbursed up to €250k for election expenses

An order increasing the maximum amount of election expenses that can be reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election from €200,000 to €250,000 has been signed by Minister for Housing and Local Government James Browne. Election expenses are reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election who is elected or, if not elected, the total of their votes exceeds one quarter of the quota. Advertisement Section 21A of the Electoral Act 1997 provides that the maximum amount of election expenses that can be reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election is €200,000. However, under the Act, the minister may vary the amounts having regard to changes in the Consumer Price Index. A review of the amounts typically takes place in advance of each election. Applying the CPI increase since the amount was last revised resulted in a potential increase to €252,700 which has been rounded down to €250,000. Section 53 (as amended) of the Electoral Act 1997 provides that spending by a candidate at a presidential election shall not exceed €750,000. It is not proposed to increase the spending limit, so it will remain at €750,000.

Kamala Harris says she doesn't plan to return to ‘broken' system of US politics
Kamala Harris says she doesn't plan to return to ‘broken' system of US politics

The Guardian

time36 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Kamala Harris says she doesn't plan to return to ‘broken' system of US politics

Kamala Harris has said that she currently has no desire to re-enter 'the system' of American politics because it is 'broken'. On Thursday night the Democratic party's defeated presidential nominee, who replaced Joe Biden late in the 2024 campaign after he dropped his re-election bid, gave her first interview since losing the election to Donald Trump, talking to Stephen Colbert on The Late Show. After she announced she will not run for the governorship of California just a day earlier, Harris told the TV show that it was about something more 'basic' than whether she wanted to run for something else instead – with the subtext being whether she will attempt a White House run again in 2028. 'Recently I made the decision that I just – for now – I don't want to go back in the system. I think it's broken,' she said, provoking a collective groan from the studio audience. Colbert later returned to the subject, saying that her remark was harrowing. 'Well, but it's also evident, isn't it?' she said. Describing herself as a 'devout public servant', the former vice-president added: 'I always believed, that as fragile as our democracy is, our systems would be strong enough to defend our most fundamental principles. And I think right now that they're not as strong as they need to be. And for now I don't want to go back into that system.' Harris's choice of The Late Show as the channel for her first post-election defeat interview was pointed. The most-watched talkshow was cancelled last month by the CBS network, which pleaded financial stress, though the decision was widely denounced as being politically motivated. The cancellation was announced after Colbert had criticized CBS and its parent company Paramount Global for reaching a $16m settlement with Trump. The president had sued CBS News over an interview on the 60 Minutes show with Harris at the height of last year's presidential campaign, which Trump claimed had been manipulated in her favour. None of this febrile back story was mentioned by either Colbert or Harris on Thursday. But she did delivery a passionate lament for the numbers of people who she said had 'capitulated' to the aggressive second Trump administration. When Colbert invited her to say 'I told you so' after she had predicted many of Trump's most contentious moves – including Medicaid cuts, ignoring court orders, and 'massive tax cuts to the rich' – she replied: 'But Stephen, what I did not predict was the capitulation.' She went on: 'Perhaps it's naive of me … there should be many who consider themselves to be guardians of our system and our democracy who just capitulated, and I didn't see that coming.' The timing of the interview was also poignant, as she was considered to be the automatic frontrunner if she had decided to run to become the next governor of California. Her wider remarks on 'the system' help explain that decision, though they still notably left room for another possible presidential run. In the meantime, Harris has a book to sell, 107 Days, which she name-checked copiously on the Late Show in advance of its publication next month. The book, as its title suggests, relates the story of the shortest presidential run of all time. She said it would give a 'behind-the-scenes sharing' of those intense days. Whether it is to sell the book or to lay the foundations for another presidential bid remains a moot point, but Harris said she wanted to use the next period to 'travel the country and listen to people. I don't want it to be transactional, where I'm asking for their vote.' Harris admitted that it had taken her months following her defeat before she had the strength to tune into the news again. 'You know, I'm just not into self-mutilation,' she said. Instead there had been 'lots of cooking shows', her top choice being The Kitchen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store