Ryanair cancels flights for 30,000 passengers amid French ATC strike
"European families are held to ransom by French Air Traffic Controllers going on strike," wrote Ryanair CEO Michael O'Learyin a press release. "It is not acceptable that overflights over French airspace en route to their destination are being canceled/delayed as a result of yet another French ATC strike."
"It makes no sense and is abundantly unfair on EU passengers and families going on holidays," he added.
Ryanair asked EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to "take urgent action to reform EU ATC services" after the airline was forced to cancel 170 flights slated for Thursday and Friday, which happens to coincide with the start of the European summer holiday season.
Ryanair's release also noted that aside from flights involving France being canceled, flights that fly over France to and from countries such as Ireland, Spain and Greece are also impacted.
"EU skies cannot be repeatedly closed just because French Air Traffic Controllers are going on recreational strikes," it declared.
"I am determined to stand firm against this unacceptable movement," said French Transport Minister Philippe Tabarot in an X post Wednesday.
He called the ATC's choice to strike during the peak holiday departure time and salary increase demands, among other conditions, "unacceptable."
Tabarot also noted that the ATC strike impacts Air France, whose losses he said "are likely to amount to millions of euros, a burden that will ultimately fall on French taxpayers."
Ryanair has also created a website titled "Air Traffic Control Ruined Your Flight," which lists several EU nations' transportation ministers under the banner "ATC League Of Delays." It lists each minister's country, then alleges how many flights have been disrupted and passengers have been impacted by ATC delays.
It has Tabarot at the top, and purports 26,008 flights and 4,681,440 have been affected under his watch.
O'Leary also said in his statement that should von der Leyen reform EU ATC services by making sure ATC services are fully staffed for the beginning of daily departures and provide protection for overflights during national ATC strikes, it would "eliminate 90% of all ATC delays and cancellations, and protect EU passengers from these repeated and avoidable ATC disruptions due to yet another French ATC strike."
The UNSA-ICNA air traffic control engineer union had announced in June it would be striking on July 3 and 4, and in a statement released Saturday said it is "calling for a change of course to strengthen the staff, to complete technical modernization projects and to reinstate operational priorities at the heart of decisions."
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
How the Trump-Putin summit signals a return to imperial thinking
The term was first popularized by Gerard Libaridian, an Armenian American historian, who used it in a 2014 speech in England to refer to former empires like Iran, Turkey and Russia as they sought to influence post-Soviet states they had once controlled. In his view, it describes an approach that lingers in many a national psyche, fusing a simplistic nostalgia for greatness to strong beliefs about the right to keep dominating smaller nations and neighbors. Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the idea has gained momentum, usually in reference to Putin's Russia. And Trump's assertive second term -- with his threats to seize Greenland and the Panama Canal, make Canada the 51st state and send U.S. troops into Mexico -- has spurred new accusations from historians and world leaders that his demands for deference reflect an imperial mentality. Advertisement Trump has hardly been consistent. He has often condemned foreign intervention and 'stupid wars' while bombing Iran and expressing ambivalence about U.S. alliances and the defense of vulnerable democracies like Taiwan. Advertisement Still, there's perhaps something imperial -- or at least a version of great-power behavior with some additional traits -- in his talk of 'land swaps' to bring peace in Ukraine over the country's own objections. 'There's been a powerful 'countries don't resolve their differences by annexing' norm that's held for a while, and Putin is obviously pushing on that,' said Daniel Immerwahr, a historian at Northwestern University and the author of 'How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States.' 'And Trump seems very comfortable with a reversion to the old rules.' The imperial mindset, of course, has never been confined to real estate. It is a mental framework for policy and the projection of power. It is a belief system with a long menu. And as the Trump-Putin meeting commences, historians and diplomats argue that the Alaska summit has already legitimized at least three imperial ideas that many had thought were buried in the past. 1. Core vs. periphery This week's summit was announced as an insider's affair: Ukrainian and European leaders were not invited. That exclusion set off a week of frantic diplomacy, yielding assurances from Trump that he is going to do more listening than deciding. But the two-man meeting remains. The European Union has been relegated to secondary status. Many still fear another Yalta, when the world's superpowers divvied up Europe in 1945 after the defeat of Nazi Germany, with the most-affected countries kept from the room where it happened. For Poland, it was not the first time, either. 'Between 1792 and 1795, Poland was divided three times by the great powers of the day: Austria, Prussia and Russia,' said Amitav Acharya, the author of a new book 'The Once and Future World Order.' Advertisement In such carving lies the imperial idea of the core vs. the periphery. Empires are hierarchies of subordination, scholars note. Power stays concentrated at the center, while the edges are forced to accept fewer rights and privileges, purportedly in exchange for 'civilization' or enrichment. The Romans resisted extending citizenship to conquered peoples. The French rebuffed requests for small measures of self-rule in Vietnam. In Puerto Rico and Guam, which the United States acquired after the Spanish-American War of 1898, residents are still not granted the same democratic representation as mainland Americans. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine has already experienced a moment steeped in great-power dynamics -- and subordination -- when Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated him for his lack of gratitude for U.S. military aid during a televised White House visit in February. 'You're not in a good position,' Trump told him. 'You don't have the cards.' In other words, he suggested, Ukraine is too weak to be anything but an appendage. Now Ukraine's leaders fear that the summit is strengthening the idea that only a few major powers make decisions for the world. Any attempt to turn their country of nearly 40 million people into a bystander in its own future is especially sensitive, historians say, because Ukrainian identity centers on the principle 'nothing about us without us.' 2. Supremacy and self-aggrandizement The imperial mindset, from the Crusades onward through Europe's royals and Asia's emperors, frequently involves a strong belief in cultural and often racial supremacy. European colonizers justified brutal actions and grand larceny of national treasures by claiming they were saving souls or protecting valuables from damage and decay. Advertisement Imperial-minded leaders throughout history have also cast themselves as the embodiment of greatness -- superhumans at the apex of superior nations that must be honored by all. Putin has become an updated version of that self-aggrandizing, imperial urge. A few years ago, he directly compared himself to Peter the Great, Russia's first emperor. Former diplomats in Russia have said that he has often fostered ideas of messianic imperialism, seeking to make Ukraine and many other neighboring countries a part of grander Russia. 'The Russian imperial mindset is alive and well in Russia,' said Michael McFaul, the former U.S. ambassador to Russia and the author of several books on Putin. Acharya, who teaches international relations at American University in Washington, said the summit, which Putin requested, harks back to a world order when great powers carved up states for 'the personal glory of their rulers.' Trump appears in some ways to also be headed that way. Although he has still focused his attention more at home than abroad, he has encouraged a blurring of the lines between patriotism and his own cult of personality. He sells coins with his face on the front. Gwenda Blair, who wrote the definitive biography of the Trump family, likened his second inauguration to a king's return. On his 79th birthday, he spent the day soaking up the scene at a military parade that he had personally ordered up -- ostensibly to mark the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, but arguably for his own honor as well. His family business, meanwhile, is putting the Trump name on real estate projects all over the world, leading some countries to bend their own rules for his favor. Advertisement Europeans see his acceptance of the summit -- on U.S. soil -- as a gift to Russia's leader that validates his viewpoint. 3. Economic empirecraft The British East India Co., a powerful trading company, was the tip of the spear for British colonialism. America's interventions in Latin America to protect big U.S. companies like United Fruit came later. Both are examples of the kind of top-down, less market-driven relationship among trade, business and the state that in some ways seems to be making a comeback in Russia and the United States. Then and now, the melding of power politics and commerce can take on a few forms. Chinese emperors relied on state monopolies for key products like salt -- not unlike Russia's state-owned energy companies or China's state-owned conglomerates. The British crown did not typically direct businesses but often took a stake in the companies that were extracting wealth from overseas -- similar to Trump's demand that the United States be given a share in future revenues from Ukraine's mineral reserves in return for its military aid. Trump's dangling of an offer to lift sanctions on Russia, and his threat to add 'very severe tariffs' to Russia's trading partners if Putin does not agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine, also fits an imperial mindset model. In these cases and others, he is merging national and corporate interests and prioritizing wealth as a tool to shape the global order. Now, in Alaska, the U.S.-Russia relationship has been set up more as a business deal than a contest of philosophies. Both presidents are motivated by their own ideas of past greatness. Trump insists peace is the goal. Territory, for both leaders, is apparently the means. Advertisement Ukraine and the rest of the world now have to wait to hear about whatever the two men discussed. This article originally appeared in
Newsweek
10 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Vladimir Putin Takes Swipe At Biden, Says 'No War' if Trump Was President
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russian President Vladimir Putin took a swipe at former President Joe Biden during a joint news conference alongside President Donald Trump on Friday following a summit regarding the ongoing war in Ukraine. Newsweek reached out to Biden's office via online form on Friday for comment. Why It Matters The high-stakes bilateral meeting concluded Friday ahead of schedule amid efforts to advance a potential ceasefire agreement in the war in Ukraine. It represented a direct U.S.–Russia engagement that could determine whether a ceasefire would be negotiated in Europe's deadliest conflict since World War II, while raising concerns among Ukrainian and European leaders that Ukraine might be sidelined in any agreement. Observers flagged that any agreement reached without Ukraine's direct participation risked freezing gains Moscow had made on the battlefield and could redraw security arrangements in Europe. During the news conference, Trump said he would get on the phone with NATO and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to brief them on the talks. What To Know While speaking to a host of international media outlets, Putin slammed Biden, saying in part that, "In the end, I would like to add one more thing. I'd like to remind you that in 2022, during the last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my previous American the situation should not be brought to the point of no return when it would come to hostilities. "I said it quite directly back then that it's a big mistake," Putin added. "Today when President Trump [said] that if he was the president back then, there would be no war. And I'm quite sure that it would indeed be so, I can confirm that. I think that overall, me and President Trump have built a very good businesslike and trustworthy contact. And I have every reason to believe that moving down this path we can sooner the better, to the end of the conflict in Ukraine." Putin's remarks were translated via CNN. President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) can be seen holding a meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. (Photo by) President Donald Trump (R) and Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) can be seen holding a meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. (Photo by) What Happens Next Trump said that the two countries agreed on various points, but ultimately, no deal was made. Trump added, though, that "great progress" was achieved during the summit. This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information.
The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says progress made but no deal with Putin at Alaska summit
JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska — President Trump on Friday said he made progress on key points during a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but did not specify what those points were or what disagreements remained to achieve peace in Ukraine. 'We didn't get there, but we have a good chance,' Trump said. The president did not take questions or offer any other details. He indicated he would speak with European leaders and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky following Friday's summit in Alaska.
