
Felony charge against Akwesasne activist dismissed
Larry V. Thompson, 71, was charged May 22, 2024 with felony second-degree criminal mischief during a demonstration on Barnhart Island held in opposition to a proposed Mohawk land claim settlement.
He and six other activists and an Akwesasne journalist who was there covering the event were all arrested after Thompson started digging a hole with a backhoe. Each of the eight people were charged with misdemeanor conspiracy and a trespass violation. Those charges were all dismissed in November 2024.
Thompson was additionally charged with the felony mischief count for allegedly causing over $1,500 in damage to New York Power Authority land. It carried a maximum sentence of 2 1/3 to seven years in state prison. He and the six other demonstrators were holding the protest to express their views that the land rightfully belongs to the Mohawk people.
Thompson's felony case made its way to St. Lawrence County Court in front of Judge Gregory P. Storie in December 2024. He had steadfastly refused to get an attorney and insisted on representing himself.
In July of this year, St. Lawrence County Chief Public Defender James M. McGahan drafted and filed a written motion on Thompson's behalf seeking dismissal of the felony charge. He argued that Thompson's right to a speedy trial had been violated.
Specifically, McGahan wrote that Thompson was arraigned May 22, 2024, which started a six-month clock for the prosecution to declare readiness for trial, which they didn't do until a St. Lawrence County grand jury indicted Thompson Dec. 5, 2024.
St. Lawrence County Assistant District Attorney Alexander A.V. Nichols wrote a response saying that portions of that time period should have been excluded from the six-month timeframe. He argued that after Thompson's initial appearance in Massena Town Court for his arraignment on May 22, 2024, Thompson had re-appeared three subsequent times in June, July and August. His case was adjourned during the first two of those because Thompson refused to accept an attorney.
Massena Town Justice Joseph Brown conducted a hearing during the third appearance on Aug. 27, 2024 to determine Thompson's ability to represent himself, which the town justice granted. That led to the case eventually being divested to county court.
In Judge Storie's written ruling filed on Thursday, he sides with McGahan on the grounds that Massena Town Court should have conducted a "searching inquiry" as to Thompson's ability to represent himself during his initial arraignment on May 22, 2024. Storie said that's because that the record shows this was the first time Thompson refused legal counsel and asserted his desire to self-represent. Justice Brown did not do that until Thompson's fourth appearance in Massena Town Court on Aug. 27, 2024.
"The arraignment court did no further inquiry as to the defendant's intentions regarding counsel, nor did it conduct a formal searching inquiry as to the defendant's ability to represent himself. Based on the record presented, this Court determines that a searching inquiry should have been conducted by the arraignment court, on May 22, 2024," Storie wrote in his ruling. "The defendant next appeared in Massena Town Court on June 11, 2024. At that time, he informed the Massena Town Court that he did not intend to retain an attorney and that he did not want counsel assigned to him. The local court, in this Court's view, was obligated to engage in a searching inquiry to determine if the defendant was able to represent himself. But it did not do so."
"The [prosecution] further urge this Court to nullify the local court's determination approving self representation on August 27, 2024 but this Court elects not to disturb the lower court's ruling in that regard," Storie wrote.
Thompson had also challenged the validity of the prosecution's filing a certificate of compliance formally stating they have turned over all discovery and are ready for trial. Storie noted he conducted a speedy trial inquiry on Dec. 12, 2024 and found the prosecution to be ready for trial. His ruling throws out that certification.
"The defendant argues that the people's Certificate of Compliance should be invalidated because it was filed in excess of six months from commencement. As noted, the people are assessed six months and fourteen days of chargeable time from the defendant's initial arraignment to the people's announcement of readiness," the ruling says. "This period of time exceeds the statutory requirement for the people to be ready for trial within six months. Therefore, based on the people's untimely announcement of readiness, the people's certificate was not valid."
Thompson had repeatedly argued in both Massena Town Court and St. Lawrence County Court appearances that they have no jurisdiction over him.
He said he is Onkwehonweh, which in the Mohawk language means the original people of Turtle Island (North America), who was protesting on land that rightfully belongs to the Onkwehonweh. Therefore, the foreign court has no authority over him.
He sees lawyers as officers of that foreign court. Therefore, according to Onkwehonweh law, he says he was not able accept an attorney's legal services.
"I assert and maintain this honorable court does not have jurisdiction to take my plea ... accordingly, I will file a notice of removal," he said during his Dec. 18, 2024 appearance.
"How can you charge someone who ... is native to the land," Thompson told the judge. "We were here first. We are the first law of the land."
Following an appearance in Massena Town Court in July 2024, Thompson told the Times that he started digging on Barnhart Island with the intention to start building a foundation for Native housing so Akwesasne community members could move upstream from decades of industrial pollution caused by Alcoa, Reynolds Metals and General Motors plants.
Thompson and the six protesters were demanding fair compensation for Barnhart Island, integral to the Moses-Saunders power dam, which has generated billions of dollars in electricity for the U.S. and Canada. They also sought redress for generations of pollution-related illnesses among Akwesasne people that result from upstream industrial activities by Alcoa, Reynolds Metals and General Motors. For decades, those plants used large amounts of PCB — a known carcinogen — in their operations. PCB stands for polychlorinated biphenyls.
The activists cited the Two-Row Wampum, dating back to 1613, as the standing treaty governing the relationship between non-native peoples and the Onkwehonweh. It is among the earliest treaties between the Haudenosaunee people and European colonizers. Symbolized by two parallel purple rows on a white background, it signifies mutual navigation of the river in separate vessels — a Native canoe and a Dutch ship — pledging never to interfere with each other's paths.
The federal government sold large swathes of the Akwesasne reservation without congressional approval, in violation of the Indian Non-Intercourse Act of 1796. It stands as the American law today, saying Native land cannot be sold without an affirmative vote of Congress.
In 2022, a judge ruled New York state unlawfully took thousands of acres of Mohawk land in the 1800s. Negotiations for a settlement have been ongoing between Albany and U.S., Canadian, and traditional Mohawk councils.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
a day ago
- CBS News
Felony charges dropped against 2 San Bernardino County medical center staffers accused of assaulting a federal officer
Felony charges against two staff members from a San Bernardino County medical center have been dropped, federal prosecutors confirmed. The charges, which also included interfering with immigration enforcement actions, stemmed from an incident on July 8, when two U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers detained a man inside the Ontario Advanced Surgery Center. The U.S. Attorney's Office claimed the staff members Jose de Jesus Ortega and Danielle Nadine Davila, interfered. Ortega and Davila were charged with assaulting a federal officer and conspiracy to prevent a federal officer from discharging their duties using force and intimidation. On Tuesday morning at a news conference, Carlos Juarez, Ortega's attorney, announced that felony charges against the pair were dismissed. He said his clients entered a not guilty plea to one misdemeanor charge, and they intend to fight it all the way. "The U.S. Attorney was wise enough not to pursue an indictment last week," Juarez said. "Our clients did nothing wrong." In a statement to CBS News Los Angeles, the U.S. Attorney's Office confirmed that the felony charges were dropped. The trial for their misdemeanor charges begins Oct. 6, the office said. The office declined further comment. According to prosecutors, two ICE agents were conducting "roving immigration-related operations" in Ontario on July 8, wearing government-issued equipment, driving an unmarked government vehicle, as they were following a truck with three men inside. The truck allegedly made a "quick" turn into the surgery center's parking lot and, as officers approached the men, two of them ran off. The third man was "partially detained near the surgery center's front entrance before he resisted and pulled away, causing both him and the ICE officer to fall to the ground," the U.S. Attorney's Office wrote in a news release. Juarez said his team has reviewed evidence that the government has obtained and has interviewed witnesses. He claimed that the ICE agents entered the clinic without a warrant and did not identify themselves when asked by employees inside. "What's ironic is the subject that they arrested, the gardener, was not subject to any charges whatsoever," Juarez said. "There were no criminal charges filed against the 'so-called' target."
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Auburn football tight end Hollis Davidson III arrested on felony drug possession charge
AUBURN — A third Auburn football player is facing legal trouble this offseason, as freshman tight end Hollis Davidson III was arrested and charged with felony possession of a Schedule I controlled substance on July 28 in Georgia, according to an arrest report obtained Friday by the Montgomery Advertiser. Davidson had been an active participant in Auburn's preseason team activities but has since been "suspended for violation of team rules," according to a statement provided by an Auburn spokesperson. According to Davidson's arrest report, he was found in possession of a THC vape on the evening of June 19 in Peachtree City, Georgia. Before Davidson was approached by law enforcement, as he was seen loitering outside a closed business near a golf cart, Davidson placed an item inside the golf cart and the reporting officer smelled marijuana, which gave probable cause for a search. Loose marijuana was found in the golf cart, according to the report, and a THC vape was found in Davidson's pants pocket. The vape was sent to a lab for further testing, and it returned with a positive Delta 9 concentrate of 1.42%. A warrant was issued for Davidson's arrest on July 26. The arrest occurred two days later, and Davidson was released on July 29, with his bail set at $5,000. A four-star recruit in both 247Sports and Rivals rankings, Davidson was the 15th-highest-rated signee in Auburn's 2025 class. Davidson's arrest, which happened one day before players reported to Auburn's preseason camp, was the third of an Auburn player this offseason, as former linebacker DJ Barber and wide receiver Malcolm Simmons were arrested on drug and domestic violence charges, respectively. Barber was dismissed from the program following his arrest, but Simmons has been an active participant in Auburn's preseason activities. During Simmons' preliminary hearing Friday, his defense team asked for youthful offender status in his case. Adam Cole is the Auburn athletics beat writer for the Montgomery Advertiser. He can be reached via email at acole@ or on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, @colereporter. To support Adam's work, please subscribe to the Montgomery Advertiser. This article originally appeared on Montgomery Advertiser: Auburn football's Hollis Davidson III arrested on drug possession charge

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Grand Forks murder trial to begin Tuesday
Aug. 18—GRAND FORKS — A Grand Forks man will stand trial for murder Tuesday, Aug. 19. Donald Joseph "DJ" Bartlette, 46, faces up to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole if found guilty of Class AA felony murder. Bartlette was charged last October, days after 49-year-old Anthony "Tony" James Kiehl was found unresponsive in his apartment. An affidavit filed in the case said Kiehl sustained multiple injuries to his head and face and wasn't breathing. He was pronounced dead at Altru Hospital. Some of the information that linked Bartlette to the death, according to court documents, included surveillance footage of the apartment building that showed him entering and exiting Kiehl's residence earlier that evening, as well as a witness statement that Bartlette said he'd gotten into a fight with Kiehl. Bartlette appeared in court Monday morning, Aug. 18, for a status conference, where a few matters were addressed. Samuel Gereszek, Bartlette's attorney, filed a motion that was approved in part during the hearing. Judge Jason McCarthy agreed with the first request of the motion, which was that Bartlette wear street clothes and non-visible restraints during his trial. This is common for a jury trial, because wearing a jail uniform and visible shackles could affect the jury's ability to see a defendant as innocent until proven guilty. The second part of the motion was a request to exclude all jail video calls the prosecution plans to play during the trial, because of that same risk of prejudice when seeing a defendant in a jail uniform and inside a correctional facility. Rachel Egstad, an attorney for the prosecution, said the calls will contradict other statements Bartlette made about what happened the night of the alleged murder; they will be important in allowing the jury to determine his credibility. She also said video showing a defendant in jail clothing has been found not to have as strong of a prejudicial effect and, in this case, she believes the value of the videos as evidence is stronger than any potential prejudice. In an earlier hearing, Gereszek argued the timeline of the alleged murder didn't make sense, and it was likely that someone else committed the crime after his client left following a fight with Kiehl, in which Bartlette claims to have acted in self-defense. Egstad said the video footage will show Bartlette making statements that no one else was there at the time. Another man, Nicholas Alexander Wride-Arnold, has been formally accused of involvement in Kiehl's death. Specifically, he has been charged with Class AA felony conspiracy to commit murder, though it was said in a previous hearing that his charge may be reduced to a lesser offense. Court documents say Wride-Arnold also went into Kiehl's apartment that night, and video footage showed him in the hallway afterward, vigorously cleaning himself and Bartlette with a towel. Wride-Arnold has been served a subpoena to testify during Bartlette's trial. He maintains his innocence and is scheduled for a final dispositional conference Thursday, Aug. 21. McCarthy questioned whether the audio of Bartlette's jail calls could be played without the video clips from the calls, and decided he would make a ruling after he has that information. Egstad said she believed Bartlette's body language and other visuals are relevant. Jury selection is scheduled for 9 a.m. Tuesday. From a pool of 64 potential jurors, a jury of 12 — plus two alternates — will be selected. The hope is to get jury selection finished by the noon hour, so the trial itself can begin after a lunch break, McCarthy said. Megan Essig, a prosecutor in the case, said she was hopeful trial would be finished by the end of the week, but said it may go into the next week. The prosecution's witness and exhibit lists were not publicly filed as of early afternoon Monday, but various subpoenas were available. They include multiple law enforcement personnel, as well as a doctor, dispatcher, a member of hospital staff, a member of jail staff, someone from North Dakota Parole & Probation, members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Wride-Arnold and two of Bartlette's family members. Gereszek stipulated to most of the evidence the prosecution plans to present at trial, which means he doesn't plan on objecting to it. He did object to some photographs, saying they were essentially duplicates of each other and asking that only one of each relevant photo be allowed. McCarthy noted slight differences in the photos and overruled the objection for the time being. Gereszek also requested that some clips be cut out the in-car video taken when Bartlette was arrested, because of additional concerns about prejudice. He said some of Bartlette's statements reveal he is familiar with the local jail. If jurors are aware he has spent time in jail before, they could make assumptions about his guilt. Essig said a statement made by Bartlette about not wanting to return to prison had already been removed from the footage for that very reason, and said she believed other statements were relevant evidence. She said Bartlette spoke in the video about wanting to go to sleep, which is relevant because he is alleged to have evaded law enforcement all night after Kiehl was found. The objection was overruled.