EFF challenges budget process, calls for reset and VAT clarity
The EFF warned that Sars risked undermining public trust by acting on executive announcements rather than properly enacted legislation.
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) filed supplementary court papers in the Western Cape High Court on Saturday to intervene in the legal challenge regarding Parliament's adopted fiscal framework and revenue proposals.
The political party is taking a stand to defend constitutional principles and protect South Africans from what they consider an unjust VAT increase.
This legal action follows Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's sudden reversal of the planned VAT increase.
On Thursday, shortly after midnight, the National Treasury announced that the proposed VAT increase had been canceled and would remain at 15%, ending a two-month dispute over the controversial tax hike.
ALSO READ: DA files supplementary affidavit to block the proposed VAT hike
EFF's constitutional concerns on budget
In their court filing, the EFF expressed 'deep concerns' about the conduct of the Speaker of the National Assembly and parliamentary secretaries, accusing them of entangling Parliament in partisan politics.
The party maintains that South Africa currently has no lawful budget, arguing that the fiscal framework and revenue proposals were adopted through processes that violate the Constitution and the Money Bills Amendment Procedure and Related Matters Act.
'The only legitimate and practical way forward is a full reset of the 2025 budget process to re-establish constitutional compliance and fiscal legitimacy,' the EFF asserted.
ALSO READ: EFF calls for 'apartheid tax' counter instead of VAT hike [VIDEO]
EFF challenge to Sars commissioner
In addition to the court filing, the EFF sent an urgent letter to South African Revenue Service (Sars) Commissioner Edward Kieswetter questioning the legal basis for the tax authority's communication regarding the VAT rate adjustment.
EFF National Chairperson and Parliamentary Chief Whip, Nontando Nolutshungu, criticised Sars for creating confusion by allowing two different VAT rates to operate simultaneously until May 15.
'We must further express our alarm at the absurdity of SARS's pronouncement permitting two VAT rates — 15% and 15.5% — to operate simultaneously until 15 May 2025.
'This reckless allowance not only sows confusion among vendors and consumers but also creates fertile ground for exploitation, price manipulation, and criminality,' Nolutshungu wrote.
Legislative authority questions
The EFF demanded clarification on how Sars could issue binding instructions to VAT vendors without proper legislative processes being completed.
'We seek to understand how such administrative instructions could be issued when Parliament has not yet lawfully repealed or amended the relevant fiscal framework through proper legislative processes,' Nolutshungu stated in the letter.
The party warned that Sars risked undermining public trust by acting on executive announcements rather than properly enacted legislation, cautioning that they reserved the right to pursue legal remedies if Sars failed to provide a satisfactory explanation within 24 hours.
ALSO READ: Budget 3.0 not unexpected, possible decrease in social grant increase
Godongwana's VAT reversal
Godongwana's reversal comes after significant opposition to his planned implementation of an initial 0.5 percentage point VAT increase on May 1, which would have been followed by another 0.5 percentage point increase on April 1 next year.
The National Treasury confirmed that Godongwana would introduce legislation to formally reverse this decision, keeping the VAT rate at 15%.
EFF calls for parliamentary integrity
The EFF urged Parliament to avoid political gamesmanship and prioritise its constitutional obligations.
'Parliament must remember that in terms of Section 44(1)(a)(ii) of the Constitution, the legislative authority to pass money bills resides with the National Assembly, and not with any member of the Cabinet,' the party emphasised in their statement.
The party called for decisive leadership during this critical period, advocating for 'a competent, consultative, and transparent Parliament that acts with integrity' and serves the interests of all South Africans, particularly the poor and working class.
NOW READ: Treasury reverses proposed VAT hike, will remain at 15%
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Netflix hikes package prices: How much you will now pay
Netflix subscribers are facing higher monthly bills as the global streaming giant implements price increases from June. Image: Netflix South African Netflix subscribers are facing higher monthly bills as the global streaming giant implements price increases across three of its four subscription tiers. The changes, which began rolling out in May 2025, are now in full effect for most users. The new pricing structure sees increases to the Mobile, Standard, and Premium plans, while the Basic plan remains unchanged. This marks Netflix's second price hike in South Africa since its 2016 launch. When South Africans connect, we don't just network; we build a community. The Lekker Network is a professional network where every conversation starts with, 'How can I help you?' Come join us & be a part of a community of extraordinary Saffas. New Netflix South Africa pricing: Mobile : R59/month (up from R49) – +20% : R59/month (up from R49) – Standard : R179/month (up from R159) – +13% : R179/month (up from R159) – Premium : R229/month (up from R199) – +15% : R229/month (up from R199) – Basic: Remains at R99/month Subscribers were notified via email and in-app messages depending on their billing cycles, with the updated prices applying from their next payment date in June. While Netflix has not released an official media statement regarding the change, a note on its website reads: 'Plans and pricing may change as we continue to improve our service and add more TV shows and movies. Adjustments can also happen in response to local market changes, such as changes to local taxes or inflation.' The price hikes come at a time when South African consumers are increasingly sensitive to cost-of-living pressures, with many streaming platforms competing for attention in a saturated market. MultiChoice also upped prices Earlier this year, MultiChoice implemented its own price and product adjustments for DStv and Showmax, signaling a broader industry trend of rising subscription costs as content providers invest more in technology, content rights, and user experience. The unchanged Basic plan offers some relief to budget-conscious subscribers, while the Mobile plan -aimed at single-device viewers – is still Netflix's most affordable option, albeit now 20% more expensive than before. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
BEE is bringing South Africa's economy to its knees
BEE is bringing South Africa's economy to its knees – new report A report released on June 12 by the Solidarity Research Institute (SRI) and the Free Market Foundation (FMF) has sent shockwaves through South Africa's political and economic landscape. The report delivers a scathing critique of the country's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) policy, asserting that it is causing substantial damage to the South African economy while enriching only a small, politically connected elite. BEE was initially introduced as a transformative policy aimed at redressing the economic imbalances of apartheid by promoting greater inclusion of black South Africans in the economy. However, the latest findings paint a different picture, highlighting a policy that is now burdening economic growth, exacerbating inequality, and stalling job creation. According to the report, the annual compliance costs for BEE range from R145-billion to R290-billion, which represents between 2% and 4% of South Africa's Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This enormous economic burden has resulted in an annual reduction of GDP growth by between 1.5% and 3%, with a concomitant loss of between 96 000 and 192 000 jobs each year. Over the years, this has accumulated to about 3.8 million lost job opportunities for South Africans. 'This huge economic cost is not simply the result of negligence or the mere poor implementation of a plan. It is a deliberate government policy that causes it,' said Theuns du Buisson, economic researcher at the SRI and co-author of the report. 'It is irrelevant when someone then says the policy was introduced with good intentions. Today it serves as a mechanism to enrich the elite at the expense of our country's economy and especially at the expense of its poorest citizens.' The report further outlines that while there has been some progress in terms of black ownership and skills development, these gains are heavily overshadowed by the adverse effects of BEE. Among these are increased inequality, elite capture of policy benefits, and widespread economic stagnation. 'The policy places a particularly heavy burden on critical sectors such as mining and finance,' the report reads, 'and it deters foreign investment, encourages capital flight, and stifles technological progress.' South Africa's economic position on the global stage has deteriorated markedly, falling behind other middle-income countries with which it was once comparable. The report critiques the lack of focus and effectiveness in the implementation of BEE policies, which contrasts with more successful affirmative action or empowerment programmes abroad. Du Buisson pointed to countries such as Brazil and the United States, which have begun to phase out similar race-based economic policies. 'Moreover, in other countries, affirmative action policies are precisely there to prevent discrimination, while in South Africa, they in fact make discrimination compulsory,' he noted. 'South Africa must now follow the path of other countries and get rid of it. BEE has become an instrument that benefits a small, politically connected elite and has long ago stopped being a policy that could empower a disadvantaged society.' Connie Mulder, head of the SRI, emphasised the urgency of the situation: 'South Africa cannot afford to continue down this path. The data is clear. BEE, in its current form, is damaging the economy and hurting those it was meant to help. We need policies that promote real economic participation and growth without racial quotas that cripple progress.' The call to action from the writers of the report is for policymakers to immediately abolish the current BEE framework and replace it with a policy that fosters inclusive growth without impeding the economy. 'We need an economic environment where all South Africans, regardless of race, have the opportunity to contribute and prosper,' Du Buisson said. – Access the full report here: Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to bennittb@ or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading! Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App Stay in the know. Download the Caxton Local News Network App here
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Mashatile offers solutions to rising water debt crisis at Municipalities
Deputy President Paul Mashatile said the Department of Water and Sanitation, the National Treasury, Salga and Cogta will collaborate to develop a comprehensive water debt management plan. Image: Phando Jikelo/African News Agency (ANA) Deputy President Paul Mashatile said on Thursday top slicing the Equitable Share of municipalities was one of the considerations to deal with those councils battling to pay the debts owed to water boards. Mashatile said the Portfolio Committee on water and Sanitation had recommended that the Department of Water and Sanitation, the National Treasury, Salga, and Cogta should collaborate to develop a comprehensive water debt management plan. 'This plan will implement strategies like, for instance, top slicing the Equitable Share and the municipal infrastructure grants to address rising municipal water debt. 'The National Treasury is also considering invoking Section 216 of the Constitution against defaulting municipalities, meaning their upcoming equitable share payments will be withheld while repayment agreements are negotiated with the relevant water boards,' he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Mashatile was responding to DA MP Leon Basson, who wanted to know the interventions he has spearheaded to hold municipalities and provinces to account for failing to provide adequate water supply to their respective communities. He said the Department of Water and Sanitation could withhold or stop grant funding where there was poor performance by municipalities that were implementing agents, in line with the Division of Revenue Act (DORA). 'In cases of continuous under-expenditure, funding is reallocated to other struggling municipalities, (according to Section 18 and 19 of DORA. By the end of the municipal financial year, municipalities are required to have spent the allocated funding and any unspent funds are then returned to the National Revenue Fund.' Mashatile also said the Water Task Team was working with municipalities to deal with the water challenges and has also looked at the state of water supply in the 105 non-performing municipalities that were are unable to deliver on their mandate. The Department of Water and Sanitation has submitted short, medium, and long-term solutions to turn around the declining water services to these struggling municipalities. 'The Water Task Team's recent meeting emphasised the need to enhance municipal service management and financial stability in the water sector by ring fencing revenue from water sales and separating water services authorities from providers through Operation Vulindela reforms.' Mashatile stated that the Department of Water and Sanitation has strengthened its controls to ensure that funding was allocated to projects that add maximum value (to address water services needs). 'The Department of Water and Sanitation has established a specialised unit with engineers who closely monitor and oversee implementation of priority and large intervention projects. These are projects that are identified by the department as requiring more stricter oversight based on impact, risk, and past delays.' Asked whether he has considered implementing consequence management measures for municipal managers and mayors of municipalities that repeatedly fail to meet minimum water delivery standards by holding them personally accountable for the failures, Mashatile said consequence management was key to ensure that people do their work.
