logo
Outraged Democrats handcuffed in ability to do much about Padilla treatment

Outraged Democrats handcuffed in ability to do much about Padilla treatment

Democrats loudly condemned the forcible removal and handcuffing of California Sen. Alex Padilla when he tried to question U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday, but lack the power to do much beyond decrying the situation.
The altercation occurred when Padilla tried to ask a question at a news conference Noem was holding about the ongoing military deployment in Los Angeles, where people have been protesting the Trump administration's aggressive immigration raids. Several men grabbed him and pulled him out of the room. He was pushed to the ground and handcuffed in an outside hallway, videos show.
'What we're really talking about here is a Trump administration that just wants to shut down the ordinary functions of government,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Massachussetts, in a hastily shot video she filmed on her phone as she raced to the Senate floor to denounce the administration's treatment of Padilla. 'That's how it works in a democracy: We use our words to hold people accountable.'
As a member of the minority party in Congress, words are about the only ammunition at Warren disposal as she responds to the situation. Were Democrats in the majority, they would have more power to haul officials like Noem in to be questioned before a committee and to issue subpoenas for more information.
Without that power, Democrats are imploring their Republican colleagues to help them.
'Are you going to condemn this?' Gov. Gavin Newsom tweeted at House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise and Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso. 'Have a spine.'
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the political arm of congressional Democrats, released a statement pressuring three Republicans representing California in Congress — Ken Calvert, David Valadao, and Young Kim — to demand answers from the Trump administration.
Democrats in Congress held a press conference on the steps of the U.S. Capitol to denounce the way Padilla was treated. Rep. Maxwell Frost, D-Florida, tweeted a video showing a group of them walking through the Capitol.
'We are marching to Senator Thune's office,' he wrote. 'There must be accountability for the detainment of a Senator. This is not normal.'
But so far, Republicans have not responded as their Democratic colleagues are requesting.
Johnson said Padilla, not Republicans, should be censured.
'At a minimum, it rises to the level of a censure,' he told reporters at the Capitol in Washington. 'I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we're going to do… We're not going to have senators charging cabinet secretaries.'
Noem also criticized Padilla's actions.
'If he had requested a meeting I would have loved to have sat down and had a conversation with him,' Noem said on Fox News. 'Coming into a press conference like this is political theater.'
Padilla entered the room, began walking toward the podium as Noem was speaking and interrupted her to ask a question, but did not immediately identify himself, according to a reporter at the press conference who asked not to be named because they did not have authorization from their network to speak.
A video shows the senator attempting to push back against agents removing him from the room, repeating 'hands off, hands off' as individuals grab at his clothing and force him backward toward the room's doors.
'I am Sen. Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla can be heard saying.
Once in the hallway, Padilla was pushed facedown on the ground by three officers who then handcuff him behind his back, according to a video shared on social media by Padilla's staff.
Padilla was later released; he was not arrested.
Edgar Rodriguez, a spokesperson for Padilla, confirmed that after Padilla was released, he met with Noem and raised concerns about the deployment of military service members in Los Angeles. 'It was a civil, brief meeting, but the Secretary did not provide any meaningful answers,' according to a statement from Padilla's office.
Local and state officials have also forcefully spoken out against Padilla's handcuffing.
'When a sitting Senator is manhandled, pushed, shoved, and handcuffed for simply asking a question at a press conference, something is gravely wrong,' San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu wrote in a statement. 'These are the actions of an authoritarian dictatorship crushing lawful dissent through force.'
State Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, also criticized Padilla's treatment.
'This is where we're at as a country: Federal thugs detaining & roughing up a United States Senator for trying to speak to a cabinet secretary & question administration policy,' he wrote on the social media website BlueSky. 'Anyone who continues to doubt whether this is fascism is living in an alternate reality.'
Wiener and his Democratic colleagues in the state Legislature hold a supermajority, unlike their fellow Democrats in Congress. But they lack the same level of oversight over members of the Trump administration like Noem.
U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, a Trump appointee who oversees federal prosecutions in Los Angeles, said Padilla did not behave appropriately. Essayli, who was at the news briefing with Noem, said Padilla 'stood up and started advancing' and that Padilla received 'standard operating procedure for the Secret Service.'
Padilla argued that he was simply trying to ask a question after he and his Democratic colleagues had for months tried unsuccessfully to get answers from Noem's department on its immigration raids.
Essayli has some experience with the frustration of being in the minority party. Essayli, who served in the state Legislature before Trump appointed him to be a federal prosecutor earlier this year, would at times yell obscenities and pound his fist on his desk on the Assembly floor in exasperation during floor debates when he was censured for speaking out of turn. Sometimes, he posted videos of those exchanges on his YouTube channel.
'He wasn't there looking to have a genuine dialog. He was there to cause a scene and go viral,' Essayli said of Padilla. 'I guess he got what he wanted.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case
Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

Hamilton Spectator

time32 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Appeals court won't reconsider ruling that Trump must pay E. Jean Carroll $5M in sex abuse case

NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court won't reconsider its ruling upholding a $5 million civil judgment against President Donald Trump in a civil lawsuit alleging he sexually abused a writer in a Manhattan department store in the mid-1990s. In an 8-2 vote Friday, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's petition for the full appellate court to rehear arguments in his challenge to the jury's finding that he sexually abused advice columnist E. Jean Carroll and defamed her with comments he made in October 2022. Carroll testified at a 2023 trial that Trump turned a friendly encounter in spring 1996 into a violent attack after they playfully entered the store's dressing room. A three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the verdict in December, rejecting Trump's claims that trial Judge Lewis A. Kaplan's decisions spoiled the trial, including allowing two other Trump sexual abuse accusers to testify. The women said Trump committed similar acts against them in the 1970s and in 2005. Trump denied all three women's allegations. In an opinion Friday, four judges voting to reject rehearing wrote: 'Simply re-litigating a case is not an appropriate use' of the process. 'In those rare instances in which a case warrants our collective consideration, it is almost always because it involves a question of exceptional importance,' or a conflict between precedent and the appellate panel's opinion, Judges Myrna Pérez, Eunice C. Lee, Beth Robinson and Sarah A.L. Merriam wrote. All four were appointed by President Joe Biden, Trump's one-time Democratic rival. The two dissenting judges, Trump appointees, Steven J. Menashi and Michael H. Park, wrote that the trial 'consisted of a series of indefensible evidentiary rulings.' 'The result was a jury verdict based on impermissible character evidence and few reliable facts,' they wrote. 'No one can have any confidence that the jury would have returned the same verdict if the normal rules of evidence had been applied.' Carroll's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said in a statement: 'E. Jean Carroll is very pleased with today's decision.' 'Although President Trump continues to try every possible maneuver to challenge the findings of two separate juries, those efforts have failed. He remains liable for sexual assault and defamation,' said Kaplan, who is not related to the judge. Trump skipped the trial after repeatedly denying the attack ever happened. He briefly testified at a follow-up defamation trial last year that resulted in an $83.3 million award. The second trial resulted from comments then-President Trump made in 2019 after Carroll first made the accusations publicly in a memoir. Kaplan presided over both trials and instructed the second jury to accept the first jury's finding that Trump had sexually abused Carroll. Arguments in that appeal are set for June 24. The Associated Press does not identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they come forward publicly, as Carroll has done. ___ Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Man convicted of killing 2 people outside bar to be executed in July

time34 minutes ago

Man convicted of killing 2 people outside bar to be executed in July

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- A man convicted of fatally shooting a man and woman outside a Jacksonville bar as part of an attempted revenge killing has been scheduled for execution in Florida under a death warrant signed Friday by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, the eighth this year. Michael Bernard Bell, 54, is set to die by lethal injection July 15 at Florida State Prison near the city of Starke. Bell was convicted in 1995 and sentenced to death for the murders of Jimmy West and Tamecka Smith. In December 1993, Bell spotted what he thought was the car of the man who fatally shot his brother earlier that year, according to court records. Bell was apparently unaware that the man had sold the car to West. Bell called on two friends and armed himself with an AK-47 rifle, authorities said. They found the car parked outside a liquor lounge and waited. When West, Smith and another woman eventually exited the club, Bell approached the car and opened fire, officials said. West died at the scene, and Smith died on the way to the hospital. The other woman escaped injury. Witnesses said Bell also fired at a crowd of onlookers before fleeing the area. He was eventually arrested the next year. Bell was later convicted of three additional murders. He fatally shot a woman and her toddler son in 1989, and he killed his mother's boyfriend about four months before the attack on West and Smith, officials said. Six other executions have taken place in Florida this year, with a seventh scheduled for June 24, all by lethal injection.

Trump approves U.S. Steel merger with Japan's Nippon after companies sign national security agreement
Trump approves U.S. Steel merger with Japan's Nippon after companies sign national security agreement

CNBC

time34 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump approves U.S. Steel merger with Japan's Nippon after companies sign national security agreement

President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Friday approving U.S. Steel's merger with Japan's Nippon Steel, after the companies signed a national security agreement with the U.S. government. Trump opposed U.S. Steel's controversial sale to Nippon in the runup to the 2024 president election, as Republicans and Democrats have leaned into protecting U.S. companies against foreign competitors. But Trump started softening his opposition to the takeover after assuming office, ordering a new review of the deal in April. President Joe Biden had blocked U.S. Steel's sale to Nippon during his final days in office, citing national security concerns, despite Japan being a close ally. Trump has avoided calling the deal an acquisition or merger, describing it as a "partnership" in a May 23 post on his social media platform Truth Social. He insisted that U.S. Steel will remain "controlled by the USA" during a speech to workers at one of the company's plants outside Pittsburgh on May 30. U.S. Steel made clear it would become a "wholly owned subsidiary" of Nippon North America under the terms of the merger agreement in an April 8 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Trump's description of the deal as a "partnership" caused confusion among investors and union leadership. The president told U.S. Steel workers that Nippon will be a "great partner." The Trump administration is currently engaged in trade talks with Japan as investors eagerly await signs that the U.S. will strike deals with key partners that avoid steep tariffs. Trump told the steelworkers that Nippon had agreed to keep U.S. Steel's blast furnaces operating at full capacity for a minimum of 10 years. The president said the deal would not result in layoffs and promised there would be "no outsourcing whatsoever." He said workers will receive a $5,000 bonus. Trump announced that he was doubling U.S. tariffs on steel imports to 50% during his remarks to U.S. Steel workers. Those tariffs went into effect on June 4.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store