
Facebook posts, allegedly poisoned pasta: The evidence Erin Patterson jury didn't hear
The media had been banned from reporting on pre-trial hearing evidence to allow Patterson time to appeal, but the suppression order was lifted on Friday.
Allegedly poisoned penne Simon told pre-trial hearings he believed he was first poisoned the night before a planned camping trip in November 2021.
He ate penne bolognese made by Patterson and vomited at her home the next morning, as well as on the way to the campsite, he said.
Simon Patterson said he believed Erin Patterson tried to poison him several times, from as early as 2021. Source: AAP / Diego Fedele Patterson arranged accommodation for them instead of camping, and the following day he felt like he was "going downhill" and needed to go to hospital. Simon assumed it was gastro and was transferred to Monash Hospital, where he stayed for five days, as a doctor was concerned about his kidneys. Simon detailed three other suspected alleged poisonings that he said occurred during 2022, with Patterson accused of serving him poisoned dishes of chicken korma curry and a vegetable wrap. Prosecutor Nanette Rogers alleged Patterson deliberately "allocated certain foods" to Simon in each suspected poisoning, much like she did in choosing different plates for her beef Wellington lunch guests than for her own. But defence lawyers claimed it was not clear whether Simon assisted in preparing some of the meals and said Patterson had eaten the same food. Simon told his GP, Christopher Ford, about the alleged poisonings and removed Patterson from his medical power of attorney about five months before she served up the poisonous beef Wellingtons. "He thought that Erin was trying to poison him," Ford told pre-trial hearings. When Simon told Ford his family was in hospital on the day after the July 2023 lunch, the GP called and alerted his medical colleagues at Leongatha and Korumburra hospitals.
During pre-trial, Patterson's barrister Colin Mandy said the claims involving Simon could not be proven on the medical evidence and Patterson denied all attempted murder charges.
Justice Christopher Beale ruled Patterson should face two trials, one for the murders and one for Simon's alleged attempted murder. However, prosecutors discontinued the latter charges and focused their trial on the murderous lunch.
'My cat chewed on this mushroom' One of the most bizarre pieces of evidence that did not make it to the trial was a Facebook post to a poisons help page. Prosecutors alleged Patterson uploaded a photo of a cat eating mushrooms about 18 months before Simon claimed he was first poisoned by his estranged wife, in November 2021. "My cat chewed on this mushroom just now," the post said, according to pre-trial evidence. "He is having a vomit. Was in grassland near trees, I'm in Victoria, Australia." Patterson owned a dog but did not own a cat. Prosecutors alleged the post was fake and they planned to use it in the trial to show the killer's long-held interest both in poisons and wild mushrooms. Prosecutor Jane Warren said it showed Patterson's interest in mushrooms was "in the poisonous properties".
Defence successfully argued against the post being permitted as evidence in the triple-murder trial.
"The prosecution is at pains to establish the accused did not have a cat and therefore that this post was dishonest," Mandy told a pre-trial hearing. "That will reflect poorly on the accused if that's admitted to evidence." The post might have been manipulated by the person who provided it to police, Mandy said, as he argued they should have been called to give evidence in the trial. "The witness who produced the screenshot had previously manipulated screenshots in the Facebook group using Photoshop," the defence barrister said. "Its reliability on the face of it is questionable."
Ultimately, Beale ruled it out of evidence before the trial began.
Penchant for poisons A number of other items of evidence revealed Patterson's alleged penchant for poisons. These were found by Victoria Police digital officers, who trawled through thousands of pieces of data found on devices seized from Patterson's home. The digital investigators used keywords including "death", "mushroom" and "poison". An appendix from a 2007 book called Criminal Poisonings was found on a Samsung tablet. It listed the colour, odour, solubility, taste and lethal dose of poisons including antifreeze, arsenic and cyanide. Prosecutors alleged in pre-trial hearings Patterson had access to the document in October 2019.
However, defence lawyers successfully argued prosecutors could not prove she accessed the file just because it was found on the device as there was no evidence she had downloaded it or read it.
Mandy said it would be prejudicial to Patterson in her trial and claimed Patterson's children might have been using the tablet when the file was downloaded. "And 2019 is too remote to be relevant to these allegations," Mandy told pre-trial. Another PDF titled "An overview of fungi in Melbourne" was found on a device at Patterson's home with an unknown date. But the defence claimed it had limited probative value as it did not mention poisonous mushrooms. The document had death cap mushrooms on the second page. "There's lots of people who are widely read, but don't read about poisonous mushrooms," Beale commented on the document. The jury was told about Patterson ditching the dehydrator she used to dry out the deadly mushroom after she left Melbourne's Monash Hospital on 2 August 2023. However, they were not told about her first visit to Koonwarra transfer station — on the same day as the beef Wellington lunch — where she disposed of cardboard. Prosecutors told pre-trial hearings Patterson was seen going to the tip on 29 July 2023. She also put her rubbish bins out for collection on the day of the lunch — which prosecutors alleged was incriminating conduct — but the jury was not told that either. Patterson will return to the Supreme Court on 25 August for a pre-sentence hearing.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
Call for stronger self-defence laws in Victoria amid rise in home invasions
Strengthening Victoria's self-defence laws amid a rise in home invasions would give residents "peace of mind", according to a crossbench MP pushing for a review of the state's laws. Libertarian Party MP David Limbrick, who will bring a proposal for a Law Reform Commission review to parliament this week, said a change would provide greater clarity than the existing laws offer. "At the moment, in Victoria, there's some exemptions for self-defence in your home, but we want them to look at strengthening that so that people who are defending their own home against violent criminals have more peace of mind that they won't get into trouble themselves," he said. Mr Limbrick said an increase in home invasions and his constituents raising concerns had prompted him to raise the issue. "There's no real certainty. If someone invades my house and I've got a baseball bat and I hit them with it, it might be left up to a court on whether I get into trouble for that or not," he said. "I think most people naturally feel that they should be able to defend their home without fear of legal consequences, as long as they don't go over the top. "I'd like to see it that if you're protecting your home, protecting your family, and a bad guy gets hurt in that process then, you know, they've found out the hard way that you shouldn't get into trouble with the law." For most of the last decade, the rate of residential aggravated burglary — which includes breaking into a house while armed with a weapon, or when people are home — has remained relatively steady. But in the last couple of years, it has just about doubled, according to data from Victoria's Crime Statistics Agency. This rate is still lower than instances of non-aggravated burglaries, which have overall decreased across the last decade. Police have attributed the rise in home invasions to youth offenders, who were responsible for about half of aggravated burglaries recorded in recent crime statistics. The crossbench MP said Victoria should adopt laws that mirror those in place overseas, in countries such as the UK. "In the United Kingdom they've got what they call 'castle doctrine', where effectively if someone comes into your home and you defend yourself against an intruder, then you're pretty much protected from harm as long as you don't do anything egregious," he said. Victorian Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny defended the state's existing self-defence laws. "Our self-defence laws here in Victoria are proportionate, and Victorians are encouraged — in fact we plead with Victorians — to please continue to call Victoria Police in any emergency situation," she said. "Self- defence laws are about what is reasonable, what's a reasonable amount of force in any situation. Those are our laws already in Victoria. They are proportionate." A spokesperson for the opposition did not say whether it supported the proposed review. "The reason these laws are being discussed is because the Allan Labor Government has created a crime crisis in our state with their weak bail laws and cuts to police funding," they said. Bail laws that were brought into effect in March were described by the state government as the "toughest" in the country, and further reforms specifically relating to serious robbery and home invasion offences have been introduced to parliament.

News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
Predator Catholic brother Desmond Gregory Mackrell loses appeal against conviction for historical child rape
A predator Catholic brother and former school principal convicted of the vile historical sexual assault of a student will be returned to prison after his appeal attempt fell apart. The Court of Appeal ordered a warrant for Desmond Gregory Mackrell – previously known as 'Brother Bede' to his students – to lie on file for five days after the 90-year-old's unsuccessful application. Mr Mackrell, 90, was convicted in March on a single charge of repeated sexual conduct with a child and two charges of carnal knowledge against the order of nature. The conduct involved Mackrell raping a child in a toilet cubicle and sexually assaulting the student while he was in 'a state of partial or complete undress' in his office. The third count of carnal knowledge related to Mackrell being party to another rape by a different teacher – aiding this teacher by 'holding or pulling the complainant down'. A jury was told all offences occurred between 1980-82 while Mackrell was a school principal. Mackrell was sentenced to seven years' jail with parole eligibility after serving half that time behind bars. But just a month later he was released on bail after challenging the convictions in Queensland's Court of Appeal, arguing they were 'unreasonable' and 'cannot be supported by the evidence'. On Tuesday, Justices Debra Mullins, Thomas Bradley and Philip Morrison dismissed the application. Mackrell had argued there was a 'reasonable possibility' the complainant had 'no actual memory' of the assaults – putting the 'memories' of sexual acts committed by the former principal down to 'dreams and nightmares' the complainant was experiencing. His legal team pointed to alleged discrepancies of the complainant not having a memory of the events of the sexual abuse until 'after he had a dream or nightmare' about the events in question. Mackrell said the complainant's first experiences of the nightmares of the abuse – or 'at best shards of memories he had developed and pieced together' – related only to the second teacher, referred to as 'Brother X'. The complainant had testified each time he experienced more nightmares 'the more he believed he had remembered', which Mackrell said created the risk that events would be 'recalled' that had not actually happened 'or that any true events would be recalled in a distorted fashion'. 'The evolution of the complainant's accounts of sexual abuse reinforced the reasonable possibility … that his 'memory' of the appellant's participation in the abuse by others was the product of distortion and unreliable reconstruction,' Mackrell's team had argued, according to a published court judgment. Mackrell said this was reinforced by alleged inconsistencies between the accounts of offending and the evidence could therefore not be accepted as reliable. In the Court of Appeal's decision, Justice Morrison said the complainant had maintained he had actual memories of the events – even if they were referred to as 'shards'. A jury heard the complainant reject the proposition from Mackrell's defence team that he had no real memories or they were the product of dreams or nightmares. 'The complainant's attempts to explain the significance of the dreams and nightmares were in the context of his maintaining that they added to memories that already existed,' the judgment states. 'The dreams and nightmares added clarity or volume or depth. Properly understood, the complainant's evidence did not accept that the dreams and nightmares established reality that was not there otherwise.' Justice Morrison said the evidence did not reach the point of compelling the conclusion that events recalled had not actually happened – or that any true events were recalled in a distorted fashion. He noted the complainant said he always knew that two Brothers were involved – and that Mackrell was one of them. 'In my view, the jury's advantage in seeing and hearing the evidence is capable of resolving … doubt, and therefore no miscarriage of justice has occurred,' the judgment continues. 'The assessment of the evidence does not cause me to have such a doubt as to the reliability of the complainant's evidence that the convictions should be set aside. 'In my view, upon the whole of the evidence it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was guilty.'

The Australian
7 hours ago
- The Australian
Sydney light rail: Alarming near-miss incidents caught on camera
Heartstopping footage has captured the moment a man was almost struck by a tram in Sydney. The vision shows a tram rumbling along at night, as two people break out into a run to get across the tracks. As the tram is just metres away, another person - seemingly absent-mindedly - almost follows their lead before a bystander yanks him back by his backpack, stopping him from being hit by a matter of seconds. Footage has been released showing a man being saved from being hit by a Sydney tram by someone yanking them by their backpack. Picture: Supplied The hair-raising miss was just one of a number of clips reelased by the NSW government as part of the annual Rail Safety Week awareness campaign. The CCTV footage was captured on-board light rail vehicles in Sydney, the city's eastern suburbs, Parramatta and Newcastle. According to government figures, there have been more vehicle near-misses on the new Parramatta system in the past 12 months than other lines as Western Sydney adjusts to the new format. 'These moments are hard to watch because in some cases there are just centimetres or milliseconds from the result being so much worse,' Transport Minister John Graham said. 'Light rail vehicles can't deviate their path and at 85 tonnes when fully loaded, they take time to stop. 'Please stay alert and follow the rules to ensure your own safety and the people you are with. Footage from Newcastle showed a cyclist causing a crash with a car as he rode along the tram track. Picture: Supplied 'Whether you're a pedestrian, a cyclist, or a driver, it is so important to take responsibility for your own safety.' The footage shows cars darting in front of moving trams, motorbikes and scooters cutting across the tracks when it is not safe, and pedestrians almost being run over. The trams drivers slam on their own brakes in the most dangerous of the clips. The chaos isn't confined to the Sydney area. A compilation of clips from the Newcastle area shows even wilder near-misses, and a few crashes too. The Newcastle videos show people driving their cars on the tracks, a cyclist's front tyre becoming stuck in the track and flipping onto the concrete, and a 4WD ute being struck and spun out by a tram which the driver cut off. The 20th annual Rail Safety Week begins on Monday. Blair Jackson Reporter Blair's journalism career has taken him from Perth, to New Zealand, Queensland and now Melbourne. Blair Jackson