PMK founder's allegations are inconsistent: Anbumani camp
Party spokesperson K Balu, recently removed from his post as president of Samooga Needhi Peravai, the advocates' forum founded by Ramadoss, said that the PMK founder has been inconsistent and made various contradictory statements on the eavesdropping issue.
'If you see, first he said he doesn't know who has installed a bugging device in his house, then he said event media houses may have installed, yesterday he said Anbumani has installed,' Balu told reporters. 'We will wait for the investigation. That will bring out the truth.'
Anbumani has so far not issued any response to his father's allegations.
Meanwhile, the father and son have announced separate general council meetings on August 17 and August 9 respectively, leaving party cadre in a tough spot.
'If there is a son who spied on his own father, it is Anbumani,' Ramadoss said on Saturday.
'He has eavesdropped on me. I have filed a complaint with the police about the bugging device found in my house. We have handed over the equipment to the police. I have also hired a special agency to find out who is behind this,' added the PMK founder.
Ramadoss also dismissed the General council meeting convened by his son as illegal.
After Ramadoss called on chief minister and DMK president MK Stalin on Saturday to inquire about the latter's health post his recent hospitalisation episode, there was reportedly speculation that he would seek an alliance with the ruling party in the lead-up to the 2026 assembly elections.
PMK has historically shifted allegiances constantly between the DMK and AIADMK. An influential party in Tamil Nadu with a 5% core vote bank from the Vanniyar community, it is presently a key ally of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA).
Disagreements between the father and son over party leadership flared up in December 2024.
On May 29, Ramadoss said that he wanted the party to align with the AIADMK but that Anbumani insisted that they remain in the NDA.He also said that he regretted making Anbumani a Union minister (in the UPA-I government) when the latter was only 35 years old.
Ramadoss also said in his May 29 interview that he had realised Anbumani's intentions to take over the party during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's swearing-in ceremony in 2014, when the latter told him that he would take care of the party.
Ambumani was made president of the PMK in 2023.
To be clear, Ramadoss was only confirming on record what has been known off the record ever since the AIADMK left the BJP in 2023 before patching up this April.
After the split, those in the NDA including PMK stayed with the BJP, with only the DMDK (Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam) taking the AIADMK's side.
On April 11, the 85-year-old patriarch again took over the party from Anbumani. He declared himself president and announced that Anbumani would be its working president. The following day, Union home minister Amit Shah, during a campaign visit to the state, announced that the BJP and AIADMK had resolved their differences and would fight the 2026 elections together.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
New Bill to boost construction equipment industry on the cards: Gadkari
New Delhi: The Union government is working on a new Bill to support India's construction equipment (CE) industry, Roads and Highway Minister Nitin Gadkari said on Thursday. The move aims to reduce the imports, particularly from China, and enhance the sector's competitiveness through targeted policy measures. 'We will frame rules and regulations for it. Our Bill will be released in the next session. Once it is approved, the standards will be set. You will not have to face the problems you are facing today. The standards will be set. Once the Bill is approved, all your worries will be solved,' the minister said. He was speaking at the annual session of the Indian Construction Equipment Manufacturers' Association (ICEMA), the apex industry body representing over 150 members, including 95 per cent of the country's OEMs and component manufacturers. India's construction equipment industry , valued at approximately $9 billion, has been facing the heat in recent years from Chinese imports. According to experts, the share of Chinese imports has risen to approximately 25 per cent in segments like excavators. Last year, major domestic players like Tata Hitachi also flagged concerns over the surge in cheaper imports from China. Speaking on efforts to decarbonise the sector, Gadkari said the government is considering a 10 per cent machinery advance for OEMs shifting to flex engines and clean fuels, along with zero per cent interest loans for equipment buyers using alternative fuel technologies. Industry growth Gadkari acknowledged that last year's slowdown in the industry was due to the cancellation of the Bharatmala project , but added that it should not affect progress this year. 'That problem has been solved. We have awarded ₹2 lakh crore so far. Now we will award another ₹5 lakh crore taking the total to ₹7 lakh crore by year-end.' 'We aim to award road projects worth ₹10 lakh crore every year,' he added. Retail sales of construction equipment (CE) grew marginally to 24,568 units during April-July 2025, up from 24,240 units in the same period last year, according to data from the Federation of Automobile Dealers Associations (FADA). The minister urged the CE industry to invest in high-capacity machinery for tunneling and pre-cast construction, 'We are building tunnels worth ₹3 lakh crore, but machinery availability remains a bottleneck. European nations have advanced tunnel boring equipment, we need to adapt such machines for Indian conditions. Pre-cast is now mandatory in many projects, requiring specialised machinery. I urge your industry to step up in these areas.' Giving reference to a recent study, he noted that the country's logistics costs have declined from 16 per cent due to enhancements in road infrastructure. He added that the government is working to reduce this further to 9 per cent by December. Skill training Gadkari also advised industry players to provide training and develop skillsets among equipment operators. 'It is very important to give skill training to these people. You should have a three-month course at the regional level on how to operate it, especially in areas where you have strong sales. Come to me, I will give you approval from the Indian government,' he said. Unlike road vehicles, the operation of heavy construction machines currently does not require any formal licensing or regulatory mandate.
New Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
'To defeat a powerful adversary, a strong alliance is vital': EPS
Edappadi K Palaniswami, AIADMK general secretary, who is on a whirlwind tour of Tamil Nadu as part of his 'Makkalai Kaapom - Tamizhagathai Meetpom' (Let us protect people, retrieve Tamil Nadu) campaign, spoke to TNIE's T Muruganandham near Courtallam in Tenkasi district in an exclusive interview. He spoke about his party's electoral prospects, the alleged failures of the DMK, and the AIADMK's stance on coalition government. Edited excerpts: You have completed your campaign in more than 50 assembly constituencies. What is your assessment of the people's mood? I have been able to sense clearly that the people desire a change in Tamil Nadu's politics and governance. Moreover, the people believe that only the AIADMK can bring that change. There is overwhelming support for me and the party. You have begun this campaign eight months ahead of the election. Are there any specific reasons? Being a farmer, I've taken to heart the saying 'kaalathey payir sei' (cultivate / sow at the right time). Doing that ensures success. Hence, I chose a reliable partnership (with the BJP) and entered the field early with them. If one starts campaigning only during the heat of the election season, it is impossible to reach out to people in all 234 constituencies. You have expressed your concern about Tamil Nadu's debt burden. There is a perception that no government has taken concrete measures to bring down the debt. Do you have a plan? We will cut down on extravagant spending and concentrate on welfare schemes. We will not roll out schemes for self-promotion or those that won't benefit the people. With available resources, we will fulfil people's requirements. We are not the DMK to make promises that cannot be fulfilled. When we were in power, I used to review the fiscal situation often and devise schemes accordingly. Capex would be mostly high while lowering revenue expenditure. Borrowing cannot be avoided. However, the debt should be within limits. When the DMK government completes five years, it would have borrowed nearly `5.38 lakh crore. How can this be repaid? Strangely, revenue receipts have gone up, but the borrowing has also gone up, all without implementing any new or huge schemes. This is a clear case of inefficient governance.
Indian Express
44 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Manipur MP Bimol Akoijam: ‘Rs 500 crore for rehabilitation adds to humiliation … need much larger economic package'
The Lok Sabha on Thursday passed the Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025, and the Manipur Appropriation (No.2) Bill, 2025, amid protests by the Opposition over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Both pieces of legislation were cleared by voice vote without discussion. Inner Manipur MP from Congress Bimol Akoijam spoke to Deeptiman Tiwary about the development It is unfortunate to say the least. The crisis has affected Manipur in all spheres, and its economy has been severely affected. It will take decades to recover. We need substantial support from the Centre. The Union government must discharge its constitutional and moral responsibility towards its citizens in the state. The voice of the people of the state must be heard, most importantly, given a chance to be heard. Forget about MPs like me, did the Finance ministers consult their own MLAs and party leaders in Manipur for this budget? For heaven's sake, Manipur is not a vassal state; it's a constituent state of the Union. 2. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the Opposition was shedding 'crocodile tears' for Manipur while stalling the House. How do you respond to that charge? I am sorry to say that the Finance Minister should not have indulged in such rhetoric that trivialises a serious issue such as the economy of the crisis-affected state of Manipur, and bulldozed a budget without discussion under the cover of a legitimate protest against SIR by the opposition. I must say, how the budget has been passed today is a reflection of the overall orientation and response of the Government of India under the BJP to the unprecedented crisis in Manipur, something that the country has not seen in its postcolonial history. 3. The Appropriation Bill includes over `500 crore for rehabilitation and over `500 crore for security. Do you believe these allocations reflect the actual needs on the ground? This `500 crore for rehabilitation is adding to the humiliation that the people of the state have been going through over the last two years. See, about 60,000 people have been rendered homeless and displaced, thousands of houses and hundreds of villages have been destroyed. Besides the loss of life, these internally displaced persons are going through unprecedented hardships, such as losing their means of livelihood. From the issue of their day-to-day needs, the issue of health and education of the children, do you think the amount mentioned in the budget helps… It is a cruel joke; it's nothing but sprinkling salt to the wound! We are not begging; we are only asking what a responsible, democratic national government must do for its citizens. The budget should have a much larger economic package for the IDPs, besides measures to rejuvenate the economy of the state. Measures such as the exemption of income tax for at least a decade to boost the economy should have been there in the budget, especially in the face of the crisis. 4. Were you or other Manipur representatives consulted on these bills before they were brought to the House? No, we were not consulted. That itself reveals the central government's approach — unilateralism, not federalism. It's deeply ironic that in a so-called cooperative federation, representatives from the state in question are kept in the dark while decisions are taken in Delhi by people far from the realities on the ground. This isn't just about disrespecting MPs — it's about silencing the voice of an entire state and abdication of responsibility by the Union government towards the nation itself. 5. What would you have said in the Lok Sabha today, had there been a discussion on these bills? Besides the issues I have raised above, I would have said that the crisis in Manipur is not merely about law and order — it is a crisis of constitutional governance, of moral leadership, and of democratic accountability. I would have demanded answers: Why has there been no comprehensive political initiative and adequate socio-economic measures to address the crisis? Why are thousands still displaced, months after the violence started? And most importantly, how long will the people of Manipur be treated as if they do not matter in this country?
