Alberta reviewing controversial U.S. musician's application to play at legislature grounds
Article content
Feucht, 41, is a singer, songwriter, and founder of the Let Us Worship organization.
Article content
Article content
He has drawn controversy and cancellations during the initial Canadian dates of his tour and is scheduled to play at the bandshell on the Alberta legislature grounds on the evening of Aug. 22.
Article content
Article content
Last month, Infrastructure told Postmedia that organizers for Feucht's tour had submitted an incomplete event permit application, but that the department was assisting them in submitting a complete application.
Article content
Article content
He began his Canadian tour on the east coast but was forced to find alternate venues for performances in Charlottetown, Fredericton, Quebec City, Moncton, Montreal, and Gatineau, Que. after permits were withdrawn due to security concerns or local codes of conduct related to use of public venues.
Article content
Feucht has threatened lawsuits in response to the cancellations, arguing his Charter right to practise religion was being infringed on.
Article content
Those performances drew protesters angry over what they see as Feucht's hateful views on the LGBTQ+ community, which he has called 'a cult bent on perverting and destroying the innocence of every child they can,' as well as on abortion laws, which he said 'feverishly promote the slaughter of the unborn and the newborn.'
Article content
Article content
Feuch has used members of the far-right Proud Boys extremist group as his security detail and has referred to the Black Lives Matter movement as 'shady' and a 'fraud.'
Article content
Article content
He has also shared his affinity for U.S. President Donald Trump and ran unsuccessfully in 2020 as a Republican candidate for Congress in California.
Article content
Alberta Infrastructure says ongoing security assessments are done for all scheduled events held at the legislature grounds.
Article content
A Montreal church that hosted his concert was fined $2,500 after allowing Feucht's event to proceed without a permit, with the city's mayor stating, 'freedom of expression is one of our fundamental values, but hateful and discriminatory speech is not acceptable.'
Article content
Feucht's tour is slated to resume on Friday in Rochester, N.Y., and is scheduled to return to Canada for five events, starting Aug. 20 in Winnipeg though the city has also denied him a permit citing safety concerns from the un-ticketed event event stating, 'it is not operationally feasible' without a better idea of how many will attend.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
The redcoats are coming — but this time the Americans invited them
Article content While he's aware of the role soldiers from Fort York played in the War of 1812, Jonathan Cole, who heads the American Bar Association's house of delegates, downplayed any suggestion that inviting redcoats to Monday's session is meant as a commentary on Trump's trade war or his musings about annexing Canada. Article content He noted the ABA's Toronto session has been years in the planning, pre-dating the recent friction between two countries that share the world's longest international land border. Article content 'It's a good chance to work together despite political issues,' Cole said in an interview from Nashville, Tennessee. Article content Fort York's history is a reminder of how 'the two countries have worked together since and have been such great allies,' Cole said. Article content He's excited the honour guard from Fort York is participating. 'They'll present both the American flag and the Canadian flag, and we'll have the national anthems sung for both countries as well before we begin our proceedings.' Article content Article content 'It was an unpleasant business for people in and around York at the time.' Article content Hickey argues the War of 1812 was 'essentially Canada's war of independence — and they won, so it is far better remembered in Canada than in the United States.' Article content Article content There are several ways to see the conflict, he said. Article content 'If you look at what happened on the battlefield and in the peace treaty (of Ghent) it looks like a draw because it was very hard to wage offensive warfare in the North American wilderness and when the United States was on the offensive early in the war they failed to make much headway in Canada,' Hickey said. Article content 'And when the British were in the driver's seat in the last year of the war, they didn't make much headway either.' Article content Article content But overall 'it's a clear British and Canadian victory because the United States went to war to force the British to give up the orders in council, which restricted American trade with the continent of Europe, and also to end impressment — the removal of seamen from American merchant vessels,' Hickey said. 'And neither of those issues was mentioned in the peace treaty' signed in December of 1814. Article content The only way to argue the U.S. benefitted from the conflict is, 'the British had a real problem after the war was over; nobody knew that was going to be the last Anglo-American war. And how were they going to defend Canada next time around from this growing expansionist colossus to the south?' Hickey said. 'They decided that their best tack was to accommodate the United States. And they pursued that policy in the course of the 19th Century, and ultimately it worked. There was a genuine Anglo-American accord by the 1890s. Then it turned into co-belligerency in World War One, and full-fledged alliance in World War Two that continues to this day. So, in the end, the United States got a little more respect for its sovereignty from the British.'
Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
'Major threat' to trade: U.S. Congress Republicans call for Canada to rescind Online Streaming Act
OTTAWA — Republicans on an influential House committee are pushing top Trump administration officials to pressure Canada to kibosh its controversial Online Streaming Act, which they describe as a 'major threat' to the trade relationship. Article content In a July 31 letter obtained by National Post, 18 Republican members of Congress on the powerful House ways and means committee ramped up pressure on White House officials to get Canada to dump the 'discriminatory' Act the same way it ditched the Digital Services Tax in late June. Article content Article content 'The fact that the Online Streaming Act already imposes discriminatory obligations and threatens additional obligations imminently is a major threat to our cross-border digital trade relationship,' reads the letter to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Article content Article content Greer, Bessent and Lutnick are at the forefront of negotiations with Canada for a new trade deal that Mark Carney's government hopes will eliminate a host of new U.S. tariffs against key Canadian industries. Article content The letter sheds light on how a growing number of influential U.S. politicians are using ongoing trade negotiations with Canada to push back against Canadian digital policies that impacts American companies. Article content Article content It also comes amid a growing trade war between both countries in which Republicans and President Donald Trump have been vocal about a plethora of commercial irritants with Canada. Article content Article content The Online Streaming Act is a hotly contested law implemented by the Liberals in 2023. It brought online streaming platforms under Canadian broadcasting laws and regulation by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). Article content Under the new law, the CRTC ruled last year that streaming services such as Spotify, Netflix, Amazon and Apple will have to pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenue into a fund dedicated to creating Canadian content. Article content The decision — which is estimated to cost the platforms $1.25 million each yearly — is currently being challenged by Apple, Amazon and Spotify at the Federal Court of Appeal. Article content While members of the prestigious U.S. House committee have previously raised concerns about the Act, it's the first time a significant number of members have called for Canada to rescind it completely.
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
'Major threat' to trade: U.S. Congress Republicans call for Canada to rescind Online Streaming Act
Article content OTTAWA — Republicans on an influential House committee are pushing top Trump administration officials to pressure Canada to kibosh its controversial Online Streaming Act, which they describe as a 'major threat' to the trade relationship. Article content In a July 31 letter obtained by National Post, 18 Republican members of Congress on the powerful House ways and means committee ramped up pressure on White House officials to get Canada to dump the 'discriminatory' Act the same way it ditched the Digital Services Tax in late June. Article content Article content Article content 'The fact that the Online Streaming Act already imposes discriminatory obligations and threatens additional obligations imminently is a major threat to our cross-border digital trade relationship,' reads the letter to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Article content Article content 'As bilateral trade negotiations continue, we urgently request that you engage with your Canadian counterparts to share our concerns and rescind the Online Streaming Act,' they added. Article content Greer, Bessent and Lutnick are at the forefront of negotiations with Canada for a new trade deal that Mark Carney's government hopes will eliminate a host of new U.S. tariffs against key Canadian industries. Article content The letter sheds light on how a growing number of influential U.S. politicians are using ongoing trade negotiations with Canada to push back against Canadian digital policies that impacts American companies. Article content Article content It also comes amid a growing trade war between both countries in which Republicans and President Donald Trump have been vocal about a plethora of commercial irritants with Canada. Article content Article content The Online Streaming Act is a hotly contested law implemented by the Liberals in 2023. It brought online streaming platforms under Canadian broadcasting laws and regulation by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). Article content Under the new law, the CRTC ruled last year that streaming services such as Spotify, Netflix, Amazon and Apple will have to pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenue into a fund dedicated to creating Canadian content. Article content The decision — which is estimated to cost the platforms $1.25 million each yearly — is currently being challenged by Apple, Amazon and Spotify at the Federal Court of Appeal. Article content While members of the prestigious U.S. House committee have previously raised concerns about the Act, it's the first time a significant number of members have called for Canada to rescind it completely.
