ICC judges looking into Italy's release of Libyan fugitive
THE HAGUE, Feb 10 - Judges at the International Criminal Court are investigating whether Italy's release of a Libyan military officer wanted for war crimes by the tribunal breaches the court's statute, a court spokesperson said on Monday.
Last week Italy's Justice Minister Carlo Nordio said Rome had no choice but to free ICC suspect Osama Elmasry Njeem because of what he described as mistakes and inaccuracies in the court's arrest warrant.
Njeem was released and flown home to Tripoli two days after being detained last month in northern Italy on the back of the ICC warrant which said he was suspected of the murder, torture and rape of detainees in Libya.
His release sparked outrage among Italian opposition parties and triggered a legal investigation into Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, two of her ministers and a cabinet undersecretary.
The procedure now opened at the ICC could lead to Rome being referred to the court's governing body or ultimately the United Nations Security Council, which could issue reprimands.
The ICC spokesperson added that Italy will get a chance to present its side of the case to judges before a decision is made, but gave no timeline for the process.
The court has been investigating allegations of serious crimes committed in Libya since the country's 2011 civil war following a referral by the U.N. Security Council.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
7 hours ago
- Metro
Why I'm scared by a report about Britain's 'minority white' future
A new study has predicted that 'white British' people are set to become a minority in Britain in the next 40 years. Cue the hysteria. I'm not surprised, it feels like this was exactly the intention behind this report. Conducted by Matt Goodwin of Buckingham University, who is also a regular voice on the right-wing TV channel GB News channel, the research claims that the proportion of white Brits will decline from 73% (where it currently stands) to 57% by 2050. It is then thought that white British people will become a minority by 2063 and that by the end of the century they will only constitute a third of the overall population. Referencing his study's findings, Goodwin said that those in favour of 'maintaining the way of life of the traditional majority population' will need their concerns 'recognised, respected and addressed.' Let's be real about what we're looking at here. This is not an impartial, apolitical study of demographic change. Goodwin's definition is so absurdly broad that figures such as King Charles and Winston Churchill wouldn't be considered 'White British' in this instance. Firstly, Goodwin makes frankly insulting and arbitrary decisions about what exactly is considered 'White British'. He defines this as those without at least one immigrant parent – creating a strange conclusion in which some people seem defined only by their 'foreign' side, creating a two-tiered system in which only those untainted by immigrant blood are considered genuinely 'White British' or native. By his definition, as a Muslim with one English parent and one Libyan, I'm not as British as a white non-Muslim, despite being born and raised here. This only reinforces what I have known my entire life – or at least, since I started looking visibly foreign by first wearing the hijab at 15: That I am always defined by my foreignness and never my Englishness. Goodwin's definition is so absurdly broad that figures such as King Charles and Winston Churchill wouldn't be considered 'White British' in this instance. But it is not white people with an American mother or a Greek father who are accused of diluting the native British population when it comes to studies like these. It's people like me whose brown, Muslim lineage renders me a foreigner, despite me being ethnically just as English as I am Libyan. Why else would Goodwin focus on his headline-grabbing statistic that 1 in 5 Britons will apparently be Muslim by the end of the century. In fact, Goodwin's main report on 'religious projections' doesn't even mention any other faiths, simply categorising the UK population along the lines of Muslim or non-Muslim. This sounds chillingly like 'us versus them', 'good guy versus bad guy' or 'native versus foreigner' – all of which fuel hysteria about a Muslim takeover and label Islam and Britishness as mutual exclusives. In fact, just this week we have seen Reform – a party that many predict could soon find its way in Number 10 – raising the issue of a Burka ban. For many, being British is about more than a passport. It looks, sounds and acts a certain way – and that is not Muslim. Studies like the one released this week embolden those holding Islamophobic views, giving them a statistical basis for their bigotry. Research conducted by someone with such incendiary views should be taken with far more suspicion than we have seen with these findings – but I suppose that doesn't matter when there are some catchy fear-mongering soundbites on offer. While the survey has predictably been used as evidence for lowering immigration levels, beneath the odd (frankly racist) categorisation of British identity, it also paints a picture of the birth rates of different communities in the UK and how that will impact future demographics. Given that Britain's birth rate is at an all-time low, we have seen pronatalist policies slowly creep into the mainstream as politicians panic about what the future will look like if nobody can afford to have babies. But what this survey seems to reinforce is that calls to raise the birth rate aren't simply about providing the nation with the next generation of workers and taxpayers. It is, for many, ensuring that the future face of the west remains white and that the so-called native population reproduces quickly enough to balance out other communities like my own, who traditionally tend to have larger families. Last year a peer in the House of Lords made a speech in which he warned about radical Muslims taking over Britain 'through the power of the womb'. More Trending Every year when the name Muhammad inevitably tops the list of most popular baby names, we see another wave of media-manufactured moral panic that Britain overrun by Muslims unless the white British population has more babies. Reports like these don't just legitimise conspiracy theories like this, they help manufacture them, and attempt to make people like me feel more othered, more unsafe. Who knows what this hypothetical Britain will look like in decades time? But if the children and grandchildren of people like me aren't considered part of the future British population, but a hostile outside force, then things are only going to get worse for all of us. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Donald Trump and Elon Musk might make peace – but it will never last MORE: What does Eid Mubarak mean and how should you reply to the greeting? MORE: Universal digital 'BritCards' on an app could soon be used to prove who you are
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump and Musk joust in astonishing social media duel
Good morning. Elon Musk has called for Donald Trump's impeachment and in effect claimed the president was part of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged child sexual abuse ring in an extraordinary social media blow-up between the former allies on Thursday. Trump did not hold back either, threatening to end federal contracts and tax subsidies for the billionaire's companies as the feud that had been brewing flared up on their respective social media platforms. In the saga's most explosive movement, Musk tweeted: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The post followed Trump threatening to cut subsidies for Musk's companies as it would save 'billions'. What is the origin of the feud? Tensions have been mounting for weeks over a Republican spending bill that Musk has been critical of. How is it affecting Musk's bottom line? Tesla's shares plunged by about 14.2% on Thursday at market close after the pair traded barbs. The US is imposing sanctions on four judges from the international criminal court (ICC) for what it has termed its 'illegitimate actions' against the United States and Israel, the secretary of state has announced. Marco Rubio announced the sanctions against Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou of Benin and Beti Hohler of Slovenia on Thursday after Donald Trump instructed cabinet officials to devise sanctions against the court. Why were these judges targeted? Two of the judges authorized the arrest warrants against the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the former defense minister Yoav Gallant, while the other pair authorized an ICC investigation into abuses by US personnel in Afghanistan. Has the US targeted others before? Yes – it sanctioned the ICC's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, after he pursued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant. As a result, Khan has lost access to his email and had his bank accounts frozen, the Associated Press reported. A district judge in Boston has blocked the Trump administration's ban on Harvard's foreign students from entering the United States after the university argued it had violated federal law. The Ivy League school argued that the administration failed to back up the president's claims that the students posed a threat to national security and asked Judge Allison Burroughs to block the ban. The filing also argued that the administration's national security argument was unsound as, under the ban, the same people were able to still enter the country – just not attend Harvard. The development came while hundreds of thousands of Chinese students in the US struggle with an uncertain future after the state department said last week that it would 'aggressively' revoke visas for Chinese students. Why did Trump ban Harvard from accepting international students? The White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson has called Harvard 'a hotbed of anti-American, antisemitic, pro-terrorist agitators' – claims the school denies. Harvard argues Trump is angry because it has refused to give in to the administration's demands to shape the school's governance, curriculum and ideology of staff and students alike. Russia's overnight missile and drone barrage on Kyiv overnight killed four people after Vladimir Putin vowed revenge for Ukraine's attack on its bomber fleet. The IDF has recovered the bodies of two Israeli-American hostages in their 70s who were abducted during Hamas's 7 October attack, in an overnight operation in southern Gaza. El Salvador is using emergency gang violence legislation to seize land that was granted to people following the country's civil war. The University of Michigan is using private, undercover investigators to surveil pro-Palestinian campus groups, the Guardian can reveal, with the records from the school's governing body showing that the university paid at least $800,000 between June 2023 and September 2024 to Ameri-Shield, the parent company of the private security group City Shield. Five students who have been followed, recorded or eavesdropped on said it appeared largely to be an intimidation tactic. Disneyland recently announced an animatronic recreation of Walt Disney, intended to give visitors a sense of 'what it would have been like to be in Walt's presence', earning a rebuke from his granddaughter Joanna Miller. Long a fascination for cinema, posthumanism is starting to feel worryingly current, writes Stuart Heritage, after experts this year voiced concerns about Neuralink, Elon Musk's brain implant company. When a Swiss village was wiped out in seconds after a glacier collapsed above it on 28 May, attention turned to why it happened – and how global heating will make such events more common. This podcast tells the shocking story. Sabemos que sacar sillas o mesas a la puerta es tradición en muchos pueblos, pero la vía pública está regulada. Si la Policía pide retirarlas, hazlo por respeto y convivencia. Con civismo y sentido común no hay molestias. ¡Gracias por colaborar! Police in a small Andalucían town have unleashed a storm after they chose to illustrate a call for people not to disturb their neighbors late at night with … a picture of six older women sitting outside. The move violated the silent Spanish injunction that forbids any attempts to alter the habits of the country's cherished older people – particularly given the long tradition of the outdoor sit-down chat as the heat of the day gives way to the cool of the evening, known as tomando el fresco, or taking the cool air. The social media response was full of force and sarcasm. One typical example: 'We need to put an end to this serious issue – no more impunity for grannies who sit out to enjoy the fresh air.' First Thing is delivered to thousands of inboxes every weekday. If you're not already signed up, subscribe now. If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@
Reuters
11 hours ago
- Reuters
ICC governing body condemns US sanctioning ICC judges
AMSTERDAM, June 6 (Reuters) - The International Criminal Court's governing body on Friday condemned the Trump administration's decision to impose sanctions on four ICC judges. "It is with deep concern that we note the latest actions announced by the Government of the United States ... These ... are regrettable attempts to impede the Court and its personnel in the exercise of their independent judicial functions", The ICC's governing body said in a statement.
