
Call for action on creating more health roles for Māori
Ōtākou Health Ltd (OHL) chairwoman Donna Matahaere-Atariki was responding to concern from Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora (HNZ) Southern leader Dr Hywel Lloyd, who at a recent Southern community meeting said he was "disappointed that Māori leadership has been confirmed to not be coming back to the districts".
Ms Matahaere-Atariki shared the disappointment, but said if it was up to HNZ, there would never be the support those roles would need.
"If Māori are going to wait on government to make room for us in leadership roles, we're never going to get there.
"So my position has always been that I know I have enough information to be a leader in health here and I will take those roles if they're there."
OHL created Te Kaika, an integrated health service, in 2018.
It now has more than 12,000 people on its books across the region, and through its low-cost approach, is able to offer initiatives such as free dental care for under-18s.
"What I've found in my experience is these roles and these Māori roles that [government] created, they have leadership roles, but they never have a budget, they have no staff and so you might get the high salary, but you're actually not able to do anything.
"So I think it's better that I've always said, 'no, we'll create our leaders on the outside and we'll wait for them to lean into us'.
"So rather than chasing that up, because we can't be held hostage to whatever government is in town and whoever thinks what is right."
Previous health board roles dedicated to Māori were "practically useless", she said.
"The problem is when you produce Māori leadership roles in your organisation, sometimes you think you don't actually have to go out there and talk to community.
"Māori leaders are not public servants — we serve our communities."
She said Te Kāika, which is based in Dunedin, Oamaru and Queenstown, was a "one-stop health shop" which improved health and wellbeing outcomes for all whānau and community by making essential health, social, education and employment services affordable and accessible across the wider Otago region.
"When we set up Te Kaika and we had to pay for all that ourselves, you know, we got a big bank loan and that to build that — our attitude was 'we set up the infrastructure, they will come knocking'.
"We know that we've got ourselves into a position where we have the only health infrastructure that doesn't belong to government in town.
"We had to use our own money to get into the sector, set up the infrastructure and then be noticed by them. But we did that really well."
The Dunedin base in Caversham was a site designated for high-density residential living.
"We could have just gone and built apartments there, but we didn't want to do that.
"The most outstanding lesson I've learned is we can't rely on government to look after us. We've had so many reviews that say they don't look after Māori — I'm sort of tired of these reviews and reports."
Te Kaika's success reminded her of the need to grasp opportunities.
"Over the years, I've realised that there are particular moments that were a perfect storm, that allowed us to put it right at that time: we got that money from the Whanau Ora Commission, the Ministry of Health, and the Education Ministry gave us that building until it was sold — then, of course, when it was sold, we bought it.
"So, there was a perfect storm at that gate."
She said she wanted to thank Dr Lloyd for his "well-intentioned" comments.
"From his perspective, there doesn't seem to be any Māori voice there [in HNZ Southern].
"I think that's important. However, that Māori voice needs to know what they're saying or else I don't want to hear it."
HNZ has been approached for comment.
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
12 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Health plan doubts
Anyone ploughing through the 85-page New Zealand Health Plan document might wonder if the wait was worth it. The lack of detail and some of the disconnection between it and planned amendments to existing health law, and other actions already taken or signalled by the government, are among the issues. There is also the thorny question of whether it can do what it says it will. According to Health Minister Simeon Brown, the plan, covering financial years from 2024 to 2027, outlines how Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora will deliver on the government's health priorities. But Auditor-general (AG) John Ryan, who, under existing law, must audit the costed plan before it goes to the minister, could not give it a green light. He was unable to form an opinion on whether the plan provided a reasonable basis for delivering publicly funded health services to achieve desired improvements in health or gave reasonable effect to the Government Policy Statement on Health. Mr Ryan said the plan did not provide a clear explanation of how the actions intended to improve aspects of the health system had been selected and prioritised, and how they would contribute to the achievement of the desired improvements and targets. Health New Zealand said the plan was indicative of the level of maturity of the organisation and not costed to the level of traceability and integration between the financials, activities and desired improvements from a fully mature plan. The government plans to do away with the requirement for the AG to audit the plan, and its delivery. This move is included in the wide-ranging Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) Amendment Bill, submissions on which close today. Mr Brown says removing requirements for auditing the plan pre- and post-delivery aligns HNZ with other crown entities. The organisation would still have its annual financial statements and statement of performance audited by the AG. While we understand there might be concern such an audit before the plan becomes public may be time-consuming, it is hard not to see this removal of specific scrutiny of the plan altogether is more about avoiding criticism rather than ensuring greater transparency and accountability. It is not the only time recently the Auditor-general's office has been critical of health plans. We have already written of the AG's concerns about whether the government's push for more planned surgery to the private sector may result in patients with complex issues, not suited for such referral, waiting longer than they otherwise might have. As the office pointed out at the health select committee last week, faster care did not necessarily mean more equitable care. It is still not clear how HNZ plans to ensure its plans do not exacerbate inequity, which should include looking at unmet need. The health plan has some clangers in it which do not align with the current government position. In the section on improving timely access to primary and community care, it says "we are resolving pay equity claims and improving nursing recruitment and retention by ensuring there is consistency in nurses' pay". That would have been a surprise to those in the sector who still do not have pay parity with their colleagues in HNZ and whose pay equity claims were scuppered after the government's ambush law changes earlier this year. Public health advocates may have been buoyed by the statement "we aim to reduce the availability and social acceptance of alcohol" in the section on modifiable risk factors, along with reference to strengthening compliance and regulatory approaches in this area. However, recent RNZ reporting showed initial plans to reduce off-licence sale hours now appear to be off the table nationally, and there will be an emphasis on reducing red tape for alcohol retailers to make life easier for them. Hard on the heels of the release of the health plan came another damning report about the health post-code lottery, this time for the treatment of heart disease, the biggest single cause of death in New Zealand. It was another illustration of how much work the government has to do to convince the public it has a cohesive plan for an equitable health system.


NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
The shocking roadblocks to timely cardiac care in New Zealand
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Study puts the total cost of heart disease deaths in 2020 at $13.09 billion. Image / Getty Images The Kia Manawanui Trust has shone a shocking spotlight on the roadblocks to timely cardiac care in New Zealand, but members are optimistic things can be fixed. Cardiac care in New Zealand is in trouble. There are extensive delays for surgery, a shortage of specialists, long waits for scans, and lack of access to drugs that would help heart patients. Two years ago, officials considered sending patients to Australia for treatment because the situation here was so dire, and not for the first time. The Kia Manawanui Trust (it means 'the heart of Aotearoa') is out to try to make a difference. A sister charity to the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation, it set out in 2018 to identify the problems and find ways to fix them. 'This is a major killer in New Zealand,' says CEO Letitia Harding. 'We're going to find out where the bottlenecks are, what lobbying needs to be done, why we don't have devices and medical interventions you can get overseas that we know save lives, and we're going to start raising awareness and pushing for change.' One of the trust's first successes was to raise funds for portable electrocardiogram (ECG) machines to be sent to under-served communities. It has also run a certified course in intravascular imaging, a technique that can significantly reduce cardiac death as it allows doctors to see inside blood vessels to assess the severity of disease. Now, it has funded research by Otago University which has pinpointed just how badly heart care in New Zealand is lagging. Almost half of all heart attack patients are not being treated within internationally accepted timeframes, the 'Heart Disease in Aotearoa' report found. Areas with the fewest cardiac specialists – Tairāwhiti, Whanganui and the central North Island – have the highest death rates. Māori and Pasifika are hospitalised or die from heart disease on average a decade earlier than the population as a whole. Auckland is the only region where the number of specialists per head of population is comparable to European countries. The study put the total cost of heart disease deaths in 2020 at $13.09 billion. 'The lack of investment in the cardiac space has been going on for many, many years,' says Harding. 'I don't blame one government or the other, this has been decades. 'We're going to make some noise and come up with solutions.' Harding says it isn't such a stretch for a charity focused on respiratory health to become involved with cardiac care, too. 'The heart and lungs are related,' she points out. 'We know that COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease] can lead to heart failure, for instance. And when the Asthma and Respiratory Foundation was talking about vaping issues, more and more literature was coming out on how it affects not just the lungs but the heart.' In a bid to tackle the shortage of cardiac sonographers, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand has already partnered with the University of Auckland to launch a training programme for at least 15 students per year. However, during their studies they need to train in a cardiology department, and Harding says there's no budget for that. Ringfencing funding is among a list of solutions the trust has suggested to Health Minister Simeon Brown. Kia Manawanui also wants to see more funding for dedicated cardiac beds at hospitals in main centres, an end to delays in hiring new medical staff when someone leaves a hospital position, and a commitment to tackling the waitlist for ECGs. The trust estimates at least 15,000 patients are waiting for heart scans to diagnose potentially life-threatening conditions and has called for locum staff to be used to run extra clinics to clear the backlog. Particularly in rural areas, there are delays for patients who need heart scans that could detect atrial fibrillation early. The condition can lead to heart failure and affects about one in 35 Kiwis. Te Whatu Ora has announced plans to shorten hospital waiting lists by outsourcing simpler 'elective' procedures to private surgeons. Harding agrees this could ease the pressure on the health system. 'But private hospitals don't do acute services. They aren't going to be seeing the heart attack patients at 3am – they go to the public hospital. 'There is a place for the public-private partnership model this government is obviously very keen on. But you still have to invest in secondary hospitals that are screaming out for more beds.' Harding is optimistic that the trust can make a difference. 'There was a need for someone to speak out about the issues going on in the cardiac space. Heart disease affects so many lives and we're really excited to get into this new area.'


NZ Herald
2 days ago
- NZ Herald
Bowel screening uptake in Bay of Plenty appalling
It is a similar story in the Lakes health district, covering Taupō and Rotorua, where 27,694 were sent between August 1, 2022, and May 26, 2025. Of those, only 15,039 were returned. These figures are alarming because New Zealand has one of the world's highest bowel cancer rates, and it is the second-highest cause of cancer. That means an average of about eight people a day are being told they have it. It's not just an older person's cancer either, because more than 350 people under 50 are diagnosed annually. Many people know someone who has survived bowel cancer or died from it, and much has been done over the past eight years to try to get in front of the problem. The National Bowel Screening Programme started in July 2017 and has been introduced by all the former 20 district health boards, with Bay of Plenty being the last. People are invited to join the programme at 60, and are then sent a free home-test kit every two years until the age of 74. The Government is lowering the eligibility age to 58 nationwide from March. It has, however, been criticised for axing plans to lower the age for Māori and Pacific people to 50. The national charity Bowel Cancer New Zealand wants the screening age lowered to match Australia, where it is 45. It is, understandably, unhappy with the Government's slow progress. The media and advertising also play important roles in raising awareness. There are countless news articles in the media, and the national bowel screening multimedia campaign launched in July 2022 encourages people to take part in screening, emphasising it is free, quick and simple, 'and you can do it at home'. The good news is that Health NZ credits the campaign with raising awareness. But perhaps among the most powerful weapons for raising awareness are the individual patient stories. Kiwis such as Tauranga survivor Rachael Ferguson, who was 32 when she was diagnosed with stage 4 bowel cancer in December 2020. She has been 'clear' since surgery in February 2021. Then there's Rotorua father Matthew Keogan, who was 49 when he was diagnosed in 2021. He was told to get his affairs in order and say goodbye to his family as he might live only another three to six months. He has made a miraculous recovery after chemotherapy and immunotherapy with pembrolizumab (Keytruda). Last month, Northland's Cheryl Waaka, a former Black Fern and mother of two teenagers, talked about facing her toughest opponent yet: stage 4 bowel cancer. There are plenty of other personal stories on Bowel Cancer NZ's website, each offering an insight into that person's journey, each offering hope and each helping drive a greater understanding. All these people are brave and inspirational. So, given there's been a national screening campaign, heightened awareness, personal stories, and a lowering of the screening age, a reasonable question remains: Why would people fail to do something simple that costs them nothing but could save their lives? Reasons could include fear, stigma and people simply not wanting to go through what they perceive as the unpleasant procedure of having to collect samples and send them off. However, it would be fair to say some people probably can't be bothered, are ignorant or believe it won't happen to them. Whatever the reasons, the Bay of Plenty and Lakes figures are appalling. As survivor Rachael Ferguson rightly says, there are 'so many people under the age of 60 that are screaming out to have those kits' that eligible people not returning them is simply 'wasted resources'. The Government needs to lower the screening age further. At the same time, everyone eligible needs to take up the offer. It could save their lives. Bowel Cancer NZ chief executive Peter Huskinson has the final word. 'That free test in your mailbox doesn't just detect cancer – it can stop it before it starts,' he says. 'Don't leave it in a drawer. Put it by the loo and get it done.' Wise words indeed. Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.