logo
Feeding scheme or feeding scam: KZN education department responds to food tender ‘corruption'

Feeding scheme or feeding scam: KZN education department responds to food tender ‘corruption'

The Citizen5 days ago
The school nutrition Programme in KZN benefits around 2 million learners.
As KZN education MEC Sipho Hlomuka waits to hear whether he will be sanctioned by Premier Thami Ntuli, his department has denied allegations of tender corruption.
It is alleged that politically connected companies were awarded National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) contracts in an alleged attempt to garner support for his bid to become ANC provincial chairperson.
Political parties in the KZN legislature are demanding an investigation into the tender process, and the minister of basic education, Siviwe Gwarube, has also requested answers from the province.
On Wednesday, the provincial Head of Department, Nkosinathi Ngcobo, said all correct procedures were followed in the awarding of the contracts.
'From the outset, it is important that we place on record the fact that the process has been done in line with all the procurement processes and relevant prescripts.
'The process undertaken had various stages, which included the advertising of the tender, after which every eligible South African was at liberty to apply.
'It is also very important to indicate that after the advertisement of the bid, all bidders were invited to the compulsory briefing sessions in all 12 Districts, where all the bidders were taken through the requirements of the bid,' Ngcobo said.
Twenty thousand bids received for NSNP tender
He claimed 20 000 bids were subjected to the same comprehensive evaluation criteria in line with all the Supply Chain Management (SCM) processes.
'All the bids were subjected to a standard evaluation process as set out in the bid document. It is also important to state categorically that evaluation and adjudication were followed in line with the prescribed procedures,' he said.
ALSO READ: Julius Malema's message to KZN police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi
The department will respond to all aggrieved bidders
Ngcobo said he is aware that some bidders may not be happy with the outcomes of the bidding process.
'The Department is currently at a stage where it is dealing with the appeals or objections. An unfortunate situation with regard to this tender is that it attracts thousands of bidders who all have to compete for only 1 756 clusters across the 12 Districts.
'We note with disappointment that once some bidders are not recommended for the award, they resort to illegitimasing the entire process,' he said.
Ngcobo said the department would respond to Gwarube's interrogation of the tender process.
NOW READ: Higher education minster accused of covering up tender irregularities — report
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MK Party sends legal letter to Ramaphosa over two acting police ministers
MK Party sends legal letter to Ramaphosa over two acting police ministers

IOL News

time13 minutes ago

  • IOL News

MK Party sends legal letter to Ramaphosa over two acting police ministers

MK Party president Jacob Zuma says the country cannot afford two ministers in one portfolio. Image: Independent Media The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) says South African taxpayers cannot afford to pay for two ministers in one portfolio as it accused President Cyril Ramaphosa of of violating his oath of office and failing to uphold the Constitution as required by that office. This was after Ramaphosa placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on leave and appointed Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Police Minister. MKP leader, Jacob Zuma, has also given Ramaphosa until 10am on Friday, August 8, to resign. In a letter dated August 4, Zuma said he will take action against Ramaphosa if he fails to adhere to the demand. Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya said they were aware of the letter. 'The legal team will deal with that letter,' he said. The letter from KMNS attorneys, who act on behalf of Zuma, comes after the Constitutional Court last week dismissed the MKP's application to have a direct access to challenge Ramaphosa's decision to place Mchunu on a leave of absence, appointing Cachalia as acting police minister and establishing a judicial commission of inquiry to investigate the corruption allegations in the police and judiciary. 'Various reasons have been offered in respect of the decisions which were impugned by our client and uMkhonto weSizwe Party in the Constitutional Court which found that it lacked exclusive jurisdiction and/or has no basis to grant the requested direct access. "As a result, our client has or sought urgent advice on possibly taking the relevant dispute(s) to the High Court and/or any other appropriate forum. It is assumed that you stand by the reasons previously given for the decisions announced on 13 July 2025,' reads the letter. The party's spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela added: ' The judges did not want to take a decision knowing exactly that the MK Party has a strong case. By placing Mchunu on leave of absence and appointing Cachalia as an acting police minister, the country is having two ministers of police. Both ministers are acting.' Zuma, who said he is a concerned citizen, a voter and a former President, also demanded the date and time when Ramaphosa decided to place Mchunu on leave of absence and the decision to appoint Cachalia as acting police minister, as well as their current positions. 'When exactly (date and time) was your decision to place Minister Mchunu on leave of absence taken? When exactly (date and time ) was your decision to appoint Professor Cachalia as Acting Minister of Police (was) taken, communicated to him and to the public? 'What exactly is a 'Minister Designate', from a constitutional point of view? Immediately after the swearing-in ceremony (i.e. from around 9:30am on 1 August 2025), what was the exact correct description of Professor Cachalia? Was he a minister, acting minister or minister designate? What is the present, correct, full and official description of Mr. Senzo Mchunu? If the answers are the same, for how long is it envisaged that South Africa will have and pay for two Ministers of Police at the same time?' Zuma asks in the letter. He also wanted to know Ramaphosa's reasons for not dismissing Mchunu based on the allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal police boss Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, that Mchunu had ties to criminal gangs and meddled in police investigations into politically motivated murders. Zuma also wanted to know what is the public benefit in having two ministers of police, adding that one is active, while the other one is on leave. 'What were the reasons why one of the 2 (two) Deputy Ministers of Police was not promoted to the position of Acting/Minister of Police as you did, for example, with Deputy Minister (Buti) Manamela who was subsequently promoted to Minister of Higher Education? What are the estimated costs to the taxpayers for the failure to act in a similar or consistent manner?' He said irrespective of the answers Ramaphosa might give, his conduct to place Mchunu on leave and appoint Cachalia remain illegal, irrational and unconstitutional. 'With the publicly available information as well as the pleadings and deliberations in the recent Constitutional Court proceedings, our client is of the view that, irrespective of any answers you might give to the above list of questions, the impugned conduct remains illegal and irrational and unconstitutional.' 'It may have been further compounded by the events which occurred between July 13 2025 and August 1, 2025 and which have a continuing adverse impact on the South African citizens and taxpayers, including our client,' the letter read, adding that Ramaphosa should withdraw his decision to place Mchunu on leave and the appointment of Cachalia. 'Due to the obvious urgency and importance of the issues raised above, these demands must be fulfilled immediately but by no later than 10h00 on Friday, August 8 2025, failing which all our client's rights are reserved, including the right to urgently approach the courts for appropriate relief, without any further notice to you.' [email protected]

Lamola slams opposition parties as US slaps 30% tariffs on South African imports
Lamola slams opposition parties as US slaps 30% tariffs on South African imports

IOL News

time13 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Lamola slams opposition parties as US slaps 30% tariffs on South African imports

Minister Ronald Lamola addresses the media at Germiston Civic Centre, calling for national unity in response to US tariffs on South African imports. Image: Supplied/GCIS International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola has lashed out at opposition parties, both within and outside the GNU, for failing to speak with one voice on matters of national interest, following the United States' decision to impose a 30% tariff on South African imports. Speaking at a joint media briefing on Monday at the Germiston Civic Centre in Ekurhuleni, Lamola, alongside Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau, called on all South Africans to unite in response to the escalating trade dispute. 'These are complex issues. All South Africans should speak with one voice in the national interest - whether in opposition, in the GNU, in government, outside government, NGOs or in business,' Lamola said. The tariffs, announced by the administration of US President Donald Trump, will take effect at 12:01am on August 8. While other African countries, including Lesotho and Zimbabwe, will face a 15% tariff, South Africa has been singled out for a significantly steeper duty. Analysts argued that this was a sign of worsening relations between Pretoria and Washington. Lamola said the government has worked diligently to stabilise and strengthen trade ties with the US since the start of the seventh administration. In May, South Africa submitted a comprehensive framework deal aimed at addressing the US trade deficit, promoting digital trade, boosting investment, and removing non-tariff barriers. However, despite ongoing discussions, Washington pressed ahead with the unilateral tariff hike. 'This decision comes as both countries are engaged in efforts to resolve long-standing bilateral issues,' Lamola said. 'Sadly, these efforts now seem to have been undermined, much to our dismay.' Lamola said that the tariffs were not unique to South Africa. 'This is not just a South African phenomenon. The US has imposed similar tariffs on both its allies and adversaries. We must not take it personally, but instead work to find common ground,' he said. The Democratic Alliance (DA), the second-largest party in the GNU, has blamed Lamola and Tau for failing to secure a more favourable outcome. DA trade spokesperson Toby Chance said the government's failure to station a permanent diplomat in Washington had left South Africa at a disadvantage during negotiations. 'This 'no deal' scenario is the result of negligence, failed diplomacy and ineptitude,' Chance said. 'Our negotiators missed the initial deadline to submit trade terms and then had to request an extension.' He added that neighbouring Botswana had successfully negotiated its tariffs down from 37% to 15%, and said South Africa should have achieved similar results. The DA itself has also come under fire for its approach to the US. Ealier this year, senior party members, including MP Andrew Whitfield, then deputy minister of trade, travelled to Washington in an effort to salvage the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) agreement. President Cyril Ramaphosa later dismissed Whitfield for making the trip without authorisation. The DA described the March visit as a diplomatic mission aligned with the country's foreign policy, but the ANC criticised it as reckless and unauthorised. Lobby groups including AfriForum, Solidarity and Freedom Front Plus also undertook trips to the US, citing concerns about land expropriation, farm attacks and controversial political rhetoric, including the 'Kill the Boer' chant by Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema. Lamola rejected these separate initiatives as counterproductive and reiterated the need for unity. 'We must all speak in one voice to promote South Africa's national interest, because if there are any consequences, they will affect us all,' he said. In his weekly letter to the nation, President Cyril Ramaphosa noted that South Africa is grappling with the United States' he insists the country is not alone in facing mounting global trade challenges.

South Africa eyes new markets after US tariffs: President
South Africa eyes new markets after US tariffs: President

IOL News

time13 minutes ago

  • IOL News

South Africa eyes new markets after US tariffs: President

President Cyril Ramaphosa said SA will continue to engage the US in an attempt to preserve market access and accelerate the diversification of the country's export markets, particularly by deepening intra-African trade. Image: GCIS South Africa is seeking new markets in Africa and Asia as it negotiates with the United States over looming 30% trade tariffs, which could cost around 30,000 jobs, officials said Monday. Government ministers expressed frustration with the United States over the tariff -- among those due to take effect against several countries later this week -- saying South African exports do not compete with US industry and were only a fraction of that country's total imports. The 30% tariff is the highest in sub-Saharan Africa and comes as diplomatic relations between South Africa and the United States are in tatters over a range of domestic and international policies. "Our foremost priority is protecting our export industries," President Cyril Ramaphosa said in his weekly newsletter. "We will continue to engage the US in an attempt to preserve market access for our products. We must also accelerate the diversification of our export markets, particularly by deepening intra-African trade," he said. The United States is South Africa's second-largest trading partner by country after China. The tariffs will in particular hit South Africa's agriculture, automotive and textiles sectors, officials said, although 35% of exports are exempted, including copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber articles and certain critical minerals. The impact on growth depends on various factors, including the sourcing of alternative markets, Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola said in a statement. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ He cited forecasts that the impact may shave 0.2% off growth, which was only around 0.1% The South African Reserve Bank last week warned that the US levy could cost 100,000 jobs, with unemployment already at more than 30%. But trade department director general Simphiwe Hamilton told reporters Monday their estimate was that approximately 30,000 jobs could be affected. South Africa 'no threat' In a bid to avert the high tariff, South Africa has offered to import US liquefied natural gas and some US agricultural products, as well as invest in its mining and metals-recycling industries. Pretoria is focused on negotiations for a new deal despite the "very extreme provocation" on the part of the United States, Lamola told reporters. The 30% tariff was "inscrutable" considering that imports from South Africa only represented 0.25% of total US imports, the minister said. "Moreover, South Africa poses no trade threat to the US economy nor its national security," he said, arguing the imports supported US industry and did not compete with it. An example was that South African agriculture exports were "counter-seasonal" and so filled gaps in the US market without replacing domestic produce, he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store