Europe wants to show it's ready for war. Would anyone show up to fight?
Nice tanks you got there, Europe—got anyone to drive 'em? Such are the taunts the continent's generals might have to endure following the announcement of a splurge in defence spending expected from the NATO summit in The Hague on June 24th-25th. Assuming European governments don't bin their commitments to bigger defence budgets once some kind of peace is agreed to in Ukraine—or Donald Trump leaves the White House—spending on their armed forces will roughly double within a decade. A disproportionate slug of the jump from a 2% of GDP spending target to 3.5% will go towards purchasing equipment. But armies are about people, too. Attracting youngsters to a career that involves getting shot at has never been easy; a bit of forceful nagging (known in military jargon as 'conscription') is already on the cards in some countries. Even dragooning recalcitrant teens into uniform will not solve a problem that is lurking deep in the continent's psyche. Europeans are proud of their peaceful ways. If war breaks out there, will anybody be there to fight it?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Russian government nervous as country faces economic challenges
At the St Petersburg International Economic Forum, a Russian MP came up to me."Are you going to bomb Iran?" he asked."I'm not planning to bomb anyone!" I replied."I mean you, the British…""Don't you mean Donald Trump?""He's told what to do by Britain," the man smiled. "And by the deep state."It was a brief, bizarre conversation. But it showed that in St Petersburg this week there was more on people's minds than just the economy. Take President Vladimir Friday, the Kremlin leader delivered the keynote speech at the forum's plenary session. It focused on the it's what the Kremlin leader said in the panel discussion afterwards that made headlines."We have an old rule," Putin declared. "Where the foot of a Russian soldier steps, that's ours."Imagine you're the leader of a country that's hosting an economic forum, seeking foreign investment and cooperation. Boasting about your army seizing foreign lands wouldn't appear to be the most effective way to achieve that's the point. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the state of the economy has been secondary to the goal of winning the war against Ukraine. That is the Kremlin's overarching priority. True, Russia's economy has been growing, but largely due to massive state spending on the defence sector and military-industrial complex. Russia fears another loss in Middle East from Iran's conflict with IsraelHow the West is helping Russia to fund its war on Ukraine And even this war-related growth is now petering didn't sound overly concerned."As far as the 'murder' of the Russian economy is concerned, as a famous writer once said - 'rumours of my death are greatly exaggerated,'" the Russian president declared. But the Russian government is clearly the forum, Russia's Minister for Economic Development, Maxim Reshetnikov, warned that the country's economy was teetering "on the brink of recession". "We grew for two years at a fairly high pace because unused resources were activated," said Russian Central Bank Governor Elvira Nabiullina. "We need to understand that many of those resources have truly been exhausted."The St Petersburg International Economic Forum was conceived as a shiny showcase for the Russian economy. A lot of that shine has faded due to the thousands of international sanctions imposed on Russia over the war in Ukraine. Many Western companies pulled out of Russia. Might they return?After all, US President Donald Trump has made it clear he wants better relations with Moscow."Today we had breakfast with the American Chamber of Commerce and lots of investors came from the US. We get a sense that lots of American companies want to come back," Kirill Dmitriev, President Putin's envoy on foreign investment, told me. We spoke on the sidelines of the St Petersburg forum."I think the American administration understands that dialogue and joint cooperation is better than sanctions that do not work and hurt your businesses."Western businesses, though, are unlikely to return in large numbers while Russia is waging war on Ukraine."I think it's clear you have to have some sort of an end to the conflict before American companies are going to seriously consider going back," said Robert Agee, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Russia."Have you asked the Trump administration to remove some sanctions from Russia?" I asked him."We've been to Washington," he replied. "We have made an analysis of the impact of American sanctions on American businesses. We passed that on to the administration.""Do you accept that the idea of Western businesses returning is controversial in light of the war in Ukraine?" I asked. "Western businesses have made decisions based on what happened three or four years ago," replied Mr Agee. "And it's up to them to decide whether it's the right time to return."After more than three years of war and mass sanctions, Russia faces tough economic challenges: high inflation, high interest rates, reports of stagnation, recession. The problems in the economy are now openly discussed and unclear how soon they will be resolved.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Map reveals your nearest nuclear fallout shelter if major US cities are bombed
The fear of a nuclear apocalypse has reached a level not seen in decades as leaders in the US, Israel, Iran, and Russia continue to warn about the start of 'all-out war.' The world has been waiting to see if President Donald Trump will deploy US forces to strike Iran, which has refused to give up its development of a nuclear weapon, a move that could ignite World War III. For everyday Americans, the only question that may matter in the minutes and seconds before a nuclear weapon strikes the US is where are the nearest fallout shelters. A nuclear fallout shelter is designed to shield people from radioactive particles, known as fallout, that spread after a nuclear explosion. Although they're not built to withstand the initial blast, extreme heat, and shockwaves of a nuclear explosion, they can act as a safe room for anyone who lives to see the aftermath. Using tools like Google Maps and historical records from the Cold War, when most of these shelters were built, doomsday preppers have been able to find where thousands of them may still be standing. Even after several decades, records show that states like New York, Maryland, Michigan, Texas, and Wisconsin all still have hundreds and possibly thousands of underground facilities labeled as emergency fallout shelters. A new map has now revealed where Americans can find safety during a nuclear attack, unearthing the locations still listed as fallout shelters throughout the country. The new fallout shelter map reveals that the vast majority of these radiation bunkers are scattered throughout America's largest cities. This includes dozens (and possibly hundreds) of basement shelters in cities like Boston, Baltimore, Dallas, Detroit, Memphis, Milwaukee, New York, Oklahoma City, Sacramento, and Washington DC. Sean Gold, an Air Force veteran and founder of the survival guide website TruePrepper, is one of the experts trying to find all of the fallout shelters that are still viable for Americans to use in the event of a nuclear attack. He noted that the canned food and medical supplies that were originally put in these bunkers decades ago are likely not there anymore, making it harder for people in 2025 to survive without bringing their own food and water. As for what makes a good fallout shelter, Gold said that shielding is the most important factor. Thick walls and a roof made of concrete or steel are necessary to block out the radiation produced by a nuclear explosion. 'The thicker the shielding, the better the protection. Alternatively, several yards of dirt will work, so many shelters are below ground,' Gold explained in an April report. Fallout shelters also need good ventilation with proper filters to trap radioactive particles in the air. Those inside will need enough food and clean water to last for weeks or months, an area for waste disposal so you don't contaminate clean supplies, and a comfortable place to sit or sleep. Additionally, Gold noted that the location of a fallout shelter should be in an area that isn't likely to take a direct hit from a nuclear bomb, and it should also be within a short distance of the people planning to use it. The US began building fallout shelters at a rapid pace during the 1950s and 1960s, with efforts intensifying around 1961 through the National Fallout Shelter Survey, a project to identify public buildings, including schools, libraries, and basements, as potential shelters. Bradley Garrett, a cultural geographer and author of the book Bunker: What It Takes to Survive the Apocalypse, has studied the history of how these bunkers have been designed through the years and how well they'd protect you in an emergency. 'They would not be able to take a direct hit,' Garrett told Newsweek in 2022. 'But you could shelter in them for the 14 days that would be necessary after a nuclear attack until the radiation levels fall to a point where it's relatively safe to emerge from the bunker,' he continued. To this day, residents in large metropolitan areas like New York will still see the fallout shelter symbol (three yellow triangles) on building plaques throughout the city. This lets the public know there's a nuclear fallout shelter down in the basement and may even provide directions on how to get there and how many people can fit inside. Thousands of these bunkers were built all around the US during the Cold War. In New York alone, there were reportedly more than 18,000 during the height of nuclear tensions with Russia. However, they were largely forgotten as the threat of nuclear war faded in the 1980s. Many Cold War-era shelters have been repurposed for storage, parking, or other uses, especially in major cities. Since the 9/11 terror attacks and Russia's invasion into Ukraine, however, doomsday preppers have been feverishly trying to track down all of these hidden shelters as the threat of global destruction has returned. Unfortunately, actually accessing a fallout shelter in your community may be harder than it sounds. There is currently no public list of active shelters available for everyday Americans, since most are now defunct or privately owned by homeowners who built one for themselves in their basements and backyards. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) now advises the public to shelter in place instead of looking for an old fallout shelter. Federal officials have recommended basements or inner rooms with thick walls to block radiation. In FEMA's 2023 Nuclear Detonation Planning Guide, they explained that the change in their reasoning focused on practicality, claiming that modern nuclear threats are unpredictable. FEMA also claimed that maintaining a nationwide shelter network was logistically and financially impossible for the US government. The agency recommended staying indoors for at least 24 to 48 hours, even though it could take much longer for the fallout to completely clear the area.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
John Healey says NATO must 'step up' and increase its military might amid plan to spend 5% of GDP on defence
JOHN Healey today says NATO must 'step up' and increase its military might - as he pushes for defence spending to hit 5 per cent of GDP. The Defence Secretary said this week's NATO summit will be a 'defining moment for our alliance and for Britain's security' as we confront a more dangerous world. 2 And as war between Iran and Israel rages, he said 'Britain stands ready' to send more RAF jets to protect UK bases in the Middle East. Keir Starmer is meeting fellow NATO leaders for crunch talks this week as the bloc is poised to agree a new target to spend 5 per cent on defence and security by 2032. It comes after Donald Trump said the bloc is shirking its responsibilities and the days of America paying for Europe's protection are over. Writing in The Sun on Sunday, Mr Healey said: 'We're living in a more dangerous and unpredictable world. 2 This Summit is a defining moment for our alliance and for Britain's security. 'It's a moment where NATO allies will pledge to step up on defence spending to boost our collective security. 'President Trump and NATO chief, Mark Rutte, are right: the current NATO spending pledge – to spend at least 2 per cent of GDP on defence – is a relic of a past era. 'We are now in a new era of threat. And as threats increase, defence spending must too.' He added: 'It's why this week, at NATO we will discuss a new, higher spending target. And Britain is up for that discussion.' NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is pushing for the bloc to spend 5 per cent of GDP on a new defence and security by 2032. This would be made up of 3.5 per cent for core military spending and 1.5 per cent on broader security related areas like infrastructure resilience. Spain is reportedly kicking off at the new target and may try to block it. But while Mr Healey does not explicitly commit to the new target in today's article, he backs talking about hiking spending. Britain faces a more 'dangerous and unpredictable world' as Iran and Israel trade missiles and Russian troops continue to fight in Ukraine, he warned. Amid spiralling tensions in the Middle East, the PM has already sent Typhoon fighter jets to the region. Mr Healey said he is prepared to send more there if security fears grow. He writes: 'Force protection for our bases and personnel is at the highest level and I won't rule out sending more capabilities if needed. Because Britain stands ready.'
