State and federal MPs describe death threats and vile abuse in wake of Joanna Howe's anti-abortion campaign
Howe, an expert in migration law at the University of Adelaide, has campaigned for anti-abortion laws in various state parliaments, and this month organised a rally – attended by the former prime minister Tony Abbott – against NSW reforms to improve access to services. She said on social media people 'need to be hysterical' about the bill, which represented what she called 'an extreme, radical takeover of our country'.
In NSW parliament this week, the state Liberal leader, Mark Speakman, accused Howe of 'brazen bullying'.
The NSW Greens MP Amanda Cohn, who introduced the bill, told Guardian Australia she had received 'threats to my personal safety' from third parties and felt her workplace had become 'unsafe' for her staff.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Labor's Julia Finn accused Howe in NSW parliament last week of using 'bizarre and nasty' tactics and 'obnoxious, attention-seeking behaviour'.
She told parliament Howe had gone into her office and spoken to a heavily pregnant and 'vulnerable' electorate officer, and 'while she did not say anything unkind', the interaction was filmed and posted without the staff member's knowledge or consent. 'That is not OK,' Finn said.
Howe did not take the post down when asked, Finn said.
Howe said in a social media post it was possible the staff member did not know she was being filmed but didn't know if she (Howe) could be held responsible for that.
A federal MP who asked not to be named told Guardian Australia they were targeted online by Howe after expressing their views on abortion. They said they then received abusive messages from anonymous people, including one who said they hoped the MP would suffer and die, and another who said their mother should have 'swallowed' so that they were never born. The MP said they were concerned enough about those messages to contact the police.
The independent South Australian MLC Tammy Franks, formerly of the Greens, told Guardian Australia her office received threats from third parties after Howe named her as part of the 'Baby-Killers Club' for being opposed to what the Greens described as a 'forced birth' bill last year. Howe was banned from SA parliament for her behaviour during the vote for that bill.
'We got lots of death threats, we got rape threats to the office … that was to the person who answered the phone,' Franks said.
Howe has posted multiple videos of herself following MPs and asking them questions about abortion. In one, she follows the South Australian child protection minister, Katrine Hildyard, as she leaves Easter mass and, as Hildyard helps a parishioner into a car, asks her why she wants 'babies born dead'.
Hildyard was also one of the women Howe branded as part of the 'Baby-Killers Club'.
Staff in the office of the Queensland Labor leader, Steven Miles, called the police after Howe entered their office last year and the person with her began filming without consent, while she asked a staff member about abortion and refused to leave when asked.
Howe posted a video of the police talking to her after the incident. The police said their concern was that she had not left when asked. Howe said she thought it was 'problematic in a democracy' that she couldn't speak to Miles, who was premier at the time, to 'hold him to account', and 'insane' that the staff member called the police. No charges were laid.
One social media post from Howe about Miles attracted multiple comments from other internet users wishing death on Miles, including saying someone should 'terminate his life', that he should 'have a date with a NOOSE' and that he should swing 'from the gallows'. The comments remain online.
In 2023, the Labor MLC Lorna Harper told the Western Australian parliament Howe had attacked her and her beliefs online and encouraged her followers to 'leave offensive messages' on her social media for supporting abortion legislation. Harper said 'according to [Howe's] followers' she was 'a baby killer, a murderer, not fit to be in parliament, a radical, highly offensive, gutless, coldblooded and a feminist extremist'.
Howe has been praised by the Coalition senators Alex Antic and Matt Canavan, the United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet and some state parliament representatives for her advocacy for anti-abortion laws, none of which have passed.
Speakman told parliament this week Howe had 'threatened to lead a public campaign aimed at encouraging a grassroots opposition to you as Liberal leader' if he supported the NSW bill.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'I will not cave to brazen bullying like this nor to the Americanisation of NSW politics,' Speakman said.
Howe said in response on social media that politicians used parliamentary privilege to tell 'the most brazen lies' while they 'work with their comrades in the media in advance' to get coverage.
She said MPs weaponised accusations of misinformation and disinformation and likened it to 'some kind of Tourette's' or 'verbal diarrhoea'.
She said of being called a bully that it was 'democracy' and she was just asking questions.
'It's not like I'm going around threatening to beat up their family or I'm finding them in a dark alleyway and I'm … harassing them,' she said. She said pro-life women and church leaders had always sat down with politicians for meetings and 'just lost dismally', playing 'Christian voters for fools'.
'I'm not your nice pro-life Christian girl,' she said. 'I bring a level of activism and assertiveness and it's clearly effective because it's rattled you [NSW politicians],' she said.
'You're just going to have to get with the program, because the old sitting down for a meeting and listening to your BS … those days are over. We're not doing that any more.'
Howe also published video of the NSW premier, Chris Minns, criticising her. 'He's just called me a liar and a bully,' she said. 'It really just shows how fragile these snowflake politicians are.'
Other comments he made were 'good' for a potential defamation action, she said.
'For Minns to say that, you know, I'm responsible for all this misinformation, whipping up this hysteria – people need to be hysterical about this bill,' she said. 'This was an extreme, radical takeover of our country.'
Howe targeted the federal Liberal senator Maria Kovacic with a petition for her to be 'dumped', describing her as having an 'anti-child, anti-family ideology'. Kovacic told Guardian Australia MPs had a duty to resist attempts to coerce them into silence or submission.
Franks said she 'can't believe' the University of Adelaide lets Howe 'trade on her association with that institution as a law professor when her lack of respect for … what is reasonable behaviour in the democratic process continues to be flouted'.
The university said academics were free to 'make lawful public comment on any issue in their personal capacities', but were expected to comply with the university's code of conduct. It did not say whether it considered Howe's actions to be in accordance with the code.
Howe did not respond to a request for comment, but posted on X saying she did not need to answer questions and was 'busy being a real person with a life'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Young Australians may endure worse lives than their parents, ‘worried' productivity chief warns
Young Australians may endure worse lives than their parents, the nation's productivity chief has warned. Danielle Wood, chair of the productivity commission, said young people are facing a future of lower wages, increased costs and the impacts of climate breakdown without major government action to tackle major economic challenges. Wood also urged the government to not put new regulations on AI, claiming existing rules on fraud, safety and discrimination are already sufficient – an argument running counter to human rights experts and unions calling for greater protections against abuse and for workers. On the eve of the Albanese government's economic reform summit, with its key focus on productivity, Wood will address the National Press Club in Canberra on Monday. She said Australia must adopt a 'growth mindset' and boost productivity to solve looming problems for future generations, saying it was 'the only way to sustainably lift wages and opportunities over time'. 'Overwhelmingly, young people today believe they won't live better lives than their parents did. As chair of the Productivity Commission, I'm worried too,' Wood will tell the Press Club, according to a speech notes released ahead of the address. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Wood's speech blames recent Australian governments for key challenges facing young people, pointing to 'policy choices' for house prices growing faster than incomes, and claiming politicians have 'for so long avoided the lowest cost policy choices' in dealing with climate change. Wood will say that productivity comes from better skills and training, new technologies, and policy settings making it easier to switch jobs or run a business. The commission has, in the lead up to the roundtable, released several major reports suggesting changes to tax settings, workforce issues and training, and technology among others. Amid criticism of the summit before it had even been held, the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, maintained the exercise had already been a success, claiming it had helped focus Australians' attention on productivity and the economic challenges faced by the government. A YouGov survey of 1,500 people, conducted for community organisation Amplify, last week found 73% of Australians either did not know or were unsure about the summit, and only 29% were confident it would lead to meaningful change. Around two-thirds of people surveyed believed productivity increases would mean people had to work harder, with the benefits going to bosses, but the same percentage believed it would lead to more job opportunities. 'We've focused the country on the productivity challenge. We've gotten people accustomed to dealing with the economic and fiscal trade‑offs that governments deal with every day,' Chalmers said on Sunday. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Among the key issues to be discussed through the roundtable is AI. Business and tech groups have urged the government to embrace a light-touch approach to legislating it, saying over-regulation could stunt the productivity benefits associated with the new technology. The government is still debating how best to respond to AI, with a diversity of views among Labor voices. The former industry minister Ed Husic had set out plans for a standalone AI act to regulate the field, while the new minister, Tim Ayres, has spoken about regulation and legislation among plans still to be decided. It is unclear what Labor will settle on. The commission has set out proposals for how tech, including AI, could be regulated and treated in Australia, suggesting it could add up to $116bn to Australia's GDP. However, the commission was strongly criticised last week for suggesting big tech companies be allowed to mine Australian copyright content – including music, literature, art and journalism – to train their AI models, an idea advanced by the Tech Council of Australia and its chair, the Atlassian co-founder Scott Farquharson. The Tech Council on Monday released its submission to the roundtable, where it again called for 'copyright reform' including 'narrowly tailored text‑and‑data‑mining exceptions and increased access to high‑quality Australian datasets' to help train AI models. 'Australia's current copyright frameworks are restricting frontier AI innovation. Training foundation models depends on text and data mining,' the submission read. Wood's speech notes contain no repeat of the PC's controversial suggestion for a copyright carveout, but she will again call on the government to not over-regulate AI. 'While managing the risks is important, we do not think that a new and overarching regulatory framework for AI is the way to go. That's because the risks posed by AI are mainly existing risks,' she will say. 'AI may make it cheaper, easier and faster for bad actors to create harms, but most of these harms – from product safety, to discrimination, to fraud – are already covered by regulatory frameworks.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
The roundtable is a test of Labor's courage and vision. Will it rise to the occasion?
Remember when governments took bold steps – deregulating the dollar, introducing the GST, freeing up trade and rolling out the NDIS? Not any more, even though the need is greater than ever. Treasury explicitly advised Jim Chalmers in its post-election advice that the budget settings are 'unsustainable', that personal and company tax are too high and that 'indirect taxes' are a solution for reform. Addressing the intergenerational inequity in our tax system requires courage and vision. At this rate, we will be passing on a lower standard of living, diminished health and education outcomes, and a degraded environment to younger Australians. The most recent federal election was defined by embarrassing small-mindedness from the major parties – promises of $7 off your weekly fuel bill or a $5 tax cut. These are not serious solutions to the structural challenges we face. When you combine these small target strategies with the increasing need to show an electoral 'mandate' before tackling any policy issue, how will we ever address the big challenges? Sign up: AU Breaking News email There are two schools of thought about how reform happens: one argues that it requires a strong majority government; the other believes it will take a minority government pushed by a principled crossbench. The fact that overall support for the major parties fell again with 33.6% of voters supporting community independent or minor party candidates demonstrates increasing frustration at the major parties' unwillingness to confront Australia's long-term challenges. The election of independents to the crossbench was driven by two decades of gridlock on economic reform, coupled with a lack of a coherent approach to climate change mitigation. During the 2022 election campaign and immediately after, I spoke of the urgent need for broad tax reform. In the last parliament, I raised this issue in the house 10 times. Allegra Spender spoke about it 21 times. The major parties avoided the topic entirely. I was heartened by the treasurer's decision to expand the agenda for the economic reform roundtable to include tax reform. Could this be the moment when the government finally confronts the structural challenges in our budget and the demographic shifts ahead? It was refreshing to hear the treasurer push back against the 'rule in, rule out' game that has stifled meaningful debate for years. But unfortunately, the prime minister is managing our expectations down to tinkering. The case for tax reform is compelling and GST provides an opportunity. Our current tax system disproportionately burdens younger Australians. Bracket creep – the stealthy tax increase on workers – is our only plan for addressing the deficit. We need to explore alternatives with productivity in mind. The economist Chris Murphy has shown that, per extra dollar of revenue raised, the GST causes the least economic harm, followed by personal income tax, and then company tax. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Yet our GST is among the narrowest and lowest in the OECD. It applies to just 7.5% of the economy, compared to an OECD average of over 11%, and its rate is half the OECD average. Broadening the base and increasing the rate could allow us to shift the tax burden from those who work to those who spend. In anticipation of the roundtable, the economist Richard Holden and I revisited our 2023 work and asked the Parliamentary Budget Office to model a 'progressive GST' – a way to relieve pressure on personal income tax while protecting low and middle-income earners. Under our model, the GST rate would increase to 15% and exemptions would be removed. To ensure equity, every Australian adult would receive a $3,300 annual payment, effectively making the first $22,000 of spending GST-free. PBO modelling shows that this could leave the bottom 60% of income earners better off, even before accounting for the personal income tax cuts enabled by the additional $24bn in revenue. This is the test. The Labor government has a 19-seat majority. If a comfortable margin is truly a prerequisite for reform, now is the time to act. If we see no action now and the major parties decide an electoral mandate is required, they are now on notice. The voters are on to you. You have three years to build community support for a bold and viable plan to fix our tax system. Any party that wants to be taken seriously as a contender for government in 2028 must come to the election with a tax plan that is fair, future-focused, and fit for the demographic changes ahead. The small target game is over. Australians are ready for courageous action to secure a prosperous future for our children. Kate Chaney is the independent member for Curtin
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shock new poll reveals why Aussies see Donald Trump as a bigger threat than 'communist dictator' Xi Jinping
Australians are more afraid of Donald Trump 's tariffs than the increasing Chinese military threat in the Pacific, according to a shocking new poll. The Newspoll, conducted between Monday and Thursday last week, revealed far greater concern among voters about the US President's unpredictable trade penalties than there was about Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping 's westward push. When the two issued were posed to 1283 Australians, 42 per cent of voters said US tariffs were more of a concern, while just 37 per cent stated Beijing 's military build-up in the Indo-Pacific region was the more pressing issue. Voters who were neutral on the two global issues stood at 21 per cent, the poll published in The Australian revealed. However, the polling analysis also showed a partisan effect was at play, with Labor and the Greens viewing Trump's tariffs as the bigger threat, while Coalition and minor party voters saw China as the more dangerous issue. Trumps tariffs triggered 55 per cent of Labor voters and 60 per cent of Greens voters, but just 29 per cent of Coalition and minor party voters. On the other hand, China's military muscle moved 50 per cent of Coalition supporters and 49 per cent of minor party supporters, but just 26 per cent and 22 per cent of Labor and Greens voters respectively. The poll also revealed that, for the first time since September 2023, more Australians are satisfied with Anthony Albanese's performance than not. The primary votes of the Coalition and One Nation improved by one point to 30 and nine per cent, respectively, since last month's first post-election Newspoll. Labor remained at 36 per cent and holds a two-party-preferred vote over the Coalition at 56 to 44 per cent. The Prime Minister's personal popularity has returned to levels not seen since the cost-of-living crisis and voice referendum led to a slump in his approval ratings. Albanese now has a net approval rating of plus-three, with 49 per cent of voters satisfied with the Labor leader's performance and 46 per cent dissatisfied. He has not been in positive territory since September 2023, when he recorded 47 per cent and 44 per cent satisfaction and dissatisfaction ratings. The Prime Minister's current rating is the highest it's been since July 2023, when 52 per cent of voters rated his performance positively. Sussan Ley, who took over as leader of the Coalition following Peter Dutton's departure, has since her performance ratings drop since last month's poll. She had a net approval rating of minus-seven last month, similar to Dutton's levels following the 2022 election. However, Ley has seen the gap widen to minus-nine. After the election, the Coalition experienced its worst result for the Liberal/Nationals parties since Newspoll first compared primary vote levels in November 1985. The first post-election poll had Labor at 36 per cent compared with the Coalition's 29 per cent. Labor won the May 3 election after securing 34.6 per cent of the primary vote. Support for the opposition remains below the 31.8 per cent primary vote won by the Coalition in May. Pauline Hanson's One Nation rose a point to nine per cent while the Greens remained steady at 12 per cent. Others, including independents and minor parties, fell from 15 to 13 per cent.
