logo
The funniest, weirdest and most niche bumper stickers seen around L.A.

The funniest, weirdest and most niche bumper stickers seen around L.A.

Here in auto-saturated Los Angeles, the bumper sticker has always been a healthy form of self-expression. But in recent years, they've become far weirder than your average tourist-trap souvenir or presidential endorsement.
'This new wave of stickers,' writes Times contributor Renée Reizman, 'is more concerned with cracking self-deprecating jokes or aligning with a niche fandom. There's a bumper sticker for everybody. You can profess your love for John Cage, neon art or frogs. You can declare your other car is a poem, ask drivers not to stress out your dog or claim to be a silly goose.'
Artists, small-business owners and residents are creating highly specific bumper stickers to serve their social circles and earn some laughs. In my neck of the woods, I've clocked 'ON A QUIET NIGHT YOU CAN HEAR MY BUICK RUST!' 'DREAMS HAPPEN,' and my personal favorite, 'I'D RATHER BE SLOWLY CONSUMED BY MOSS.' Alone, these stickers might make you smile, contemplate or drop your jaw. Together, they're a mosaic of Angelenos' collective conscious.
To celebrate the colorful little decals that keep Angelenos rubbernecking on the road, we asked locals and visitors to share their favorite bumper stickers. Here's what they submitted.
Where did you see it? 'Glendale Boulevard in Atwater Village.'What'd you like about it? 'Made me stop and laugh.'
— Robert Grenader, Los Feliz
Where did you see it? '101 Northbound near Melrose.'What'd you like about it? '[It was] on a Honda Prelude. The composer Claude Debussy wrote a famous piece called 'Prelude to the Afternoon of a Faun. So ... Prelude 2PMFaun. Definitely a classical musician driving that one.'
— Lee Bridges, Laurel Canyon
Where did you see it? 'Foothill Boulevard, between Pennsylvania and Lowell [in] La Crescenta'What'd you like about it? 'Touché, all you obnoxious parents.'
— Ben Elder, La Crescenta
Where did you see it? 'North Westdale… On Barry, just south of Sardis (near a Whole Foods)'What'd you like about it? '[It was] in plain black, on white, without punctuation. It is poetry!
— Dave Kopplin, West L.A.
What'd you like about it? 'It says so much in so little text.'
— Russ Charvonia, Ventura
Where did you see it? 'In Lone Pine. The driver said he was from L.A.'
— David Morrow, Bend, Ore.
Where did you see it? 'On the 5, just south of Magic Mountain.'What'd you like about it? 'Made me laugh ... and continue to worry. It appeals to the literate.'
— Theo Moreno, Cambria
Where did you see it? Jefferson and Lincoln [in] Playa VistaWhat'd you like about it? 'A niche spoof on a classic California bumper sticker.'
— Katie Purtill, Playa del Rey
Where did you see it? 'It was parked in a red zone in front of Maury's Bagels in Silver Lake.'What'd you like about it? 'I think we can all relate to this a little bit. I also wonder what would happen to sales of Ozempic if we embraced this idea more fully.'
— Ted Walker, Silver Lake
Where did you see it? 'In Topanga.'What'd you like about it? 'First, the bumper sticker was thought of by the Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Community. This organization has been around since 1963. It was established to fight off overdevelopment in the Santa Monica Mountains, specifically in Topanga. We all in Topanga realize Topanga needs to be enjoyed by everyone. People move here because they see something that enriches their soul. We wanted to get the message out and remind all why they came here and [to] not bring with them the very thing they were trying to get away from. We want folks to breath deep and love Topanga for what it offers and not change it to suit a more urban environment.'
— Roger Pugliese, Topanga
Where did you see it? 'I was in the Valley, about to make a left onto Ventura Boulevard. I go to school at CSUN, so I have the privilege of escaping the Westside regularly.'What'd you like about it? 'The song immediately came to my mind when I read it, and I laughed out loud in my car so loud, like a huge dork, and it was fantastic.'
— Alexis Evanoff, West L.A.
Where did you see it? 'Palmdale near Antelope Valley Mall'What'd you like about it? '[It was] in a Lisa Frank type of font in soft pastel colors. I laughed out loud when I read it. The sweet tone is so passive-aggressive.'
— Polly Drown, Palmdale
Where did you see it? 'West L.A. in heavy traffic.'What'd you like about it? 'Cleverness. You see so many stickers saying I Brake For Squirrels, or Garage Sales or whatever. Brachiation is using your arms to swing through the tree branches, like gibbons and spider monkeys.'
— Karen Hohenstein, West Hills
Where did you see it? 'Seen at Foothill Ranch Library, Orange County.'What'd you like about it? 'Based on real events. College rugby team's plane crashed in snowy Andes in 1972. Survivors had little food ... they did have the dead bodies of family and friends. Of 45 people aboard, just 16 survived subfreezing nights until rescue 72 days later.'
— John Grimshaw, Lake Forest

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jon Stewart Calls Los Angeles ‘Our Most Flammable City' Amid ICE Protests: ‘Trump Happily Lights the Fuse'
Jon Stewart Calls Los Angeles ‘Our Most Flammable City' Amid ICE Protests: ‘Trump Happily Lights the Fuse'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Jon Stewart Calls Los Angeles ‘Our Most Flammable City' Amid ICE Protests: ‘Trump Happily Lights the Fuse'

On this week's episode of 'The Daily Show,' Jon Stewart covered the ongoing protests in Los Angeles, which are fighting back against aggressive raids from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Stewart opened the show by joking he was in L.A. over the weekend 'getting a BBL from a celebrity doctor.' While there, he had one question for Angelenos: 'Is your city ever not on fire?' More from Variety Jon Stewart Tackles Elon Musk's Exit From the Trump Administration: 'This Guy Has Seen Some S--' Jon Stewart Slams CNN for Relentlessly Promoting Book on Joe Biden's Declining Health Amid Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: 'Doing the Story Seems Almost Disrespectful' 'Daily Show' Host Jordan Klepper Wanted to Understand Young Trump Voters: 'I Expected a Bunch of D--s ... but the Cruelty Wasn't There' 'Whether you win a basketball championship, a world series championship, whether you have an exploding piñata gender reveal gone wrong, congratulations, it's a boy and an evacuation,' Stewart joked. 'Or you're just protesting the Trump administration's expanded deportation raids. L.A. continues to be our most flammable city.' Stewart then played a clip of Donald Trump on the campaign trail saying, 'We're going to get the criminals, the murderers, the drug dealers.' He then contrasted Trump's statement with a news snippet, reporting that 'protests started following ICE raids at a Home Depot parking lot in Paramount, south of the city.' 'A Home Depot? From 'the worst of the worst' to a fucking Home Depot? Jeez, ICE, if you need assistance in arresting people, those guys are looking for work,' Stewart said. 'It's an explosive situation, on the cusp of federalism vs. states' rights. Border control vs. due process. Terrifyingly militarized sweeps vs. hard-working people in local communities.' The late-night pundit, clearly setting up a joke on Trump, added that the situation requires 'a deft touch' to calm the conflict. Stewart then hard cut to a clip of Trump at a press conference, saying that he has 'a little statement: They say, 'They spit, we hit.'' 'Predictably, these non-targeted, much broader deportation efforts in cities that feel very connected to the immigrant population [are] a tinderbox, and Trump happily lights the fuse,' Stewart said later in the show. 'Luckily, in the midst of all this chaos, there have been no fatalities. Well, human fatalities.' Another news clip then played, reporting that the self-driving car service Waymo was 'suspending service after at least five of its cars were vandalized and set on fire' during the protests. 'It took five of them before you were like, 'Should we stop sending the Waymos? Four could be a coincidence,'' Stewart joked. Watch the entire segment below. Best of Variety 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400M countersuit against Blake Lively
Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400M countersuit against Blake Lively

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400M countersuit against Blake Lively

Judge dismisses Justin Baldoni's $400M countersuit against Blake Lively Show Caption Hide Caption Blake Lively's team slams Baldoni's over Taylor Swift subpoena Blake Lively's team has condemned Justin Baldoni's team's decision to subpoena Taylor Swift, calling it a blatant attempt to exploit Lively's friendship for tabloid attention. unbranded - Entertainment Justin Baldoni's $400 million countersuit against his "It Ends with Us" costar Blake Lively, her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and The New York Times has been dismissed by a judge. The "It Ends with Us" director first sued Lively, Reynolds and the Times after the actress went public with claims Baldoni sexually harassed her and helped orchestrate a smear campaign against her. The lawsuit was filed in response to Lively's sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit in late 2024. Judge Lewis Liman granted a June 9 motion for dismissal from Lively's legal team because Baldoni's claims of civil extortion, defamation and false light did not hold up legally. However, the judge is allowing Baldoni's team another chance to address specific claims by filing a second amended complaint – for breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with contract – by June 23. Reynolds, Lively and publicist Leslie Sloane's request for Baldoni to cover their attorneys' fees was denied without prejudice, meaning their request could also be refiled. USA TODAY has reached out to Baldoni's reps for comment. "Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times," Lively's lawyers said in a Monday, June 9, statement to USA TODAY. "As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it," the statement continued. "We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation." In a filing reviewed by USA TODAY, the judge noted that Baldoni's complaint focused on two main claims. First, he alleged Lively threatened to refuse to promote "It Ends with Us" and attack him publicly if he didn't agree to give her control over the movie. The complaint argued this amounted to civil extortion. But Liman said the complaint did not adequately allege that Lively's "threats were wrongful extortion rather than legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions." The judge also determined that Baldoni and his fellow plaintiffs failed to show that they were damaged by some of Lively's allegedly "extortionate acts." Secondly, Baldoni's complaint alleged that Lively, Reynolds, Sloane and the Times "spread a false narrative that Baldoni committed sexual misconduct towards" Lively and engaged in a smear campaign against her. But the judge said the complaint did not allege that Lively "is responsible for any statements" other than those made in a California Civil Rights Department complaint, which are privileged. As for statements made by Reynolds, Sloane and the Times, the judge said the complaint did not allege that these parties "would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them," which is required for them to be liable for defamation.

Judge Dismisses Justin Baldoni's Lawsuit Against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, The New York Times
Judge Dismisses Justin Baldoni's Lawsuit Against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, The New York Times

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Judge Dismisses Justin Baldoni's Lawsuit Against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, The New York Times

Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and The New York Times was dismissed by a judge on Monday, according to court documents obtained by HuffPost. The news marks the latest in the tumultuous back-and-forth legal battle that stems from the film 'It Ends With Us,' which Baldoni directed and starred in. Lively, who is married to Reynolds, starred in the film as well. Baldoni filed a $400 million countersuit against Lively, Reynolds and Lively's publicist, Leslie Sloane, in January, claiming that they attempted to extort and defame him with sexual harassment claims and that the two actors tried to take control of his film. He also claimed in a defamation suit that the Times had falsely reported that he had created a smear campaign against Lively. Baldoni's countersuit also lists the film producer Jamey Heath, Wayfarer partner Steve Sarowitz and publicists Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel as plaintiffs. However, Judge Lewis J. Liman of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan argued that Lively had relied on 'legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions' rather than extortion. Liman also said that Lively's statements accusing Baldoni of sexual harassment are privileged because they were made in a California Civil Rights Department complaint and therefore not considered defamation. Additionally, Liman wrote that Baldoni's claim that Reynolds, Sloane and the Times defamed him does not hold up because the suit does not prove that any of the parties 'seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them.' In a 132-page opinion, the judge explicitly wrote that the Wayfarer Parties, which refer to Baldoni, Wayfarer Studios and others in the company, 'have not adequately alleged that Lively's threats were wrongful extortion rather than legally permissible hard bargaining or renegotiation of working conditions. Additionally, the Wayfarer Parties have not shown that some of Lively's allegedly extortionate acts damaged them.' (Baldoni is a co-founder of Wayfarer Studios, an independent production studio involved in the film.) 'The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged,' the opinion also stated. 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign. But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law.' 'The Times had no obvious motive to favor Lively's version of events,' Liman added.'The Wayfarer Parties' additional claims also fail. Accordingly, the Amended Complaint must be dismissed in its entirety.' While the judge dismissed the lawsuit, Baldoni is allowed to file an amended complaint by June 23. However, he may only include claims relevant to breach of implied covenant and tortious interference with a contract, which were also included in his complaint. Lively's lawyers Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb told HuffPost that the ruling is 'a total victory and a complete vindication.' 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it,' the statement continued. The attorneys said they will be seeking attorneys' fees, and treble and punitive damages from Baldoni and other Wayfarer Studios parties. Sigrid McCawley, Sloane's attorney, told HuffPost in a statement on Monday that she was 'wrongfully dragged' into this lawsuit in an attempt to damage her reputation. 'Today's decision by the Court makes clear that Sloane did nothing wrong. Sloane stands fully vindicated, and justice has been served,' McCawley said. The New York Times celebrated the lawsuit's dismissal in a statement to HuffPost. 'We are grateful to the court for seeing the lawsuit for what it was: a meritless attempt to stifle honest reporting,' a spokesperson for the Times said. 'Our journalists went out and covered carefully and fairly a story of public importance, and the court recognized that the law is designed to protect just that sort of journalism. We will continue to stand up in court for our journalism and for our journalists when their work comes under attack.' Lively's lawsuit was filed in New York in December. 'For years prior to the release of the Film, Mr. Baldoni portrayed himself asa leader of the male feminist movement, writing books, hosting podcasts, and holding TED Talks on the topic. In reality, however, Mr. Baldoni's public persona is a stark contrast to his private behavior, which is replete with hypocrisy, misogyny, and retaliation,' Lively's attorneys wrote in her complaint. Baldoni's countersuit argued that Lively and Reynolds used their prestige 'to steal an entire film right out of the hands of its director and production studio.' It added that Baldoni and Wayfarer only took legal action because Lively had 'unequivocally left them with no choice, not only to set the record straight…But also to put the spotlight on the parts of Hollywood that they have dedicated their careers to being the antithesis of.' The trial is expected to start in March 2026. Representatives for Reynolds, Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios did not immediately reply to HuffPost's request for comment. Blake Lively's Lawyer Accused Of Threatening To Leak Taylor Swift Texts Blake Lively Accuses Justin Baldoni Of Making Women On 'It Ends With Us' Set Uncomfortable Justin Baldoni Reportedly Admits He 'F***ed Up' In Voice Note Apology To Blake Lively

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store