Person arrested on suspicion of arson after fire at First World War airfield
A person has been arrested on suspicion of arson after a major fire at a First World War airfield.
Firefighters tackled the blaze at Old Sarum Airfield in Salisbury, Wiltshire on April 17 after its Grade II listed Hangar 3 caught light, causing the building to partially collapse.
No casualties were reported from the incident.
Wiltshire Police said on Friday that a person had been arrested in connection with the fire and had since been released on bail.
The age of the suspect has not yet been revealed, with the force's investigation ongoing.
The airfield, which lies within the setting of a scheduled monument, is recognised by the Government as a nationally important archaeological site.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Tories in call to arm specialist prison officers to counter Islamist gangs
Shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick said specialist teams should be armed with Tasers, stun grenades, and in some circumstances, lethal weapons. He also called for high-collar stab vests to be provided to frontline officers right away, citing the threat from inmates after recent attacks on prison officers. 'Islamist gangs and violent prisoners in our jails are out of control. It's a national security emergency, but the Government is dithering. 'If they don't act soon, there is a very real risk that a prison officer is kidnapped or murdered in the line of duty, or that a terrorist attack is directed from inside prison,' he wrote in The Telegraph. He said he had commissioned former prison governor Ian Acheson to carry out a rapid review. 'We have to stop pussy-footing around Islamist extremists and violent offenders in jails,' he wrote. 'That means arming specialist prison officer teams with Tasers and stun grenades, as well as giving them access to lethal weapons in exceptional circumstances. 'If prison governors can't easily keep terrorist influencers and radicalising inmates apart from the mainstream prisoners they target, then we don't control our prisons – they do. We must take back control and restore order by giving officers the powers and protection they need.' It come after attacks by high-profile inmates. Manchester Arena plotter Hashem Abedi targeted prison staff with boiling oil and homemade weapons in a planned ambush last month. Southport killer Axel Rudakubana allegedly attacked a prison officer at HMP Belmarsh earlier this month by pouring boiling water over them. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood has ordered a snap review into whether stab vests should be used more routinely, and a trial that will give specialised officers dealing with serious incidents Tasers is due to be launched this summer. Officers already have access to batons and Pava spray, a synthetic form of pepper spray, in men's prisons in the public sector. A Ministry of Justice source said the Government has a 'zero-tolerance approach' to violence and extremism in prisons. 'The last Government added just 500 cells to our prison estate, and left our jails in total crisis. In fourteen years, they closed 1,600 cells in the high-security estate, staff assaults soared, and experienced officers left in droves. Now the arsonists are pretending to be firefighters. 'This Government is cleaning up the mess the last Government left behind. We are building new prisons, with 2,400 new cells opened since we took office. And we take a zero-tolerance approach to violence and extremism inside.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Government's ill-judged prisoner-release scheme puts the public at risk
SIR – I, along with the majority of my countrymen, am appalled by the Government's decision to release certain prisoners early (' Met chief: Starmer's early release scheme will lead to more crime ', report, May 28). This is to compensate for the shortage of prison spaces, as our population grows ever larger, in part due to poorly controlled immigration. First, the punishment meted out by the courts should match the gravity of the crime. Stricter sentencing would surely act as a deterrent to help reduce criminality, whereas the present system allows certain sentences to be commuted or for the prisoner to be granted parole. This in itself creates too much recidivism, and it is now to be exacerbated by the early release of offenders, many of whom are likely to reoffend. This is not the decision of a sensible government that is weighing up all the facts with balanced judgment. Secondly, we should consider our already overworked police officers, many of whom do a fantastic job and lack the high regard they deserve, particularly given the much wider range of policing responsibilities they are now expected to undertake compared to 20 years ago. Policing the streets is of paramount importance, especially in inner-city areas, where regard for the law is often lax. Presumably the Government will now expect the police to monitor those on early release. What has happened to our once highly regarded system of justice and policing? It appears to be yet another casualty of this ludicrous Labour Government. Tony Millard Redhill, Surrey SIR – Week after week, our local magistrates' court deals with an endless list of people who have been caught driving drunk or high on drugs. At present, they are fined and disqualified from driving for a period. Isn't it time that our society made people wholly responsible for their actions, by imposing a lifetime driving ban on them if caught? It may make them think twice before getting behind the wheel when they are drunk or stoned, and consider the devastating impact that such selfish behaviour could have on others. It would also save the magistrates from having to deal with repeat offenders. The roads are dangerous enough without people who view driving as a right, rather than as a privilege with enormous responsibilities. Andy Breare Plymouth, Devon
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Scottish Government chiefs' verdict after Nicola Sturgeon forced to hand over memoir
Documents reveal four copies of 'Frankly' were handed over and will be 'securely held' NIC ALL-WRITE Scottish Government chiefs' verdict after Nicola Sturgeon forced to hand over memoir CIVIL servants spent a month poring over Nicola Sturgeon's memoir for potentially reputation-damaging stories. The ex-SNP leader's book was submitted to the Scottish Government under vetting rules requiring ex-ministers not to write negatively about officials. 1 'Frankly' will hit the shelves on August 14 Credit: INSTAGRAM Documents reveal four copies of 'Frankly' were handed over and will be 'securely held' to avoid leaks before its August 14 release. A senior team including a top aide overseeing ethics reviewed the manuscript in April before signing it off that month. Records also show former First Minister Ms Sturgeon tried to ensure it was kept under wraps. She told the Government: 'I'd be grateful for an indication of what the circulation will be within SG and what steps will be taken to ensure confidentiality.' Scottish Tory deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'The public will hope this forensic poring over of Nicola Sturgeon's memoir did not divert from crucial work — or this editing did not dilute it down from being as frank as she claims.' Ministers declined to comment. Ms Sturgeon's spokeswoman said she was 'looking forward' to her autobiography's launch. We told previously the ex-FM has pocketed another £76,500 for her upcoming book through her personal company, Holyrood records show. Sturgeon declared the second of four payments to the Scottish Parliament. Her register of interests states: "On 21 March 2025 my company NICOLA STURGEON LIMITED received a payment of £76,500 made via my literary agent, DHA. This represents the second of four instalments of a book advance from Pan Macmillan of £75,000 (plus VAT and minus agent commission)." She has promised her book will be open and honest about her time as First Minister and her fall-out with her former ally, Alex Salmond.
