Homer Glen Mayor Christina Neitzke-Troike says lobby stopped quick-take bill on 143rd Street
Homer Glen Mayor Christina Neitzke-Troike said Saturday afternoon a bill pending in Springfield to allow Will County to use quick take powers to seize property along 143rd Street is on hold until fall.
Neitzke-Troike and Will County Board member Jim Richmond, whose district includes Homer Glen, headed to the capitol to ensure lawmakers didn't plan a last-minute vote before the legislature's spring session scheduled end Saturday.
Both Neitzke-Troike and Richmond said they talked to numerous state representatives, senators, legislative assistants and lobbyists to protest the county's use of quick take along 143rd Street.
The Will County Division of Transportation is hoping to begin widening 143rd Street through Homer Glen next year, but Homer Glen and Homer Township officials would like to put the brakes on the project and discuss options other than the planned five-lane roadway.
The expansion is opposed by many residents, who have protested the project for at least 18 months. Residents and local officials said it would disrupt the rural nature of the area and invite more noise, trucks and traffic.
The street is under the jurisdiction of Will County, which has said the expansion is needed to improve traffic flow and safety.
Village officials said studies to widen 143rd Street from State Street/Lemont Road to Bell Road are outdated and were completed long before the Illinois Department of Transportation widened 159th Street.
'Our residents are adamant this is not a five-lane road, and that's who we are representing,' Homer Glen Village Manager Joe Baber said.
Baber and Neitzke-Troike said residents have actively filled out witness slips opposing the county's use of quick-take powers.
Neitzke-Troike said 240 of the 260 witness slips filled out for the original House bill opposed the legislation authorizing quick take powers. Residents continued to fill out witness slips when amendments to the House bill were introduced and nearly all of them were against the project, Neitzke-Troike said.
'I believe Springfield heard us,' Neitzke-Troike said. 'They are doing what government is supposed to be doing, which is listening to the people.'
The bill is in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
While the road project is not stopped, it buys the village more time to come up with a more palatable solution.
'I'm very thankful, and it gave me hope that we can come to a middle ground on what's best for the residents of Homer Glen,' Neitzke-Troike said. 'My job is to protect the people in our community, and that's what I'm doing.'
She plans to continue meeting with county leaders to come up with a solution that village officials and residents could get behind. One possible option is a center or third lane with curbs that would require less land to be acquired and be cheaper.
Richmond, the County Board's Republican Leader, said he has always been opposed to the five-lane expansion of 143rd Street.
'Hopefully we can come up with some type of compromise,' Richmond said.
Will County began engineering studies on the 159th Street expansion in 2009, and County Board members have voiced their support for the project for more than a decade.
In November 2023, the County Board approved a resolution requesting Springfield approve quick-take powers to acquire right of way for the 143rd Street project. The resolution passed 12-11 along party lines with Democrats supporting quick take.
The County Board in June 2024 approved its five-year transportation plan by a 17-3 vote, which included the 143rd Street widening as among the county's expenditures.
The total cost for the 143rd Street widening is about $72.6 million and $6.2 million has already been spent, county spokesman Mike Theodore said.
The county has also received a $7 million federal grant, which must be obligated in 2026, Theodore said. Any delays in the project could put those funds at risk, he said.
But the repercussions could extend beyond the Homer Glen road widening project, Theodore said.
'Failure to obligate these funds could negatively impact Will County's ability to receive these roadway dollars in the future, as the federal government would not have faith in the county's ability to implement projects that were approved repeatedly for years,' Theodore said.
'As the fastest-growing county in Illinois with rising infrastructure needs, federal funding provides a critical supplement to Will County roadway projects. Putting this at risk could have long-term implications on the county's budget.'
The 143rd Street expansion has long been controversial. In February 2024, the County Board voted to halt the project as planned and look into a three-lane option.
County Executive Jennifer Bertino-Tarrant mistakenly signed that resolution and subsequently vetoed it, leading 10 County Board Republicans to file a lawsuit against her.
'Will County has held a consistent position since 2009: That the existing two-lane road is a danger to the public, impedes the flow of traffic, and prevents the safe passage of residents throughout the county,' Bertino-Tarrant said in her veto.
The lawsuit against her was dismissed earlier this year in Will County Circuit Court.
Neitzke-Troike said she hopes to speak with Bertino-Tarrant about the village's concerns. Richmond said he would like the 143rd Street project to be added to future County Board transportation committee agendas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Keep it real and show the receipts': California Congresswoman on how to fight Trump's agenda
Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, who represents parts of Los Angeles and sits on the House Judiciary Committee, says Trump has 'created and manufactured violence in Los Angeles to distract from the Republican budget.' She joins the Weeknight to break down Trump's escalating use of force on protesters – and what the tactics are really about.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Challenge to Tampa Bay Senate seat revisits how it was created in 2022
The federal courthouse in Tampa on June 11, 2025. (Photo by Mitch Perry/Florida Phoenix) Day Three of the federal lawsuit alleging that a Tampa Bay area state Senate district was racially gerrymandered focused in part on how that district was created in 2022. The suit, filed by the ACLU of Florida and the Civil Rights & Racial Justice Clinic at New York University on behalf of three residents of Tampa and St. Petersburg, alleges the Legislature packed Black voters into District 16 to reduce their influence in nearby District 18, in violation of their equal-protection rights. Democrat Darryl Rouson serves in SD 16, while Republican Nick DiCeglie is the incumbent in SD 18. The defendants are Senate President Ben Albritton and Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd, and their attorneys began their defense on Wednesday, bringing Jay Ferrin back to the witness stand in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa. Ferrin is now a senior adviser to the Florida Senate, but he served as staff director of the Florida Senate Committee on Reapportionment in the fall of 2021, when the districts lines were created. He discussed how he and his staff went about drawing up the Senate districts that year and the guidelines they followed. The reapportionment process beginning that fall was taking place under the guidance of Ray Rodrigues, who chaired the Senate Reapportionment Committee. Defense attorneys aired several Florida Channel video excerpts on Wednesday showing Rodrigues explaining how 'hard lessons were learned' following the Florida Supreme Court's decision in 2015 to throw out the GOP-controlled Legislature's maps after deeming them unlawful under the Fair Districts constitutional amendments adopted by voters in 2010. Rodrigues was insistent that he wanted the 2022 Legislature to conduct itself in such a fashion that the courts would not reject the maps lawmakers would produce. 'This map will withstand a court challenge,' Rodrigues declared on the floor of the Senate. That's what the trial taking place this week will ultimately determine. Ferrin testified that, after his staff created other Senate districts in the Tampa Bay area, there remained about 100,000 residents in Pinellas County who would have to be inserted into another Senate district. (With the population of Florida in 2021 at 21.5 million people, Ferrin said, his staff were tasked to draw approximately 538,438 voters into each of the 40 Senate districts). The resultant SD 16, which encompasses parts of St. Petersburg and Hillsborough County, is similar to the 'benchmark' map created in 2015 that was then known as Senate District 19. Ferrin denied that he was instructed to maintain that same configuration. He also said that under the rules promulgated by Rodrigues, he and his fellow staffers could speak about any new maps only with either the Senate's general counsel or other Senate members — and not the general public. He was not supposed to review public submissions. Florida senators were allowed to propose amendments during the reapportionment process, to add their own maps. Rodrigues and Democratic Sen. Audrey Gibson had filed such amendments, Ferrin said, but no senator had asked him to directly to create any Senate maps. ACLU attorney Nicholas Warren said at the beginning of the morning that he had sought to depose Rodrigues and fellow Republican and committee member Danny Burgess before the trial, but both had asserted legislative privilege, which shields them having to testify in certain lawsuits. In the afternoon, the defense called two expert witnesses who criticized the expert witness testimony and voting analysis that came from the plaintiffs on Tuesday. Steven Voss is a political science professor at the University of Kentucky. When asked to break down the political partisanship of the Tampa Bay area, he included four counties that make up the Tampa Bay metropolitan statistical area — Hillsborough, Pinellas, Polk and Hernando. Based on population, he said, five Senate districts could be folded into the area, and that three historically were reliably Republican while two would favor Democrats. Currently, that breakdown is four Republican districts and one Democratic — with Senate District 14, which Voss said historically favored Democrats, going to the GOP in 2022. Voss took aim at the alternative voting maps produced for the ACLU by Penn State University professor of statistics Cory McCartan. Those maps showed that a district could have been fairly drawn up exclusively in Hillsborough County while still protecting Tier-1 standards there and in Pinellas County. (That involves the Florida Constitution's Fair District Amendment, which says that districts shall not be drawn with the intent or result of denying or abridging the equal opportunity of racial or language minorities to participate in the political process or diminish their ability to elect representatives of their choice). Voss said that the result of McCartan's work was that he was 'cracking and packing' voters in his maps to ultimately help Democrats at the voting booth. Sean Trende, senior elections analyst for RealClearPolitics, also testified for the defense. He praised the composition of the Senate maps passed by the Legislature in 2022, saying it was 'pretty incompetent racial gerrymandering, if that's what's going on.' The trial is expected to conclude on Thursday. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Virginia governor candidates vow to end 'car tax'
PORTSMOUTH, Va. (WAVY) — Virginia's car tax is widely considered the most-hated tax in the state, and it could be coming to an end soon. Both candidates for the Virginia governor's race have expressed their desire to eliminate the state's car tax. Republican Lt. Gov Winsome Earle-Sears recently announced her 'Axe the Tax' initiative, which would end the state's car tax as well as income taxes on tipped wages. A campaign spokesperson for Democrat Abigail Spanberger said, 'Abigail will work with both Democrats and Republicans to put Virginia on a real path towards eliminating the car tax once and for all.' However, the state estimates an elimination of the state's car tax would cost localities around 2.5 to 3 billion a year, a price some state lawmakers are concerned about. 'You got to wrestle through a way to deal with that. That doesn't leave the localities holding the bag because it's localities who pick up most of the cost. For example, your local police department or your local school divisions,' said Sen. Mark Warner. In a statement sent to 10 On Your side, Sen Tim Kaine said, 'This is a complicated issue that requires delicate balancing, and it's ultimately up to the General Assembly to make changes to the state tax code.' Despite the hefty price, some residents in the Hampton Roads area are still in favor of eliminating the tax. 'I most certainly am in favor of whichever candidate wins to stop, to eliminate, to get rid of the personal property taxes on our cars. There's other avenues, where a city can bring in that extra money so, I would say let's end it and go from there,' said Portsmouth resident Michael Crowell. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
