logo
Homer Glen Mayor Christina Neitzke-Troike says lobby stopped quick-take bill on 143rd Street

Homer Glen Mayor Christina Neitzke-Troike says lobby stopped quick-take bill on 143rd Street

Chicago Tribune02-06-2025

Homer Glen Mayor Christina Neitzke-Troike said Saturday afternoon a bill pending in Springfield to allow Will County to use quick take powers to seize property along 143rd Street is on hold until fall.
Neitzke-Troike and Will County Board member Jim Richmond, whose district includes Homer Glen, headed to the capitol to ensure lawmakers didn't plan a last-minute vote before the legislature's spring session scheduled end Saturday.
Both Neitzke-Troike and Richmond said they talked to numerous state representatives, senators, legislative assistants and lobbyists to protest the county's use of quick take along 143rd Street.
The Will County Division of Transportation is hoping to begin widening 143rd Street through Homer Glen next year, but Homer Glen and Homer Township officials would like to put the brakes on the project and discuss options other than the planned five-lane roadway.
The expansion is opposed by many residents, who have protested the project for at least 18 months. Residents and local officials said it would disrupt the rural nature of the area and invite more noise, trucks and traffic.
The street is under the jurisdiction of Will County, which has said the expansion is needed to improve traffic flow and safety.
Village officials said studies to widen 143rd Street from State Street/Lemont Road to Bell Road are outdated and were completed long before the Illinois Department of Transportation widened 159th Street.
'Our residents are adamant this is not a five-lane road, and that's who we are representing,' Homer Glen Village Manager Joe Baber said.
Baber and Neitzke-Troike said residents have actively filled out witness slips opposing the county's use of quick-take powers.
Neitzke-Troike said 240 of the 260 witness slips filled out for the original House bill opposed the legislation authorizing quick take powers. Residents continued to fill out witness slips when amendments to the House bill were introduced and nearly all of them were against the project, Neitzke-Troike said.
'I believe Springfield heard us,' Neitzke-Troike said. 'They are doing what government is supposed to be doing, which is listening to the people.'
The bill is in the Senate Judiciary Committee.
While the road project is not stopped, it buys the village more time to come up with a more palatable solution.
'I'm very thankful, and it gave me hope that we can come to a middle ground on what's best for the residents of Homer Glen,' Neitzke-Troike said. 'My job is to protect the people in our community, and that's what I'm doing.'
She plans to continue meeting with county leaders to come up with a solution that village officials and residents could get behind. One possible option is a center or third lane with curbs that would require less land to be acquired and be cheaper.
Richmond, the County Board's Republican Leader, said he has always been opposed to the five-lane expansion of 143rd Street.
'Hopefully we can come up with some type of compromise,' Richmond said.
Will County began engineering studies on the 159th Street expansion in 2009, and County Board members have voiced their support for the project for more than a decade.
In November 2023, the County Board approved a resolution requesting Springfield approve quick-take powers to acquire right of way for the 143rd Street project. The resolution passed 12-11 along party lines with Democrats supporting quick take.
The County Board in June 2024 approved its five-year transportation plan by a 17-3 vote, which included the 143rd Street widening as among the county's expenditures.
The total cost for the 143rd Street widening is about $72.6 million and $6.2 million has already been spent, county spokesman Mike Theodore said.
The county has also received a $7 million federal grant, which must be obligated in 2026, Theodore said. Any delays in the project could put those funds at risk, he said.
But the repercussions could extend beyond the Homer Glen road widening project, Theodore said.
'Failure to obligate these funds could negatively impact Will County's ability to receive these roadway dollars in the future, as the federal government would not have faith in the county's ability to implement projects that were approved repeatedly for years,' Theodore said.
'As the fastest-growing county in Illinois with rising infrastructure needs, federal funding provides a critical supplement to Will County roadway projects. Putting this at risk could have long-term implications on the county's budget.'
The 143rd Street expansion has long been controversial. In February 2024, the County Board voted to halt the project as planned and look into a three-lane option.
County Executive Jennifer Bertino-Tarrant mistakenly signed that resolution and subsequently vetoed it, leading 10 County Board Republicans to file a lawsuit against her.
'Will County has held a consistent position since 2009: That the existing two-lane road is a danger to the public, impedes the flow of traffic, and prevents the safe passage of residents throughout the county,' Bertino-Tarrant said in her veto.
The lawsuit against her was dismissed earlier this year in Will County Circuit Court.
Neitzke-Troike said she hopes to speak with Bertino-Tarrant about the village's concerns. Richmond said he would like the 143rd Street project to be added to future County Board transportation committee agendas.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Biden admin evacuated 55 Afghans on terror watchlist to US during botched withdrawal: DOJ watchdog
Biden admin evacuated 55 Afghans on terror watchlist to US during botched withdrawal: DOJ watchdog

New York Post

time32 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Biden admin evacuated 55 Afghans on terror watchlist to US during botched withdrawal: DOJ watchdog

US officials encountered 55 Afghan evacuees on the terrorist watchlist after the Biden administration's chaotic 2021 withdrawal from the Middle Eastern country, according to a Justice Department inspector general report. The report, released Tuesday, confirmed longstanding suspicions from Republican lawmakers that the Biden administration failed to properly vet US-bound refugees as the Taliban retook control of Afghanistan. 'I've sounded the alarm about the need to thoroughly vet Afghan evacuee applicants since August 2021,' Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said in a statement, reacting to the DOJ IG report. 'The Biden-Harris administration, my Democrat colleagues in Congress and many in the media were quick to dismiss glaring red flags that a nonpartisan national security analysis now confirms.' 3 Grassley charged that the Biden administration endangered the lives of Americans by allowing improperly vetted Afghan refugees into the US. AP The FBI's Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) identified 55 Afghans that were either already on the terrorist watchlist and made it to a US port of entry or were added to the database during the evacuation and resettlement process, the report found. Of those, at least 21 were added to the terror list after they had already entered the US. After investigations, the FBI eventually removed 46 evacuees from the watchlist, determining that they posed no threat to the homeland. However, nine remained in the terror database as of July 2024 and eight were in the US. 'As if it wasn't already obvious, the Biden-Harris administration endangered American lives by allowing suspected terrorists to enter the United States and roam free for years,' Grassley argued, noting that his 'oversight of this matter will continue.' Roughly 90,000 Afghans were allowed entry into the US and became eligible for Special immigrant Visas under the Biden administration's Operation Allies Refuge (OAR) and Operation Allies Welcome (OAW) programs, which provided the foreign nationals immigration processing and resettlement support. 'According to the FBI, the need to immediately evacuate Afghans overtook the normal processes required to determine whether individuals attempting to enter the United States pose a threat to national security, which increased the risk that bad actors could try to exploit the expedited evacuation,' the DOJ IG report stated. Despite the 55 individuals flagged, the DOJ inspector general determined that overall 'each of the responsible elements of the FBI effectively communicated and addressed any potential national security risks identified.' 3 The Biden administration hastily evacuated tens of thousands of Afghans as the country fell to the Taliban in 2021. AFP via Getty Images 3 As of July 2024, eight Afghans on the FBI's terror watchlist were still in the United States. AP Last October, the DOJ charged an Afghan national brought into the US during the chaotic withdrawal with plotting an ISIS-inspired Election Day terror attack. Nasir Ahmad Tawhedi, 27, was living in Oklahoma City on a Special Immigrant Visa as he took steps to stockpile AK-47 rifles and ammunition to carry out an attack on US soil 'in the name of ISIS,' according to the Justice Department. Tawhedi entered the US on Sept. 9, 2021, just weeks after the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan and the last US troops departed from the war-torn nation. Tawhedi was charged with conspiring and attempting to provide material support to ISIS and is currently awaiting trial.

Arizona governor vetoes bill banning teaching antisemitism, calls it an attack on educators
Arizona governor vetoes bill banning teaching antisemitism, calls it an attack on educators

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Arizona governor vetoes bill banning teaching antisemitism, calls it an attack on educators

PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would have banned teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and exposed educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. The proposal would have prohibited teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would have barred public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Hobbs, a Democrat, said Tuesday that the bill was not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits," she said in a statement. "Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff." Hobbs described antisemitism as a very troubling issue in the U.S., but said students and parents can go through the state's Board of Education to report antisemitism. The measure cleared the Legislature last week on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with 'unlawful discrimination' to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, has said his proposal would create accountability when educators fail to protect students from the rise in antisemitism since the start of the Israel-Hamas war. Opponents said the bill aimed to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opened up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would have been able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. Last week, Lori Shepherd, executive director of Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, wrote in a letter to Hobbs that if the bill were approved it would threaten teachers' ability to provide students with a full account of the holocaust. Under the bill, 'those discussions could be deemed 'antisemitic' depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intent or context,' she said. The bill would have created a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a second offense to a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate and a third offense to a revocation of the certificate. At colleges and universities, violators would have faced a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would have required colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.

GOP lawmaker presses for de-escalation in LA
GOP lawmaker presses for de-escalation in LA

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

GOP lawmaker presses for de-escalation in LA

Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) on Tuesday called for de-escalation in downtown Los Angeles following the federal troop deployment to quell protests. In an interview on NewsNation's 'The Hill,' the moderate Republican said the massive show of force in L.A. is important to send a message against 'lawlessness' in the city but that the situation should de-escalate going forward. Asked about the 'rules of engagement' for the 700 active-duty U.S. Marines deployed to the L.A. area, Gonzales stressed that they are there as a 'support mechanism' for the law enforcement and federal agents on the ground. He also said the Marines contributed to 'the overwhelming force to be able to go, 'This is not going to be tolerated. Lawlessness will not be tolerated in our country.'' 'But we also need to de-escalate things right after you've accomplished that. Now you de-escalate. Now you start to, you know, you start to calm things down,' Gonzales added. Gonzales said lawmakers and others with public platforms can play a role in toning things down. 'Those of us in the political arena, we need to do that. We need to get back to going, 'Wait a second here. We can have laws. We can also have protests. Let's do it peacefully. Let's calm the jets and let's go back to our corners,'' he added. Gonzales — who represents the largest stretch of the U.S. southern border — said it's important for Republicans to focus on deporting convicted criminals, both in practice and in messaging. 'I'm all about somebody protesting — whether you agree with it or don't agree with it — that's what we need. Perfectly okay with that. But burning a city to the ground? I don't want to see that happen in L.A. I don't want to see that happen anywhere else. 'So to me, what brings us together is if we focus on convicted criminal illegal aliens. There's over 600,000 of those people in our country,' he added. Gonzales was asked about concerns that individuals getting caught up in immigration enforcement operations are not only convicted criminals, but also people who have not committed any violent crime. He said 'details matter' and said he'd continue pressing for more information about who the individuals are that are getting swept up in so-called ICE raids. 'I've talked to DHS officials, and I've asked for — and there'll be more of this — I've asked for, well, who are the people that are apprehended? Are they, indeed, these convicted criminals? Are they somebody who overstayed their visa, or are they somebody who, you know, finished their adjudication process and were denied? Like, who are they?' 'I want to get the breakdown of it,' he continued. 'But once again, those are more sensitive cases. If you're focused on going after the convicted criminal, everybody gets behind you.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store