SBOE welcomes new members for first meeting of 2025
A preliminary list of instructional materials was presented for the board's consideration under the Instructional Materials Review and Approval (IMRA) cycle 2025.
The board approved proposed changes to 19 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 67, Subchapter B and Subchapter C, which further clarify:
— Procedures and policies for eligibility, appointment, training and duties for IMRA reviewers.
— Guidance on public comment related to instructional materials.
— Guidelines for the selection and local adoption of instructional materials by school systems.
In addition, the application window is now open for quality and suitability reviewers to support the 2025 IMRA cycle. Texas residents are encouraged to apply as suitability reviewers, while those with expertise in K — 12 mathematics, K — 6 English Language Arts (ELAR), and K — 6 Spanish Language Arts (SLAR) are encouraged to apply as quality reviewers of instructional materials.
Reviewers play a critical role in ensuring the quality and suitability of materials for Texas students and educators. Interested individuals can apply at sboe.texas.gov/IMRA. The deadline to apply is Feb. 24.
In other action, the SBOE welcomed its newly sworn-in members who took the oath of office in a ceremony officiated by Gov. Greg Abbott.
The newly sworn-in members are:
— Gustavo Reveles (District 1)
— Marisa B. Perez-Diaz (District 3)
— Staci Childs (District 4)
— Tom Maynard (District 10)
— Brandon Hall (District 11)
— Pam Little (District 12)
— Tiffany Clark (District 13)
— Aaron Kinsey (District 15)
As part of the first regular meeting after the election and qualification of new members, the SBOE confirmed its officers for the new term. Pam Little was re-elected to serve another term as Vice Chair and Will Hickman was elected to serve as Secretary.
New chairs were also selected for the board's committees:
— Audrey Young will lead the Committee on Instruction.
— Tom Maynard will lead the Committee on School Finance/Permanent School Fund.
— LJ Francis will lead the Committee on School Initiatives.
The 2024 National Blue Ribbon Schools designees from Texas were honored. The board also signed a resolution to designate February 2025 as Career and Technical Education (CTE) Month, recognizing the 1.35 million Texas secondary students enrolled in one or more CTE courses across 1,200 school systems. These programs give students the opportunity to gain academic, technical and employability skills necessary for career readiness.
The board would also like to thank the Brazoswood High School P.M. Jazz Band from the Brazoswood Independent School District for their outstanding performance during Friday's session.
Announcements
Nominations are now open for the 2025 Student Heroes Award. The SBOE encourages students, teachers, administrators and community members to nominate any Texas public school students who exemplify the core value of selfless service.
The deadline to submit a nomination is April 25, 2025. To nominate a student visit https://form.jotform.com/TXEd/student-hero-nomination-form.
The SBOE's next regular meeting is scheduled for the week of April 8, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
School choice may be the fix to DC's crime crisis
Washington, D.C., faces a serious crime crisis, with violence and homicide rates dangerously high. Even government officials have been targeted. While the Trump administration's plan to increase federal involvement may help temporarily, relying on permanent federal intervention is unsustainable. The long-term solution requires tackling root causes — especially chronic disengagement from education, which is widespread in D.C.'s traditional public schools and contributes significantly to youth crime. In the 2023–2024 school year, more than half of all high school students in Washington, D.C., were chronically absent, meaning they missed 10 percent or more of the school year. This absenteeism represents a failure to keep students connected to constructive environments and opportunities for success. When young people are not in school, evidence overwhelmingly shows they are at much higher risk of engaging in criminal behavior. The academic outcomes for D.C. public school students further illustrate the crisis. On recent standardized tests, only about 32 percent of students in grades 3–5 met or exceeded expectations in English Language Arts, a slight improvement from the previous year but still alarmingly low. Just 11 percent of high school students met or exceeded math standards. These outcomes are a direct reflection of an education system unable to provide the foundation students need for success, making disengagement and subsequent criminal activity more likely. Charter schools offer a proven, evidence-based alternative that can disrupt this cycle. Unlike traditional public schools in D.C., charter schools provide students with 30 to 50 percent more instructional time, effectively giving students up to four additional months of schooling each year. This extra time in the classroom correlates with improved academic performance and stronger student engagement. A landmark study conducted by Harvard and Princeton researchers demonstrated that winning a lottery to attend a New York City charter school almost completely eliminated the chance of incarceration for male students in the study sample. The same study also found a 59 percent reduction in teen pregnancy rates for female students who attended charter schools through the lottery. Another study, published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, found that winning a lottery to attend a school of choice in Charlotte, N.C., halved the rate of criminal activity among high-risk male students. And research on Milwaukee's voucher program found that students attending charter schools were significantly less likely to commit crimes by their mid-twenties compared to matched peers in public schools. Despite delivering compelling results, D.C.'s charter schools face significant funding disparities compared to traditional public schools. Though only a few studies have examined the precise funding differences between charter schools and public schools, one found that charter schools in D.C. receive approximately 41 percent less funding per pupil than public schools, averaging $17,525 per student compared to $29,808 per student — a gap of $12,283. This significant disparity limits charter schools' ability to expand facilities, attract qualified staff and improve programs. Meanwhile, demand for charter school seats far exceeds supply, with 17,047 students on waiting lists during the 2021–2022 school year, reflecting strong parental preference for alternatives to the struggling traditional system. Despite this funding disparity, evidence shows that public charter schools in Washington, D.C., specifically, continue to outperform traditional public schools. The success of charter schools in other cities demonstrates what could be achieved if D.C. removed these barriers and increased support. New York City's Success Academy, whose student population is 98 percent non-white and predominantly low-income, achieved remarkable academic results: 96 percent of students passed state math exams and 83 percent passed English Language Arts exams. This starkly contrasts with New York City's overall public school proficiency rate of around 49 percent, illustrating that well-supported charter schools can deliver superior outcomes even among disadvantaged populations. Washington, D.C. must view charter school expansion and equitable funding as integral parts of its strategy to reduce crime. Increasing access to quality education through charter schools addresses the root causes of criminal behavior by keeping youth engaged in structured, rigorous environments that foster academic achievement and discourage delinquency. Ultimately, no city can arrest or incarcerate its way out of a crime crisis. Long-term, sustainable solutions demand investments in education and opportunity. The District of Columbia has a proven tool in charter schools to disrupt the cycle of violence and provide at-risk youth with a pathway out of crime and into success. It is time for policymakers to remove funding disparities, lift arbitrary caps, and prioritize school choice as a core component of public safety reform in the nation's capital.
The Hill
06-07-2025
- The Hill
Zohran Mamdani's education agenda would set New York City up for failure
Zohran Mamdani's recent victory in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary has drawn widespread attention for his affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America and what some see as antisemitic rhetoric. But beyond the headlines, it's the education platform Mamdani champions that could pose the greatest threat to New York City families — especially those striving to access better schools and brighter futures for their children. At the core of Mamdani's approach is an unambiguous rejection of school choice. He opposes vouchers, charter school expansion, and even co-location policies that allow high-performing charters to operate in underutilized public school buildings. His platform calls for a funding overhaul that could severely reduce resources for charter schools, even though they serve 15 percent of city students. Mamdani opposes charter schools and vouchers based on the claim that they divert public resources, lack accountability and mainly benefit wealthier families at the expense of low-income students. He argues that voucher programs, despite being marketed as tools to help struggling students, are often used by affluent families already in private schools. As President Trump pushes for a national voucher initiative, Mamdani insists that New York must instead invest in a fully funded public school system to ensure true educational equity. But the evidence paints a sharply different picture. Success Academy, New York City's largest and most scrutinized charter network, enrolls a student population that is 98 percent made up of minority students, with the vast majority coming from low-income households. Despite these demographics, its academic results are nothing short of exceptional: 96 percent of its students passed the state math exam, and 83 percent passed the English Language Arts exam. By contrast, the citywide public school proficiency rate hovers around just 49 percent, underscoring the extent to which charter schools like Success Academy are not undermining public education but outperforming it. By restricting charter expansion and threatening funding, Mamdani's platform effectively removes one of the few viable paths to academic success for students in underserved neighborhoods. The families who rely on charters are not opting out of public education — they are opting out of failure. As a co-author of the 'People's Budget' proposed by the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic and Asian Legislative Caucus, Mamdani supports targeted spending initiatives that prioritize political messaging over tangible educational outcomes. The 2025 budget included an initiative aimed at increasing teacher diversity, with the caucus demanding an $8 million investment in recruitment, training and retention programs to make the teaching workforce more diverse. This initiative is particularly ironic given that New York City's public school system — the largest in both the state and nation — already has a teaching staff that is approximately 42 percent Black, despite African Americans comprising only 22 percent of the city's population. In the same budget, Mamdani's caucus allocated $250,000 to promote 'racial and cultural inclusivity' in K–12 classrooms and dedicated $351,500 for statewide conventions aimed at supporting 'underrepresented' educators, supposedly to address barriers faced by educators of color. But the problem isn't with diversity — it's with Mamdani's misaligned priorities. New York City already boasts one of the most diverse populations in the country. Meanwhile, student performance in core subjects continues to falter, and chronic absenteeism nears 40 percent. Despite spending more per student than any other state — over $36,000 annually — New York continues to fall short on basic benchmarks. Mamdani's answer is more spending, with little accountability and no meaningful strategy to improve outcomes. School choice, in contrast, offers a proven mechanism to elevate student achievement without pulling funding from traditional public schools. Programs in states like Florida and North Carolina show that scholarship and charter models can coexist with public education. In many cases, they drive improvement system-wide. A 2019 study even found modest academic gains in public schools that must compete with nearby choice-based alternatives. Mamdani dismisses these successes, framing school choice as an ideological threat rather than a practical solution. But for many families, school choice lets parents select the best educational environment for their children, whether that's a high-performing charter, a faith-based school, or specialized instruction that better fits a student's needs. Mamdani's plan offers the opposite. It preserves a rigid system that too often fails the students most in need, while redirecting resources toward symbolic programs that do little to improve reading, math, or attendance. His vision elevates bureaucracy over results and ideology over opportunity. New York City doesn't lack funding, it lacks alignment between spending and outcomes. What the city needs are policies that empower families, reward effective schools and confront failure with urgency — not just slogans. Mamdani is not the kind of leader New York City students can afford to have in office. Gregory Lyakhov is a high school student from Great Neck, N.Y.
Yahoo
30-06-2025
- Yahoo
Texas SBOE Proposes Enhanced Training Standards For School Trustees
(Texas Scorecard) – State Board of Education members are considering new standards for local school district trustee training that emphasize elected officials' accountability to Texas families and taxpayers, representing a fundamental shift in public school governance. The State Board of Education is the policy-making body of the Texas Education Agency, which coordinates all government K-12 educational activities. State law requires the SBOE to provide trustee training and adopt a framework for continuing education that outlines critical governing performance areas for public school boards. Five of the 15 elected SBOE members serve on the board's Committee on School Initiatives, which is responsible for developing the trustee training standards: LJ Francis, chair; Julie Pickren, vice chair; Staci Childs; Tiffany Clark; and Brandon Hall. During a meeting on Thursday, the committee approved a revised Framework for School Board Development that emphasizes elected trustees' supervisory role over the superintendents they hire and prioritizes trustees' responsibility to students, families, and taxpayers. 'The board of trustees is the governing body for Texas public schools and holds the ultimate responsibility for the district's success in educating students. Above all else, trustees owe the highest duty to students and their parents, and the board represents taxpayers, attempting to maximize learning outcomes while minimizing resources required,' states the preamble to the proposed new framework. The existing framework instructs trustees to govern in tandem with the superintendent as a 'Team of Eight,' and board members frequently state that their primary responsibility is to the district as a whole, rather than to individual constituents. Francis, Hall, and Pickren voted in favor of the revised framework, which will be put to a vote of the full SBOE on Friday. The rewritten framework focuses on five core areas: —Setting a clear vision and goals for students —Evaluating the likely success of the superintendent's strategic plan —Monitoring progress —Ensuring transparency —Maintaining accountable governance The core areas emphasize trustees' roles and responsibilities in overseeing the superintendent as well as the board's accountability to families and taxpayers for achieving district goals related to students' success. The standards also put transparency in place of the current framework's 'advocacy and engagement.' During Thursday's committee discussion of the revisions, Hall, who represents District 11 in North Texas, cited the arrest of a local superintendent for failing to report teachers accused of abusing students as an example of why trustees need better training. 'As I dug into the issue and communicated with the board, it just became really clear to me that they did not understand their proper role of oversight and accountability,' said Hall. 'I think another thing that's tackled here is the importance of focusing on student outcomes, because the ambiguity of the original framework that we had in front of us from 2020 pretty much allows almost anything as continuing education credits,' he added. 'And so I think narrowing the focus to student outcomes and also emphasizing the role and responsibility of the trustees as elected officials accountable to the taxpayers is really important.' Pickren, who represents District 7 east of Houston, noted the need for improved training on school electioneering, which has been a significant issue in recent election cycles that has sparked several lawsuits. 'One of the largest school boards in Texas… our superintendent of that board was actually under attorney general investigation for electioneering,' said Pickren. 'The members of the school board, they are very well-meaning people. They come from both sides of the aisle. They just want to serve children,' she said. 'So I appreciate this clarification on behalf of my trustees.' She added that the new training framework 'sticks very closely with the letter of the law, and I think that is the safest place that we can put all of our trustees in.' Clark, who represents District 13 in the Dallas area, voted against the new standards, asserting that the committee had not considered sufficient public input. 'I've heard from my colleagues, and they are not in favor of this proposed framework, because it does leave out advocacy and engagement, which are vital components of school board trustees and the work they do,' added Clark. The original Framework for School Board Development was adopted in 1996. It was amended in 2012 and again in 2020. The latest revision was first presented during the committee's meeting in April, but Chairman Francis postponed a vote until the June meeting. The full State Board of Education will vote on the proposed new framework during its meeting on Friday, June 27.
