Passenger Rail protester hopes precedent set for future climate change activism after charges dropped
26022025 photo DAVID UNWIN / THE POST
Restore Passenger Rail protestors appear in Wellington District Court. Defendant Thomas Brydone Taptiklis, 44.
Photo:
The Post/David Unwin
A protester agitating for climate change action feels no joy after the Crown abandoned the prosecution of more than 20 defendants, including his own, in the Wellington District Court.
The Crown confirmed on Tuesday that it would no longer pursue a retrial of three defendants on
charges of endangering transport
and that it would also drop a further six trials related to protests under the banner of Restore Passenger Rail in 2022 and 2023.
The jurors in the first trial couldn't reach an agreement on whether the protests carried an unreasonable risk to the public.
Now, the Crown said any future trials would face the same issue and it was not in the public interest to continue.
Protesters brought rush-hour traffic to a halt in Wellington when they staged sit downs and stuck their hands to the road, abseiled above Mount Victoria tunnel and hung banners from gantries above State Highway 1.
Some defendants were discharged without conviction, while others await sentencing on guilty pleas - however, most of the charges were dismissed.
The trial for Andrew Sutherland, Michael Apathy, Thomas Taptiklis, and Te Wehi Ratana began on 26 February.
All four faced charges of endangering transport, with a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison.
After more than three days of deliberation, Sutherland was acquitted on 10 March - a day later, the jury was dismissed and a retrial ordered after jurors were unable to reach a verdict for the other three defendants.
The Crown has now abandoned the retrial and a further six trials for other defendants.
However, Thomas Taptikilis said it was far from a personal triumph.
"The climate is worse than ever. There's no going on with my life and being happy.
"I'm sad that it feels like we have to go to such lengths to try to get adequate action and we haven't remotely got [it] ... so, I can't say I feel any joy about this."
He said he hoped it set a precedent and that protesters would not face prosecution for future climate change activism.
Te Wehi Ratana said while the issue of climate change hadn't gone away, the result was a vindication.
"When the jury was given all the facts, and the evidence from our two expert scientists - who made it very clear what was going on - the jury were unable to convict us and say what we did was unreasonable.
"Because what we did was reasonable within the context of the climate crisis."
In a memorandum to the court, Crown prosecutors said it was clear that the jury became deadlocked on the issue of whether the risk each defendant took was unreasonable across three protests in 2022.
"Given the way the trial developed, and the issue on which the jury became deadlocked, the Crown does not consider a re-trial is in the public interest.
"Similarly, the remaining six prosecutions would have the same issue. The Crown does not consider that continuing with those prosecutions is in the public interest."
Four defendants had charges dismissed without conviction, while six pleaded guilty to lesser charges.
Sutherland and Taptiklis pleaded guilty to wilful damage charges and await sentencing.
Defendants whose charges were also dismissed include; Rachael Mary Andrews, Susan Melanie Boyde, James Louis Cockle, Carrillon Dawn Cowan, Jill Jackson, Timothy Richard Musson, Anne Margueretta Smith, John Wilson Tovey, Dominic James Grose, Alex Sidney Jacobsen, Jenniffer Mary Olsen, Alex Harry, Gregor Morgan, Kaile Quian, Caroline Rousseau Sheldon-Williams, Julian John Warmington, Jenny Whittington, Rosemary Anne Penwarden, Alexander Henry Cockle and Joanne Kathleen Sutherland.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
9 hours ago
- 1News
Sydney underworld figure offers cemetery as bail security
An underworld figure, desperate for release from prison, has wagered a multimillion-dollar cemetery as collateral, taking a judge by surprise. Omar Haouchar, 32, was arrested in January over an alleged conspiracy to murder a rival gang member outside the Day St police station in Sydney's city centre. His barrister told a Supreme Court bail hearing that a person close to Haouchar had put forward a cemetery as security to support his release application. "I've never seen a cemetery offered as security before," Justice Ian Harrison told the NSW Supreme Court today. The valuation of the cemetery was uncertain because, unlike its surrounding property, it was not available for subdivision, barrister Ertunc Ozen SC said. ADVERTISEMENT But it was estimated to be worth millions of dollars. Haouchar, who appeared in court via a video link from the Goulburn supermax remand centre, was previously denied bail in February. Since that time, Ozen said further documents had been tendered to the court by prosecutors, detailing evidence against his client. Associates of the Haouchar crime network allegedly used encrypted app Threema to discuss murdering 30-year-old Andre Kallita in December 2023. Prosecutors claimed that Haouchar was using the handle "Invisible" in an encrypted group chat titled "URGENT". The murder plot involved a lookout, waiting to see Kallita report to the police station for bail, alerting two shooters waiting close by, according to a police statement filed with the NSW Supreme Court. But Ozen said there was insufficient evidence to prove Haouchar was Invisible. ADVERTISEMENT "The Crown simply cannot tie Invisible to this applicant," he told the court. "This is the crux of the crown case, and without that attribution, the crown case fails." He also argued that since Haouchar's transfer to supermax, his ability to communicate with his legal team had been limited and this would result in delays to court proceedings. "The conditions of custody make it nearly impossible for him to prepare for this matter," Ozen said. Crown prosecutor Rebecca Stefani opposed bail, arguing Haouchar posed a risk of committing further offences and attempting to leave the state. She told the court he had spent 11 years in custody for a slew of offences. These included reckless wounding, aggravated burglary and directing the activities of a criminal group. The Haouchar syndicate, largely operated by leaders based in Lebanon, has been tied to AU$1.5 billion (NZ$1.6 billion) in cryptocurrency transactions and various firearm, drug, tobacco and money-laundering offences, police said previously. Justice Harrison will make his decision on the bail application after further submissions have been filed.
Scoop
15 hours ago
- Scoop
A Bold Dream Gets A Cut As Predator Free 2050 Ltd Is Disestablished
Article – RNZ Predator Free 2050 was hit by a budget blow, and now the 'moonshot' goal is under threat, for The Detail The environmental sector worries that the future of a predator-free Aotearoa is in jeopardy after the Government swung the axe in the latest budget. It was billed as a 'moonshot' for New Zealand's environment – a bold, world-leading goal launched by Sir John Key in 2016, aimed at eradicating rats, possums and stoats from our islands by 2050. The vision has been clear – bring back birdsong to every valley, protect the flightless kiwi, and restore what once thrived. But today, the future of Predator Free 2050 looks uncertain. Predator Free 2050 Ltd, the Crown-owned company established to drive and fund large-scale eradication and breakthrough science, is now being disestablished, as announced as part of Budget 2025. Funding for the company will cease by the end of the year, with its responsibilities shifted to the Department of Conservation (DOC), which the government says will reduce duplication, increase efficiency and save about $12 million. 'People are now worried for this programme,' Newsroom environment editor David Williams tells The Detail. 'They say without ongoing funding, we will not only not go forward, but we will go backwards. This programme needs funding, and that's up to the government.' The government insists the broader goal of predator eradication remains. But Dr Kayla Kingdon-Bebb, chief executive of WWF New Zealand, is not entirely convinced. 'New Zealanders believe in the Predator Free 2050 dream, and we want the government to get behind them too. But I'm not sure this will happen. 'I've not been seeing a lot of enthusiasm for environmental outcomes from this government, full stop. We describe the government's policy agenda as a war on nature, and I think it is disappointing that a previous National government got so strongly behind this moonshot objective, and this government does not seem to care so much.' Both Williams and Kingdon-Bebb say the country has 'overwhelmingly' backed the Predator Free 2050 initiative, allowing it to 'come a long way, in a relatively short time'. Already, predator-elimination projects cover more than 800,000 hectares. 'This is a big amount of land,' says Williams. 'And the goal is big … but they have done well. 'They also said they wanted to fund scientific research, and 15 or 20 projects have already had money to try and sort this problem out. 'A lot of community groups have latched on to this – someone said to me that this is the one conservation project that has captured the imagination of New Zealanders more than any other.' Kingdon-Bebb agrees. 'It has certainly captured the hearts and minds like nothing else,' she says. 'We have seen an explosion of community trapping groups and landscape-scale projects over the last nine years, which has been amazing … now I feel the government is taking its foot off the pedal. 'What is apparent is that the government has had a look at the delivery model of the programme as a whole, which is complex. 'So, if it is the case that the government has reviewed it and determined that a crown-owned corporation is not the best delivery methodology, I can accept that. 'DOC has a lot of capability … and perhaps it is appropriate for DOC to be coordinating this work, perhaps there was duplication of roles and functions and costs. 'But where I would be concerned is that in the wider scale of what has happened in the last two budgets, the Department of Conservation will see, in total, about 300 million dollars in savings exacted from it. 'So, it does beg the question whether a very stretched department can pick up the leadership of this initiative in a way we would want to see it done.' Critics say that move will slow momentum, bury innovation under bureaucracy and confuse local projects already stretched thin. They also argue that across the country, hundreds of predator-free community groups, many driven by volunteers, will be left wondering what support will look like without the company's funding, research backing and strategic oversight. But the government insists the predator-free projects and contracts funded by the company are not affected and it is committed to the predator-free 2050 goal.
1News
19 hours ago
- 1News
'Wild goose chase': Patterson accused of inventing Asian grocer
Prosecutors have accused Erin Patterson of fabricating a key detail in her defence, telling the Supreme Court of Victoria she lied about buying mushrooms from an Asian grocery store in a bid to cover up the alleged poisoning of her in-laws. The Crown argues Patterson deliberately misled health authorities, doctors and police by claiming she purchased dried mushrooms from a shop in Melbourne's southeast, despite being unable to name the store or its location. "You lied about the source of the death cap mushrooms because you knew you were guilty of deliberately poisoning your four [relatives]," Crown Prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers SC said in court. "Incorrect," Patterson replied. Rogers told the court that Patterson had claimed to public health official Sally Ann Atkinson that she bought the mushrooms from a store somewhere in Oakleigh or Glen Waverley – areas she would be familiar with, having worked for the Monash Council. Yet, Patterson has never identified the store. ADVERTISEMENT "The Asian grocer story was a deliberate lie," Rogers alleged. Patterson insisted she wasn't sure where the mushrooms came from, but was trying to help. "I clarified... I think I made it clear at all times that I really wasn't sure, but I was trying to be helpful," she said. Woman accused of killing three people with poisonous mushrooms in beef Wellington testifies in her defence. (Source: 1News) She also told the court the mushrooms "smelled funny" when she first bought them, so she transferred them to a Tupperware container and later ran them through a food dehydrator – a detail Rogers suggested was "invented" to make the story sound more plausible. "You described the packaging in this way because you wanted it to sound like they were not commercially [provided] mushrooms," Rogers said. "That's incorrect," Patterson replied. ADVERTISEMENT In a tense back-and-forth, Patterson said she couldn't remember some of the details, including whether she herself accessed the iNaturalist website where sightings of death cap mushrooms had been logged in the months before the fatal lunch. "Well, somebody did," she said, "and that somebody could've been me." She also rejected allegations that she told doctors inconsistent things about where the mushrooms came from. When Rogers suggested she had changed her story about the mushrooms' weight and packaging to different officials, Patterson maintained: "It would have been me trying to clarify, not change." The prosecution argued the story mattered because it prompted a full-scale investigation by health officials – one they say was needlessly complicated by Patterson's misleading and inconsistent accounts. Patterson's defence lawyer Colin Mandy SC told the jury in opening remarks that these were not calculated lies, but rather actions made in panic and fear, as Patterson worried about being blamed. 'You went to Loch to collect death caps' Death cap mushrooms (file image). (Source: Prosecutors pointed to mobile phone data showing Patterson travelled to the town of Loch where death cap mushrooms had previously been spotted just hours before buying a food dehydrator. ADVERTISEMENT Dr Rogers alleged: "You went to Loch to collect death cap mushrooms. Within two hours, you bought a dehydrator." Patterson replied: "The only part of that that is true is that I bought a dehydrator." The court also heard further phone tower data allegedly placed Patterson in the Outtrim area on May 22, near a site where a well-known fungi expert had flagged death cap mushrooms on iNaturalist just one day earlier. Patterson said she didn't go there deliberately: "I didn't go to Outtrim, to Neilson St, and I don't remember going to Outtrim as a destination." Asked whether she may have passed through, she said: "That is possible, because you can pass through Outtrim on the way to Wonthaggi or Phillip Island." Rogers also suggested Patterson had "blitzed" dehydrated death cap mushrooms into powder and used it in the beef Wellingtons, comparing the method to how she'd previously hidden powdered mushrooms in her children's meals. Patterson rejected that claim, responding simply: "Disagree." ADVERTISEMENT Feeding leftovers to her children Most recipes for the dish found online contain mushrooms. (Source: Patterson admitted serving her children leftovers from the same lunch, telling the court: "It was the same lunch, yes." But she insisted the mushrooms had been removed. When asked why she proceeded with the meal after learning her in-laws were unwell, she said: "I didn't know or suspect that." When prosecutors suggested she hesitated to take her children to hospital for assessment after the lunch, Patterson admitted she asked doctors if it was "really necessary" because they had no symptoms. Rogers said it was not credible that, "if you thought, genuinely, that your children had eaten a potentially fatal poison... you'd be worried or stressed about pulling them out of school." Patterson replied: "The issue was mushrooms and they had not eaten the mushrooms." When asked if she loved her children, she responded: "I still love them." Patterson has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one of attempted murder, maintaining the fatal July 2023 lunch was a tragic accident. The cross-examination of Erin Patterson in her triple murder trial continues.
