logo
I've been forced to sell my beloved caravan at a holiday park after Haven Holidays increased our rent by £5,000 - we only used it for ten weekends and I'm now £36,000 out of pocket

I've been forced to sell my beloved caravan at a holiday park after Haven Holidays increased our rent by £5,000 - we only used it for ten weekends and I'm now £36,000 out of pocket

Daily Mail​14 hours ago

A grandfather has been left £36,000 out of pocket and forced to sell his holiday home in Somerset after the ground rent was increased by £5,000.
Christopher Jeff and his wife, Ida, thought snapping up a caravan using a chunk of their pension would provide a lifetime of happy memories.
But the couple were faced with a tough ultimatum; sell at a loss or continue drowning in mounting annual fees.
The first year's ground rent was £3,127 - which they didn't realise was only a partial payment - and it has since increased to £8,161 which is more than half the cost of the entire caravan.
It's left the retired couple at least £36,000 out of pocket.
'Being unable to pay the ground rent this year, we are in the position of needing to sell the caravan,' Christopher, from Bedworth, told Luxury Travel Daily.
'It's just too expensive to own one of these units. We have only holidayed in it for ten long weekends.'
The former lorry driver first visited Haven Holidays' beachfront park, Doniford Bay, 13 years ago.
They then returned with their grandson and out of curiosity, Christopher asked how much it'd be to own a caravan at the site before spending £14,859 on the secondhand holiday home.
The grandad said: 'We knew we couldn't afford a brand new caravan, but we found what we thought was a nice one that was a bit older.
'I had to cash in a good chunk of my pension to pay for the caravan. I thought it would be worth it for some family holidays away from the rat race.
'We were told that we would be able to resell it back to the park, or we could resell it privately but pay the park 15 per cent.
'We had no intentions of reselling at that point, we wanted the holidays. What we didn't realise was how much all the other costs were going to be.'
The couple forked out on a new microwave, fridge freezer and bedding, totalling £5,000.
They claim to have been 'encouraged' to also pay out for new decking, costing £4,500, as well as a storage box, £300, and a bench for £120.
A MailOnline graphic detailing the hidden costs of owning a static home (pictured)
To cover the mounting annual costs, the Haven salesperson allegedly told the couple that they could rent out the holiday home privately.
But to do so, they'd need to have someone staying in it every single week of the season for £450, including passes.
He said: 'If we were using it some weeks ourselves, we would have to charge even more than that.
'Haven were undercutting us by renting their own caravans cheaper all season long - sometimes £150 for a week in the off-season.
'We managed to rent out for a few weeks [last year] - five in total - but my wife, Ida, is still working in sales and all of her commission was used up covering the shortfall in rent.
'Also the park is closed for three months.
'That's a quarter of the year we can't even advertise it for rent.'
Christopher and Ida have tried to sell the caravan back to Haven, though they claim to have been told they have 'too much stock already and couldn't make an offer' unless they upgraded to a more expensive unit.
The best offer they've had so far privately is £3,000 and with the added 15 per cent commission to pay the park on any private sales, they're looking at a gut-wrenching £12,450 loss.
He added: 'Even that offer fell through due to the costs involved.
'Nobody wants to buy a caravan and take on the commitment of paying over £8,000 for nine months of caravan access.
'Especially when you can't rent it out and break even because it's cheaper for guests to go directly through Haven.'
European Consumer Claims has been called in to help get the couple's money back.
Greg Wilson, CEO, said: 'When we first started looking into holiday park consumer abuse, we were aware that there were issues.
'However, the sheer scale of wrongdoing was shocking, even to us.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The best cure for low prices is low prices. This miner is set to benefit
The best cure for low prices is low prices. This miner is set to benefit

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The best cure for low prices is low prices. This miner is set to benefit

Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest. Investors are still not quite sure what to make of the turnaround plan at miner Anglo American, with the shares no higher than they were in late 2021, but the demerger of Valterra Platinum offers the latest pause for thought. Valterra's shares trade in Johannesburg and London and the timing of the spin-off could be interesting since platinum prices stand at a three-year high and the CRB Commodities index is making a good go of testing its loftiest level since 2011. We remain interested in Anglo American on the basis that the proposed restructuring should reduce debt, simplify the group structure and leave the FTSE 100 constituent as a more focused play on copper, iron ore, nickel and phosphates. In addition, the valuation does not look demanding relative to the company's book, or net asset, value per share. Potential future catalysts to unlock that value could be the proposed sale or flotation of diamonds specialist De Beers, further debt reduction and any hint of further advances in commodity prices, a trend that could result from China's efforts to stimulate its economy, American determination to foster growth, or safe haven buying of real assets if inflation rears its head once more. Anglo American retains a near-20pc stake in Valterra after a deal which saw investors get 110 shares in the leading producer of platinum group metals (PGM) for every 1,075 they held in the parent.

Eurostar vows to run direct trains from UK to Germany and Switzerland
Eurostar vows to run direct trains from UK to Germany and Switzerland

The Guardian

time29 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Eurostar vows to run direct trains from UK to Germany and Switzerland

Eurostar has vowed to run direct trains from the UK to Germany and Switzerland, as it attempts to fend off potential competitors eyeing its London depot space. The cross-Channel rail operator's chief executive, Gwendoline Cazenave, said she had no doubt the direct services would run in the early 2030s despite the failure of previous ventures to connect London and Frankfurt. Eurostar said the conditions were now 'finally right' and it was ready for a 'new golden age of international sustainable travel', as it reiterated plans to buy up to 50 new trains. Total passenger numbers for Eurostar grew 5% last year, and a number of other possible players have announced plans to break into its monopoly on train services between Britain and France. However, the rail regulator, the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), has said that there is only depot space in London for one more operator – or for Eurostar to expand. The ORR has asked Eurostar and its rivals to submit plans, for a decision later this year, on how to allocate the space in the Temple Mills depot in east London. Sir Richard Branson's Virgin group has announced plans for a 12-train cross-Channel service, while a similar-sized operation could be run by a British startup, Gemini Trains, chaired by the Labour peer Lord Berkeley. The Italian state railway FS Italiane is also looking to enter the market in a joint venture with a Spanish company, Evolyn. Eurostar has insisted there is no space in the depot, particularly if its own growth plans go ahead. It has indicated it would help fund a new depot, although it has called on the UK government to develop a 'clear national strategy for supporting international rail'. It is targeting direct trains from London to Frankfurt and Geneva, taking about five hours to the German financial hub and about 20 minutes more to the Swiss city. It said that the number of flights operating on the routes showed the strong demand for travel – and many business and leisure passengers would now wish to take the train instead to travel more sustainably. The next generation of trains would also be able to handle the complexities of different systems and these longer routes. Creating the new connections will require a number of hurdles to be overcome, including establishing border controls, station infrastructure, and timetable paths, a spokesperson said. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion However, Cazenave told the PA news agency that she had 'no doubt' the new direct services would happen because of the 'willingness' of Eurostar, passengers and governments. The UK and Switzerland signed a memorandum of understanding last month aimed at establishing direct train services between the countries. Eurostar said its revenues grew 2% to €2bn (£1.7bn) in 2024, with passenger numbers across its services – including those within France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany – up to 19.5 million. It has yet to select a manufacturer for its planned €2bn train order. Eurostar, meanwhile, confirmed it will boost the frequency of its direct trains to the Netherlands after the completion of building work at the international terminus in Amsterdam in February, allowing it to board a full complement of 850 passengers. A fourth daily return service between London St Pancras and Amsterdam will run from 9 September, and a fifth one will start in mid-December.

Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn
Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn

The National Trust and RSPB have joined forces with farmers to warn the government that cutting the agricultural budget could be "catastrophic" for nature and rural businesses. In a letter to food security and rural affairs minister Daniel Zeichner, exclusively seen by Sky News, a dozen of the biggest rural industry organisations say they are "deeply concerned" about rumoured cuts that will be made to the agricultural budget in Wednesday's spending review. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out budgets for each government department for the rest of this parliament, set to end in 2029. The letter says cutting funding for existing and new environmental farming schemes will be "catastrophic" to the government's aims for the environment. "Many of the environmental features present in the countryside and enjoyed by the public will be under threat and will disappear," the letter says. "This would be a poor legacy for this government." Sir Keir Starmer's government has made getting to net zero by 2050 a key goal, already initiating several policies to restrict carbon emissions and make the UK greener since winning the election last July. However, the government shocked farmers in March when it shut down applications for the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI), which rewards farmers for managing their land in environmentally sustainable ways, with just a few hours' notice as they said a cap had been reached for the year. The rural organisations say the Environmental Land Management (ELM) scheme payments are "critical to the government's statutory targets on environmental improvement", including the main goal of halting the decline of biodiversity. 3:26 The letter states farmers and landowners are fully committed to environmental schemes, with 77,000 live agri-environment scheme agreements, according to the latest government figures, "with millions of hectares under environmental land management". "So much good has been done by these agreements, the oldest of which has run for decades," the letter says. "The unprecedented engagement in the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) is testament to the appetite of farmers and land managers to rise to the challenge and do more." The letter finishes with: "The industry would like to have your assurances that this critical work will continue to be funded at the same level." David Wilson, a farmer for 53 years, told Sky News it took many years for farmers to get on board with the environmental schemes but they are now joined up, and reducing funding could damage years of work and be a backwards step for not just the UK's environment, but the world's. "This is ultimately about sustainability. To produce good food, you need good ecology and reducing this funding could damage the UK's ecology and our food security," he added. A return to intensive farming Alex Robinson, 39, a farmer from Gloucestershire with 424 hectares, said the schemes have been "a lifeline for nature", with birds, bees and wildflowers returning - including 14 red-listed bird species, many that had not been seen in decades. His farm's soil health is improving, which means he can grow more resilient nutrient dense crops for people to eat. If funding is cut he said he "may have no choice but to return to intensive farming methods sooner than the soils are ready for", with wildflowers and field margins becoming "difficult to justify", which will put the UK's climate, biodiversity and long-term food security "in real danger". Government will be abandoning nature Signatory Victoria Vyvyan, farmer and president of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), said: "If sustainable farming contracts are cut, government won't just abandon nature - it will abandon its own environmental and legal commitments. "The Sustainable Farming Incentive is working - for farmers, for nature, for the public, and for the Treasury. It's bringing back wildlife, cleaning up rivers, and restoring the health of our soil. "Take away the funding for nature contracts, and farmers will be pushed back to intensive methods - forced to undo years of progress. Nature will suffer as well as farmers, and on the environment, it will go against everything government claims to agree with." The letter has been signed by the heads of The National Trust, the National Farmers' Union (NFU), the RSPB, the Soil Association, the CLA, the Tenant Farmers Association, the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, the Nature Friendly Farming Network, the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers, the National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs, the British Institute of Agricultural Consultants and the Agricultural Industries Confederation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store