Food for Health Alliance backs controversial South Australian ban on junk food ads
Food for Health Alliance executive manager Jane Martin, in a statement released to NewsWire, said the ban, which is now in effect, would influence diets and help pull down the 'wallpaper' of junk food ads.
'Current food marketing rules in Australia are largely voluntary and controlled by industry itself,' she said.
'They're ineffective, inconsistent and full of loopholes.
'As a result, junk food ads bombard kids everywhere they go – on social media, on billboards, on public transport, at sports games.
'It is the wallpaper in our children's lives and it shapes what kids want, what they pester their parents for and, ultimately, what they eat.'
The ban prohibits a range of junk food items from being displayed on Adelaide's buses, trains and trams, including processed meats like ham.
Chocolate, lollies, confectionary, desserts, ice creams, soft drinks and chips are all banned from display alongside processed meats, with the measure designed to limit children's exposure to unhealthy food and drink advertising.
The ban ignited controversy in the months before its July 1 introduction, with the Australian Association of National Advertisers pushing hard against what it called a 'blanket ban'.
'As it stands, this policy bans all processed meats, which means a simple ham salad sandwich can't be advertised.' AANA chief executive Josh Faulks said in May.
'This simply doesn't make sense and the government should be making evidence-based decisions, not blanket bans that don't align with nutritional science.'
The AANA confirmed with NewsWire it opposed all advertising bans for food and beverages.
Health Minister Chris Picton, speaking in May, said the AANA was 'scaremongering' and 'providing misinformation about this commonsense policy'.
'It is not up to advertising industry lobbyists to tell us what can be displayed on our public transport assets,' he said.
Some 63 per cent of adults and 35 per cent of children across South Australia are overweight or obese, government figures show.
On Tuesday, Ms Martin said the government had made a 'smart and necessary step' that was backed by evidence.
'After similar restrictions were introduced by Transport for London, expected household purchases of unhealthy food and drinks dropped by more than 1000 calories per week,' she said.
'Other cities like Canberra, Amsterdam and New York have also adopted similar policies.
'The processed food and advertising industries have had a long, profitable run.
'But now it's time we draw a line and stop letting them promote their unhealthy products to kids on their daily commute.'
She warned Australia was already lagging behind international best practice in protecting children from 'unhealthy food marketing'.
'Our kids are paying the price,' she said.
'Over a third of Australian children's daily energy intake now comes from unhealthy food and drinks, more than 40 per cent for teenagers.
'Unhealthy diets are placing children at higher risk of being above a healthy weight in adulthood and from developing type 2 diabetes, stroke, heart disease or 13 cancers later in life.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
You don't need to walk 10,000 steps to benefit from its ‘health benefits'
Ten thousand steps per day has been widely recommended as the standard benchmark for physical activity — but a new study suggests that just 7000 could be enough to boost essential health markers. Researchers from the University of Sydney conducted a review of 57 studies spanning more than 10 countries, which tracked participants' steps and health outcomes. Led by Professor Melody Ding from the School of Public Health, the team looked at how different daily step counts impacted the risk of dying from heart disease and cancer, as well as the risk of developing cancer, type 2 diabetes, dementia and depression, according to a university press release. And it turns out, you may not need as many steps as was first thought. Researchers found that walking at least 7000 steps a day was linked to improvement in eight major health outcomes, including heart disease, dementia and depressive symptoms. 'Any increase in daily steps, even modest ones like 4000 steps, delivers health benefits compared to very low activity levels,' Ding told Fox News. 'When possible, targeting around 7000 steps per day can substantially reduce risks for many chronic diseases and adverse health outcomes. 'Even small increases in step counts, such as increasing from 2000 to 4000 steps a day, are associated with significant health gain.' Higher step counts beyond 7000 may add extra benefits, but the improvement rate slows, she noted. The results were published in The Lancet Public Health journal. In particular, the researchers found that walking 7000 steps a day reduced the risk of death by 47 per cent, almost exactly the same as 10000 steps. That same step benchmark was also linked to a 38 per cent reduced risk of dementia and a 22 per cent reduced risk of type 2 diabetes, both only slightly lower than the benefit of 10,000 steps, the release stated. 'Significant health improvements' were reported when people increased from 2000 steps per day to anywhere between 5000 and 7000. 'Aiming for 7000 steps is a realistic goal based on our findings, which assessed health outcomes in a range of areas that hadn't been looked at before,' said Professor Ding in the release. 'However, for those who cannot yet achieve 7000 steps a day, even small increases in step counts, such as increasing from 2000 to 4000 steps a day, are associated with significant health gain.' For those who are already very active and consistently hitting 10,000+ steps, Ding said, 'keep it up — there's no need to cut back'. The researchers also noted that stepping doesn't need to happen all at once or require intentional exercise. 'Everyday movements count — like getting off the bus a stop earlier or choosing stairs over elevators,' Ding advised. 'Small, incidental bouts throughout the day add up and contribute to health. Embrace opportunities to move more in practical, enjoyable ways.' There were some limitations in the study, the researchers noted. 'For some outcomes, we have a small number of studies,' Ding told Fox News. There are also some study-level biases, she said. 'For example, people who are already unwell will take fewer steps because of their health conditions,' Ding said. 'And while there is an indication that the dose-response may be different for older adults, we didn't have enough data for all outcomes to explore it.' It's also important to note that while walking offers great health benefits, it is not a complete 'package' in itself, she noted. 'Everyday movements count — like getting off the bus a stop earlier or choosing stairs over elevators,' Ding said. 'Try to also incorporate strength training and mobility exercise into a weekly routine for more complete health benefits.' In next steps, the researchers plan to use these findings to shape future physical activity guidelines.
ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Government introduces bill to facilitate cheaper medicines
This week the government introduces a new bill lowering the cost of prescription medicines. The Health Minister Mark Butler speaks to Sarah Ferguson.
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Health experts urge Australians to get tested as hep B rates rise
Rates of hepatitis B in Australia are rising - and the makeup of Australians with hepatitis is changing. One in three people living with hepatitis B don't realise they have it - and this means they're missing out on life saving treatment.
