Mary-Ann Stephenson confirmed as EHRC chair despite MPs' objections
Stephenson, the chair of the Women's Budget Group, will take on the role at the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) in December. It includes responsibility for implementing guidance about transgender rights after the supreme court judgment on the definition of a woman.
The women and equalities committee and the joint committee on human rights had together raised objections about the appointment, saying her experience was not sufficient in the area of protected characteristics such as race and disability.
The committees, chaired by Sarah Owen and David Alton, had written to the equalities minister Bridget Phillipson saying: 'It is clear that Dr Stephenson has extensive academic credibility in the field of women's rights and has an important contribution to make to public life.
'However, it is with regret that we do not feel we can endorse her appointment to the role at this time. Our reasons relate to our concerns about vision and leadership, about breadth of expertise across the wide remit of the EHRC, and about rebuilding trust.'
Stephenson was announced as the UK government's preferred candidate in June and gave evidence before the committees in July.
Following her appointment, Stephenson said it was a 'great honour to be appointed as the new chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission at such a critical time'.
'I have spent over 30 years building my career across the equality and human rights sector and I am delighted to have the opportunity to bring my insight and experience to lead the EHRC with compassion, honesty and dedication,' she said.
'I look forward to working with the government and all stakeholders alongside my new colleagues at the EHRC to uphold equality and human rights and ensure that everyone is treated with respect and dignity.'
Stephenson will replace Kishwer Falkner in the job of chair. The EHRC is drawing up an updated code of practice on how public bodies should react to April's court decision that 'woman' in the Equality Act refers only to a biological woman.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
It is intended to set out to businesses and those running public spaces how the ruling affects single-sex spaces such as toilets and changing rooms, building on initial advice issued soon after the ruling.
The guidance will attempt to navigate a path for how organisations can provide single-sex and gender-neutral spaces such as toilets, changing rooms and associations.
In April, the EHRC released interim, non-statutory advice about how to interpret the ruling, which set out that transgender people should not be allowed to use toilets of the gender they live as. There are now attempts at a judicial review of the EHRC guidance by the Good Law Project and others.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lucy Connolly to walk FREE: Tory Councillor's wife who was jailed last year for 'racist' Tweet during the Southport riots is being released from prison in a matter of hours
Lucy Connolly is set to walk free from prison in just a matter of hours after being jailed for writing a racist tweet during last summer's riots. The mother and former childminder has spent more than nine months behind bars after admitting making the inflammatory post on X in the wake of the Southport attacks in July last year. Connolly, who is also the wife of Tory Councillor Ray Connolly, pleaded guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred and was handed a 31-month sentence in October. The post, which she later deleted, said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it.' She has been serving time at HMP Peterborough and had an application to have her sentence reduced rejected in May. But, the Daily Mail can now reveal that Connolly is due to be released on Thursday. The news will come as a huge boost to her husband and 12-year-old daughter as well as campaigners calling for her release. Connelly's imprisonment had prompted allegations that she was a victim of 'two-tier justice', with claims that those with right-wing views are treated more harshly than others in the UK. Connolly's X post was made just hours after killer Axel Rudakubana murdered three young girls and attempted to murder 10 others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29, sparking nationwide unrest. She was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account. But other messages which included other condemning remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. The Southport atrocity sparked nationwide unrest, with several people - including Connolly - jailed as a result. Her tweet was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. She later pleaded guilty to distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred at Birmingham Crown Court and was sentenced to 31 months in prison in October. In May, she had an appeal against her sentence refused by three Court of Appeal judges at the Royal Courts of Justice. In a written judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde, said: 'There is no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed by the judge was manifestly excessive. 'The application for leave to appeal against sentence therefore fails and is refused.' He added that the principal ground of appeal 'was substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected'. Connolly argued she had been 'really angry' after the Southport attacks, but hours after posting the rant on X realised it was not an acceptable thing to say, so deleted it. She also said that news of the Southport murders had triggered her anxiety caused when her baby son, Harry, died as the result of a hospital blunder 13 years earlier. At her appeal case, Adam King, representing Connolly, asked if she had intended for anyone to set fire to asylum hotels or 'murder any politicians'. She replied: 'Absolutely not.' Naeem Valli, for the prosecution, told the court the post was a reflection of her attitude towards immigrants. At the time Mr Connolly told of the pain of his wife's long imprisonment, saying: 'The 284 days of separation have been very hard, particularly on our 12-year-old girl.' Connolly's case later became international news, with US officials saying earlier this year they are keeping tabs on developments over their 'concerns' about free speech. A State Department spokesman said in May: 'We can confirm that we are monitoring this matter. The United States supports freedom of expression at home and abroad, and remains concerned about infringements on freedom of expression.' It came after political commentator and Trump ally Charlie Kirk was made aware of Connolly's ordeal after a visit to the UK and vowed to get the US State Department involved in the process. Appearing on GB News, Kirk said: 'I am going to try and get the US State Department involved. I'm going to bring this up to Marco Rubio. I'm going to send him a text.' Kirk had been in the UK for a debate at the Oxford Union on Monday when the case of Mrs Connolly was raised. He later appeared on GB News, during which he said: 'I'm sorry, speaking as a citizen not on behalf of the US government, is this a way that a liberal democracy and ally of the United States acts? Kirk continued: 'I just find it so outrageous that she is now going to jail for two and a half years for a deleted social media post that she apologised for. As you guys (the UK) have birthed free speech to the world, you are now becoming a totalitarian country. 'I'm going to bring this up to Marco Rubio. I'm going to send him a text. This should be mentioned. It's not new.' Connolly's sentence was recently brought under the spotlight again last month after a man who abused a first class cabin crew on a flight from London was jailed for just 15-months. Recruitment tycoon Salman Iftikhar, 37, was flying in first class when he launched a vile tirade of abuse towards Virgin Atlantic staff on a flight from London Heathrow to Lahore in his homeland of Pakistan. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the sentence was evidence of 'two-tier justice', given Connolly was jailed for more than double his sentence. Mr Philp told the Mail last month: 'Iftikar was sentenced to only 15 months in prison last week for threatening an air stewardess with gang rape and for racially aggravated harassment. Iftikhar has multiple previous convictions. 'Yet Lucy Connolly got 31 months for a far less serious offence - a prosecution Lord Hermer personally authorised. 'This is two-tier justice in action. 'I have today referred the case to the Attorney General Lord Hermer for review under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme. 'We'll now find out if Hermer is willing to take action to fix Britain's two-tier justice problem.'
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Calls for smacking ban in England grow as 8 in 10 adults say punishment is 'unacceptable'
Demands for a smacking ban in England are growing as a poll revealed eight in ten adults think the punishment is 'unacceptable'. Parents are still allowed to use 'reasonable punishment' against their children despite the practice being outlawed in Scotland and Wales. In both nations, any type of corporal punishment, including smacking, hitting, slapping and shaking, has been illegal for at least three years. Polling for children's charity NSPCC, carried out by YouGov, surveyed 3,800 adults across England – of whom 749 were parents with a child under 18 and 198 were aged 18 to 24. It found 82 per cent of adults aged between 18 and 24 believe it is unacceptable for a parent to use force, however slight, against a child – up from 64 per cent in 2023. And 81 per cent of parents with children under 18 felt the same, a slight increase from 80 per cent last year. Of all adults surveyed, 71 per cent said they believe physical punishment against a child is unacceptable, up from 67 per cent in 2023. Earlier this year, leading health experts urged parliamentarians to give children the 'fundamental right to safety and protection' by backing a smacking ban. Children's doctors and psychiatrists said decades of research showed the 'detrimental effects of physical punishment'. NSPCC chief executive Chris Sherwood said: 'Parents and young people are telling us loud and clear that they don't want physical punishment to be a part of anyone's childhood. File image: Parents are still allowed to use 'reasonable punishment' against their children despite the practice being outlawed in Scotland and Wales 'Parents know their children and what works best for them. It is therefore crucial their experiences and opinions are not ignored or undermined.' In June, as part of debate on the Bill, Conservative peer Lord Jackson of Peterborough warned that introducing a smacking ban in England would be 'disproportionate and heavy-handed'. He argued 'reasonable chastisement' was harmless and it risked 'criminalising good and caring parents, as well as overloading children's services departments'. But in the wake of the murder of ten-year-old Sara Sharif in 2023 by her father – who had claimed in a call to police after fleeing England that he 'did legally punish' his daughter and that he 'beat her up too much' – the UK's four children's commissioners jointly called for a wholesale smacking ban. The commissioners insisted 'loving, well-meaning' parents have no need to be concerned about a change in the law. The Government, which has previously said it has 'no plans to legislate at this stage', was contacted for comment.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Price of Labour is a leap in inflation: Tax raid on employers and minimum wage hike have driven up costs, with more pain to come
came under fire on Wednesday after her tax raid on jobs helped push inflation to an 18-month high. The Tories warned 'Britain can't afford Labour' after figures showed consumer prices rose by 3.8 per cent last month compared with a year earlier. That was up from 3.6 per cent in June and higher than the predicted 3.7 per cent figure. Air fares, petrol costs and food prices were among the factors driving inflation higher. Hotel prices also climbed – with some experts citing an 'Oasis bump' as fans snapped up rooms near venues for the band's sold-out comeback tour. The Resolution Foundation think-tank said the UK was now 'increasingly looking like an inflation outlier', with prices rising at the fastest pace in the G7 group of advanced economies. Worse is to come as the Bank of England predicts inflation will climb to 4 per cent later this year – double its 2 per cent target. And the worsening picture has further diminished hopes of another interest rate cut by the Bank before the end of 2025, in a major blow to borrowers. It comes as households prepare for a further hit when regulator Ofgem announces its latest energy price cap next week –which is predicted to result in a rise in bills. Much of the surge in inflation has been caused by the Chancellor's £25 billion raid on employer national insurance as well as a big increase in the minimum wage, which has made it more expensive to hire staff. That has resulted in many firms passing on the costs in the form of higher prices – or in other cases cutting back the workforce. The figures will further fuel accusations that Ms Reeves' tax raid on employers has backfired. Yet with growth slowing and debt surging the Chancellor is likely to announce even more painful tax rises in her autumn Budget as she seeks to fill a financial black hole estimated at up to £50 billion. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said the rise in inflation was 'deeply worrying for families'. He added: 'Labour's choices to tax jobs and ramp up borrowing are pushing up costs and stoking inflation – making everyday essentials more expensive. 'And with leading economists warning that the Chancellor has blown a colossal black hole in the public finances, families and businesses are bracing for yet more pain come in the autumn Budget. 'Families are paying the price for Rachel Reeves' economic mismanagement. Britain can't afford Labour.' The Office for National Statistics said a sharp increase in air fares – blamed on the timing of school holidays – was to blame for much of the rise in inflation. Fares rose by a record 30 per cent between June and July and by 15 per cent compared with the same month last year. Petrol and diesel prices also went up, while food price inflation climbed for the fourth month in a row, to 4.9 per cent – the highest recorded since February last year. That means households have been seeing their supermarket shopping bills go up more quickly every month since the spring. Among the products seeing striking double-digit increases were staples such as milk, up 11 per cent, butter (18 per cent), and chocolate (17 per cent). The Food and Drink Federation (FDF), representing manufacturers, said the industry was being 'squeezed on all sides' by high energy and ingredient costs as well as Labour's new packaging tax and NI hike. Jim Bligh, director of corporate affairs and packaging at the FDF, said: 'We expect that high food and drink inflation will persist through the year, so any fresh costs for businesses in the autumn Budget will inevitably put yet more pressure on shoppers' pockets.' Steve Clayton, head of equity funds at investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Rachel Reeves landed a major bill onto employers when she hiked national insurance costs earlier this year and they are now trying to pass the buck on to consumers through price increases.' Stuart Morrison, research manager at the British Chambers of Commerce, said: 'Businesses tell us national insurance, wage growth and tariffs are all bubbling away in a cauldron of price pressures.' The Chancellor said: 'We're a long way from the double-digit inflation we saw under the previous government, but there's more to do to ease the cost of living.'
