Yankees to make bullpen change Thursday per insider
The New York Yankees celebrated a dramatic walk-off win over the Rangers on Wednesday night, but the celebration didn't come without questions.
Just minutes after Jasson Dominguez's homer sealed the victory, the attention shifted to the bullpen. Manager Aaron Boone revealed that reliever Fernando Cruz had been quietly shut down with a shoulder issue, and another arm, Ian Hamilton, continued to struggle.
Advertisement
By the end of the night, uncertainty hung over the relief corps, and now, it appears reinforcements are on the way.
New York Yankees reliever Brent Headrick pitches in spring training.© Nathan Ray Seebeck-Imagn Images
According to Brendan Kuty of The Athletic, the Yankees are calling up left-hander Brent Headrick from Triple-A Scranton/Wilkes-Barre. Kuty reported on X.com (formerly Twitter) that Headrick will join the big-league club ahead of Thursday's series finale against Texas.
The 26-year-old Headrick, acquired off waivers from the Twins this winter, has quietly impressed in the minors. In 10 appearances for the RailRiders, Headrick has posted a 3.38 ERA with 25 strikeouts over 21.1 innings. He offers a second left-handed option in the bullpen alongside Tim Hill and could provide value as a long reliever if needed.
Advertisement
Though the Yankees have not officially announced a corresponding move, several possibilities are in play.
Fernando Cruz, who hasn't pitched since Saturday, could land on the injured list. Boone said Cruz is dealing with 'some shoulder stuff' but downplayed the severity, noting imaging showed no structural damage.
Ian Hamilton, meanwhile, gave up another home run Wednesday and now holds a 6.28 ERA through 14 appearances. The right-hander has a minor league option remaining, which gives the Yankees flexibility if they choose to make a performance-based change.
With the bullpen in transition and more arms returning from the injured list, Thursday may be the first of several moves to come.
Related: Devin Williams Has A Sharp Answer For Yankees Bullpen Questions
Related: Brian Cashman's Comments on Trade Deadline Will Alarm Yankees Fans
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘Throwback' Ryan Yarbrough has become a Yankees rotation savior with tweaked pitch
Access the Yankees beat like never before Join Post Sports+ for exciting subscriber-only features, including real-time texting with Greg Joyce about the inside buzz on the Yankees. Try it free As an AL East veteran, Ryan Yarbrough has pitched against the Yankees enough for them to know how much trouble he can give lineups. But what the left-hander, often described by Aaron Boone as a 'throwback,' has now done for them in five starts since moving into the rotation may even be better than they could have hoped for. Advertisement Armed with an improved changeup — thanks in part to a former Yankees minor league pitching coach — multiple arm slots and a wide-ranging arsenal that ranges from 67.7-90.9 mph, Yarbrough has been a savior at the back end of the Yankees rotation and will try to keep it going on Saturday against the Red Sox. 4 Ryan Yarbrough throws a pitch during the Yankees' game against the Rangers on May 21. Robert Sabo for the NY Post 'It's a lot of fun [catching him],' Austin Wells said Friday. 'I feel like you get to appreciate the art of being able to call a game. The way he's able to throw pitches in the entire zone and fill it up and still get the swing and miss and chase that guys that throw 100 do, I think it's arguably at times more fun to do something like that with a guy like that.' Yarbrough entered Saturday with a 2.08 ERA in five starts with 24 strikeouts in 26 innings since he entered the rotation. Advertisement To get there, the process began in spring training with the Blue Jays. 4 Ryan Yarbrough reacts during the Yankees' game against the Rangers on May 21. Corey Sipkin for the NY Post Their bullpen coach, Graham Johnson, previously served as the pitching coach at Triple-A Scranton/Wilkes-Barre, so he speaks the same language and has a similar approach as the Yankees' pitching group. Advertisement Johnson began working with Yarbrough on tweaking his changeup, and he got promising results with it before Yarbrough triggered the opt out of his minor league deal and then signed a $2 million contract with the Yankees three days before Opening Day. At the time, Yarbrough offered bullpen depth but with the potential to swing into the rotation if needed, and it did not take long for that to be the case. 4 Ryan Yarbrough pumps his fist during the Yankees' game against the Angels on May 26. IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect 'We obviously know Graham really well and know where he was coming from on the changes,' pitching coach Matt Blake said Friday. 'It at least showed that Yarbs is interested in making adjustments to his arsenal and opened up the conversation, 'What was the adjustment? What were you doing before? Here's some other thoughts around it.' ' Advertisement Yarbrough joined the Yankees in Miami for their exhibition against the Marlins and sat down with the pitching group to dive into what he had been working on. They let the first week or so of the season play out with his old changeup before they made a subtle adjustment — using the same grip, but lining the laces up slightly differently to induce more drop. The result? CHECK OUT THE LATEST MLB STANDINGS AND YANKEES STATS Yarbrough has thrown 137 changeups (20.6 percent of his pitches) and opposing batters are hitting just .167 with a .367 slugging percentage against it. It has accounted for 11 strikeouts and a 46.6 percent whiff rate compared to 22.7 percent last season. The average exit velocity against it is 79.4 mph, the weak contact part of why he ranks in the 99th percentile in average exit velocity against (84.1). Advertisement Go beyond the box score with the Bombers Sign up for Inside the Yankees by Greg Joyce, exclusively on Sports+. Thank you Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Enjoy this Post Sports+ exclusive newsletter! Check out more newsletters 'I think it's just getting a little more depth to it, a little bit more bite,' Yarbrough said of the pitch that has averaged 4.1 more inches of vertical drop from last year. 'But I also think now we're setting it up and using other things to help it continue to get better.' The 'other things' include his four-seam fastball that averages 88.3 mph, a sinker that averages 87.2 mph, a cutter that averages 83.3 mph and a sweeper that averages 71.8 mph. 4 Ryan Yarbrough prepares to throw a pitch during the Yankees' game against the Angels on May 26. Imagn Images Advertisement Only the changeup and cutter come from the same arm angle (11 degrees), with the other three pitches ranging from nine degrees to 21, according to Baseball Savant — all much more side-armed than league average. 'He's got the different angle,' DJ LeMahieu said. 'He's not going to light up the radar gun, but all his pitches feel like they get on you. His fastballs look like they get on you and his offspeed looks extra slow. Just one of those guys that has good stuff and knows what he's doing out there.'
Wall Street Journal
12 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Landmark House v. NCAA Settlement Approved by Judge, Allowing Colleges to Pay Athletes
A federal judge in California finally approved a $2.6 billion settlement for college athletes that upends a century-old tenet of college sports—the notion that schools cannot pay the athletes that play for them. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken on Friday ushered in a new era—a professional era—for college sports by signing off on a plan for the NCAA and the five most prominent sports conferences to settle a class-action lawsuit with current and former college players. The deal will give backpay to some, as well as creating a system in which each Division I school will be able to distribute roughly $20 million a year to their athletes. Schools are poised to begin implementing the new model this fall. The decision has been months in the making, drawn out in its final weeks by the judge's insistence that the NCAA find a way to stop current athletes from losing their roster spots. The settlement would 'enable NCAA schools to share their athletic revenues with Division I college student-athletes for the first time in the history of the NCAA,' Wilken wrote in her 76-page opinion. She added that it was 'expected to open the door for Division I student- athletes to receive, in the aggregate, approximately $1.6 billion dollars in new compensation and benefits per year, with that amount increasing over the next ten years.' Each school that elects to share revenue with athletes will start by distributing more than $20 million in the coming academic year. That amount will reach about $32.9 million per school by 2034-35, the end of the injunctive-relief settlement, Wilken wrote. The settlement brings the biggest changes yet to college sports, which until recently had banned athletes from earning much more than a scholarship, room and board. It comes on the heels of years of upheaval that have included loosened restrictions on off-the-field compensation for players, liberalized transfer rules and blockbuster television deals for schools and the chaotic conference realignment that followed. Yet during all of that time, many college sports leaders had still resisted paying athletes directly from the billions of dollars in revenue they helped generate. Now, that restraint is off. Schools have been readying for months for the settlement effects to land on their athletic departments, most immediately by transforming how they recruit and manage rosters in football and basketball. 'People have been doing a lot of work on a contingent basis to try to create the infrastructure that's envisioned by the settlement,' NCAA President Charlie Baker said ahead of the final approval. 'It'll definitely be rocky and kind of messy coming out of the gate, because big things are that way.' Private equity has already been circling college sports, pledging to inject capital into schools but also to advise them on how to grow their sports business. And athletic departments are openly wrestling over what the ruling means for the future of Olympic sports on campus. Most of these sports do not generate much revenue, but American campuses serve as the primary Olympic training ground for Team USA. The settlement largely immunizes the NCAA against similar claims, a provision the association considered essential as it seeks to move past decades of court battles over payments for players. But it will almost certainly not end litigation over the shape of college sports. It isn't clear whether the money needs to be distributed equitably in accordance with Title IX, the federal statute that requires publicly funded institutions to provide equal opportunities to male and female athletes. Aside from preparing for schools to distribute roughly $20 million a year to athletes, the settlement didn't specify how exactly much should be allocated to each sport. The majority will likely go to football, the financial engine of most athletic departments, as well as men's basketball. Female athletes have raised questions over the payouts they are set to receive and what fair compensation looks like for them going forward. 'This settlement doesn't come close to recognizing the value I lost,' LSU gymnast Livvy Dunne said in an unsuccessful attempt to object to the settlement. There's also the open question of whether athletes getting paid by their institutions are working for them—a distinction that could open up schools to more legal challenges. But even without employee status, the settlement will transform the relationship between players and schools. Write to Louise Radnofsky at Laine Higgins at and Rachel Bachman at
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers will be the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. One of the adjustments made at Wilken's behest was to give those athletes a chance to return to the schools that cut them in anticipation of the deal going through. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again.
