logo
Six Rotherham sites to be bought for anti-flood measures

Six Rotherham sites to be bought for anti-flood measures

BBC News27-06-2025
A £15m scheme to buy land and build anti-flood infrastructure in two Rotherham villages is to be considered by the council.The project could see reservoirs, wetlands and flow control systems created on parcels of land around Whiston and Laughton Common.Whiston was last affected by flooding in October 2023, while Laughton Common suffered severe damage during the 2019 floods.Cabinet members will vote on July 7 to approve the acquisition of five plots of land near Whiston Brook and one plot near Eel Mires Dike in Laughton Common.
Once approved, construction on the Whiston Brook scheme could begin later this year, with completion expected in 2026, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.The Eel Mires Dike scheme is also progressing, with more land deals due to follow, a report said.Councillor Lynda Marshall, cabinet spokesperson for street scene and green spaces, said they were committed to taking "decisive" action."By securing the necessary land to progress these vital flood alleviation schemes, we are demonstrating our commitment to delivering long-term, effective solutions."These projects are a crucial part of our wider strategy to build better public spaces and resilience against future flooding events," she added.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Plans for covers at a Grade II listed lido in Peterborough
Plans for covers at a Grade II listed lido in Peterborough

BBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Plans for covers at a Grade II listed lido in Peterborough

Plans for mechanical covers at a city's Grade II listed open-air swimming pool to help reduce energy costs have been lido currently faces "significant financial challenges", according to council December a report highlighted the art deco-style facility costs more than £400,000 a year to run, including entrance covers would retain heat, "potentially extending the swimming season and increasing revenue", planning documents have stated. A heritage statement submitted to Peterborough City Council said the lido "stands as a distinguished example of interwar public leisure architecture".It has a 50 yard (45m) main pool, as well as learner and paddling statement said "careful consideration" was required "to ensure that the cover's materials and mechanisms are sympathetic to the existing aesthetic and do not detract from the building's historic ambiance".The plans - which have been submitted by the council - stated: "The retractable cover offers a cost-effective solution to enhance the lido's functionality without compromising its historic fabric."The running costs are expected to reduce as a result, which generates a saving in the best interest of the taxpayer." Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

An attempt to salvage the rubble of our investment thesis
An attempt to salvage the rubble of our investment thesis

Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

An attempt to salvage the rubble of our investment thesis

Questor is The Telegraph's stock-picking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest We must now pick through the rubble of our investment thesis after last week's profit warning from landscaping and building and roofing products supplier Marshalls. The share price caved in, to leave us sitting on a nasty book loss of around 30pc and with a decision to make as to whether to cut and run, or to try and tough it out. We shall go for the latter, partly because we are habitually reluctant to liquidate a holding in a company where the shares are no higher than in 2000, and partly because we try to adhere to legendary investor Charlie Munger's assertion: 'You don't make money when you buy, and you don't make money when you sell. You make money when you wait.' The update was undeniably disappointing. In the first six months of the year, Marshall's revenues rose 4pc, as higher volumes offset lower prices. Roofing and building products both showed a higher top line, but landscaping offered a 1pc drop, and this is where the outlook turned ugly. Lower volumes, price competition, an unhelpful product mix and input cost inflation have left the unit near breakeven and weighed heavily on overall group profits. After the alert from the West Yorkshire-headquartered company, analysts slashed their earnings forecasts by a fifth for 2025 and by around a sixth for next year. The net result is that the shares are more expensive now than they were 15 months ago on an earnings basis, even after the share price calamity, thanks to those downgrades. That said, a forward price-to-earnings ratio of some 15 times does not seem so unappealing given the multiple is based on what should prove to be depressed profits. Marshalls made nearly 30p in earnings per share (EPS) in 2019, and the share price represents barely seven times that figure, which is a lot more enticing. Granted, that 30p number looks a long way away when the consensus analysts' forecast for 2025 is 14p, the macroeconomic backdrop does not feel unduly helpful, and even the putative recovery only takes EPS estimates to 17.5p by 2027. But management is already looking to take out further costs and at some stage it seems logical to expect further interest rate reductions from the Bank of England. Governor Andrew Bailey and the Monetary Policy Committee may need further signs of a cooling in inflation before it moves decisively to cut headline borrowing costs once more, although lower oil and gas prices (and thus energy price caps), a higher pound and softer economic activity thanks to tariffs and trade wars could all provide encouragement in this respect in the second half of 2025 and beyond. Marshall's share price may well respond to the prospect of such monetary stimulus long before sales and profits start to motor. In the meantime, we must wait, and the balance sheet enables us to do so. Admittedly, there is relatively little asset backing in the business, given how more than 80pc of the £661m in net assets are intangible. But net debt is relatively low, even including pensions and leases, and interest cover is still around four times, even using the downgraded forecasts for this year. Questor says: buy Ticker: MSLH Last share price: 203p Update: Shaftesbury Capital We went looking for trouble at Marshalls and found it, but another contrarian pick has maybe just started to go our way. Real estate investment trust (Reit) Shaftesbury Capital also had a share price chart that went from the top left of the screen to the bottom right when we first studied it, but in this case we have accrued a one-sixth paper gain with 3.5p a share in dividends on top. This week's interim results suggest there could be more to come. The owner of large chunks of Chinatown, Soho, Carnaby Street and Covent Garden pointed to another increase in the net asset value (Nav) of its property portfolio, thanks to higher rents, increased letting activity and lower vacancies. That Nav was also underpinned by the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund's swoop for a 25pc stake in Shaftesbury Capital's Covent Garden assets at a cost of £570m this spring. The Reit's shares still trade at a discount to Nav of more than a fifth and further asset growth looks possible. As with Marshalls, interest cuts would also be helpful for both the underlying business and sentiment toward the shares. Lower borrowing costs can boost economic growth and reduce the company's interest bill on its debt, while a lower return on cash can also make the dividend yields offered by Reits look relatively more attractive.

Hotel tycoon reveals Heathrow runway expansion proposal
Hotel tycoon reveals Heathrow runway expansion proposal

BBC News

time3 hours ago

  • BBC News

Hotel tycoon reveals Heathrow runway expansion proposal

Hotel tycoon Surinder Arora has announced he is submitting a Heathrow expansion plan which rivals a proposal from the airport's billionaire's Arora Group said the "primary benefit" of the plan it submitted to the government was a shorter new runway which would avoid the costly and disruptive need to divert the M25 a 2,800-metre third runway instead of the full-length 3,500-metre runway planned by the airport would result in "reduced risk" and avoid "spiralling cost", the company airport declined to comment on the Arora Group's proposal. A shorter runway could have limits on its use, although Arora Group insisted it would be able to accommodate aircraft of all announcement means that for the first time, there will be two bids on the table to build a third runway at Heathrow. Arora Group said its plan, called Heathrow West, could have a new runway fully operational by 2035, while a new terminal would open in two phases, in 2036 and plan, developed with infrastructure company Bechtel, has a cost estimate of under £25 billion, not including the redevelopment of the airport's existing central said in 2018 it could complete its runway for £14 billion, but it is now expected to cost billions June, the government invited competing proposals for Heathrow's expansion and set a deadline of 31 Arora, who is one of the largest landowners at Heathrow, said: "After a decade working with our world-leading design and delivery team, I am very proud that the Arora Group can finally unveil to the UK government our Heathrow West proposal."The Arora Group has a proven track record of delivering on-time and on-budget projects including in and around Heathrow airport."We are delighted that the government has taken a common-sense approach to invite proposals from all interested parties for the very first time rather than granting exclusivity to the current airport operator, no matter its track record."Mr Arora has repeatedly accused the airport of wasting money. Carlton Brown, CEO of Heathrow West, said the new company would be able to dedicate time and focus to the expansion while working with stakeholders including airlines, communities and business."Ultimately, I want to see Heathrow help Britain become the best-connected nation in the world and facilitate the trade and inward investment our UK economy needs," he December 2024, French company Ardian completed a deal to become Heathrow's largest shareholder with a 23% stake, while Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund purchased a 15% Rachel Reeves gave her backing for a third runway in a speech on growth in will submit its own expansion plan to the government on had planned to create a third runway by rerouting the M25 motorway between junctions 14 and 15 through a tunnel under the new runway. After receiving the proposals, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander will review the Airports National Policy Statement, which provides the basis for decision-making on any Development Consent Order is understood to be open to a discussion with airlines about building a shorter runway if it can deliver the same expanded, the number of flights at Heathrow Airport could go up to 720,000 - or nearly 2,000 a day on average. They are currently capped at 480,000 a told the BBC that it would eventually be able to serve up to 140 million passengers a year once a third runway is in operation. Paul McGuinness, chair of the No 3rd Runway Coalition, said they were concerned that thousands of people would have to be rehomed for the plans to move added: "There's a real danger that we'll end up with a hole in the ground and a debt pile for taxpayers to underwrite, because the government had foolishly encouraged Heathrow's profligate self-interest, as if blind to the lessons of HS2."In the past, the cost, the Covid pandemic and legal challenges have all got in the way of any development. A third runway was first proposed in 2009 by Gordon Brown's Labour government but was only finally given the go-ahead by the Supreme Court in 2020. 'Growth is important' The last bid sunk was partly by a legal challenge from five local councils and the Mayor of London. Several members of the current government - including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer - voted against a Heathrow expansion when in Sir Keir told the BBC that the government has climate commitments, "but growth is really important too".Asked in January this year, when the government announced that it was in favour of a third runway, London's mayor Sir Sadiq Khan refused to rule out joining any future legal challenge to expansion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store