German economic sentiment drops to 21-month low as tariff fears linger
Germany's economic sentiment has taken a sharp downturn in April, reaching its lowest level in nearly two years, as concerns over US trade policy under Donald Trump cast a shadow over business confidence.
According to the latest ZEW Economic Sentiment survey, the indicator collapsed to -14 points, down from 51.6 in March, marking the weakest reading since July 2023. The figure missed expectations by a wide margin, with economists having forecast a more modest decline to 9.5.
ZEW described the drop as the steepest monthly decline since March 2022, when sentiment plummeted in the immediate aftermath of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. At that time, the indicator fell from 54.3 to -39.3 points.
For the eurozone, sentiment followed a similarly bleak trajectory, dropping to -18.5 points in April from 39.8 in March, far below forecasts of 14.2. This represents the lowest euro area reading since December 2022.
'The erratic changes in the US trade policy are weighing heavily on expectations in Germany, which have sharply declined. It is not only the consequences the announced reciprocal tariffs may have on global trade, but also the dynamics of their changes, that have massively increased global uncertainty,' ZEW President, Achim Wambach, PhD, said.
He added that this heightened unpredictability is directly reflected in both German and eurozone economic expectations.
Particularly affected by the sharp deterioration are Germany's export-heavy industries, including the automobile, chemical, metal, steel, and mechanical engineering sectors, which had recently been showing signs of recovery.
Still, despite the worsening sentiment, financial market experts do not currently perceive a significant risk of a new inflation spike in either Germany or the broader eurozone. This, according to the ZEW, provides the European Central Bank (ECB) with potential room to support the economy through further interest rate cuts.
European stock markets rose on Tuesday despite the dismal ZEW figures, supported by diminished concerns over Trump's tariff plans following his recent concession on Chinese imports and expectations of an ECB rate cut on Thursday.
The German DAX index led gains, rising 1.6% to 21,279 by 11:20 CEST, outperforming other European benchmarks. Rheinmetall topped the index with a 3.6% gain, followed by Vonovia (+3.4%) and BMW (+3%). Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz also rose, up 2.5% and 2.4%, respectively.
Elsewhere in Europe, the CAC 40 in France and the Euro STOXX 50 each gained 0.8%, underperforming Germany amid weakness in the luxury sector. Shares in LVMH fell 7.1% after reporting a 3% decline in Q1 sales, worse than expected. Kering and L'Oréal followed suit, down 2.1% and 1.3%, respectively.
In southern Europe, Italy's FTSE MIB added 0.9%, and Spain's IBEX 35 rose 1.2%, led by banking and industrial stocks. Spanish banks Banco Santander, Unicaja Banco, and Caixabank climbed between 2.2% and 2.7%. In Italy, Stellantis rose 4.5%, Leonardo gained 3%, and Pirelli advanced 2.7%.
The euro remained stable at $1.1340, while German Bund yields were unchanged at 2.50%, as investors awaited signals from the ECB's upcoming monetary policy meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Latest Donald Trump approval ratings: new poll finds good news for president
Registered voters like what they see from President Donald Trump, according to a new poll. A survey released by Napolitan News Service found that 51% of respondents approve of Trump's handling of the presidency. Of those respondents, 30% said they 'strongly' approve of the work Trump has done so far, while 21% said they just 'slightly' approve. The poll also found that 46% of respondents disapprove of Trump's work in the Oval Office. Among those who said they disapprove, 35% said they 'strongly' disapprove, while 11% said they only 'somewhat' disapprove. Only 2% of respondents said they were not sure about how Trump has handled the job of the presidency, according to the poll. The poll was conducted between May 27 and June 3 with a sample size of 3,000 registered voters. The poll's margin of error is plus or minus 1.8%. The Napolitan News Service is part of the Napolitan Institute, founded by veteran Republican pollster Scott Rasmussen, The organization bills itself as involved in 'rigorous, unbiased polling,' providing 'deep insights into American sentiment.' These numbers represent an incremental improvement in Trump's approval rating when compared to Neapolitan News Service's previous poll, conducted between May 20 and May 29. In that poll, 50% of respondents said they disapproved of Trump's handling of the presidency, while 49% said they approved. The previous poll's sample size also was 3,000 registered voters. It had a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8%. The last time a Napolitan News Service poll found that a clear majority of respondents approved of Trump's handling of the presidency was in May. The poll, conducted between May 7 and May 15, found that 52% of respondents expressed approval, while 48% expressed disapproval. Like the other two polls, the survey's sample size is 3,000 registered voters and has a margin of error of plus or minus 1.8%. Other polls conducted around the same time as the Napolitan News Service poll offer mixed results for the president's approval rating. A YouGov/Economist poll conducted between May 30 and June 2 found 49% of respondents disapproving of the job Trump is doing as president, while 45% approve of the work he is doing. The poll's sample size is 1,610 U.S. adults. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.2%. A CBS News/YouGov poll conducted between June 4 and June 6 found that a majority of respondents (55%) disapprove of Trump's work as president compared to 45% who said they approve. The CBS News/YouGov poll's sample size is 2,428 U.S. adults. Its margin of error is plus or minus 2.4%. Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed 'sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Can the Mass. GOP flip this Taunton state House seat? | Bay State Briefing ABC News suspends correspondent over social media post critical of President Trump Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can $1,000 at birth change a child's future? A Republican proposal aims to find out
WASHINGTON (AP) — When children of wealthy families reach adulthood, they often benefit from the largesse of parents in the form of a trust fund. It's another way they get a leg up on less affluent peers, who may receive nothing at all — or even be expected to support their families. But what if all children — regardless of their family's circumstances — could get a financial boost when they turn 18? That's the idea behind a House GOP proposal backed by President Donald Trump. It would create accounts for all babies born in the U.S. over the next four years with $1,000 that would accrue interest until the children reach adulthood. At age 18, they could withdraw the money to put toward a down payment for a home, education or to start a small business. If the money is used for other purposes, it'll be taxed at a higher rate. It builds on the concept of ' baby bonds,' which two states — California and Connecticut — and the District of Columbia have introduced as a way to reduce gaps between wealthy people and poor people. Rep. Blake Moore, a Republican from Utah, spearheaded the effort to get the initiative into a massive House spending bill. In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, he said wealth inequality has soured many people on capitalism. 'Trump Accounts,' as the proposal calls them, could be the antidote, he said. 'We know that America's economic engine is working, but not everyone feels connected to its value and the ways it can benefit them," Moore wrote. 'If we can demonstrate to our next generation the benefits of investing and financial health, we can put them on a path toward prosperity.' The bill calls for the money to be handled by investment firms. The bill would require at least one parent to produce a Social Security number with work authorizations, meaning the U.S. citizen children born to some categories of immigrants would be excluded from the benefit. But unlike other baby bond programs, which generally target disadvantaged groups, this one would be available to families of all incomes. 'When little baby is born they're gonna start off with a thousand dollars and if we do a good job of investing their money — we're going to go with one of the investing guidelines, who the hell knows if they're any good — but they have a chance to be very rich,' Trump said at a rally last week in Pittsburgh. 'It's going to be very cute to see.' Economist Darrick Hamilton of The New School, who first pitched the idea of baby bonds a quarter-century ago, said the GOP proposal would exacerbate rather than reduce wealth gaps. He envisioned a program that would be universal but would give children from poor families a larger endowment than their wealthier peers, in an attempt to level the playing field. The money would be handled by the government, not by private firms on Wall Street. 'It is upside down,' Hamilton said. 'It's going to enhance inequality.' Hamilton added that $1,000 — even with interest — would not be enough to make a significant difference for a child living in poverty. A Silicon Valley investor who created the blueprint for the proposal, Brad Gerstner, said in an interview with CNBC last year that the accounts could help address the wealth gap and the loss of faith in capitalism that represent an existential crisis for the U.S. 'The rise and fall of nations occurs when you have a wealth gap that grows, when you have people who lose faith in the system,' Gerstner said. 'We're not agentless. We can do something.' The proposal comes as Congressional Republicans and Trump face backlash for proposed cuts to programs that poor families with children rely on, including food assistance and Medicaid. Even some who back the idea of baby bonds are skeptical, noting Trump wants to cut higher education grants and programs that aid young people on the cusp of adulthood — the same age group Trump Accounts are supposed to help. Pending federal legislation would slash Medicaid and food and housing assistance that many families with children rely on. Young adults who grew up in poverty often struggle with covering basics like rent and transportation — expenses that Trump Accounts could not be tapped to cover, said Eve Valdez, an advocate for youth in foster care in southern California. Accounts for newborn children that cannot be accessed for 18 years mean little to families struggling to meet basic needs today, said Shimica Gaskins of End Child Poverty California. 'Having children have health care, having their families have access to SNAP and food are what we really need ... the country focused on,' Gaskins said. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariff Fallout Hits LA Port: Cargo Decline Leaves Half of Dockworkers Idle
Dockworkers at the Port of Los Angeles are seeing a shortage of work opportunities due to the decline in cargo entering the California gateway as Chinese exports to the U.S. continue to plummet. Nearly half of the longshoremen who support operations at the port went without work over the past two weeks, Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles, told The Los Angeles Times in a Saturday report. More from Sourcing Journal Hapag-Lloyd Bookings Double on China-US Route in Weeks After Tariff Truce Guess Limits Tariff Impact to Less Than $10M, Adjusts Sourcing and Buying Strategies US Trade Deficit Contracted in April Amid Tariff-Driven Import Paralysis Over the last 25 work shifts, which span roughly two weeks, only 733 jobs per day were available for 1,575 longshoremen looking for work. The cargo decline has stemmed from President Donald Trump's tariffs on U.S. trading partners initially imposed in April, led by duties on Chinese goods that at one point reached 145 percent. In the wake of those tariffs, American companies had been cancelling import bookings, while ocean carriers on the trans-Pacific trade lane from Asia to the U.S. West Coast began blanking sailings. In May, 17 cargo ships canceled their planned trips to Los Angeles amid the plummeting demand. Although China is just one of the dozens of countries slapped with tariffs on its exports, the magnitude of products flowing from the country to the U.S. gives it a more outsized role on the trade lane and at the Port of Los Angeles itself. About 40 percent of imports that pass through the terminals at the port originate from China, Seroka said in April. In May, China's exports to the U.S. had their sharpest drop in five years—since the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic—to $28.8 billion, according to customs data. The 34.5 percent decline was the second-biggest pullback on record after the 54 percent collapse in February 2020 as the pandemic upended global trade. The May export drop has been reflected in the decline in cargo at the Port of Los Angeles. While the California gateway has not yet released official statistics for May, the port processed 25 percent less cargo than forecast for the month, according to Seroka. With less cargo comes fewer work opportunities. The 733 'job orders' are a significant decline from the usual range between 1,700 and 2,000 job orders posted during a typical day shift. For night shifts, 1,100 to 1,400 opportunities are typically posted. At the Port of L.A., terminal operators post available work opportunities, known as job orders, on a digital board three times a day. Dockworkers can review the job orders at each shift and bid on the jobs they want to take. If there are more longshoremen than job orders, a portion of them will go without pay. 'They haven't been laid off, but they're not working nearly as much as they did previously,' Seroka told The Times. 'Since the tariffs went into place, and in May specifically, we've really seen the work go off on the downside.' Concerns over the lighter cargo loads have been apparent in industries across the supply chain impacted by port throughput, including trucking and rail, which are tasked with transporting the cargo to warehouses. Retail businesses that would otherwise be taking in these deliveries also remain concerned about the impacts, particularly SMBs that may not have had the luxury of front-loading goods into the U.S. However, the 90-day rollback of the China tariffs in early May has since resulted in a rapid rush to bring goods into the U.S. ahead of a new Aug. 14 negotiation deadline, which could ultimately result in a flood of containers into the Port of Los Angeles and its sister port, the Port of Long Beach. Hapag-Lloyd said it saw bookings out of China more than doubled in the three weeks after the trade truce went into effect, illustrating just how dramatic the swing has been. Such excess ordering, alongside an increase in trans-Pacific ocean freight capacity in line with demand, sets U.S. ports up for another likely escalation in freight handling. This would benefit the dockworkers and result in an increase in job orders across ports once the first wave of post-tariff truce container vessels start to reach the U.S. later this month. Although analysts have predicted that the San Pedro Bay ports could see record traffic across June and July due to the increased capacity from Asia to North America, Seroka has continually held a more reserved viewpoint about possible impacts on Los Angeles. 'The June numbers that we're projecting right now are nowhere near where they traditionally should be,' Seroka said.
