logo
Benjamin Netanyahu unloads on Australia and brands country with single brutal word - as Anthony Albanese weighs in on Gaza war

Benjamin Netanyahu unloads on Australia and brands country with single brutal word - as Anthony Albanese weighs in on Gaza war

Daily Mail​4 days ago
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has slammed Australia as 'shameful', after Anthony Albanese condemned the Gaza takeover plan and advocated for a Palestinian state.
Netanyahu's comments came after Israel was criticised at a United Nations Security Council meeting on Sunday - just two days after announcing a plan to widen its military offensive.
The plan to take 'full military control' would mean Israeli forces would eventually run the whole Gaza Strip including the heart of Gaza City in Palestine's occupied territory.
Albanese used a trip to New Zealand to speak out against Israeli troops entering Gaza and extending the conflict in the Middle East.
'The idea that it can just be continued is completely unacceptable,' Albanese said.
In a joint statement with the New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, Albanese added: 'Any attempt by Israel to escalate hostilities, including by taking control of Gaza City, would be wrong, risk violating international law, and exacerbate the human catastrophe already unfolding inside the Gaza Strip.'
Australia and New Zealand are part of an international push against a large-scale military operation in Gaza.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke labelled the expanding military operation and show of force in Gaza as 'ridiculous'.
'This concept that you're weak against Hamas unless you're cruel against the Palestinian people is a ridiculous proposition,' Burke said.
Opposition Home Affairs spokesperson Andrew Hastie added military occupation in Gaza had never been successful.
'I look at the weight of history Gaza has never been successfully occupied or pacified by Israel so I'm not sure why we think it would be different now,' Hastie said.
In a press conference aimed at telling the truth and 'puncturing lies' about Israel's military and humanitarian action, Netanyahu hit out at country's backing Palestine.
Netanyahu vehemently denied the idea Israel has embarked on a 'starvation policy' and said it was an 'absurdity' to recognise Palestinian statehood.
'It defies imagination or understanding how intelligent people around the world, including seasoned diplomats, government leaders, and respected journalists, fall for this absurdity,' he said.
Netanyahu called out Australia, claiming a Palestinian statehood would bring war rather than peace.
'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful,' he said.
The Albanese government, like many of Australia's allies, seem destined to announce formal recognition of Palestine in the coming weeks.
Australia's recognition of Palestine is dependent on Hamas removing its presence from Gaza.
The recognition is also contingent on reforming the Palestinian Authority - which is the alternative governing force - and positioning it as the ruler of Gaza, with the commitment that Israel is left in peace.
The Australian government also faced growing pressure from protesters after thousands marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge.
Authorities believed around 90,000 people arrived at the Harbour Bridge on August 4 and took part in the pro-Palestine 'March for Humanity'.
Joshua Lees of the Palestine Action Group, which organised the rally, claimed the protest's attendance was up to 300,000 people - three times greater than police's early estimate.
Netanyahu's stance comes after Australia participated in yet another joint statement with Britain, Canada, France and other allies in condemning Israel's actions.
In July, Australia was one of 28 countries urging Israel to drastically increase the supply of aid in the Gaza Strip following images of starving children and reports civilians were being shot outside humanitarian depots.
Health officials said that 20 Palestinians seeking aid were shot dead on Saturday, and 11 adults died of malnutrition-related causes in the past 24 hours, as the growing international criticism of Israel came with pleas to allow far more food to reach people in the besieged enclave.
Gaza's Health Ministry said the new adult deaths from malnutrition-related causes over the past 24 hours brought the total to 114 since it began counting such deaths in June.
It said that 98 children have died of malnutrition-related causes since the war began with the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, with militants killing around 1,200 people and abducting 251.
The toll from hunger isn't included in the ministry's death toll of 61,300 Palestinians in the war.
The ministry, part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals, does not distinguish between fighters or civilians, but says around half of the dead have been women and children.
The UN and independent experts consider it the most reliable source on war casualties.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New draft of plastic pollution treaty doesn't limit production but calls for a global response
New draft of plastic pollution treaty doesn't limit production but calls for a global response

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

New draft of plastic pollution treaty doesn't limit production but calls for a global response

The latest draft of a treaty to end plastic pollution would not put a limit on producing plastics, but recognizes that current levels of production and consumption are 'unsustainable' and global action is needed. Nations are meeting at the United Nations office in Geneva to try to complete a landmark treaty to end the plastic pollution crisis. The draft, released early Friday, contains new language to say these levels exceed current waste management capacities and are projected to increase further, 'thereby necessitating a coordinated global response to halt and reverse such trends.' This falls short of the limit that many countries sought, but could pave the way for one in the future. The objective of the treaty was also revamped to state that the accord would be based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full lifecycle of plastics. The biggest issue of the talks has been whether the treaty should impose caps on producing new plastic or focus instead on things like better design, recycling and reuse. Powerful oil- and gas-producing nations and the plastics industry oppose production limits. They want a treaty focused on better waste management and reuse. Thursday was the last scheduled day of negotiations, but work on the revised draft continues into Friday. Every year, the world makes more than 400 million tons of new plastic, and that could grow by about 70% by 2040 without policy changes. About 100 countries want to limit production. Many have said it's also essential to address toxic chemicals used to make plastics. While an earlier draft contained no mention of chemicals, this version could lead to the reduction of plastic products containing 'a chemical or chemicals of concern to human health or the environment,' as well as the reduction of single-use or short-lived plastic products. Negotiators are still deciding whether the measures in that article would be voluntary or binding. If adopted, parties would have to take measures to ensure the better management of plastic waste. They could be required to take steps to improve the design of plastic products to be recycled and reused. They are deciding whether the section on product design would be voluntary or binding. Delegates will discuss the revised version when they reconvene later Friday. The earlier version was widely panned. Many countries said it was not ambitious enough. Some petrostates said it didn't have the scope they wanted to set the parameters of the treaty or precise definitions. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at

Five key points on how a long-respected US human rights report became a ‘cudgel' under Trump
Five key points on how a long-respected US human rights report became a ‘cudgel' under Trump

The Guardian

time40 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Five key points on how a long-respected US human rights report became a ‘cudgel' under Trump

In May, Donald Trump took to the stage at a business conference in Saudi Arabia's capital, promising that the US would no longer chastise other governments over human rights issues or lecture them on 'how to live and how to govern your own affairs'. With the release this week of the US government's annual report on human rights worldwide, the president has – in part – followed though on that pledge. The report – compiled by the state department – softens its criticism of nations that have sought closer ties with the US president, while alleging 'significant' human rights breaches among traditional allies across Europe, all while vastly scaling back criticism of discrimination against minority groups. The report's claims of 'no credible' human rights abuses in Hungary and El Salvador sit at odds with the state department's own report from a year earlier, which described the situation in Hungary as 'deteriorating', while highlighting 'arbitrary killings', 'enforced disappearance' and 'torture' in El Salvador. In April, a delegation of EU lawmakers warned that the rule of law in Hungary is 'rapidly going in the wrong direction' under Viktor Orbán's government. They highlighted threats to press freedom and targeting of minorities. In June a law banning content about LGBTQ+ people from schools and TV was found to violate basic human rights and freedom of expression by a scholar at the European court of justice. Meanwhile, activists and opposition leaders in El Salvador have warned the country is on the path towards dictatorship after its congress scrapped presidential term limits, paving the way for President Nayib Bukele to seek indefinite re-election. Bukele's hardline approach to crime has been accompanied by an assault on civil society and democratic institutions. Orbán and Bukele have both positioned themselves as Trump adherents – with El Salvador opening up a notorious mega-prison to detain US deportees. Orbán, who came to power in 2010, was once described as 'Trump before Trump' by the US president's former adviser Steve Bannon. France, Germany and the United Kingdom are among the European countries singled out as having seen a worsening human rights situation. The picture is a far cry from the previous report, which saw no significant changes. Criticism over the handling of free speech – in particular relating to regulations on online hate speech – was directed at the governments of the UK, Germany and France. The criticism comes despite the US itself moving aggressively to deny or strip visas of foreign nationals over their statements and social media postings, especially student activists who have criticised Israel. Since being returning to power, Trump and his administration have stepped up criticism of traditional allies – in February the vice-president, JD Vance, accused European leaders of suppressing free speech, failing to halt illegal migration and running in fear from voters' true beliefs. The report also singles out Brazil, where Trump has decried the prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Brazil, the report says, has 'undermined democratic debate by restricting access to online content deemed to 'undermine democracy.'' The report's section on Israel and the Palestinian territories is much shorter than last year's edition and contains no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis or death toll in Gaza. It acknowledges cases of arbitrary arrests and killings by Israel but says authorities took 'credible steps' to identify those responsible. More than 61,000 people have been killed in Gaza, the Gaza health ministry says, as a result of Israel's military assault after an attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas in October 2023 in which 1,200 people were killed. Sections within the report highlighting discrimination have been vastly pared back. Any criticism focused on LGBTQI rights, gender-based violence or racial and ethnic violence which appeared in Biden administration editions of the report, appear to have been largely removed. A group of former state department officials called some omissions 'shocking,' particularly highlighting the lack of detail on Uganda, which in 2023 saw the passing of some of the harshest anti-LGBTQ+ laws in the world, including the death penalty for some homosexual acts. For decades, the report has been used as a blueprint of reference for global rights advocacy – but critics have labelled this year's edition politically driven. 'The report demonstrates what happens when political agendas take priority over the facts,' says Josh Paul, a former state department official, adding 'the outcome is a much-abbreviated product that is more reflective of a Soviet propaganda.' In April, secretary of state Marco Rubio wrote an opinion piece saying the bureau that prepares the report had become a platform for 'left-wing activists,' and vowed that the Trump administration would reorient it to focus on 'western values'. State department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the report was restructured to improve readability and was no longer an expansive list of 'politically biased demands and assertions'. Democratic party lawmakers, however, have accused Trump and Rubio of treating human rights only as a 'cudgel' against adversaries, in a statement released this week. Rubio's state department has 'shamelessly turned a once-credible tool of US foreign policy mandated by Congress into yet another instrument to advance Maga political grievances and culture war obsessions,' said Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. With Reuters

Anthony Albanese erupts over Trump ambassador Mike Huckabee's 'disgust' at Palestine move
Anthony Albanese erupts over Trump ambassador Mike Huckabee's 'disgust' at Palestine move

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Anthony Albanese erupts over Trump ambassador Mike Huckabee's 'disgust' at Palestine move

The Prime Minister has returned fire at a US diplomat, throwing his words back at him to defend Australia's recognition of Palestine. Australia on Monday revealed it would join other Western nations, including the UK, France and Canada, in recognising a state of Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September, in response to the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Mike Huckabee, who was appointed America's ambassador to Israel by President Donald Trump in April, said the US was taken aback by the move, and stressed there was an 'enormous level of disappointment and some disgust' over the announcement. But Anthony Albanese backed Australia's decision, saying the continued human suffering in Gaza had disgusted the nation. '(Mike Huckabee) is an ambassador of a country - not Australia - to another country,' he told ABC Radio on Friday. 'My job is to represent Australia's interest and Australians have been disgusted by what they see on their TV every night. 'When you have children starving, when you have children losing their lives with families queuing for food and water, that provokes - not surprisingly - a human reaction.' Mr Huckabee also criticised the timing of the statehood announcement. 'What Australia and the other countries may have done inadvertently is to push Israel towards doing exactly what they're afraid of,' he told ABC's 7.30 program on Thursday night. 'The result of this has been to completely halt any type of thoughtful negotiations going forward.' Almost 150 out of the 193 UN member states already recognise the state of Palestine. While the ambassador said the US got 'no heads up' about Australia's decision, Foreign Minister Penny Wong did inform US Secretary of State Marco Rubio ahead of it being made public. Mr Albanese also spoke in advance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a tense phone call. Liberal senator Jane Hume claimed Americans on both sides of politics had been shocked by Australia's decision on statehood. 'This decision by the Labor government has bewildered the Americans, that (the government) essentially departed from years of a strong alliance between Israel and America and Australia to make this decision unilaterally,' she told Seven's Sunrise. The Coalition has pledged to reverse Australia's position if it wins the next election. Australia's decision to recognise a Palestinian state was fuelled in part by Israel's newly unveiled plans to occupy Gaza City and came after at least 90,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge in support of Palestine. 'There have been tens of thousands of people suggesting this is not the way forward. You just can't continue with the same pattern without an endpoint,' Mr Albanese said. 'The endpoint has to be to isolate Hamas.' The conditions for Australia's recognition include assurances that the designated terrorist group Hamas, which controls Gaza, plays no role in a future state. Many within the pro-Palestine movement say recognition will do nothing to change the situation on the ground, urging the government to go further and impose sanctions on Israel. Israel's campaign in Gaza has killed almost 62,000 Palestinians, including 18,000 children, since October 7, 2023, according to local health authorities. It began after Hamas's invasion on October 7, 2023, when it killed more than 1200 Israelis and took about 250 people hostage. Not all of the hostages have been released.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store